.

DefendAgains_.t the Institutions.

Partisan .

of Elected.

Score-Settling Student .

Two dnys back ( 16.4.12), a vicious!ef{/let full ofbaseless and concocted accusations against the AISA .

Representations.

..... the malicious accusations and Individualised Politicl<ing.

misinterpretations led JNUSU was distributed in the hostel messes. The leaflet. on the pretext ofvoicing .

JNUSU and AISA for which there exists no recorded or written proof. The abundance of concoctions and Yamuna hostel. in the purnphlet the concerns ofYamuna hosteL with any proofwhat so ever. Statements, positions and actions were attrib..lted to the current necessitates a brief encapsulation ofcertain fa~ts regarding theconcerns ofthe .

onlyand onlyindulged in characterassassination orJNUSU leadershipand AI Sl\activi~is without bod1ering to substant~atc.

eno .

About one year back, allegations aboullhe misuse ofthe office ofthe warden ofYamuna hostel had reenraised by the .

23' last December ,.

pur recvmmendcd I .

.

residents ofthe Yamuna hostel. The previous Vice ChanceUor had been for;ced to form a ract finding team which only .

IV1<lrch, when the president ofthe Yamuna hostel and some other residents informed the JNUSU that the ousted ' .

N; with the President ofYamunn.

tht' administra.

-\ O warden was still continuing in the residence and interferingtion__ the Yamuna hostel President verballycommunicated to JNUSU that they may go loran indefinite .

thnt the warden be removed and a new warden appointc:d within three months. ln.

t\ Hostel to speak to the Vice-Chancellor.

c: to build the movement in the day to day issues of the hostel, the JNUSU went along .

~ .

at Dean ofStudents office. The purpose .

hunger-strike fi·om 1st April onwards. The JNUSl.) informed thern that it needed time and space to strategize on how administrative further and immcdiatelv regarding this issue. After theconversation with.

. t1·mnday one, these concernswere maliciously mechanism o fwh.ich the.ca-se o, f the Yamuna hostel warden wasthe most glaring example. However, .

included the Yamtma hostel issue in its 29 March Protest Demonstration to coru1ect the current issue with a broader administrative apathy and mismanage.

·1he students will rccaJJ that whenever \Vas to ensure that the administration be made accountable for the failure of its .

been and should not be the nonn ofstudents' lnovcments..

rigorous groundwork, .

.

tntcrpreted as diluting the issue ofYamuna hostel Qy_go Litically mol ivated forces. This has never we have undertaken mentY:ununa hosteL be-cause the residents.

IlO\\CYer. the student represenwtives had l)btuined detailed informationcommitment and afterhunger strike immediatestruggles, they have been with utmost serousness .

in order to ensure that the administration is left with no excuse to hide behind. In the cac;e of.

!) and declared about the case. it vvas neces~ry for the newly-elected JNUSU to get some space to make note ofthem and build up an urgent agitation to address the san1c..

struggle os a co/lecri\·c ofthe hosteL decided to go ahead \.vith their pre-decided .

ofthe Yamuna hostel tore\ iew their ·decision ofthe hunger strike' and give JNUSU some space and time to further the .

ond representarh·e modeofagitation.

on. with no discussion it publicly. Jn sucha situation, JNUSU, while expressing full support and .

to fight for Lhc Yamuna hostel issues, had to come out with a vvrittcn statement i.e. I1ov;e,·er, the entire issue set aver) unfortunatebody ofthe en/ire student commzmiappealingto the representativesprecedent,.

tJu-ough that particular .

l)' vis-a-vis the administration.

.

some course ofaction (v:.:hich '"as as serious as an indefinite hunger strike), JNUSU was asked to ..leoo the struggle"· .

with the rest ofthe campus or JNUSU. A11d after unilalerally .

wherein a serious course <?(action was uni]aterally ..

t:~pr~.!sscd deciding decided.

.

unconditional andembarkingon .

as an iustitution. IfJNUSU as an institution has to :.lead'' any struggle. should not JNUSU, which has already .

.

n1odc. \Ve hope student community will appreciate that this is against the democn!ti.

suppot1 for the issue. be allov·led some lime and space to decide the course ofnct!on to carry .

l()rward rh~struggle. keeping lhc interests ofthe entire student community in n1ind? .

decision-making mechanism that we have collectively evolved over the yeat~s for the functioning ofJNUSU"t .

The .J~USU has time and again not only reiterated but also fulfilled its unconditional commitment towards re ....oh ing the Yamuna a~\\l'll as '-IC\ cnll oth~r related issues. .

the issues of the Yamuna Hostel, be it by talking t.o the JNlJTA to come together on this issue, or holding .

sc,·cral rounds ofnegotiations\\ith the adminL~tration. The JNUSU also hcJd a n1ccting \\ ith oJJ the hostel presidents. .

\1 .

str~ngthcning the platl{)rm o 1\:kcted representatives. in order to put enllccti\c pressure onth~,t administrati(m .

t~1r.

.

Lh:: \'amuna"" arden·s rl.!~idcncc.

Ho~t~j a_gr..e~Q_tojill .

t_l}e_l1ungcr .

This collective pressure of the student and the tcachc·r community ''as in~trumcntal in forcing thr ~.

.

.. .

.

th(· a(!ministration ~wtcd that .. u/i<:r /(t/king to rhc JN1 1SU and the .1.\'l ''l~l" ·it has decide-d w shif1 a n~w~vvarJcn to .

------~------· .

administration to come out with two written statements on this issue on 4 and 9 .\.prii.~J he se~ond statement .

\\ ithin une ll1()nlb. Ilwas bas~.,:Y._ ~)n this :~ta~~-tl)t;nt. tlt~!l Lhc j)p;sjdetlLofth~Yamun_a .

_.._ .. _ ot" .

!tvt~~l_Sj\-l~9)NL1Sl_,.. ''il). ~i~l_ ~be._Js t1112llilc.;t_9I.J21:~~i~.k.nL. I.

.. --... -~ ---.

admmtstratrvc stakm~mthttt was lxtsl'd nnc()l1stllldtions .

f strikg.: f_Uhc: author -oUI1e leaflet i~ ll.

admu"~\· ....... -. -.._..... ~'ithJ r_.:,,_.tl)c hung~r ~~l r ihc_~H1Jhc b~tsisof 3f1.

.

§_ays that the£~j'l..!JQ 12r.9of q_f_ any '"'"'"j)jlia \:;>~1!'9 tb.§r.:t -·-· .

.:..

burnt tt1e f\ags after \eannld \I .-... .

D daY? atter_the Bathani To\a tnassacre .

P.T.O.

on t..ov _ .

.

.

blasts of October 11, 2007 were similar to Malegaon, indicatinginvolvement of Sangh elements. .

Innocents Tortured .

In the Mecca Masjid case, police, governments and media hadconfidently named Muslim outfits as being responsible, and had pickedup and interrogated a large number of Muslim youth. These youth hadbeen tortured brutally subjected to electric shocks, water bottles hungtheir genitals etc. Some of them lost their reproductive ability as a resultof the torture. .

In the Ajmer blasts case too, innocent Muslims were arrested andpublicly declared to be the masterminds. Mohammed Salim, a youngman who died in the explosion at the dargah was branded as a Harkat-ul-Jehad Islami (HUJI) terrorist and blamed for planting the bomb. .

Now that Sangh Parivar members have been proven to be the realperpetrators, what can compensate for the tortures and characterassassination that innocent Muslim youth suffered? .

.

RSS Role .

The RSS has tried to deny any link whatsoever with those accused ofterrorism. But the evidence is mounting: .

.

Devendra and Sanjay Gupta, Vishnu and Chandrashekhar Patidarand Lokesh Sharma, named in the Ajmer case, have been found to have links with the RSS and some extremist Hindutva groups. RSShas admitted that some of these suspects had been its members. .

.

.

Senior RSS leaders of UP Ashok Varshney and Ashok Beri have admitted in questioning by CBI that they provided help (such assim cards and accommodation) to blast accused Devendra Gupta when he was on the run. .

.

.

One Sumil Joshi, an RSS organizer based in Dewas (MP) and a long-standing associate of Sadhvi Pragya was murdered in 2007;he is also said to have been involved in some of the blasts. .

.

.

Joshi and other RSS pracharaks are said to have been linked to the Samjhauta Express Blasts of February 18, 2007. .

.

.

.

.