Truth in science
The truth about dinosaurs.
Knowledge about dinosaurs didn't suddenly begin in the 19th century - or with the popularisation of evolution, as some would have us believe.
So what were dinosaurs called before Richard Owen coined the term 'dinosaur' in 1842?
They were already well known creatures.
They were documented for thousands of years in literature, historical documents, art, the Bible, folklore and stories - in cultures and civilisations all around the world.
Their previous, generic name (in English) was 'dragon'.
It is obvious that 'dragons' were not simply the imaginary or mythical creatures that evolutionists imply.
Some people (who should know better) try to make a distinction between dinosaurs and dragons, as though they were not the same creatures. They insist that dragons were just imaginary, but dinosaurs are real.
Dragon was simply the name given to dinosaurs before the word 'dinosaur' (meaning terrible lizard) was invented.
Why do some wish to deny the fact that dragons and dinosaurs are the same?
It can only be because they would have to explain how ancient people, throughout history, and in all nations and cultures, knew that such creatures as dinosaurs existed and what they looked like? They were not all expert palaeontologists.
The accounts of dragons in literature and art, and even official documents, demonstrate that ancient people knew dragons/dinosaurs as real, living creatures they had actual experience of.
creationwiki.org/File:Dragon_Book.jpg
Why are we not told that?
See forbidden history:
www.forbidden-history.com/dinosaurfacts-owen.html
Why are we lied to in the name of science?
www.nwcreation.net/dinosdragons.html
Dinosaurs are widely presented as icons of progressive evolution. They are used to influence and persuade children from a young age that evolution is a fact.
However, they are not evidence for evolution at all - there is no sound evidence that dinosaurs/dragons evolved from anything else.
There are no intermediates in the fossil record which show the gradual, progressive evolution of dinosaurs.
It would have taken hundreds of millions of years for dinosaurs to evolve, so there should be numerous examples of transitional creatures preserved as fossils, but there are none. Dinosaurs just appear suddenly in the fossil record with no credible, fossil evidence showing their gradual development.
The truth about dinosaurs.
Knowledge about dinosaurs didn't suddenly begin in the 19th century - or with the popularisation of evolution, as some would have us believe.
So what were dinosaurs called before Richard Owen coined the term 'dinosaur' in 1842?
They were already well known creatures.
They were documented for thousands of years in literature, historical documents, art, the Bible, folklore and stories - in cultures and civilisations all around the world.
Their previous, generic name (in English) was 'dragon'.
It is obvious that 'dragons' were not simply the imaginary or mythical creatures that evolutionists imply.
Some people (who should know better) try to make a distinction between dinosaurs and dragons, as though they were not the same creatures. They insist that dragons were just imaginary, but dinosaurs are real.
Dragon was simply the name given to dinosaurs before the word 'dinosaur' (meaning terrible lizard) was invented.
Why do some wish to deny the fact that dragons and dinosaurs are the same?
It can only be because they would have to explain how ancient people, throughout history, and in all nations and cultures, knew that such creatures as dinosaurs existed and what they looked like? They were not all expert palaeontologists.
The accounts of dragons in literature and art, and even official documents, demonstrate that ancient people knew dragons/dinosaurs as real, living creatures they had actual experience of.
creationwiki.org/File:Dragon_Book.jpg
Why are we not told that?
See forbidden history:
www.forbidden-history.com/dinosaurfacts-owen.html
Why are we lied to in the name of science?
www.nwcreation.net/dinosdragons.html
Dinosaurs are widely presented as icons of progressive evolution. They are used to influence and persuade children from a young age that evolution is a fact.
However, they are not evidence for evolution at all - there is no sound evidence that dinosaurs/dragons evolved from anything else.
There are no intermediates in the fossil record which show the gradual, progressive evolution of dinosaurs.
It would have taken hundreds of millions of years for dinosaurs to evolve, so there should be numerous examples of transitional creatures preserved as fossils, but there are none. Dinosaurs just appear suddenly in the fossil record with no credible, fossil evidence showing their gradual development.