View allAll Photos Tagged AAPL
Out of all the iterations of iPods over the years, this remains my favorite design.
I got this in late 2005 when it was first introduced. It has held up pretty well cosmetically despite my abuse (I don't baby my gadgets).
I have two monitors. Too bad neither one of them is an Apple display, but Apple's monitors are expensive and I've had some bad experiences. First a MultiScan 15", then a 17" Studio Display.
Why Apple is so successful: “The reason Jobs and Jonathan Ive get it right is because they design products with elegant and simple interfaces—for themselves. And they count on their hip gaggle of early adopters to see it the same way. Once the snowball starts rolling, it’s all momentum from there. ”
How Microsoft's phenomenal success led the company astray. For years now, Microsoft watchers have wondered about the timing and other specifics of Steve Ballmer's departure. Now we know them — or a lot more than we did yesterday, anyway. After 33 years at the company, the executive who started at Microsoft in 1980 and has been its CEO since 2000 has announced that he'll retire within the next 12 months, once a successor has been named. For folks interested primarily in the stock market, Ballmer's time as Microsoft's head honcho is defined by the fact that its shares have largely flat-lined during his tenure. Here, courtesy of Wolfram Alpha, is a chart comparing how MSFT has compared to AAPL during that time period: If you — like me — don't care much about Microsoft's stock price, Ballmer's legacy is far more complicated. It can't be summed up in a chart or a tweet or even in one blog post. I am not among the man's harshest critics, in part because I believe that all tech-company hegemonies are destined to decline, sooner or later. The dustbin of tech-company history is littered with outfits which were once market-defining behemoths: Lotus, WordPerfect, Netscape, Palm and oh, so many more. Microsoft in 2013 is not a company on the verge of joining them: It's still making vast amounts of money and managing to be highly competitive in everything from mundane business software to blockbuster videogames. Bottom line: I'm pretty sure that there are alternate universes in which the company was run by someone else in recent years — maybe even Bill Gates himself — and fared considerably worse than it has under Ballmer. Still, I can't imagine that there's anyone out there who believes that it's a given that Microsoft will be anywhere near as important to the future of personal computing as it has been to its the first four decades. Including Steve Ballmer: Last month, he instigated a massive reorg, with the aim of turning Microsoft into a "devices and services" company. Those moves acknowledge that the Microsoft of the future, assuming it's successful, won't be the Microsoft we've known. Like the reorg, many of the most notable Microsoft moments of the past few years involve sudden, epoch-shifting change. Ballmer's company has done things you wouldn't have expected Microsoft to do, from giving Windows 8 an entirely new primary interface to making its own PC hardware. It's been a lot for the company's customers to process all at once, particularly since so many of them value comfortable familiarity over great leaps forward. (Exhibit A: Windows XP, the 12-year-old operating system Microsoft can't kill.) If Microsoft is behaving like it's trying to make up for lost time, it's because...well, it's because it needs to make up for lost time. And it's lagging behind Apple and Google in the race to define the future of personal computing mostly for one simple reason: For too many years, Windows was too damn successful. At some point along the way, Microsoft's golden goose became an albatross. The Windows era — which began with Windows 3.0 in 1990 and continues on, at least if you're talking about laptops and desktops — made billions for Microsoft and its investors. But it also gave the company a number of bad habits it's still trying to overcome. Such as: • Windows' success led to hubris. From its very earliest days, Microsoft was never a company afflicted by a crippling lack of self-confidence. In the years when it was crushing the competition in categories such as PC operating systems and productivity software, being unimaginably headstrong helped. But after that competition was crushed, Microsoft lost its ability to take the most serious threats to its dominance of personal computing seriously. (I'm still not sure whether Ballmer's famous blustery dismissal of the iPhone was sincere or not — but either way, it was unfortunate.) The company also treated paying customers shabbily in some instances — like with the dismal copy-protection scheme it insultingly named Windows Genuine Advantage — in a way that couldn't have been less humble or less lovable. t necessarily be very much like old stuff, a philosophy that led to the Metro interface used by Windows 8 and Windows Phone.
www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202208/06/WS62ee20b5a310fd2b29e70...
Pelosi family under scrutiny for stock trades
US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her family are now under scrutiny for several market trades. Her husband, Paul Pelosi, has traded and profited from Tesla, Apple, Google and other technology stocks.
Publicly available disclosures show Paul Pelosi bought as much $5 million worth of stock in software and computer-chip company Nvidia on June 17, right before the Senate chip-manufacturing bill vote.
Nancy Pelosi, a multi-millionaire, said her husband has "absolutely not" made any stock trades based on information from her.
www.businessinsider.com/nancy-pelosi-stock-trades-congres...
See every stock trade House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband has made since 2021
■ Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband is making massive stock trades as Congress mulls whether to ban lawmakers and their spouses from trading.
■ An Insider analysis estimated the Pelosis' cumulative wealth at at least $46.1 million.
■ Insider compiled each of Paul Pelosi's trades that the speaker has reported since 2021.
As members of Congress debate whether lawmakers and their spouses should play the stock market, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul Pelosi, a venture capitalist, continues to regularly buy and sell stocks and stock options.
Pelosi has access to confidential intelligence and the power to affect — with words or actions — the fortunes of companies in which her husband invests and trades.
When asked in December 2021 whether members of Congress should even be allowed to trade stocks, Pelosi answered in the affirmative.
"We are a free-market economy. They should be able to participate in that," she said.
This led some of her colleagues, on both the left and the right, to sharply criticize her — and draft legislation to restrict members of Congress and their spouses from trading stocks.
"Year after year, politicians somehow manage to outperform the market, buying and selling millions in stocks of companies they're supposed to be regulating," Republican Sen. Josh Hawley said. "Wall Street and Big Tech work hand-in-hand with elected officials to enrich each other at the expense of the country. Here's something we can do: ban all members of Congress from trading stocks and force those who do to pay their proceeds back to the American people. It's time to stop turning a blind eye to Washington profiteering."
Sen. Jon Ossoff, a Democrat, introduced a similar bill alongside Sen. Mark Kelly with the intent to ban members of Congress and their families from trading stocks.
"Members of Congress should not be playing the stock market while we make federal policy and have extraordinary access to confidential information," Ossoff said.
Pelosi has since softened her stance, but the fate of a congressional stock-trade ban remains unclear. On July 21, Pelosi denied that her husband uses information she provides to make stock trades.
A previous analysis from Insider estimated that the Pelosis are worth at least $46,123,051, making Nancy Pelosi one of the 25 richest members of Congress. The vast majority of the couple's wealth is derived from stocks, options, and investments made by Paul Pelosi.
Here are all of the trades reported by Speaker Nancy Pelosi in 2021 and 2022:
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB)
■ Purchased 20,000 shares worth between $500,000 and $1 million on December 22, 2020
■ Purchased 15,000 shares worth between $500,000 and $1 million on February 18, 2021
■ Purchased 25,000 shares worth between $500,000 and $1 million on February 23, 2021
■ Purchased 10,000 shares worth between $250,000 and $500,000 on January 27, 2022
Alphabet Inc. - Class A (GOOGL)
■ Exercised 40 call options (4,000 shares) on June 18, 2021, at a strike price of $1,200 and cumulatively worth between $1 million and $5 million
Alphabet Inc. - Class C Capital Stock (GOOG)
■ Purchased 10 call options on December 17, 2021, at a strike price of $2,000, and together valued between $500,000 and $1 million
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)
■ Purchased 20 call options on May 21, 2021, at a strike price of $3,000, and together valued between $500,000 and $1 million
American Express Company (AXP)
■ Exercised 50 call options (5,000 shares) on January 21, 2022, at a strike price of $80 and together worth between $250,000 and $500,000
Apple Inc. (AAPL)
■ Purchased 100 call options with a strike price of $100 on December 22, 2020, together worth between $250,000 and $500,000
■ Purchased 50 call options with a strike price of $100 on May 21, 2021, together worth between $100,000 and $250,000
■ Contribution of 3,000 shares to Georgetown University's Paul F. Pelosi Endowed Fund on December 30, 2021, worth between $500,000 and $1 million
■ Contribution of 3,000 shares to Trinity College on December 30, 2021, worth between $500,000 and $1 million
■ Exercised 100 call options (10,000 shares) on January 21, 2022, at a strike price of $100, together valued between $1 million and $5 million
■ Purchased 100 call options on May 13, 2022, with a strike price of $80 and together valued between $500,000 and $1 million
■ Purchased 50 call options on May 24, 2022, with a strike price of $80 and together valued between $250,000 and $500,000
■ Sold 50 call options at a strike price of $100 on June 17, 2022, and valued between $100,000 and $250,000
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)
■ Purchased 100 call options on December 21, 2021, at a strike price of $50 and together valued between $250,001 and $500,000
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT)
■ Exercised 150 call options (15,000 shares) on March 19, 2021, at a strike price of $130 and together valued between $1 million and $5 million
■ Exercised 100 call options (10,000 shares) on March 19, 2021, at a strike price of $140, and together valued between $1 million and $5 million
■ Bought 10 call options on May 24, 2022, at a strike price of $180 and together valued between $50,000 and $100,000
■ Purchased 40 call options on May 24, 2022, with a strike price of $180 and together valued between $250,001 and $500,000
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
■ Purchased 50 call options on June 3, 2021, at a strike price of $400, together valued between $1 million and $5 million
■ Purchased 5,000 shares on July 23, 2021, together valued between $500,000 and $1 million
■ Bought 50 call options on July 23, 2021, at a strike price of $100, together valued between $250,000 and $500,000
■ Exercised 200 call options (20,000 shares) at a strike price of $100 on June 17, 2022, together valued between $1 million and $5 million
■ Sold all of his shares (25,000 total) on July 26, 2022, valued between $1 million and $5 million at an average price of $164.05 and for a total loss of $341,365
Paypal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL)
■ Exercised 50 call options (5,000 shares) on January 21, 2022, at a strike price of $100 and together valued between $500,000 and $1 million
REOF XX, LLC
■ Invested between $50,000 and $100,000 in the asset-backed security on December 22, 2021
REOF XXII, LLC
■ Invested between $250,000 and $500,000 in the asset-backed security on July 13, 2021
Roblox Corporation Class A (RBLX)
■ Purchased 10,000 shares worth between $500,000 and $1 million on March 10, 2021
■ Purchased 100 call options at a strike price of $100 on December 20, 2021, together valued between $250,000 and $500,000.
Salesforce.com Inc (CRM)
■ Purchased 100 call options on December 20, 2021, at a strike price of $210, together valued between $500,000 and $1 million
■ Purchased 30 call options on December 20, 2021, at a strike price of $210, together valued between $100,000 and $250,000
Slack Technologies, Inc Class A (WORK)
■ Exchanged 10,000 shares of Slack Technologies Inc. on July 22, 2021, for 776 shares of Salesforce.com Inc. as the result of a merger, with a cash payout of $267,900
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)
■ Purchased 25 call options on December 22, 2020, with a strike price of $500, together valued between $500,000 and $1 million
■ Exercised 25 call options (2,500 shares) on March 17, 2022, at a strike price of $500, together valued between $1 million and $5 million
Visa Inc. (V)
■ Sold 10,000 shares on June 21, 2022, valued between $1 million and $5 million
Walt Disney Company (DIS)
■ Purchased 100 call options on December 22, 2020, at a strike price of $100, together valued between $500,000 and $1 million
■ Purchased 50 call options on December 17, 2021, at a strike price of $130, together valued between $100,000 and $250,000
■ Exercised 100 call options (10,000 shares) on January 21, 2022, at a strike price of $100, together valued between $1 million and $5 million
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. - Series A (WBD)
■ Received 2,419 shares on April 11, 2022, resulting from a spinoff of previously held AT&T (T) shares, together valued between $50,000 and $100,000
Methodology note: In 2012, Congress passed the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act to combat insider trading and conflicts of interest to bring more transparency to lawmakers' financial dealings.
Per the STOCK Act, members of Congress are required to file financial disclosures within 45 days of making a trade, doing so in a certified congressional document known as a periodic transaction report. Insider collected and analyzed the trades listed in each of Pelosi's periodic transaction reports submitted since 2021.
Federal lawmakers are required to report stock trades made by themselves, their spouses, and their dependent children. But they are only required to list the value of reported trades in broad ranges.
To address the expected noise levels of future aircraft, NASA’s Commercial Supersonic Technology project is already developing technologies focused on reducing the noise produced by an aircraft’s engine exhaust. via NASA ift.tt/2sQ9PG6
From AAPL's Dictionary.app:
In English usage, the word mannequin occurs much more frequently than any of its relatives manakin, manikin, and mannikin. The source for all four words is the Middle Dutch mannekijn (modern Dutch manneken) ‘little man,’ ‘little doll.’ Mannequin is the French spelling from this Dutch source. One of its French meanings, dating from about 1830, is ‘a young woman hired to model clothes’ (even though the word means ‘little man ’). This sense—still current, but rare in English—first appeared in 1902. The far more common sense of ‘a life-size jointed figure or dummy used for displaying clothes’ is first recorded in 1939. Manikin has had the sense ‘little man’ (often contemptuous) since the mid 16th century, when it was sometimes spelled manakin (as it appeared in Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night, as a term of abuse). Manikin’s sense of ‘an artist’s lay figure’ also dates from the mid 16th century (first recorded with the Dutch spelling manneken). To confuse matters further, in modern usage the words manakin and mannikin refer to birds of two unrelated families. The history of these bird names is somewhat obscure. Manakin may have come from the Portuguese manaquim ‘mannikin,’ a variant of manequim ‘mannequin.’ Mannikin may have come directly from the source of the Portuguese words, the Middle Dutch mannekijn.
Before I go home for the weekend, I like to backup to my FireWire drive and take it with me.
"Backup" is simply the name of the plan I created... I'm not making a backup of the backup as it appears.
Stocks have jumped out of the gate in the first two months of the year, clawing back the lion's share of last year's steep third quarter losses. In particular, cyclical sectors such as technology, energy and real estate have seen substantial inflows as investors cheer a more dovish Federal Reserve, ongoing trade negotiations between the U.S. and China, and a round of quarterly earnings that have exceeded Wall Street's expectations. Also, the chances of the economy slipping into recession look to have reduced.
"Because the markets weakened and Fed officials now see that the economy and inflation are weak, there has been a shift to an easier stance," wrote Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, a Connecticut-based hedge fund. "I have lowered my odds of a U.S. recession coming prior to the U.S. presidential election to about 35%," he continued, per a note on LinkedIn.
Those who want to take advantage of 2019's top performing sectors should consider using leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that are specifically designed to magnify short-term price movements. For example, if an index comprising technology stocks is up 1%, a tracking leveraged ETF providing three times exposure would be up 3%. Traders should be aware that leveraged ETFs reset daily – therefore, returns over a holding period of more than one day may not reflect the fund's advertised leverage due to compounding effects. Let's consider several trading ideas relating to leveraged sector ETFs.
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X ETF (TECL)
Created in 2008, the Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X ETF (TECL) seeks to provide three times the daily return of the Technology Select Sector Index. The benchmark index consists of U.S. large-cap technology names such as Apple Inc. (AAPL), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Google parent company Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL). The fund's tight 0.08% average spread and daily turnover of more than 400,000 shares make it a suitable instrument for all forms of short-term trading. TECL, with assets under management (AUM) of $550.57 million and offering a 0.39% dividend yield, is up 45.76% year to date (YTD) as of Feb. 28, 2019. The ETF charges a 1.17% management fee, which has a minimal impact on short stays.
After bottoming out at $68.96 in late December, TECL's share price has rallied almost 80% to close at $123.56 on Feb. 27. Traders who want to capitalize on this strongly trending market should look for entry points on pullbacks to the 20-day simple moving average (SMA). If the fund's price continues higher, the SMA can then be used as a trailing stop to let profits run. Those who hold open positions should consider moving the stop to the breakeven point when the price nears $130 – an area where it may find resistance from the 200-day SMA.
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 3X ETF (ERX)
The Direxion Daily Energy Bull 3X ETF (ERX), with net assets that exceed $400 million, aims to return three times the daily investment results of the Energy Select Sector Index. Energy sector heavyweights Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Chevron Corporation (CVX) dominate the underlying index, carrying a cumulative weighting of 41.75%. Tight spreads and deep liquidity make this ETF an energy trader's favorite. The fund yields 2.29% and has an expense ratio of just over 1%. As of Feb. 28, 2019, ERX has returned 46.27%.
The ERX share price fell off a cliff in the fourth quarter of 2018, following oil prices sharply lower. The fund bottomed in late December on climactic volume and has since tracked higher with only minor retracements. Those who wish to ride the upward momentum should enter on dips to $22, where the price finds a confluence of support from a two-month uptrend line and 20-day SMA. Traders could set take-profit orders at key resistance levels such as $26 and $32. Close open positions if the price falls much below the trendline, as this invalidates the short-term momentum setup.
Direxion Daily MSCI Real Estate Bull 3x ETF (DRN)
Launched in 2009, the Direxion Daily MSCI Real Estate Bull 3x ETF (DRN) attempts to replicate three times the daily performance of MSCI US REIT Index. The fund, with AUM of $43.66 million, suits traders who want an aggressive play in equity real estate investment trusts (REITs). It tilts more toward commercial REITs than the tracked index but still provides ample exposure to residential real estate.
Top allocations in the benchmark include Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) at 6.61%, Prologis, Inc. (PLD) at 4.70% and Public Storage (PSA) at 4.04%. A 0.63% average spread may eat too much into profits for scalpers but shouldn't overly affect swing traders who can let winning trades run over several days to cover slightly higher trading costs. DRN charges a management fee of 1.09% and has returned 41.86% YTD as of Feb. 28, 2019.
DRN shares rallied above their August 2018 peak earlier this month but have recently backed away from those highs to provide a swing trading opportunity. The fund's price should find solid support at the current price from a horizontal line that connects the July and December swing highs. Traders may want to wait for a reversal candlestick pattern, such as hammer or piercing line, to confirm that upward momentum has resumed before opening a position. Think about placing a stop-loss order under this month's low and booking profits on a test of the 2016 high at $28.64.
Nasdaq top 10 clusters
description=ftp://ftp.nasdaqtrader.com/symboldirectory/nasdaqlisted.txt
skipp negative 200 / 50 day change
skipp negative day change
description=ftp://ftp.nasdaqtrader.com/symboldirectory/nasdaqlisted.txt
skipp negative 200 / 50 day change
skipp negative day change
NASDAQ marketcap>=1000.0 mio USD OPTION=+ONLYK-means clustering using exchange method
CPU time=210 ms
Data had dimension: 3 with number of rows: 207
Number of final clusters=10
Compactness=3.437758496466221
Cluster-center and Cluster symbols:
cluster: 0 (2.13, 1.69, 0.49) APOL AAPL SNPS TTEK NVLS BOKF TXRH ORLY CSTR JACK LOGM TQNT TEVA SEIC ATVI VRSK CASY ADVS HBANP HITT FNFG LLTC
cluster: 1 (1.60, 6.25, 0.40) NWBI FELE ULTI ADBE MANT MCRS ALTE LPLA AMTD CBSH SBNY ISBC SPIL BLKB UTIW INTC THRX NWS SYMC GILD AMZN FISV WTNY ESRX CELG PEGA SIAL SBUX UMBF MEOH
cluster: 2 (6.85, 5.21, 0.25) CAKE NIHD AMRS ROVI CFFN BMRN TGA GMLP AMLN MGLN NVDA UMPQ
cluster: 3 (2.98, 11.35, 0.35) HSNI LINTB LINTA FLIR WRLD ATML USTR NBXH LKQX MORN NWSA HUGH TLEO DELL JDSU BECN ADP CCMP CHKP ESGR ONNN ACIW SYKE SIVB COST JDAS XLNX IFSIA DTV ENDP DISCB PRAA CTAS GAME MOLX SIRO MOLXA RAVN XRAY ODFL LBTYB QCOM AMGN LPNT
cluster: 4 (6.60, 15.12, 0.51) DLTR CRZO SHPGY SAPE ZBRA FWRD EQIX NUAN BRCD ENTG IDTI CGNX ICON TLCR BMC CPRT PVTB TSLA RRD IACI VMED EZPW VCLK AZPN EXPE ASNA OVTI ASMI MLNX
cluster: 5 (3.15, 20.54, 0.46) ERIC ALTR POOL BCPC CYOU JOSB SVVS GTLS BWLD ARBA PLXS RNOW LUFK SXCI CACC PSSI LEAP TSCO CHSI CHTR MWIV OTEX BIIB ACTG EROC
cluster: 6 (11.34, 22.42, 0.86) AFSI PSMT ACOM ROSE NFLX QLIK FTNT FCFS HANS MDCO TLVT CY FINL VOLC VECO NTGR SOLR HIBB INFA
cluster: 7 (7.92, 32.61, 0.98) SPWRA SPWRB ULTA SFLY FEIC TZOO AMMD ERTS LCAPA LCAPB APAGF BJRI GPRO
cluster: 8 (17.65, 39.09, 0.34) ZOLL TRNX MPEL SODA ALKS VSEA SREV SIRI QCOR
cluster: 9 (14.58, 60.39, 0.95) IPGP GLNG REGN GMCR
So a while back ryan posted about investopedia. Really it was an article but one of the cool things investopedia has is a stock simulator. I got my brother and father into a game starting Sept. 5. Over two weeks I'm not doing too badly. While the big push this afternoon with the fed rate cut helped me I'm posting 9.15% return on my initial investment. Hopefully I can keep the streak going :)
So why did I buy what I did? Check it out:
COST
Just like them. Figure they still have a bit of energy in expanding
the business.
AMZN
On the up for some reason lately. Surprised by how far the stock fell before I bought it.
RIO
Brazilian multinational with big mining expertise. Especially China.
Split during the game.
PKX
Korean steel producer. Big at supplying Asia.
IGT
These are the guys who produce the games for casinos. Was on Cramer
and I'll ride them for a bit.
MYL (sold, not a good performer)
Mylan is a local company so I figured I'd show some loyalty. Steal
compared to other pharma companies.
HMC (sold, big recall, took a hit here)
Honda. Asian company and I really like the CRV and Fit. In the fuel
concious and image concious world the Fit could be really big.
HL (almost sold this today)
Hecla Mining. Silver company. Adding people in Idaho because the price
of silver is going up. Don't expect much movement but you never know.
NEM (almost sold this today)
Newmont Mining. Gold company. What the hey...
PHG
Phillips. Wanted a nice electronics conglomerate and seemed like a
good buy. They also support the US Men's National Team. European
company btw.
STO
Statoil is a Norwegian energy company. Offshore drilling and the like.
Not the best buy but figured I'd take a flyer on it.
AAPL
Bought it after the iPod announcement (iPod touch ordered!). Obviously going to be a reasonable performer. Just wish I had known how to short before the announcement.
IAH (sold)
A holding company. Kind of interesting fund. Never really performed. Sold to get ZNH. Much better choice.
ZNH
China Southern Airlines. Personally not a huge fan of airlines. That being said, it's a) chinese and b) has to be poised to go big. Made a large purchase of planes and is one of the official Olympic carriers.
BIDU
Baidu.com. J is going to kill me when she sees this. Told her to drop Google and I still stand by that assessment in a game situation. Baidu is the Chinese version of Google. I'm in it in the short-term to make a quick (fake) buck. While I could only get 35 shares out of it I think it'll move to $300 giving me a pretty hefty return.
I've already used up two PCI slots for two FireWire cards which added 5 FW 400 ports and 2 FW 800 ports to my Quicksilver G4, but not all of the slots are full...
Look for this beautiful computer on eBay sometime next year. Some specs, in case you want to make a great offer now:
- Dual 1GHz PowerPC G4 Processors
- 1.5 GB factory-installed RAM
- Dual 250 GB ATA hard drives, for half a terabyte of internal storage!
- 6 stable FW 400 ports and a 7th finicky one
- Two FW 800 ports
- Two USB ports (not USB 2.0)
- ATI Radeon 9800 Pro graphics card (Core Image and Motion 2.0 compatible)
- Airport Card (802.11b)
- Gigabit Ethernet
- 56kbps V.90 Modem
- Boots into OS 9
- SuperDrive (2X DVD-R)
- Apple Pro Keyboard and Pro Mouse
- Original OS install (9 and X) and Restore CDs included
- Original box/styrofoam included
- Dust-free and polished regularly.
I'll also include the original NVIDIA GeForceMX video card, which has both VGA and ADC connectors.
More info from www.apple-history.com/?page=gallery&model=g4_quick_20....
Wall Street is cutting ratings on Apple (AAPL) in light of CEO Steve Jobs' leave of absence, but Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak is reassuring nervous investors Apple will persevere. Sort of.
Woz makes the good point that Apple products spend one to two years in development, so a Jobs absence of six months shouldn't impact Apple's product line too much. He also says that Steve will likely dream up all sorts of new Apple hits during his "rest."
And if Jobs doesn't come back? "One careful mind ... Read more...(ALLEYINSIDER.COM)