View allAll Photos Tagged absorption
For the test film of the Jupiter-9 lens I mounted it on the Leningrad camera (see below for detail about the lens and the camera). The lens was fitted with a generic yellow filter (screw-on 49mm) and a generic cylindrical metal shade hood designed for a 50mm lens. By safety, a lens cap fitted on the hood (55mm) was also used to protect the shutter curtains from an accidental sun burning (I forgot twice to remove the cap before shooting...)
I loaded the Leningrad with a Rollei RPX 400 film exposed for 250 ISO to compensate the absorption of the yellow filter. The light metering was done using a Minolta Autometer III with the 10° viewer for selective metering privileging the shadows areas.
The viewer of the Leningrad has build-in frame for the 85mm and is fully compensated for the parallax error.
View Nr. 19 : 1/250s f/11 focusing @ 25m
Le "Mistral" sur le Rhône au Pont Wilson, February 17, 2025
69003 Lyon
France
After completion, the film was rewound and processed using 350 mL of Adox Adonal (Agfa Rodinal) developer prepared at the dilution 1+25 for 12min15 at 20°C.
Digitizing was made using a Sony A7 camera (ILCE-7, 24MP) fitted to a Minolta Auto Bellows III with the Minolta slide duplication accessory and Minolta Macro Bellow lens 1:3.5 f=50mm. The diffuse light source was a LED panel CineStill Cine-lite.
The RAW files obtained were inverted within the latest version available of Adobe Lightroom Classic (version 14.2) and edited to the final jpeg pictures without intermediate file. They are presented either as printer files with a frame or the full size JPEG's together with some documentary smartphone color pictures.
About the camera :
After several months, my local repair shop gave up to repair my first exemplary of Leningrad camera. I got that GOMZ Leningrad for less than the price of the lens (50€) a year ago (February 24, 2024, flic.kr/s/aHBqjBftyP) at the monthly collector meeting in Saint-Bonnet-de-Mure, near Lyon, France. I looked then again for a working one.
Leningrad’s are fascinating Russian range-finder 35mm camera’s produced in Leningrad (USSR) / Saint-Petersburg, from 1956 to 1968 at about 76.000 units. It is not really a rare camera but appears only from time-to-time in the classical collector’s networks.
The Leningrad camera project was developed by GOMZ company (ГОМЗ, Государственный оптико-механический завод, Ленинград = Gosularstvennyi Optiko-Mekhanicheskii Zavod =State Optical-Mechanical Factory), Leningrad, USSR. The Leningrad ’s were constructed to a very high degree of precision and likely the most advanced rangefinder ever made at that time in Russia. At the 1958 World Exposition in Brussels, the Leningrad was awarded the "Grand Prix de Bruxelles”. Modified Leningrads were also used in the Soviet space program. In addition to a complex parallax-compensated multi-focal (for 3.5, 5, 8.5 and 13.5cm) collimated system, the camera has a built-in spring-powered mechanical motor for an automated film advance after each view taken. The Leningrad mounts the 39mm Leica-type thread lenses, especially of the Jupiter series of lens derived of classical Carl Zeiss lenses designed for the Contax (Biogon 3.5cm and Sonnar’s 5, 8.5 and 13.5cm).
In 1965, GOMZ became LOMO ( ЛОМО, Ленинградское oптико-механическое oбъединение (Leningradskoïe Optiko-Mekhanitcheskoïe Obiedinienie) that is still existing, producing instrumental optical devices (www.lomo.ru).
On eBay, I focused on a LOMO Leningrad year 1965 in working condition but without the original film plate. I got the camera for 130€ including the leather bag and a standard lens Jupiter-8 1:2 f=5cm. The seller adapted cleanly a different film plate that looked to work, but my idea was to use the camera back of my faulty Leningrad. This film plate may a precision glass plate special designed for optimum film transport and optical planarity. I received my new Leningrad on January 31, 2025 in good condition.
After a very careful inspection and a detailled cleaning, I decided to make a test film using a FOMAPAN 200 black-and-white film. On the Leningrad it is said that there is absolutely no way to check the correct film advance during the shooting session. The rewind should not be up since the mechanical forces induced would be too high for the spring-powered spooling barrel. The film should be also in a quality not too tight film cartridge and should be checked before use. This stressful machine should be manipulated with maximum care when not familiar with it.
About the lens Jupiter-9:
New in my collection in Feb. 2025, this very popular lens Jupiter-9 1:2.8 f=85mm for my Zorki’s and Leningrad camera’s. The lens was produced in 1978 by the LZOS company (Лыткаринский завод Оптического Стекла , Lytkarino Zavod Optychisovo Sticklo) located in Lytkarino (about 100 km Noth to Moscow).
I sourced a clean exemplary in Germany at regular price given the popularity of the Jupiter-9 (170€) with the Leica 39mm thread mount, front and rear caps plus the lens black storage canister. The lens is popular especially among videographers due to its peculiar bokeh and perfectly round shaped diaphragm made of 15 blades.
Originally, the Jupiter 9 is based on the design of the Carl Zeiss Sonnar designed for the Zeiss Ikon Contax in the years 1930’s. Production began in USSR in 1948, when the lens was initially called the ЗК-85 (Sonnar Kransogorsk) and it was assembled using mostly German parts in Contax/Kiev mount. The lens was also adapted to Zorki (M39) mount to fit the Zorki cameras early in production It appears, for both Zorki and Kiev mount, in a 1949 catalogue. By 1951 the name changes to Jupiter 9 (Юпитер-9). The lens has seven glass elements in three groups; a single glass at the front, and two cemented groups of three. All versions of the lens are coated. It was made by the KMZ (Красногорский механический завод, Krasnogorski Mekhanicheskii Zavod) and LZOS factories, in Leica 39 mm thread mount for Fed and Zorki rangefinders, but originally it was a Contax bayonet used in Kiev cameras. Jupiter-9 lenses were also made at the Arsenal factory in Ukraine, for Kiev rangefinders,but initially released as KMZ. It was later adapted for M42-mount Zenit SLR cameras, with an M24×1 thread mount.
Nike Air Force 1 High, Menâs Size 11.5, Black, Iridescent, UPC: 00886691908005, 2016, Padded high-cut collar, Full-length Nike Air unit, Ankle strap, Iridescent accents, leather upper, Black rubber midsole and outsole, Nike AIR printed on heel, Nike Swoosh on the sides, Ankle strap for security, tongue with Nike Air branding, Midsole Air-sole for impact absorption, Rubber outsole, Air-Sole cushioning unit, reddealsonline, redd3413
via
Sound panels reduce sound and enhance the experience and comfort in any given space. Sound absorption creates a great atmosphere by filtering out unwanted sounds from outside the room and from sounds bouncing around inside the room.
But the question of how many sound panels do I need is not always an easy question to answer. Multiple factors influence the number of panels you need.
In this article, we’ll explore a few of the factors you need to consider before choosing the number of sound panels for your room.
Shape & Size Of The Room
It probably comes as no surprise that the larger the room size, the more panels you’ll need for optimal sound absorption. Larger rooms produce more echo and more reverberation, requiring a higher level of protection to prevent sound from bouncing around the room and onto other surfaces.
The shape of a room will also affect how sound travels in and around it. A high ceiling will completely change the acoustics of a similar-sized room with lower ceilings. More height = and more space = more reverberation.
Rooms with straight, square, or rectangular walls are pretty straightforward by placing sound panels around the perimeter. But spaces with high-ceiling can benefit from sound panels on the ceiling to reduce the reverberation. Longer rooms have different problems to solve.
So before you decide on the number of panels you need, it’s important to take into consideration the size and shape of the room.
Materials In The Room
The contents of the room are important to how sound travels and is absorbed. Does your space have carpet or hardwood floors? Are the walls drywall, concrete, or wood? Is it heavily furnished or sparse? Questions like these are critical to determining the type and number of acoustical panels are needed for any given room.
Remember that hard surfaces reflect more sound than soft surfaces. Ceramic tile floors will reflect a lot more sound than carpet for example. A room full of plush couches will reflect less sound than a room full of metal chairs.
The Purpose Of The Room
The purpose of the room won’t directly affect the sound levels but is more so used to determine what is an acceptable level of noise and sound reverberation. Is your room a theater? An office? A home recording studio?
All of these rooms require different levels of noise reduction to suit their unique needs. There is no one-size-fits-all when it comes to the acoustics of a room.
For many spaces, it’s not just the amount of sound that needs consideration, but the frequency as well. Different panels will absorb different frequencies, and in general, a thinner panel will absorb higher frequencies, while a thicker panel will absorb lower frequencies.
Different materials inside the panel and the outer wrapping will affect how the panel reduces noise, and which frequencies it takes out the most.
Just like using too few panels will not reduce the sound enough, using too many panels can deaden the sound too much and produce an unnatural and undesirable effect. Reverberation is natural, and important for many rooms. Too many panels in the wrong space results in a room sounding “dead”, which is not what you want unless you’re in a recording studio or similar space.
Positioning Of The Sound Panels
The position of the sound panels plays an important role in how sound is absorbed and reflected. In general, you want to place sound panels at the first reflection points, which is the first area sound would otherwise bounce in a space.
It is recommended to place panels on the sidewalls, ceilings, corners, or the back wall to deal with the first reflections. The size, and shape of the room as well as sound source and type will all play a part in determining the best place to put the panels.
How Many Do I Need?
The short answer to this question is in general you want to have 10-30% of the area covered. However, as we explained above, several factors will determine the exact number and type. You can also use this formula as a rough guide.
Cubic Volume of the room x 3% = square footage of product
Height x Width x Depth x 0.03 = Sq/Ft
These calculations and estimates are just guides, however. If you want your room to have the best soundproofing and absorption possible, it’s best to contact an expert to help you make the right decision.
Each room is different and unique. Call Specialty Interiors and speak to one of our trained sound panel specialists who will answer all your questions and help you choose the best panels for your room.
The post How Many Sound Panels Do I Need? first appeared on Winnipeg's Leader in Flooring & Ceiling Tiles. specialtyinteriors.ca/2021/11/how-many-sound-panels-do-i-...
Nike Air Force 1 High Flax, GS, Size 5Y, Wheat, Gum, 922066-203, Outdoor Green, Gum, UPC 00883212095992, ‘Flax’ collection, outdoor green accents, tonal flax Gum outsole, Flax nubuck upper, Gum Out Sole, Perforated detailing on the toe box, Perforations for breathability, Nike Swoosh on the sides, Ankle strap for security, Nubuck tongue with Nike Air branding, Midsole Air-sole for impact absorption, Nike Air branding on the heel, Red Deals Online eBay store
Nike Air Max 1 GS Mars Stone, Size 6Y, Sail, Vintage Coral, 807602-103, UPC 00886736616735, Release Year 2018, Breathable textile mesh upper with leather overlays, Round toe and secure lace up closure, Textile lining with cushioned footbed for comfort, Air Max unit in heel for maximum impact protection, Rubber outsole with modified waffle pattern for traction, Visible Air-Sole unit in the heel for impact protection and comfort, Visible air sole unit, mesh and suede upper, debut in 1987, Air-Sole unit, Air Max technology, impact absorption, runners,
A short visit to Frederik Meijer Garden's and Sculpture Park today to break in my replacement camera (yes, I broke the other one too many times).
Oh, they are also beginning to decorate the indoor Christmas trees from around the world.
It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas...
Acoustic Sound Absorption 3D PVC Board/Panel for Wall Decoration.
Usage:
Parlor, Bedroom, Office, Meeting Room, Hotel, KTV.
More from xmnoya.en.made-in-china.com/product/EoZJvBqMlspV/China-Ac...
For the test film of the Jupiter-9 lens I mounted it on the Leningrad camera (see below for detail about the lens and the camera). The lens was fitted with a generic yellow filter (screw-on 49mm) and a generic cylindrical metal shade hood designed for a 50mm lens. By safety, a lens cap fitted on the hood (55mm) was also used to protect the shutter curtains from an accidental sun burning (I forgot twice to remove the cap before shooting...)
I loaded the Leningrad with a Rollei RPX 400 film exposed for 250 ISO to compensate the absorption of the yellow filter. The light metering was done using a Minolta Autometer III with the 10° viewer for selective metering privileging the shadows areas.
The viewer of the Leningrad has build-in frame for the 85mm and is fully compensated for the parallax error.
View Nr. 19 : 1/250s f/11 focusing @ 25m
Le "Mistral" sur le Rhône au Pont Wilson, February 17, 2025
69003 Lyon
France
After completion, the film was rewound and processed using 350 mL of Adox Adonal (Agfa Rodinal) developer prepared at the dilution 1+25 for 12min15 at 20°C.
Digitizing was made using a Sony A7 camera (ILCE-7, 24MP) fitted to a Minolta Auto Bellows III with the Minolta slide duplication accessory and Minolta Macro Bellow lens 1:3.5 f=50mm. The diffuse light source was a LED panel CineStill Cine-lite.
The RAW files obtained were inverted within the latest version available of Adobe Lightroom Classic (version 14.2) and edited to the final jpeg pictures without intermediate file. They are presented either as printer files with a frame or the full size JPEG's together with some documentary smartphone color pictures.
About the camera :
After several months, my local repair shop gave up to repair my first exemplary of Leningrad camera. I got that GOMZ Leningrad for less than the price of the lens (50€) a year ago (February 24, 2024, flic.kr/s/aHBqjBftyP) at the monthly collector meeting in Saint-Bonnet-de-Mure, near Lyon, France. I looked then again for a working one.
Leningrad’s are fascinating Russian range-finder 35mm camera’s produced in Leningrad (USSR) / Saint-Petersburg, from 1956 to 1968 at about 76.000 units. It is not really a rare camera but appears only from time-to-time in the classical collector’s networks.
The Leningrad camera project was developed by GOMZ company (ГОМЗ, Государственный оптико-механический завод, Ленинград = Gosularstvennyi Optiko-Mekhanicheskii Zavod =State Optical-Mechanical Factory), Leningrad, USSR. The Leningrad ’s were constructed to a very high degree of precision and likely the most advanced rangefinder ever made at that time in Russia. At the 1958 World Exposition in Brussels, the Leningrad was awarded the "Grand Prix de Bruxelles”. Modified Leningrads were also used in the Soviet space program. In addition to a complex parallax-compensated multi-focal (for 3.5, 5, 8.5 and 13.5cm) collimated system, the camera has a built-in spring-powered mechanical motor for an automated film advance after each view taken. The Leningrad mounts the 39mm Leica-type thread lenses, especially of the Jupiter series of lens derived of classical Carl Zeiss lenses designed for the Contax (Biogon 3.5cm and Sonnar’s 5, 8.5 and 13.5cm).
In 1965, GOMZ became LOMO ( ЛОМО, Ленинградское oптико-механическое oбъединение (Leningradskoïe Optiko-Mekhanitcheskoïe Obiedinienie) that is still existing, producing instrumental optical devices (www.lomo.ru).
On eBay, I focused on a LOMO Leningrad year 1965 in working condition but without the original film plate. I got the camera for 130€ including the leather bag and a standard lens Jupiter-8 1:2 f=5cm. The seller adapted cleanly a different film plate that looked to work, but my idea was to use the camera back of my faulty Leningrad. This film plate may a precision glass plate special designed for optimum film transport and optical planarity. I received my new Leningrad on January 31, 2025 in good condition.
After a very careful inspection and a detailled cleaning, I decided to make a test film using a FOMAPAN 200 black-and-white film. On the Leningrad it is said that there is absolutely no way to check the correct film advance during the shooting session. The rewind should not be up since the mechanical forces induced would be too high for the spring-powered spooling barrel. The film should be also in a quality not too tight film cartridge and should be checked before use. This stressful machine should be manipulated with maximum care when not familiar with it.
About the lens Jupiter-9:
New in my collection in Feb. 2025, this very popular lens Jupiter-9 1:2.8 f=85mm for my Zorki’s and Leningrad camera’s. The lens was produced in 1978 by the LZOS company (Лыткаринский завод Оптического Стекла , Lytkarino Zavod Optychisovo Sticklo) located in Lytkarino (about 100 km Noth to Moscow).
I sourced a clean exemplary in Germany at regular price given the popularity of the Jupiter-9 (170€) with the Leica 39mm thread mount, front and rear caps plus the lens black storage canister. The lens is popular especially among videographers due to its peculiar bokeh and perfectly round shaped diaphragm made of 15 blades.
Originally, the Jupiter 9 is based on the design of the Carl Zeiss Sonnar designed for the Zeiss Ikon Contax in the years 1930’s. Production began in USSR in 1948, when the lens was initially called the ЗК-85 (Sonnar Kransogorsk) and it was assembled using mostly German parts in Contax/Kiev mount. The lens was also adapted to Zorki (M39) mount to fit the Zorki cameras early in production It appears, for both Zorki and Kiev mount, in a 1949 catalogue. By 1951 the name changes to Jupiter 9 (Юпитер-9). The lens has seven glass elements in three groups; a single glass at the front, and two cemented groups of three. All versions of the lens are coated. It was made by the KMZ (Красногорский механический завод, Krasnogorski Mekhanicheskii Zavod) and LZOS factories, in Leica 39 mm thread mount for Fed and Zorki rangefinders, but originally it was a Contax bayonet used in Kiev cameras. Jupiter-9 lenses were also made at the Arsenal factory in Ukraine, for Kiev rangefinders,but initially released as KMZ. It was later adapted for M42-mount Zenit SLR cameras, with an M24×1 thread mount.
For the test film of the Jupiter-9 lens I mounted it on the Leningrad camera (see below for detail about the lens and the camera). The lens was fitted with a generic yellow filter (screw-on 49mm) and a generic cylindrical metal shade hood designed for a 50mm lens. By safety, a lens cap fitted on the hood (55mm) was also used to protect the shutter curtains from an accidental sun burning (I forgot twice to remove the cap before shooting...)
I loaded the Leningrad with a Rollei RPX 400 film exposed for 250 ISO to compensate the absorption of the yellow filter. The light metering was done using a Minolta Autometer III with the 10° viewer for selective metering privileging the shadows areas.
The viewer of the Leningrad has build-in frame for the 85mm and is fully compensated for the parallax error.
View Nr. 21 : 1/250s f/11 focusing @ infinite
Le "Mistral" sur le Rhône au Pont Wilson, February 17, 2025
69003 Lyon
France
After completion, the film was rewound and processed using 350 mL of Adox Adonal (Agfa Rodinal) developer prepared at the dilution 1+25 for 12min15 at 20°C.
Digitizing was made using a Sony A7 camera (ILCE-7, 24MP) fitted to a Minolta Auto Bellows III with the Minolta slide duplication accessory and Minolta Macro Bellow lens 1:3.5 f=50mm. The diffuse light source was a LED panel CineStill Cine-lite.
The RAW files obtained were inverted within the latest version available of Adobe Lightroom Classic (version 14.2) and edited to the final jpeg pictures without intermediate file. They are presented either as printer files with a frame or the full size JPEG's together with some documentary smartphone color pictures.
About the camera :
After several months, my local repair shop gave up to repair my first exemplary of Leningrad camera. I got that GOMZ Leningrad for less than the price of the lens (50€) a year ago (February 24, 2024, flic.kr/s/aHBqjBftyP) at the monthly collector meeting in Saint-Bonnet-de-Mure, near Lyon, France. I looked then again for a working one.
Leningrad’s are fascinating Russian range-finder 35mm camera’s produced in Leningrad (USSR) / Saint-Petersburg, from 1956 to 1968 at about 76.000 units. It is not really a rare camera but appears only from time-to-time in the classical collector’s networks.
The Leningrad camera project was developed by GOMZ company (ГОМЗ, Государственный оптико-механический завод, Ленинград = Gosularstvennyi Optiko-Mekhanicheskii Zavod =State Optical-Mechanical Factory), Leningrad, USSR. The Leningrad ’s were constructed to a very high degree of precision and likely the most advanced rangefinder ever made at that time in Russia. At the 1958 World Exposition in Brussels, the Leningrad was awarded the "Grand Prix de Bruxelles”. Modified Leningrads were also used in the Soviet space program. In addition to a complex parallax-compensated multi-focal (for 3.5, 5, 8.5 and 13.5cm) collimated system, the camera has a built-in spring-powered mechanical motor for an automated film advance after each view taken. The Leningrad mounts the 39mm Leica-type thread lenses, especially of the Jupiter series of lens derived of classical Carl Zeiss lenses designed for the Contax (Biogon 3.5cm and Sonnar’s 5, 8.5 and 13.5cm).
In 1965, GOMZ became LOMO ( ЛОМО, Ленинградское oптико-механическое oбъединение (Leningradskoïe Optiko-Mekhanitcheskoïe Obiedinienie) that is still existing, producing instrumental optical devices (www.lomo.ru).
On eBay, I focused on a LOMO Leningrad year 1965 in working condition but without the original film plate. I got the camera for 130€ including the leather bag and a standard lens Jupiter-8 1:2 f=5cm. The seller adapted cleanly a different film plate that looked to work, but my idea was to use the camera back of my faulty Leningrad. This film plate may a precision glass plate special designed for optimum film transport and optical planarity. I received my new Leningrad on January 31, 2025 in good condition.
After a very careful inspection and a detailled cleaning, I decided to make a test film using a FOMAPAN 200 black-and-white film. On the Leningrad it is said that there is absolutely no way to check the correct film advance during the shooting session. The rewind should not be up since the mechanical forces induced would be too high for the spring-powered spooling barrel. The film should be also in a quality not too tight film cartridge and should be checked before use. This stressful machine should be manipulated with maximum care when not familiar with it.
About the lens Jupiter-9:
New in my collection in Feb. 2025, this very popular lens Jupiter-9 1:2.8 f=85mm for my Zorki’s and Leningrad camera’s. The lens was produced in 1978 by the LZOS company (Лыткаринский завод Оптического Стекла , Lytkarino Zavod Optychisovo Sticklo) located in Lytkarino (about 100 km Noth to Moscow).
I sourced a clean exemplary in Germany at regular price given the popularity of the Jupiter-9 (170€) with the Leica 39mm thread mount, front and rear caps plus the lens black storage canister. The lens is popular especially among videographers due to its peculiar bokeh and perfectly round shaped diaphragm made of 15 blades.
Originally, the Jupiter 9 is based on the design of the Carl Zeiss Sonnar designed for the Zeiss Ikon Contax in the years 1930’s. Production began in USSR in 1948, when the lens was initially called the ЗК-85 (Sonnar Kransogorsk) and it was assembled using mostly German parts in Contax/Kiev mount. The lens was also adapted to Zorki (M39) mount to fit the Zorki cameras early in production It appears, for both Zorki and Kiev mount, in a 1949 catalogue. By 1951 the name changes to Jupiter 9 (Юпитер-9). The lens has seven glass elements in three groups; a single glass at the front, and two cemented groups of three. All versions of the lens are coated. It was made by the KMZ (Красногорский механический завод, Krasnogorski Mekhanicheskii Zavod) and LZOS factories, in Leica 39 mm thread mount for Fed and Zorki rangefinders, but originally it was a Contax bayonet used in Kiev cameras. Jupiter-9 lenses were also made at the Arsenal factory in Ukraine, for Kiev rangefinders,but initially released as KMZ. It was later adapted for M42-mount Zenit SLR cameras, with an M24×1 thread mount.
Nike Air Force 1 Hi Suede University Red, Women’s Size 8.5, Gum Brown, 749266-601, UPC 00888410279908, 2015, University Red suede upper, “AIR” printed on heel, Perforated detailing on the toe box, Perforations for breathability, Nike Swoosh on the sides, Ankle strap for security, Nubuck tongue with Nike Air branding, Midsole Air-sole for impact absorption, Tonal branding on the side panels, Nike Air branding on the heel, Rubber outsole for increased traction, rubber foam sole, Air-Sole cushioning unit, gum rubber sole reddealsonline, sneakerhead, eBay shoes, Authenticate, Authenticity Guarantee, Red Deals Online
Suspended time and absorption are central in our performative work. We perform „engrossed in an activity as if in denial of an audience“. We keep still. We move according to a choreographed path. We keep close to each other, we touch each other, we lie on the floor. From one tableau to the next. Holding the image for few minutes. One of us lies on a wooden plank. The whole leg, buttocks and lower back rest on the plank. Only shoulders and head touch the floor. The second figure is already doing a shoulderstand, bending the left knee and simultaneously stretching and leaning the right leg slightly over the head. The stretched leg remains leaning… The piece is inspired by the long scene in the sculpture garden at the Museum of Modern Art in New York from the film „Shadows“ by John Casavettes; Stills from Bob Fosse’s „All that Jazz“; photos of works by Yvonne Rainer and Rudolph von Laban and Kinesiology, physical therapy exercises.
Nike Air Force 1 High Flax, GS, Size 5Y, Wheat, Gum, 922066-203, Outdoor Green, Gum, UPC 00883212095992, ‘Flax’ collection, outdoor green accents, tonal flax Gum outsole, Flax nubuck upper, Gum Out Sole, Perforated detailing on the toe box, Perforations for breathability, Nike Swoosh on the sides, Ankle strap for security, Nubuck tongue with Nike Air branding, Midsole Air-sole for impact absorption, Nike Air branding on the heel, Red Deals Online eBay store
Nike Air Force 1 High Flax, GS, Size 5Y, Wheat, Gum, 922066-203, Outdoor Green, Gum, UPC 00883212095992, ‘Flax’ collection, outdoor green accents, tonal flax Gum outsole, Flax nubuck upper, Gum Out Sole, Perforated detailing on the toe box, Perforations for breathability, Nike Swoosh on the sides, Ankle strap for security, Nubuck tongue with Nike Air branding, Midsole Air-sole for impact absorption, Nike Air branding on the heel, Red Deals Online eBay store
ASICS Gel-Venture 8, Men’s Size 11.5, Grey, Orange, Black, 1011A824, Sheetrock, Habanero, Just Do It pack, Rugged two-tone mesh upper, Molded ORTHOLITE sockliner, Breathable mesh upper, synthetic overlays, Re-engineered outsole lugs, GEL cushioning, shock absorption, Rearfoot Gel technology, Smooth transition from heel to midfoot,
Four-wheel shock absorption, soft start, 2.4 G wireless remote control, 12v electric double 380 motor drive, the 12v battery raider can be customized double open the door, three gear speed, a new mute function of swing, equipped with seat belts, car LED lights, dazzle colour lights, before and after dynamic music, storytelling, early education, classical poetry, USB, MP3 pins, the volume and subtract function.
Model Number
LZ 2188 Red
Type
Jeep
Minimum Age
3 years
Maximum User Weight
50 kg
Speed
7 km/hr
Brand Color
Red
Delivery Condition
Non-assembled
Model Name
LZ 2188 Red
Color
Red
Number of Seats
1
Material
Plastic
Character
Car
Battery Operated
Yes
No Of Batteries
1
Battery Type
Lithium
Rechargeable
Yes
Power Features
Charging Time
4 hr
Battery Type
Lithium
Battery Life
60 min
Convenience Features
Charger Included
Yes
Key Start
Yes
Seatbelt Included
Yes
Mp3 Player Supported
Yes
Parental Remote
Yes
Illuminated
Yes
Horn
Yes
Dimensions
Width
125 cm
Height
66 cm
Depth
80 cm
Weight
22.5 kg
Warranty
Warranty Summary
Replacement
ayaantoys.com/product/lz-2188-red-jeep-battery-operated-r...
Nike Air Max 1, ND, Have A Nike Day, GS, Size 7Y, Space Purple, Black, Bleached Coral, AT8131-001, UPC 00888409493087, Release Year 2018, tongue features "Have A Nike Day" textile eyelets, embroidered smiley face, mesh base, multi-color sole, White midsole, Woven tongue label, black Nike “Swoosh”, smiley face metal lace dubrae, smiley face logo on the heels, pastel-translucent outsole, Black overlays on the Swoosh and mudguard, Visible air sole unit, mesh and suede upper, pastel tones and smiley face logos, debut in 1987, Air-Sole unit, Air Max technology, impact absorption, runners
Nike Air Force 1 High Flax, GS, Size 5Y, Wheat, Gum, 922066-203, Outdoor Green, Gum, UPC 00883212095992, ‘Flax’ collection, outdoor green accents, tonal flax Gum outsole, Flax nubuck upper, Gum Out Sole, Perforated detailing on the toe box, Perforations for breathability, Nike Swoosh on the sides, Ankle strap for security, Nubuck tongue with Nike Air branding, Midsole Air-sole for impact absorption, Nike Air branding on the heel, Red Deals Online eBay store
The absorption of light and colour in search of tone and texture is the pursuit of photography where painting with light often leads us into darkness. These pictures were created as I tested a new camera. When I first got my Canon 550D I thought that it was so light and well fitting in the hand that I could capture any lighting conditions. True there are some leaps and bounds for technology yet to perform to allow my unsteady hands to capture the lowest light conditions in sparkling clarity. I am sure that some of these technological leaps and bounds are occurring even as I type. It makes my hands tremble with anticipation to think of testing the next stable releases of stabilizing cameras with even lower light sensitive sensors.
Nike Air Max 1, ND, Have A Nike Day, GS, Size 7Y, Space Purple, Black, Bleached Coral, AT8131-001, UPC 00888409493087, Release Year 2018, tongue features "Have A Nike Day" textile eyelets, embroidered smiley face, mesh base, multi-color sole, White midsole, Woven tongue label, black Nike “Swoosh”, smiley face metal lace dubrae, smiley face logo on the heels, pastel-translucent outsole, Black overlays on the Swoosh and mudguard, Visible air sole unit, mesh and suede upper, pastel tones and smiley face logos, debut in 1987, Air-Sole unit, Air Max technology, impact absorption, runners
Measures strength of market. How many days of unsold inventory existing on the Palos Verdes Peninsula today? How does that compare to the last 90 day cycle? How does today's rate compare to the rate during the same 90 day cycle last year?
Ayurveda offers one of the most effective ranges of massage treatments. Calming nerves, boosting circulation and absorption through the skin can do wonders in healing, and we see that again and again at Liv Ayurveda with their Ayurveda massage treatment Sydney. At Liv Ayurveda, they offer an array of Ayurvedic massages that cater to the needs of balancing the body, calming the mind, boosting metabolism, improving digestion, healing pains, and promoting vitality. By leveraging herbal oils, powders and/or herbal pouches, these massages lend a big hand in enhancing blood circulation and fortifying the lymphatic system. Additionally, it keeps your skin smooth, helps in overcoming stress, and makes you mentally healthy. Their certified practitioners and therapists are skilled and experienced in Ayurvedic massages and provide you with massage therapies that cater to your individual needs. And also you can buy ayurveda massage oil Sydney from their store.
ASICS Gel-Venture 8, Men’s Size 11.5, Grey, Orange, Black, 1011A824, Sheetrock, Habanero, Just Do It pack, Rugged two-tone mesh upper, Molded ORTHOLITE sockliner, Breathable mesh upper, synthetic overlays, Re-engineered outsole lugs, GEL cushioning, shock absorption, Rearfoot Gel technology, Smooth transition from heel to midfoot,
This is an interior shot of a room built with All Weather Sound Panels used to quiet large chillers.
Class A Sonata acoustic absorption panels used to reduce reverberation within School, Village and Church Halls
For the test film of the Jupiter-9 lens I mounted it on the Leningrad camera (see below for detail about the lens and the camera). The lens was fitted with a generic yellow filter (screw-on 49mm) and a generic cylindrical metal shade hood designed for a 50mm lens. By safety, a lens cap fitted on the hood (55mm) was also used to protect the shutter curtains from an accidental sun burning (I forgot twice to remove the cap before shooting...)
I loaded the Leningrad with a Rollei RPX 400 film exposed for 250 ISO to compensate the absorption of the yellow filter. The light metering was done using a Minolta Autometer III with the 10° viewer for selective metering privileging the shadows areas.
The viewer of the Leningrad has build-in frame for the 85mm and is fully compensated for the parallax error.
View Nr. 24 : 1/250s f/11 focusing @ infinite
Les Quais du Rhône, February 17, 2025
Quai Victor Augagneur
69003 Lyon
France
After completion, the film was rewound and processed using 350 mL of Adox Adonal (Agfa Rodinal) developer prepared at the dilution 1+25 for 12min15 at 20°C.
Digitizing was made using a Sony A7 camera (ILCE-7, 24MP) fitted to a Minolta Auto Bellows III with the Minolta slide duplication accessory and Minolta Macro Bellow lens 1:3.5 f=50mm. The diffuse light source was a LED panel CineStill Cine-lite.
The RAW files obtained were inverted within the latest version available of Adobe Lightroom Classic (version 14.2) and edited to the final jpeg pictures without intermediate file. They are presented either as printer files with a frame or the full size JPEG's together with some documentary smartphone color pictures.
About the camera :
After several months, my local repair shop gave up to repair my first exemplary of Leningrad camera. I got that GOMZ Leningrad for less than the price of the lens (50€) a year ago (February 24, 2024, flic.kr/s/aHBqjBftyP) at the monthly collector meeting in Saint-Bonnet-de-Mure, near Lyon, France. I looked then again for a working one.
Leningrad’s are fascinating Russian range-finder 35mm camera’s produced in Leningrad (USSR) / Saint-Petersburg, from 1956 to 1968 at about 76.000 units. It is not really a rare camera but appears only from time-to-time in the classical collector’s networks.
The Leningrad camera project was developed by GOMZ company (ГОМЗ, Государственный оптико-механический завод, Ленинград = Gosularstvennyi Optiko-Mekhanicheskii Zavod =State Optical-Mechanical Factory), Leningrad, USSR. The Leningrad ’s were constructed to a very high degree of precision and likely the most advanced rangefinder ever made at that time in Russia. At the 1958 World Exposition in Brussels, the Leningrad was awarded the "Grand Prix de Bruxelles”. Modified Leningrads were also used in the Soviet space program. In addition to a complex parallax-compensated multi-focal (for 3.5, 5, 8.5 and 13.5cm) collimated system, the camera has a built-in spring-powered mechanical motor for an automated film advance after each view taken. The Leningrad mounts the 39mm Leica-type thread lenses, especially of the Jupiter series of lens derived of classical Carl Zeiss lenses designed for the Contax (Biogon 3.5cm and Sonnar’s 5, 8.5 and 13.5cm).
In 1965, GOMZ became LOMO ( ЛОМО, Ленинградское oптико-механическое oбъединение (Leningradskoïe Optiko-Mekhanitcheskoïe Obiedinienie) that is still existing, producing instrumental optical devices (www.lomo.ru).
On eBay, I focused on a LOMO Leningrad year 1965 in working condition but without the original film plate. I got the camera for 130€ including the leather bag and a standard lens Jupiter-8 1:2 f=5cm. The seller adapted cleanly a different film plate that looked to work, but my idea was to use the camera back of my faulty Leningrad. This film plate may a precision glass plate special designed for optimum film transport and optical planarity. I received my new Leningrad on January 31, 2025 in good condition.
After a very careful inspection and a detailled cleaning, I decided to make a test film using a FOMAPAN 200 black-and-white film. On the Leningrad it is said that there is absolutely no way to check the correct film advance during the shooting session. The rewind should not be up since the mechanical forces induced would be too high for the spring-powered spooling barrel. The film should be also in a quality not too tight film cartridge and should be checked before use. This stressful machine should be manipulated with maximum care when not familiar with it.
About the lens Jupiter-9:
New in my collection in Feb. 2025, this very popular lens Jupiter-9 1:2.8 f=85mm for my Zorki’s and Leningrad camera’s. The lens was produced in 1978 by the LZOS company (Лыткаринский завод Оптического Стекла , Lytkarino Zavod Optychisovo Sticklo) located in Lytkarino (about 100 km Noth to Moscow).
I sourced a clean exemplary in Germany at regular price given the popularity of the Jupiter-9 (170€) with the Leica 39mm thread mount, front and rear caps plus the lens black storage canister. The lens is popular especially among videographers due to its peculiar bokeh and perfectly round shaped diaphragm made of 15 blades.
Originally, the Jupiter 9 is based on the design of the Carl Zeiss Sonnar designed for the Zeiss Ikon Contax in the years 1930’s. Production began in USSR in 1948, when the lens was initially called the ЗК-85 (Sonnar Kransogorsk) and it was assembled using mostly German parts in Contax/Kiev mount. The lens was also adapted to Zorki (M39) mount to fit the Zorki cameras early in production It appears, for both Zorki and Kiev mount, in a 1949 catalogue. By 1951 the name changes to Jupiter 9 (Юпитер-9). The lens has seven glass elements in three groups; a single glass at the front, and two cemented groups of three. All versions of the lens are coated. It was made by the KMZ (Красногорский механический завод, Krasnogorski Mekhanicheskii Zavod) and LZOS factories, in Leica 39 mm thread mount for Fed and Zorki rangefinders, but originally it was a Contax bayonet used in Kiev cameras. Jupiter-9 lenses were also made at the Arsenal factory in Ukraine, for Kiev rangefinders,but initially released as KMZ. It was later adapted for M42-mount Zenit SLR cameras, with an M24×1 thread mount.
Concentration in the pouring out skittle vodka for shots at the pres of a 19th.
Olympus OM-D EM-5
Claire Murray
For the test film of the Jupiter-9 lens I mounted it on the Leningrad camera (see below for detail about the lens and the camera). The lens was fitted with a generic yellow filter (screw-on 49mm) and a generic cylindrical metal shade hood designed for a 50mm lens. By safety, a lens cap fitted on the hood (55mm) was also used to protect the shutter curtains from an accidental sun burning (I forgot twice to remove the cap before shooting...)
I loaded the Leningrad with a Rollei RPX 400 film exposed for 250 ISO to compensate the absorption of the yellow filter. The light metering was done using a Minolta Autometer III with the 10° viewer for selective metering privileging the shadows areas.
The viewer of the Leningrad has build-in frame for the 85mm and is fully compensated for the parallax error.
View Nr. 25 : 1/250s f/11 focusing @ infinite
Les Quais du Rhône, February 17, 2025
Quai Victor Augagneur
69003 Lyon
France
After completion, the film was rewound and processed using 350 mL of Adox Adonal (Agfa Rodinal) developer prepared at the dilution 1+25 for 12min15 at 20°C.
Digitizing was made using a Sony A7 camera (ILCE-7, 24MP) fitted to a Minolta Auto Bellows III with the Minolta slide duplication accessory and Minolta Macro Bellow lens 1:3.5 f=50mm. The diffuse light source was a LED panel CineStill Cine-lite.
The RAW files obtained were inverted within the latest version available of Adobe Lightroom Classic (version 14.2) and edited to the final jpeg pictures without intermediate file. They are presented either as printer files with a frame or the full size JPEG's together with some documentary smartphone color pictures.
About the camera :
After several months, my local repair shop gave up to repair my first exemplary of Leningrad camera. I got that GOMZ Leningrad for less than the price of the lens (50€) a year ago (February 24, 2024, flic.kr/s/aHBqjBftyP) at the monthly collector meeting in Saint-Bonnet-de-Mure, near Lyon, France. I looked then again for a working one.
Leningrad’s are fascinating Russian range-finder 35mm camera’s produced in Leningrad (USSR) / Saint-Petersburg, from 1956 to 1968 at about 76.000 units. It is not really a rare camera but appears only from time-to-time in the classical collector’s networks.
The Leningrad camera project was developed by GOMZ company (ГОМЗ, Государственный оптико-механический завод, Ленинград = Gosularstvennyi Optiko-Mekhanicheskii Zavod =State Optical-Mechanical Factory), Leningrad, USSR. The Leningrad ’s were constructed to a very high degree of precision and likely the most advanced rangefinder ever made at that time in Russia. At the 1958 World Exposition in Brussels, the Leningrad was awarded the "Grand Prix de Bruxelles”. Modified Leningrads were also used in the Soviet space program. In addition to a complex parallax-compensated multi-focal (for 3.5, 5, 8.5 and 13.5cm) collimated system, the camera has a built-in spring-powered mechanical motor for an automated film advance after each view taken. The Leningrad mounts the 39mm Leica-type thread lenses, especially of the Jupiter series of lens derived of classical Carl Zeiss lenses designed for the Contax (Biogon 3.5cm and Sonnar’s 5, 8.5 and 13.5cm).
In 1965, GOMZ became LOMO ( ЛОМО, Ленинградское oптико-механическое oбъединение (Leningradskoïe Optiko-Mekhanitcheskoïe Obiedinienie) that is still existing, producing instrumental optical devices (www.lomo.ru).
On eBay, I focused on a LOMO Leningrad year 1965 in working condition but without the original film plate. I got the camera for 130€ including the leather bag and a standard lens Jupiter-8 1:2 f=5cm. The seller adapted cleanly a different film plate that looked to work, but my idea was to use the camera back of my faulty Leningrad. This film plate may a precision glass plate special designed for optimum film transport and optical planarity. I received my new Leningrad on January 31, 2025 in good condition.
After a very careful inspection and a detailled cleaning, I decided to make a test film using a FOMAPAN 200 black-and-white film. On the Leningrad it is said that there is absolutely no way to check the correct film advance during the shooting session. The rewind should not be up since the mechanical forces induced would be too high for the spring-powered spooling barrel. The film should be also in a quality not too tight film cartridge and should be checked before use. This stressful machine should be manipulated with maximum care when not familiar with it.
About the lens Jupiter-9:
New in my collection in Feb. 2025, this very popular lens Jupiter-9 1:2.8 f=85mm for my Zorki’s and Leningrad camera’s. The lens was produced in 1978 by the LZOS company (Лыткаринский завод Оптического Стекла , Lytkarino Zavod Optychisovo Sticklo) located in Lytkarino (about 100 km Noth to Moscow).
I sourced a clean exemplary in Germany at regular price given the popularity of the Jupiter-9 (170€) with the Leica 39mm thread mount, front and rear caps plus the lens black storage canister. The lens is popular especially among videographers due to its peculiar bokeh and perfectly round shaped diaphragm made of 15 blades.
Originally, the Jupiter 9 is based on the design of the Carl Zeiss Sonnar designed for the Zeiss Ikon Contax in the years 1930’s. Production began in USSR in 1948, when the lens was initially called the ЗК-85 (Sonnar Kransogorsk) and it was assembled using mostly German parts in Contax/Kiev mount. The lens was also adapted to Zorki (M39) mount to fit the Zorki cameras early in production It appears, for both Zorki and Kiev mount, in a 1949 catalogue. By 1951 the name changes to Jupiter 9 (Юпитер-9). The lens has seven glass elements in three groups; a single glass at the front, and two cemented groups of three. All versions of the lens are coated. It was made by the KMZ (Красногорский механический завод, Krasnogorski Mekhanicheskii Zavod) and LZOS factories, in Leica 39 mm thread mount for Fed and Zorki rangefinders, but originally it was a Contax bayonet used in Kiev cameras. Jupiter-9 lenses were also made at the Arsenal factory in Ukraine, for Kiev rangefinders,but initially released as KMZ. It was later adapted for M42-mount Zenit SLR cameras, with an M24×1 thread mount.
For the test film of the Jupiter-9 lens I mounted it on the Leningrad camera (see below for detail about the lens and the camera). The lens was fitted with a generic yellow filter (screw-on 49mm) and a generic cylindrical metal shade hood designed for a 50mm lens. By safety, a lens cap fitted on the hood (55mm) was also used to protect the shutter curtains from an accidental sun burning (I forgot twice to remove the cap before shooting...)
I loaded the Leningrad with a Rollei RPX 400 film exposed for 250 ISO to compensate the absorption of the yellow filter. The light metering was done using a Minolta Autometer III with the 10° viewer for selective metering privileging the shadows areas.
The viewer of the Leningrad has build-in frame for the 85mm and is fully compensated for the parallax error.
View Nr. 3 : 1/250s f/9 focusing @ 15m
Les Quais du Rhône, February 17, 2025
Quai du Général Sarrail
69006 Lyon
France
After completion, the film was rewound and processed using 350 mL of Adox Adonal (Agfa Rodinal) developer prepared at the dilution 1+25 for 12min15 at 20°C.
Digitizing was made using a Sony A7 camera (ILCE-7, 24MP) fitted to a Minolta Auto Bellows III with the Minolta slide duplication accessory and Minolta Macro Bellow lens 1:3.5 f=50mm. The diffuse light source was a LED panel CineStill Cine-lite.
The RAW files obtained were inverted within the latest version available of Adobe Lightroom Classic (version 14.2) and edited to the final jpeg pictures without intermediate file. They are presented either as printer files with a frame or the full size JPEG's together with some documentary smartphone color pictures.
About the camera :
After several months, my local repair shop gave up to repair my first exemplary of Leningrad camera. I got that GOMZ Leningrad for less than the price of the lens (50€) a year ago (February 24, 2024, flic.kr/s/aHBqjBftyP) at the monthly collector meeting in Saint-Bonnet-de-Mure, near Lyon, France. I looked then again for a working one.
Leningrad’s are fascinating Russian range-finder 35mm camera’s produced in Leningrad (USSR) / Saint-Petersburg, from 1956 to 1968 at about 76.000 units. It is not really a rare camera but appears only from time-to-time in the classical collector’s networks.
The Leningrad camera project was developed by GOMZ company (ГОМЗ, Государственный оптико-механический завод, Ленинград = Gosularstvennyi Optiko-Mekhanicheskii Zavod =State Optical-Mechanical Factory), Leningrad, USSR. The Leningrad ’s were constructed to a very high degree of precision and likely the most advanced rangefinder ever made at that time in Russia. At the 1958 World Exposition in Brussels, the Leningrad was awarded the "Grand Prix de Bruxelles”. Modified Leningrads were also used in the Soviet space program. In addition to a complex parallax-compensated multi-focal (for 3.5, 5, 8.5 and 13.5cm) collimated system, the camera has a built-in spring-powered mechanical motor for an automated film advance after each view taken. The Leningrad mounts the 39mm Leica-type thread lenses, especially of the Jupiter series of lens derived of classical Carl Zeiss lenses designed for the Contax (Biogon 3.5cm and Sonnar’s 5, 8.5 and 13.5cm).
In 1965, GOMZ became LOMO ( ЛОМО, Ленинградское oптико-механическое oбъединение (Leningradskoïe Optiko-Mekhanitcheskoïe Obiedinienie) that is still existing, producing instrumental optical devices (www.lomo.ru).
On eBay, I focused on a LOMO Leningrad year 1965 in working condition but without the original film plate. I got the camera for 130€ including the leather bag and a standard lens Jupiter-8 1:2 f=5cm. The seller adapted cleanly a different film plate that looked to work, but my idea was to use the camera back of my faulty Leningrad. This film plate may a precision glass plate special designed for optimum film transport and optical planarity. I received my new Leningrad on January 31, 2025 in good condition.
After a very careful inspection and a detailled cleaning, I decided to make a test film using a FOMAPAN 200 black-and-white film. On the Leningrad it is said that there is absolutely no way to check the correct film advance during the shooting session. The rewind should not be up since the mechanical forces induced would be too high for the spring-powered spooling barrel. The film should be also in a quality not too tight film cartridge and should be checked before use. This stressful machine should be manipulated with maximum care when not familiar with it.
About the lens Jupiter-9:
New in my collection in Feb. 2025, this very popular lens Jupiter-9 1:2.8 f=85mm for my Zorki’s and Leningrad camera’s. The lens was produced in 1978 by the LZOS company (Лыткаринский завод Оптического Стекла , Lytkarino Zavod Optychisovo Sticklo) located in Lytkarino (about 100 km Noth to Moscow).
I sourced a clean exemplary in Germany at regular price given the popularity of the Jupiter-9 (170€) with the Leica 39mm thread mount, front and rear caps plus the lens black storage canister. The lens is popular especially among videographers due to its peculiar bokeh and perfectly round shaped diaphragm made of 15 blades.
Originally, the Jupiter 9 is based on the design of the Carl Zeiss Sonnar designed for the Zeiss Ikon Contax in the years 1930’s. Production began in USSR in 1948, when the lens was initially called the ЗК-85 (Sonnar Kransogorsk) and it was assembled using mostly German parts in Contax/Kiev mount. The lens was also adapted to Zorki (M39) mount to fit the Zorki cameras early in production It appears, for both Zorki and Kiev mount, in a 1949 catalogue. By 1951 the name changes to Jupiter 9 (Юпитер-9). The lens has seven glass elements in three groups; a single glass at the front, and two cemented groups of three. All versions of the lens are coated. It was made by the KMZ (Красногорский механический завод, Krasnogorski Mekhanicheskii Zavod) and LZOS factories, in Leica 39 mm thread mount for Fed and Zorki rangefinders, but originally it was a Contax bayonet used in Kiev cameras. Jupiter-9 lenses were also made at the Arsenal factory in Ukraine, for Kiev rangefinders,but initially released as KMZ. It was later adapted for M42-mount Zenit SLR cameras, with an M24×1 thread mount.
I received recently an unusual 35mm range-finder camera Graflex Graphic 35 made in the U.S.A. in 1955 (see below the details about Graflex company and the camera). After a complete inventory and blank mechanical/optical checking, I did a test film with a FOMAPAN 100. The light was metered using a Minolta Autometer III fitted with a 10° viewfinder for selective metering privileging this shadow areas.
The camera was equipped with an adapted French FOCA « Dyma » x3.5 36mm push-on filter plus the metal shade hood made for the FOCA Standard camera. To compensate the Dyma filter absorption the Autometer was set on 32 ISO instead of the nominal 100 ISO of the film. The Dyma FOCA filter is an original glass formula containing neodymium giving band-selective visible spectrum absorptions in the green and yellow so that proximate tonalities in these bands are better separated.
I did the all photos along the way to Lyon Saint-Jean, Lyon, France.
Documentary smartphone picture
Pause aux Ateliers de Marinette, July 30,, 2026
Rue Saint-Georges
69001 Lyon
France
After the last view #37 exposed, the film was rewound to the taking cartridge and revealed in a Posso tank with 350 mL of Adox Adonal developer (identical to the original Agfa Rodinal in its formula of 1891) prepared at the dilution 1+50. The film was processed for 9min at 20°C.
The frames were then digitized using a Sony A7 camera (ILCE-7, 24MP) adapted to a macro Minolta Auto Bellow III with Minolta Bellow MD Macro lens 1:3.5 f=50mm and the dedicated slide duplicator Minolta. The light source was a LED panel (approx. 4x5') CineStill Cine-lite.
The RAW files obtained were inverted within the latest version of Adobe Lightroom Classic (version 15.4.1, June 2026) and edited to the final jpeg pictures without intermediate file. They are presented either as print files with frame or the full size JPEG's together with some documentary smartphone color pictures.
———————————————
About the Graflex company and Graphic 35 camera:
Graflex (originally the Folmer & Schwing Manufacturing Company, founded in 1887 in New York) had long been renowned for its large- and medium-format press cameras (notably the Speed Graphic), which became the standard for photojournalism in the first half of the 20th century. After its acquisition by Kodak in 1905–1907, the works were moved to Rochester, New York. In 1926, following antitrust rulings, Graflex became independent again and continued production in Rochester until the early 1970s.
By the mid-1950s, large-format press cameras were losing ground to smaller, easier-to-use 35 mm cameras aimed at amateurs. Graflex responded by entering the 35 mm market. It had already marketed the Ciro 35 (derived from the earlier Cee-ay 35 of Candid Camera Corp., acquired via Ciro). In 1955 this design was thoroughly reworked into the Graphic 35.
Launch and Production
* Introduction: First shipments on 25 February 1955; press presentation on 8 March 1955 in New York.
* Manufacture: Body and final assembly in Rochester, N.Y. Lenses and shutters were imported from West Germany (Rodenstock or occasionally Enna “Graflar” 50 mm f/3.5 or f/2.8 lenses; Prontor-SVS leaf shutter, 1 s to 1/300 s + B, M/X sync, self-timer).
* Production period: Roughly August 1954 to July 1957 (sometimes listed as ending in 1958). Advertising continued into late 1960.
* Volume: Approximately 68,000 units (Graflex internal figures list 68,269 cameras distributed). Serial numbers began at 550,000 and later restarted at 1,100,000.
Introductory prices were about $77.50 (f/3.5) to $98–99.50 (f/2.8), making it one of the more affordable fully featured 35 mm rangefinders of its day.
Distinctive Features
* Push-button focusing on either side of the lens (“wing focusing”), invented by Graflex instrument maker Louis M. Traino, who received a $4,000 company award (roughly $35,000–40,000 in today’s money). A “Visi-Ready” distance scale was visible from above.
* Front-mounted, sideways-pull shutter-release lever.
* Spectramatic (later Universal Spectramatic) flash system, devised by engineering director Vernon Whitman: colour-coded bands that simplified aperture selection according to distance and guide number.
* Separate viewfinder and split-image rangefinder windows; film advance by knob (not coupled to shutter cocking, allowing intentional double exposures).
* Solid die-cast metal body with satin chrome finish and silver-grey leatherette covering (some later examples darker).
These features—especially the push-button focusing—were heavily promoted and helped the camera sell strongly in its first year.
After 1957–58 Graflex shifted to Japanese-made models (the Graphic/Century 35 series by Kowa, the Graphic Jet, etc.). The original Rochester-built Graphic 35 remains a characteristic mid-1950s American design: robust, unusually ergonomic in its controls, and still relatively affordable on the used market today.
It is one of the few non-Kodak 35 mm cameras actually made in Rochester and illustrates Graflex’s attempt to adapt to the postwar 35 mm amateur boom.
I did not find at now the optical formula of the lens. The lens takes 27mm screw-on filter and the external diameter is 32mm. With a little adaptation (rind made in a film canister cap...) one could fit the French FOCA filter push-on 36mm.
It seems that no lens cap was proposed for the Graphic 35. With a cap of Kodak 35mm canister, I made a plastic one to protect the front lens.
The range-finder is slightly off calibrated at infinite but it easy to correct the small shift to set the correct value on the distance scale that is only engraved in feet.
Metal roofs are increasingly popular due to their durability, energy efficiency, and modern aesthetic. However, to maximize their lifespan and performance, applying a specialized coating can be a game-changer. Metal roof coatings offer a variety of benefits, including enhanced protection against the elements, improved energy efficiency, and increased resistance to corrosion and rust. These coatings create a barrier that can reflect harmful UV rays, reducing heat absorption and lowering energy costs. Additionally, they can help prevent water infiltration and prolong the roof's life by protecting it from wear and tear. Different types of coatings are available, and their specific advantages and essential considerations for maintaining a metal roof. Through this knowledge, homeowners can make informed decisions that enhance the appearance of their roofs and ensure long-lasting performance.
Metal Roofing Materials
Metal roofing materials are famous for their durability, energy efficiency, and aesthetic appeal. Beyond their inherent advantages, applying specialized coatings, such as silicone and acrylic, can enhance these benefits even further. Elastomeric roof coatings also play a vital role in protecting metal roof surfaces. These coatings serve as protective barriers, safeguarding metal roofs against environmental factors such as UV rays, moisture, and corrosion. Additionally, these coatings can improve the roof's energy efficiency by reflecting sunlight, creating an excellent roof effect that helps regulate indoor temperatures and reduce cooling costs, especially in commercial properties.
Various coatings are available for metal roofs, highlighting unique properties and benefits. For instance, some coatings offer excellent UV and corrosion resistance, making them ideal for extending roof life, especially under extreme temperatures. The choice of coating can also depend on the specific roof type and the property's needs, whether for residential or commercial roofs. Understanding these options is essential for homeowners and builders looking to optimize the performance and longevity of metal roofs in residential and commercial applications.
Importance of Coatings for Metal Roofs
Coatings for metal roofs are crucial in enhancing the longevity and performance of roofing systems. As metal roofs become increasingly popular due to their durability and energy efficiency, applying protective coatings can significantly amplify these benefits. These coatings serve multiple purposes, including safeguarding the roof from harsh environmental elements, reducing thermal expansion, and improving energy efficiency through reflective properties. By creating a barrier against moisture, UV rays, and corrosion, coatings help extend metal roofs' lifespan while minimizing maintenance costs. With a wide range of options, building owners can choose coatings that provide protection and add aesthetic appeal, ensuring that their roofs remain functional and visually attractive for years. Understanding the importance of coatings is essential for anyone looking to invest in the long-term performance of their metal roofing system.
Benefits of Coating Metal Roofs
Coating for metal roofs offers numerous benefits, making them an excellent investment for homeowners and businesses. These coatings significantly enhance weather resistance and provide UV protection, safeguarding metal surfaces from the damaging effects of sun exposure and harsh weather conditions. Due to their flexibility and durability, silicone and elastomeric roof coatings are popular. The choice of metal roof paint can depend on the type of metal roof and the specific roof substrate.
Proper application techniques and adhesion allow these coatings to last 15-20 years, providing long-lasting protection. They also contribute to energy efficiency by reflecting heat, potentially saving up to 30% on cooling costs. The flexibility of these coatings allows them to accommodate the natural expansion and contraction of the roof structure, minimizing the risk of cracks or other damage. Additionally, these coatings are lightweight, reducing the load on the roof deck and ensuring minimal structural impact.
An essential part of any roof coating project is a thorough roof inspection to assess the condition of the roof structure and prepare the metal surfaces. Environmentally friendly options are available, aligning with sustainability goals and reducing a building's carbon footprint.
Enhancing Energy Efficiency
Metal roof coatings significantly enhance energy efficiency by effectively reflecting UV rays and minimizing heat buildup, which lightens the workload on cooling systems. This reduction in energy consumption leads to lower utility bills for property owners and contributes to a greener environment by decreasing the overall energy demand. Reflective coatings promote sustainable roofing practices by eliminating the need for tear-offs and minimizing waste generation during upgrades or maintenance. By choosing metal roof coatings, homeowners can enjoy the benefits of improved energy efficiency and environmental stewardship, positively impacting their finances and the planet. Emphasizing the importance of these coatings underscores their role in promoting sustainable roofing while ensuring optimal performance and comfort in residential and commercial buildings.
Extending the Lifespan of Roofs
Roof coatings play a vital role in extending the lifespan of metal roofs by offering essential protection against various environmental factors, such as UV rays, moisture, and temperature fluctuations. High-quality coatings, such as elastomeric roof coating systems and urethane, are crucial for ensuring enhanced durability, as they form a robust layer of protection that minimizes wear over time. These coatings are particularly effective on seam metal roofs and roof panels, providing water and impact resistance.
In addition to their protective qualities, roof coatings also offer color retention and the option for custom colors, allowing property owners to maintain or enhance their roof's appearance. Regular maintenance and inspections, including checking for issues around roof penetrations, are paramount in preserving the effectiveness of these coatings. This routine care allows for the early detection of potential problems and ensures the protective layer remains intact.
By investing in superior roof coatings and committing to routine care, property owners can significantly improve the longevity of their type of roof. This approach also avoids traditional roof tear-off, making it a cost-effective choice for any roofing project. Consulting with a professional roofing contractor can provide valuable insights into selecting the appropriate coating based on the roof's physical properties and specific needs. This proactive approach safeguards the investment through reliable environmental protection and extends the roof's overall life.
Improving Aesthetic Appeal
Metal roofs are a durable and popular choice for many homeowners and commercial buildings, but their aesthetic appeal can sometimes be enhanced for a more visually pleasing appearance. By applying specialized coatings, homeowners can transform the look of their metal roofs, offering a range of colors, finishes, and textures to complement any architectural style. These coatings improve the visual aspect of metal roofs and provide superior color retention and heat reflectivity, reducing heat gain and enhancing energy efficiency.
Additionally, coatings with rust inhibitors help protect the roof against weather damage and rust, effectively slowing down the rate of rust formation. This protective layer is especially beneficial in areas prone to adverse weather and other environmental conditions, ensuring the roof remains visually appealing and structurally sound.
These coatings' application and curing processes are critical as they determine the effectiveness of the coating in providing protection and durability. Coating manufacturers often offer different warranty periods based on the product's performance, giving homeowners peace of mind. Whether opting for a white finish to maximize heat reflectivity or a custom color to match the home's exterior, the suitable coating can significantly elevate the overall curb appeal of a property, making it stand out in a neighborhood and potentially increasing its value.
Types of Coatings Available for Metal Roofs
When it comes to enhancing the longevity and performance of metal roofs, selecting the suitable coating can make all the difference. Coatings protect metal roofing against harsh weather conditions, corrosion, and UV damage while improving energy efficiency and aesthetics. With various types of coatings available, it is essential to understand the options that best suit specific roofing needs. Bitumen coatings are a popular option for waterproofing and durability, while aluminum-zinc alloy coatings provide excellent corrosion resistance, making them a preferred choice for many applications. Reflective coatings help reduce heat absorption, which is especially beneficial in warmer climates and is chosen for homeowners looking to lower cooling costs.
Some coatings are specifically designed to address common occurrences in metal roofs, such as rust formation and fading. By exploring these different types, including bitumen coatings and weather-resistant formulations, homeowners and builders can make informed decisions about their roofing investment, ensuring that the chosen coating enhances the roof's appearance and extends its lifespan.
The Essential Role of Coatings for Metal Roofs
Coatings are essential for maximizing the performance and longevity of metal roofs. They provide critical protection against environmental elements, enhance energy efficiency, and improve aesthetic appeal. For expert advice and quality installation of metal roof coatings, contact Sky Roofing Construction & Remodeling. Let us help you make the most of your roofing investment.
Learn more about coatings and the specific roofing services at Sky Roofing Construction & Remodeling: skyroofingconstructiontx.com/coatings/
Differential Method of Measurement of the Two-Photon Absorption Coefficient in Si-Photodetector Using an Electrically Focused Tunable Lens
Justin Deterding, Francisco Lagunas
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
We report the measurement of the Two Photon absorption coefficient (TPA) of a silicon photodiode using the Differential F-Scan technique. The technique works by modulating the focal length of an electrically Focus Tunable Lens (EFTL). Using the EFTL allows for simplification of the experimental setup, an increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and increased robustness of the setup. The TPA coefficient is measured using a 1.55 μm laser source, with 50 fs pulse duration operating at 23mW and 80 MHz repetition rate. The TPA coefficient of a silicon photodiode is reported and compared with other traditional measurements like z-scan, finding good experimental agreement.
For the test film of the Jupiter-9 lens I mounted it on the Leningrad camera (see below for detail about the lens and the camera). The lens was fitted with a generic yellow filter (screw-on 49mm) and a generic cylindrical metal shade hood designed for a 50mm lens. By safety, a lens cap fitted on the hood (55mm) was also used to protect the shutter curtains from an accidental sun burning (I forgot twice to remove the cap before shooting...)
I loaded the Leningrad with a Rollei RPX 400 film exposed for 250 ISO to compensate the absorption of the yellow filter. The light metering was done using a Minolta Autometer III with the 10° viewer for selective metering privileging the shadows areas.
The viewer of the Leningrad has build-in frame for the 85mm and is fully compensated for the parallax error.
View Nr. : 1/--s f/-- focusing @ -- m
February 17, 2025
69003 Lyon
France
After completion, the film was rewound and processed using 350 mL of Adox Adonal (Agfa Rodinal) developer prepared at the dilution 1+25 for 12min15 at 20°C.
Digitizing was made using a Sony A7 camera (ILCE-7, 24MP) fitted to a Minolta Auto Bellows III with the Minolta slide duplication accessory and Minolta Macro Bellow lens 1:3.5 f=50mm. The diffuse light source was a LED panel CineStill Cine-lite.
The RAW files obtained were inverted within the latest version available of Adobe Lightroom Classic (version 14.2) and edited to the final jpeg pictures without intermediate file. They are presented either as printer files with a frame or the full size JPEG's together with some documentary smartphone color pictures.
About the camera :
After several months, my local repair shop gave up to repair my first exemplary of Leningrad camera. I got that GOMZ Leningrad for less than the price of the lens (50€) a year ago (February 24, 2024, flic.kr/s/aHBqjBftyP) at the monthly collector meeting in Saint-Bonnet-de-Mure, near Lyon, France. I looked then again for a working one.
Leningrad’s are fascinating Russian range-finder 35mm camera’s produced in Leningrad (USSR) / Saint-Petersburg, from 1956 to 1968 at about 76.000 units. It is not really a rare camera but appears only from time-to-time in the classical collector’s networks.
The Leningrad camera project was developed by GOMZ company (ГОМЗ, Государственный оптико-механический завод, Ленинград = Gosularstvennyi Optiko-Mekhanicheskii Zavod =State Optical-Mechanical Factory), Leningrad, USSR. The Leningrad ’s were constructed to a very high degree of precision and likely the most advanced rangefinder ever made at that time in Russia. At the 1958 World Exposition in Brussels, the Leningrad was awarded the "Grand Prix de Bruxelles”. Modified Leningrads were also used in the Soviet space program. In addition to a complex parallax-compensated multi-focal (for 3.5, 5, 8.5 and 13.5cm) collimated system, the camera has a built-in spring-powered mechanical motor for an automated film advance after each view taken. The Leningrad mounts the 39mm Leica-type thread lenses, especially of the Jupiter series of lens derived of classical Carl Zeiss lenses designed for the Contax (Biogon 3.5cm and Sonnar’s 5, 8.5 and 13.5cm).
In 1965, GOMZ became LOMO ( ЛОМО, Ленинградское oптико-механическое oбъединение (Leningradskoïe Optiko-Mekhanitcheskoïe Obiedinienie) that is still existing, producing instrumental optical devices (www.lomo.ru).
On eBay, I focused on a LOMO Leningrad year 1965 in working condition but without the original film plate. I got the camera for 130€ including the leather bag and a standard lens Jupiter-8 1:2 f=5cm. The seller adapted cleanly a different film plate that looked to work, but my idea was to use the camera back of my faulty Leningrad. This film plate may a precision glass plate special designed for optimum film transport and optical planarity. I received my new Leningrad on January 31, 2025 in good condition.
After a very careful inspection and a detailled cleaning, I decided to make a test film using a FOMAPAN 200 black-and-white film. On the Leningrad it is said that there is absolutely no way to check the correct film advance during the shooting session. The rewind should not be up since the mechanical forces induced would be too high for the spring-powered spooling barrel. The film should be also in a quality not too tight film cartridge and should be checked before use. This stressful machine should be manipulated with maximum care when not familiar with it.
About the lens Jupiter-9:
New in my collection in Feb. 2025, this very popular lens Jupiter-9 1:2.8 f=85mm for my Zorki’s and Leningrad camera’s. The lens was produced in 1978 by the LZOS company (Лыткаринский завод Оптического Стекла , Lytkarino Zavod Optychisovo Sticklo) located in Lytkarino (about 100 km Noth to Moscow).
I sourced a clean exemplary in Germany at regular price given the popularity of the Jupiter-9 (170€) with the Leica 39mm thread mount, front and rear caps plus the lens black storage canister. The lens is popular especially among videographers due to its peculiar bokeh and perfectly round shaped diaphragm made of 15 blades.
Originally, the Jupiter 9 is based on the design of the Carl Zeiss Sonnar designed for the Zeiss Ikon Contax in the years 1930’s. Production began in USSR in 1948, when the lens was initially called the ЗК-85 (Sonnar Kransogorsk) and it was assembled using mostly German parts in Contax/Kiev mount. The lens was also adapted to Zorki (M39) mount to fit the Zorki cameras early in production It appears, for both Zorki and Kiev mount, in a 1949 catalogue. By 1951 the name changes to Jupiter 9 (Юпитер-9). The lens has seven glass elements in three groups; a single glass at the front, and two cemented groups of three. All versions of the lens are coated. It was made by the KMZ (Красногорский механический завод, Krasnogorski Mekhanicheskii Zavod) and LZOS factories, in Leica 39 mm thread mount for Fed and Zorki rangefinders, but originally it was a Contax bayonet used in Kiev cameras. Jupiter-9 lenses were also made at the Arsenal factory in Ukraine, for Kiev rangefinders,but initially released as KMZ. It was later adapted for M42-mount Zenit SLR cameras, with an M24×1 thread mount.