gignyc
stars
#longcomment #comment #invisible art #theory of invisibility #art
“Well, folks, what if there actually was something called The Theory of Invisible Art?”
— One among many questions asked as a result of reading essays about Paul Jaisini.
#comment #? #Invisibility #theory of invisibility #invisible
Ron, Neil Klaw & Yustas are the same person.
Another Conspirator Theory Booooooog Ron, Neil Klaw & Yustas are not the same person. Pay attention, Neil doesn’t even like me. He said we are members of a “cloyingly narcissistic mutual admiration schtick” or words to that effect, and that is stiff business, coming from such as he. Klaw
But the real problem is that the entire thing is an auto-fellating sack of shit as description or criticism… I don’t think I’ll be buying the print or the book… That being so,” the desire of man must have been in an endless existence and will continue to dwell in bodies and in works of art to which Wet Dream is an example.”
Okay Yustas, let’s get a few things straight. It is clear that you have issues, and you are attempting to drag this into a pointless gutter fight – as you have attempted to do with so many others. You are well known to operate for your own ends under several pseudonyms. Indeed, well over 12 months ago your writing and photographic practices were detailed at the club’s chronic journal . Indeed you do have questionable practices… I’m sure one or two celebs would be interested to see the manipulated images you have generated. But your calls for submission… That interested me! I have now discovered that you have spammed this request so often that Google identifies that you have pushed out the exact same post on more than 62000 occasions. Indeed in the club people have been extraordinarily tolerant of your practices…
#comment #gleitzeit
you have pushed out the same post on more than 62000 occasions.
From the previous post: “That interested me! I have now discovered that you have spammed this request so often that Google identifies that you have pushed out the exact same post on more than 62000 occasions.”
1997- ongoing statistics on Paul Jaisini, Marble Lady, Narcissus, Manifesto, etc. gleitzeit “hits” - number of page views, posts on the Internet, Internet searches, comments, emails, readership accounts to a substantial number. Documenting Gleitzeit is not done to acquire the exact number of Internet hits if it’s ten million hits or a hundred million. In the course of posting here the samples of how the Gleitzeit art mission formed the ideas I do see various numbers when google search fetches results on the keywords. Somewhere I saw “page view” counts in other places there’s sitemeters with over two million hits or 20,000. Most of the sites with essays could be found online or already removed since the websites now are non-functional and some content is archived some content is gone. As high as the numbers could go is not the concern.
Very interesting even mystifying for me to understand the human reaction and its mechanics of how and why people react certain way as they did and continue to react. The reaction manifests same way now as it did years ago so long as the formula remains the same: the receiver/reader is presented with the verbal description in a form of essay about oil painting by Paul Jaisini and no image of the artwork.
#outreach #invisible #Invisibility #theory of invisibility #invisible art
“I may not be able to tell you what good invisible art is, but I know it when I see it.”
#comment #invisible #invisible art
Schmoostis: get some help Do you really have nothing better to do than stir up problems on a board where no one wants you? Haven’t you figured it out yet? Don’t you see you are pushing your idiotic writing and pseudo-philosophy on people who couldn’t care less? Please—do yourself a favor and go somewhere else. We don’t care about your stupid art interest, your crappy writing or your need to puff up your own ego by sucking attention by stirring up decent people. You add nothing here, do you understand that? Your obnoxiousness has made you hated, don’t you see that? Please, before you are dragged out of your flee-bitten apartment by the scruff of your neck to the local mental institution, get some strong psychotropic medication! Leave these good people alone—find your attention someplace else. You don’t want to end up as just another bum muttering to himself in the New York gutter—you know—like Steve Martin in “The Jerk”— sitting in a bathtub mambling to yourself: “I used to be a well-known art critic and novelist and now I’m a basket case in the gutter.” Reach out and get some help before it’s too late.
#comment #invisible art #art #theory of invisibility
Catherine writes in regards to M/C Reviews Bio: Yustas has sent me some biographical info for M/C Reviews, which I’ve condensed to form the following: “Yustas Kotz-Gottlieb begun studying the piano at the age of 6, but when stage-fright prevented a career in music, she decided to concentrate on art. After a spell in Europe, where she was trained academically in painting, she found her true calling as a writer and art critic. Yustas is now working on a book about Paul Jaisini, the inventor of Gleitzeit art.”
#comment #photocopy #yustas kotz-gottlieb
I think the heart of what you are describing is the creative process, the act of carving, sculpting, bringing to life, something out of nothing. Gary/Harry was at his best when he made the comment about which side is up. But he became thin skinned when he thought I was laughing at (rather than with) him. Such a theory as you are involved with is easily misunderstood, and I think you are perhaps often misunderstood as well because you have no patience with fools. But if you take everything I said, in the context I said it, my musings in this area go some way to explain or at least to question just how man creates. I think you might do a screenplay about your experiences. It could be funny. Maybe you are right, maybe a book on art is the way to go. Or maybe, you could do an autobiographical book on your experiences. After all, in a sense, the poster is invisible. You are describing the experiences of an essentially invisible person in the electronic age. Have you noticed how differently people respond to you when you mail than when you talk? When people reply in writing, they tend to be boastful, arrogant, cruel, flaming… take Harry/Gary for instance. As a responder, he is often openly mean, snobbish and cruel. You saw him in real time, he is timid, uncertain and repressed.
#comment #invisible #invisible art
Ken writes regarding Manifesto Gleitzeit 3/21/00: You have the wrong number. There’s no one here with that neo pro anti (or whatever) anything. Copyright 2001 A Spacy Odyssey, (long version)
#comment #photocopy #gleitzeit
Ice writes on 3/3/00 the he enjoyed the Paul Jaisini Manifesto thing.
James writes re: Narcissus 3/3/00 Fortunately, the story is just that… a myth.
stars
#longcomment #comment #invisible art #theory of invisibility #art
“Well, folks, what if there actually was something called The Theory of Invisible Art?”
— One among many questions asked as a result of reading essays about Paul Jaisini.
#comment #? #Invisibility #theory of invisibility #invisible
Ron, Neil Klaw & Yustas are the same person.
Another Conspirator Theory Booooooog Ron, Neil Klaw & Yustas are not the same person. Pay attention, Neil doesn’t even like me. He said we are members of a “cloyingly narcissistic mutual admiration schtick” or words to that effect, and that is stiff business, coming from such as he. Klaw
But the real problem is that the entire thing is an auto-fellating sack of shit as description or criticism… I don’t think I’ll be buying the print or the book… That being so,” the desire of man must have been in an endless existence and will continue to dwell in bodies and in works of art to which Wet Dream is an example.”
Okay Yustas, let’s get a few things straight. It is clear that you have issues, and you are attempting to drag this into a pointless gutter fight – as you have attempted to do with so many others. You are well known to operate for your own ends under several pseudonyms. Indeed, well over 12 months ago your writing and photographic practices were detailed at the club’s chronic journal . Indeed you do have questionable practices… I’m sure one or two celebs would be interested to see the manipulated images you have generated. But your calls for submission… That interested me! I have now discovered that you have spammed this request so often that Google identifies that you have pushed out the exact same post on more than 62000 occasions. Indeed in the club people have been extraordinarily tolerant of your practices…
#comment #gleitzeit
you have pushed out the same post on more than 62000 occasions.
From the previous post: “That interested me! I have now discovered that you have spammed this request so often that Google identifies that you have pushed out the exact same post on more than 62000 occasions.”
1997- ongoing statistics on Paul Jaisini, Marble Lady, Narcissus, Manifesto, etc. gleitzeit “hits” - number of page views, posts on the Internet, Internet searches, comments, emails, readership accounts to a substantial number. Documenting Gleitzeit is not done to acquire the exact number of Internet hits if it’s ten million hits or a hundred million. In the course of posting here the samples of how the Gleitzeit art mission formed the ideas I do see various numbers when google search fetches results on the keywords. Somewhere I saw “page view” counts in other places there’s sitemeters with over two million hits or 20,000. Most of the sites with essays could be found online or already removed since the websites now are non-functional and some content is archived some content is gone. As high as the numbers could go is not the concern.
Very interesting even mystifying for me to understand the human reaction and its mechanics of how and why people react certain way as they did and continue to react. The reaction manifests same way now as it did years ago so long as the formula remains the same: the receiver/reader is presented with the verbal description in a form of essay about oil painting by Paul Jaisini and no image of the artwork.
#outreach #invisible #Invisibility #theory of invisibility #invisible art
“I may not be able to tell you what good invisible art is, but I know it when I see it.”
#comment #invisible #invisible art
Schmoostis: get some help Do you really have nothing better to do than stir up problems on a board where no one wants you? Haven’t you figured it out yet? Don’t you see you are pushing your idiotic writing and pseudo-philosophy on people who couldn’t care less? Please—do yourself a favor and go somewhere else. We don’t care about your stupid art interest, your crappy writing or your need to puff up your own ego by sucking attention by stirring up decent people. You add nothing here, do you understand that? Your obnoxiousness has made you hated, don’t you see that? Please, before you are dragged out of your flee-bitten apartment by the scruff of your neck to the local mental institution, get some strong psychotropic medication! Leave these good people alone—find your attention someplace else. You don’t want to end up as just another bum muttering to himself in the New York gutter—you know—like Steve Martin in “The Jerk”— sitting in a bathtub mambling to yourself: “I used to be a well-known art critic and novelist and now I’m a basket case in the gutter.” Reach out and get some help before it’s too late.
#comment #invisible art #art #theory of invisibility
Catherine writes in regards to M/C Reviews Bio: Yustas has sent me some biographical info for M/C Reviews, which I’ve condensed to form the following: “Yustas Kotz-Gottlieb begun studying the piano at the age of 6, but when stage-fright prevented a career in music, she decided to concentrate on art. After a spell in Europe, where she was trained academically in painting, she found her true calling as a writer and art critic. Yustas is now working on a book about Paul Jaisini, the inventor of Gleitzeit art.”
#comment #photocopy #yustas kotz-gottlieb
I think the heart of what you are describing is the creative process, the act of carving, sculpting, bringing to life, something out of nothing. Gary/Harry was at his best when he made the comment about which side is up. But he became thin skinned when he thought I was laughing at (rather than with) him. Such a theory as you are involved with is easily misunderstood, and I think you are perhaps often misunderstood as well because you have no patience with fools. But if you take everything I said, in the context I said it, my musings in this area go some way to explain or at least to question just how man creates. I think you might do a screenplay about your experiences. It could be funny. Maybe you are right, maybe a book on art is the way to go. Or maybe, you could do an autobiographical book on your experiences. After all, in a sense, the poster is invisible. You are describing the experiences of an essentially invisible person in the electronic age. Have you noticed how differently people respond to you when you mail than when you talk? When people reply in writing, they tend to be boastful, arrogant, cruel, flaming… take Harry/Gary for instance. As a responder, he is often openly mean, snobbish and cruel. You saw him in real time, he is timid, uncertain and repressed.
#comment #invisible #invisible art
Ken writes regarding Manifesto Gleitzeit 3/21/00: You have the wrong number. There’s no one here with that neo pro anti (or whatever) anything. Copyright 2001 A Spacy Odyssey, (long version)
#comment #photocopy #gleitzeit
Ice writes on 3/3/00 the he enjoyed the Paul Jaisini Manifesto thing.
James writes re: Narcissus 3/3/00 Fortunately, the story is just that… a myth.