View allAll Photos Tagged IF_jointed
Xmas Surprise Editions ~ BAILEY ROSE & MARLEY ~ Rasta Twins “Brownies” & IF Jointed - unit (Full Sets)
- XX worldwide
- Designed & Sculpted by Charles Stephan
- Default Face Up by Charles’ Creature Cabinet
- Outfit: “Xmas Brownie” by Lin Murasaki Design
- Packaging: Exclusive CCC Sleeping bag & CCC Wooden box
- Authenticity card, numbered and signed
- Photography by Charles Creature Cabinet
(c) copyright 2009 Charles' Creature Cabinet
~Pic and text by Mydollchan “One thing we love about this hobby is the sheer variety of creations of all shapes and sizes. Here at myDollchan, we embrace them all.” 💞
•
•
•
•
#odorokikyabinetto #imaginaryfriend #charlescreaturecabinet #cccbjd #microbjd #fantasybjd #balljointeddoll #resin #anthropomorphic #glowinthedark #IF_jointed #dutchbjd #creaturebjd #charlesgrimbergstephan #designer #sculptor #artist #dollmaker #bjdartist #rotterdam #limitedition #collectibles #dollstagram #dollsofinstagram #cabinetofwonders
❤️
CCC IF Imaginary Friend | 4cm BJD Toy | Tadpole Alien | white Glow-in-the-Dark | Cabinet of Wonders ~Special Edition
BJD Design/Sculpt TM & Copyright © 2008 | Charles Grimberg-Stephan | Charles’ Creature Cabinet | All Rights Reserved.
when I released @charlescreaturecabinet CCC BAILEY Rose & MARLEY ~Rasta House Brownies Tiny BJD & IF 'imaginary friend' jointed [Dec 2009] #XmasRelease ❤️
•
•
•
•
#charlescreaturecabinet #cccbjd #ccc2009 #tinybjd #microbjd #baileyrose #marley #rastabrownie #housebrownie #fantasybjd #balljointeddoll #resin #glowinthedark #IF_jointed #dutchbjd #imaginaryfriend #charlesgrimbergstephan #designersculptor #artist #dollartist #bjdartist #rotterdam #limitedition #collectibles #dollstagram #dollsofinstagram
CCC BAILEY ROSE | 9cm Tiny BJD | Rasta House Brownie | Choco Dark Tan ~(2009)
CCC MARLEY | 9cm Tiny BJD | Rasta House Brownie | Caramel Tan ~(2009)
❤️
CCC IF Imaginary Friend | 40mm BJD Toy | Tadpole/frog-like alien | snowwhite Glow-in-the-Dark blue | Cabinet of Wonders ~Special Edition
Handmade tiny outfit/hat Lin Murasaki Design @linnn_67 | NL
Handmade rasta wigs Psychopatti's Patricia van Paasen | NL
Handmade elf shoes FairyFragilities | NL
BJD Design & Sculpt TM & Copyright © 2008 | Charles Grimberg-Stephan | Charles' Creature Cabinet | All Rights Reserved.
when I released @charlescreaturecabinet CCC BAILEY Rose & MARLEY ~Rasta House Brownies Tiny BJD & IF 'imaginary friend' jointed [Dec 2009] #XmasRelease ❤️
•
•
•
•
#charlescreaturecabinet #cccbjd #ccc2009 #tinybjd #microbjd #baileyrose #marley #rastabrownie #housebrownie #fantasybjd #balljointeddoll #resin #glowinthedark #IF_jointed #dutchbjd #imaginaryfriend #charlesgrimbergstephan #designersculptor #artist #dollartist #bjdartist #rotterdam #limitedition #collectibles #dollstagram #dollsofinstagram
CCC BAILEY ROSE | 9cm Tiny BJD | Rasta House Brownie | Choco Dark Tan ~(2009)
CCC MARLEY | 9cm Tiny BJD | Rasta House Brownie | Caramel Tan ~(2009)
❤️
CCC IF Imaginary Friend | 40mm BJD Toy | Tadpole/frog-like alien | snowwhite Glow-in-the-Dark blue | Cabinet of Wonders ~Special Edition
Handmade tiny outfit/hat Lin Murasaki Design @linnn_67 | NL
Handmade rasta wigs Psychopatti's Patricia van Paasen | NL
Handmade elf shoes FairyFragilities | NL
BJD Design & Sculpt TM & Copyright © 2008 | Charles Grimberg-Stephan | Charles' Creature Cabinet | All Rights Reserved.
If you're suffering, how do you know if joint replacement is right for you? Here are the Reasons for Hip Replacement Surgery or Knee Replacement Surgery.
But what if joint pain and stiffness are inevitable if you don’t take the medication, yet heart problems could occur if you do? Health officials say that, as with any drug, only you and your doctor can determine the level of risk that is acceptable with medications currently available to...
healthsame.com/arthritis/helpful-treatments-people-arthri...
.
11'1·---'' :.,.:.;1-' -_-,1H.I'i1·,1,··;,.J \;'l,.,·_~ ;··n.
' ' ·'.-'!,.ll'o·~ I , : .
~fit.~: .:,;__;-;J!'J):.IJ,~)-..-j!l':j.lt;J;!,;·t,!~i]·~...
--'iJ.\ ...,.w!f .-~!lL~~....;J!:!I.._,~~~!!~j,·o!t;_::-.
. . .;.. .,_.,_ :· .,-,-,· ,. ·..'i.J..
' ' .
t!UJ~ ~2.014.
Slanders,.violations &·Pettv electoral gimmicks:.
I ..
-----.
--· .
reforming, rather than rejecting LCR and much in line with that did not even place a resolution demanding the restoration.
of the JNUSU constitution. And after more than a year of slumber after that, they organised a mess deputation to CJI last.
November, only after the Joint Front took a series of antr-Lyngdoh programmes both inside and outside the campus..
For a force for whom tokenism is all that matters, they are now brandishing these two initiatives as evidence of.
their anti-LCR credentials. If students and organisations now criticize them for their absolute inaction betrayal of theirown stated commitment that the mass deputation would be followed up within a fortnight, their only response is that this is.
anti-AISAism! '.
So much so, they termed the Joint Front against Lyngdoh, which is the only force that is consistently.
demobilized and campaigned against the referendum that the Joint Front held. A force that bars students from expressing .
fighting against and talking about Lyngdoh, as a front against AISA! Not even content with that, they shamelessly.
their opinion with all forms of deceitful anti-campaign has no right to call itself democratic from any perspective. AISA.
members actively boycotted the referendum and their leaders could be seen around the booths making all efforts (in vain).
to stop the students from casting their votes. But the fact that notwithstanding all their anti-campaign, almost 1600.
.
students participated in the referendum and around 88% of them gave a resounding NO to Lyngdoh and upheld the.
JNUSU constitution is also a rejection of AISA's desperate counter-campaign and attempts to curb the democratic rights.
who participated in the referendum organised by the Joint Front, notwithstanding their failed efforts to sabotage it? .
.
of students. If Joint Front is indeed a front against AISA as they say, what do they have to say about all those students.
Much like JNUSU, AISA has also contributed to debilitating and hollowing out the institution of GSCASH by first.
its inactions and later and more dangerously by itself sabotaging it. So much for their much acclaimed call for.
·Bekhauf AzadP, when here in campus they surrendered the fight for gender justice and simply remained as mute.
.
spectators when the administration lashed at GSCASH repeatedly shielding three influential faculty members found guilty.
by GSCASH. Even when a UGBM mandated JNUSU to fight to make GSCASH recommendations binding upon.
administration, the JNUSU simply refused to act. Far from mobilizing students to build a movement to force the patriarchal.
.
administration to backtrack, they refused to call protest demonstrations before important EC meetings and even .
·'·.
shamelessly celebrated the verdicts ofthe EC that diluted GSCASH's recommendations..
If all of this was enough, their real patria~chal face however has been exposed at its worst with the recent.
.
developments around the GSCASH complaint that has been filed against two JNUSU office bearers. First, these.
two office bearers, in a brazen violation of GSCASH rules, came out with a public noti'fication informing students about the.
complaint filed against them. They said that the 'students had a right to know from their own elected representatives',.
.
when clearly no one has a right to know about GSCASH complaints and cases which are strictly confidential. TiU date..
elected positions in JNUSU to present their public defence and build a public opinion in their favour even before !he .
.
AlSA remains the only organisation that has not condemned this act of the JNUSU office bearers, who misusing their.
enquiry. Off late, AISA cadres have shunned even the minimum dignity and are going around the campus indu1ging :n.
heinous slander and a rabid character assassination against the complainant and even hounding her in pubfic. They are.
discussing their version of the case with lucid details and trying to delegitimize the complaint by portraying it once again.
.
as 'anti-AISA conspiracy'. DSU would like to warn AISA if they don't stop the rabid slander and character assass1natio, cf.
the complainant, DSU and the rest of the student community will resolutely take them to task. We can in no \\'a)f a!:c.\'.
.
relentlessly fighting against the entrenched forces of patriarchy. In the past, we have seen many women who hati hied such degenerate forces to do irreparable damage to the struggle for gender justice that was so painstakingly bunt b~ .
assassination. Such slander and public trial will only deter women in the coming days to file GSCASH complaints. .
complaints in the GSCASH were forced to leave the campus after they were hounded by such slander and character.
especially if it happens to be against a leading political activist. It can make the lives of women who have braved to comeforward to file a complaint a nightmare. AISA which swears by its campaign for gender justice has stooped so low, that 1t.
cannot simply allow the enquiry to happen quietly, but is raising a constant cacophony of smear campaign, gosstp to builda public opinion in the1r favour. What then is the difference between A/SA and any other regressive right wing force?In the last one and a half years, all those struggles that demanded a resolute fight from the side of the union.
simply vanished. Notable amongst it is the demand for 5 deprivation points for Muslim students or the political strugglefor the reduction of viva-voce marks. Both these demands are extremely important for the democratization of higher.
education in JNU and both requires resolute struggle. AISA has simply obliterated the first demand and relegated the.
and administrative decisions are now being showcased as 'important achievements'. .
second into a mere legal battle only. Now with the elections coming round the corner meaningless NGOised interventions Similar1y, here In JNU while AISA is shunning away from important struggles, on the other hand it brands all criticism as .
Those in powers in the government, brand anyone who questions their authority and policies as "anti-nationalu..
'anti-AISAism', and as per their convoluted logic against the union. JNUSU was never supposed to be a platform of.
power, but a platform of the students for struggle. The current union itself is fulfilling the dream of Lyngdoh, that students'unions should be reduced to pliant bodies that pose no challenge to the forces of privatization and meritocracy. We must.
expose and reject such hollow phrase mongoring & NGOised politics that Is being passed in the name of 'Left radicalism!' .
I ' .
.
.
reforming, rather than rejecting LCR and much in line with that did not even place a resolution demanding the restoration .
of the JNUSU constitution. And after more than a year of slumber after that, they organised a mess deputation to CJI last November, only after the Joint Front took a series of anti-Lyngdoh programmes both inside and outside the campus. .
For a force for whom tokenism is all that matters, they are now brandishing these two initiatives as evidence of their anti-LCR credentials. If students and organisations now criticize them for their absolute inaction betraval of_irheir own stated commitment that the mass deputation would be followed up within a fortnight. their only response is t. :at this is anti-AISAism! So much so, they termed the Joint Front against Lyngdoh, which is the only force that is consistently fighting against and talking about Lyngdoh, as a front against AISA! Not even content with that, they shamei9ssly .
demobilized and campaigned against the referendum that the Joint Front held. A force that bars students from expressing their opinion with all forms of deceitful anti-campaign has no right to call itself democratic from any perspective. AISA members actively boycotted the referendum and their leaders could be seen around the booths making all efforts (in vain) to stop the students from casting their votes. But the fact that notwithstanding all their anti-campaign, almost 1600 students participated in the referendum and around 88% of them gave a resounding NO to Lyngdoh and upheld the JNUSU constitution is also a rejection of AISA's desperate counter-campaign and attempts to curb the democratic rights of students. If Joint Front is indeed a front against AISA as they say. what do they have to say about all those students .
who participated in the referendum organised by the Joint Front. notwithstanding their failed efforts to sabotage it? .
Much like JNUSU, AISA has also contributed to debilitating and hollowing out the institution of GSCASH by first its inactions and later and more dangerously by itself sabotaging it. So much for their much acclaimed call for 'Bekhauf Azadi', when here in campus they surrendered the fight for gender justice and simply remained as mute spectators when the administration lashed at GSCASH repeatedly shielding three influential faculty members found guilty .
by GSCASH. Even when a UGBM mandated JNUSU to fight to make GSCASH recommendations binding upon administration, the JNUSU simply refused to act. Far from mobilizing students to build a movement to force the patriarchal administration to backtrack, they refused to call protest demonstrations before important EC meetings and even shamelessly celebrated the verdicts of the EC that diluted GSCASH's recommendations. .
If all of this was enough, their real patriarchal face however has been exposed at its worst with the recent developments around the GSCASH complaint that has been filed against two .JNUSU office bearers. First, these two office bearers, in a brazen violation of GSCASH rules. came out with a public notification informing students about the complaint filed against them. They said that the 'students had a right to know from their own elected representatives', when clearly no one has a right to know about GSCASH complaints and cases which are strictly confidential. Till date, AISA remains the only organisation that has not condemned this act of the JNUSU office bearers, who misusing their elected positions in JNUSU to present their public defence and build a public opinion in their favour even before the .
enquiry. Off late, AISA cadres have shunned even the minimum dignity and are going around the campus indulging in .
heinous slander and a rabid character assassination against the complainant and even hounding her in public. They are discussing their version of the case with lucid details and trying to delegitimize the complaint by portraying it once again as 'anti-AISA conspiracy'. DSU would like to warn AISA if they don't stop the rabid slander and character assassination of the complainant, DSU and the rest of the student community will resolutely take them to task. We can in no way allow such degenerate forces to do irreparable damage to the struggle for gender justice that was so painstakingly built by relentlessly fighting against the entrenched forces of patriarchy. In the past, we have seen many women who had filed complaints in the GSCASH were forced to leave the campus after they were hounded by such slander and character assassination. Such slander and public trial will only deter women in the coming days to file GSCASH complaints, especially if it happens to be against a leading political activist. It can make the lives of women who have braved to come forward to file a complaint a nightmare. AISA which swears by its campaign for gender justice has stooped so low, that it cannot simply allow the enquiry to happen quietly, but is raising a constant cacophony of smear campaign, gossip to build a public opinion in their favour. What then is the difference between A/SA and any other regressive right wing force? .
In the last one and a half years, all those struggles that demanded a resolute fight from the side of the union simply vanished. Notable amongst it is the demand for 5 deprivation points for Muslim students or the political struggle for the reduction of viva-voce marks. Both these demands are extremely important for the democratization of higher education in JNU and both requires resolute struggle. AISA has simply obliterated the first demand and relegated the second into a mere legal battle only. Now with the elections coming round the corner meaningless NGOised interventions .
and administrative decisions are now being showcased as 'important achievements'. .
Those in powers in the government, brand anyone who questions their authority and policies as "anti-national". Similarly, here in JNU while AISA is shunning away from important struggles, on the other hand it brands all criticism as 'anti-AISAism', and as per their convoluted logic against the union. JNUSU was never supposed to be a platform of power, but a platform of the students for struggle. The current union itself is fulfilling the dream of Lyngdoh, that students' unions should be reduced to pliant bodies that pose no challenge to the forces of privatization and meritocracy. We must expose and reject such hollow phrase mongering & NGOised politics that is being passed in the name of 'Left radicalism!' .
.
Living with pain and limited mobility can be debilitating. If joint pain is impacting your life, consider joint replacement surgery. Gujarat boasts some of India's best joint replacement surgeons, equipped with advanced technology and expertise to restore your mobility and alleviate pain. From hip and knee replacements to shoulder and elbow surgeries, these surgeons offer personalized care and minimally invasive techniques for optimal results. Take control of your life and rediscover the joy of movement by connecting with a top joint replacement surgeon in Gujarat today.
Visit: www.vachhanihospital.com/