Truth in science
Fossil Fish - the truth about progressive evolution.
The truth about progressive evolution.
An incredible story of 'creative' MISTAKES.
Fish are alleged to be among the first vertebrates (having a flexible backbone or vertebrae) to evolve from invertebrates (having no backbone, or any other bones).
Neo Darwinists claim - that all the entirely new, genetic information required for the construction of bones and flexible backbones, with all the interlocking vertebrae etc. (see picture), was created (from no previously existing, genetic information for any type of bones) by means of a series of mutations (mutations are genetic, copying MISTAKES). And with each of the many, intermediate, mutational steps becoming preserved and dominant in the gene pool, by providing a significant survival or reproductive advantage (natural selection).
To clarify, in simple terms, exactly what is proposed by evolutionists for the creation of new, constructive, genetic information is - a genetic mistake (mutation) is preserved and becomes dominant in the gene pool - followed by another mistake being preserved and becoming dominant - followed by another mistake being preserved and becoming dominant - over and over and over again, an accumulative series of mistakes - with each new mistake built on previous mistakes .... A mistake of a mistake of a mistake, etc. We also have to bear in mind that, to produce a backbone from scratch, the numerous, random mutations or copying mistakes required would, by sheer chance, have to all be relevant to the genetic instructions for exactly the same part of the body, i.e. the spine. And even if the genetic information for some sort of proto-bone was created by random, genetic, copying mistakes, it could just as easily be destroyed by further, random, copying mistakes somewhere along the line.
So that is the evolutionary mechanism which allegedly created all the new, genetic information for bones and a flexible backbone!
In fact, it is the same mechanism proposed by evolutionists for the origin of every single scrap of genetic information for the construction of every body part, anatomical feature and biological system in every living thing, including humans. Which means that the whole human genome is the result of billions of random, genetic, copying mistakes (apart from the original, genetic information in the first living cell). That original, genetic information encoded in the DNA of the first living cell, apparently, just appeared by some unknown process in the so-called, primordial soup, and then proceeded to mutate (randomly make copying mistakes of itself), billions of times - eventually creating the whole human genome - and the genome of every living thing, over millions of years!
The theory of evolution - laid bare - is more aptly called - the theory of 'Creative Mistakes'.
Mutations are bad, we would expect mistakes to be harmful, and most of them are, they cause illness, deformities and cancer. They are not something desirable, in any sense. Some are neutral in effect, which means the adverse effects are not obviously harmful, or the damage they do is not significant to cause an immediate problem.
Anything that can be described as a beneficial mutation is extremely rare, and it is doubtful if a truly, beneficial mutation (without some adverse effects) exists at all, there are no good, observable examples of any. What is certain is that they do not add the sort of useful, constructive, genetic information, which would be required as a mechanism for creating entirely, new body parts, organs etc.
There is no fossil evidence whatsoever for this amazing transformation by means of genetic MISTAKES. There are no transitional or intermediate examples of a developing backbone.
Fish appear in the fossil record, fully formed and 100% functional, like the one in the picture. And they remain exactly the same today.
The fossil fish in the picture, claimed to have lived many millions of years ago, is just like any regular fish, you will see swimming around in seas, rivers and lakes today.
The fossil record shows that fish are no more advanced or evolved today, after umpteen millions of alleged years, than the specimen shown here.
Next time you have a whole fish for dinner, take a close look at its amazing, flexible backbone, and remember this - some people want you to believe that such a marvellous construction was created entirely by a long series of random mistakes - mistake upon mistake, upon mistake ... and they want you to believe that is 'science'.
An incredible story indeed!
Fossil Fish - the truth about progressive evolution.
The truth about progressive evolution.
An incredible story of 'creative' MISTAKES.
Fish are alleged to be among the first vertebrates (having a flexible backbone or vertebrae) to evolve from invertebrates (having no backbone, or any other bones).
Neo Darwinists claim - that all the entirely new, genetic information required for the construction of bones and flexible backbones, with all the interlocking vertebrae etc. (see picture), was created (from no previously existing, genetic information for any type of bones) by means of a series of mutations (mutations are genetic, copying MISTAKES). And with each of the many, intermediate, mutational steps becoming preserved and dominant in the gene pool, by providing a significant survival or reproductive advantage (natural selection).
To clarify, in simple terms, exactly what is proposed by evolutionists for the creation of new, constructive, genetic information is - a genetic mistake (mutation) is preserved and becomes dominant in the gene pool - followed by another mistake being preserved and becoming dominant - followed by another mistake being preserved and becoming dominant - over and over and over again, an accumulative series of mistakes - with each new mistake built on previous mistakes .... A mistake of a mistake of a mistake, etc. We also have to bear in mind that, to produce a backbone from scratch, the numerous, random mutations or copying mistakes required would, by sheer chance, have to all be relevant to the genetic instructions for exactly the same part of the body, i.e. the spine. And even if the genetic information for some sort of proto-bone was created by random, genetic, copying mistakes, it could just as easily be destroyed by further, random, copying mistakes somewhere along the line.
So that is the evolutionary mechanism which allegedly created all the new, genetic information for bones and a flexible backbone!
In fact, it is the same mechanism proposed by evolutionists for the origin of every single scrap of genetic information for the construction of every body part, anatomical feature and biological system in every living thing, including humans. Which means that the whole human genome is the result of billions of random, genetic, copying mistakes (apart from the original, genetic information in the first living cell). That original, genetic information encoded in the DNA of the first living cell, apparently, just appeared by some unknown process in the so-called, primordial soup, and then proceeded to mutate (randomly make copying mistakes of itself), billions of times - eventually creating the whole human genome - and the genome of every living thing, over millions of years!
The theory of evolution - laid bare - is more aptly called - the theory of 'Creative Mistakes'.
Mutations are bad, we would expect mistakes to be harmful, and most of them are, they cause illness, deformities and cancer. They are not something desirable, in any sense. Some are neutral in effect, which means the adverse effects are not obviously harmful, or the damage they do is not significant to cause an immediate problem.
Anything that can be described as a beneficial mutation is extremely rare, and it is doubtful if a truly, beneficial mutation (without some adverse effects) exists at all, there are no good, observable examples of any. What is certain is that they do not add the sort of useful, constructive, genetic information, which would be required as a mechanism for creating entirely, new body parts, organs etc.
There is no fossil evidence whatsoever for this amazing transformation by means of genetic MISTAKES. There are no transitional or intermediate examples of a developing backbone.
Fish appear in the fossil record, fully formed and 100% functional, like the one in the picture. And they remain exactly the same today.
The fossil fish in the picture, claimed to have lived many millions of years ago, is just like any regular fish, you will see swimming around in seas, rivers and lakes today.
The fossil record shows that fish are no more advanced or evolved today, after umpteen millions of alleged years, than the specimen shown here.
Next time you have a whole fish for dinner, take a close look at its amazing, flexible backbone, and remember this - some people want you to believe that such a marvellous construction was created entirely by a long series of random mistakes - mistake upon mistake, upon mistake ... and they want you to believe that is 'science'.
An incredible story indeed!