View allAll Photos Tagged AcademicPublishing
The genius of Web2.0 is that knowledge is participatory. Most broadcast media is a one-way street. A kind of knowledge fascism.
Teaser for the reading of
Bye Bye Peer-Reviewed Publishing
hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02114531
Research Counts, Not the Journal
hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02074859
How (Not) to Lead Academia
hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02281227
Also available on LBRY.tv - publish anything freely !
© 2019 Abambres M (CC BY 4.0)
Explaining what a citation is, when and where it should be done, and describing my citation style.
This video is key to understand, through a future video, how the journal impact factor is computed nowadays and why I don´t like it, as described in
Research Counts, Not the Journal
hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02074859
Also available on LBRY.tv - publish anything freely !
© 2019 Abambres M (CC BY 4.0)
Teaser for the reading of
Bye Bye Peer-Reviewed Publishing
hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02114531
Research Counts, Not the Journal
hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02074859
How (Not) to Lead Academia
hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02281227
Also available on LBRY.tv - publish anything freely !
© 2019 Abambres M (CC BY 4.0)
PeerJ.com is an Open Access scientific journal, see Peter Suber Open Access book for details.
Peter Binfield
www.linkedin.com/in/peterbinfield, @p_binfield
Jason Hoyt
uk.linkedin.com/in/jjhoyt, @jasonHoyt
Photo reproduced with permission from Peter Binfield peerj.com/about, @thepeerj
Schools close the doors to their best intellectual assets once a student is no longer a student. Why should alumni contribute if they can't have a library card?
The dirty secret about academic publishing is that profit motives drive (and restrict) the production and distribution of knowledge.
The high priests of academia hide behind a curtain of anonymity in the name of objectivity. Quit monkeying around.
What I meant here is that typical publishing restricts content from being repurposed, repackaged, remixed, and reused.
Could mean peer review is a destructive monster. Could mean traditional peer review is getting shredded by the new media. Could mean traditional peer review kills what it assesses by taking too long and pretending to be definitive...
Concept for a campaign which highlights the disciples covered by this journal. Includes biological, chemical, earth and physical sciences. Lobster and Helvetica Neue font used. Work unpublished.