View allAll Photos Tagged Deliberative
Wise. Intelligent. Deliberative. Patient. Hilarious. Eloquent. Generous. Thoughtful. Faithful. But especially Loving. Happy Father's Day @wwejr4540 !
24 Likes on Instagram
1 Comments on Instagram:
mattmug: WARD!!!
With more than 9,000 delegates, the NEA Representative Assembly is the largest deliberative body in the world.
.
.
.
.
JAWAIIARLAL NEHRU U IVERSITY STUDENTS UNION .
.
NEW DELHI-110067 .
Phones:2671 7676,26717557,26704741 .
'. .
.
5 January, 2009 .
Dear Sir, .
eeking Written Response on the Repeated Refusal of the Administration to Involve JNUSU in all the University Bodies .
It is with grave concern that the student community of JNU notes the refusal of the JNU Administration to involve JNUSU in meetings and deliberations of university bodies where JNU U has hitherto been represented. In doing so, the JNU Administration is violating a long-established tradition of student involvement in the functioning of the university. JNU U has historically played a constructive role in all these matters ofstudent welfare and concerns of the university. .
On 24 October 2008, following the Supreme Court stay on the JNUSU -::lections, the Election Committee resigned and reinstated the incumbent JNU U Council. A University General Body meeting was immediately convened on 25 October 2008: you must know the UGBM is the highest decision making body of the student community. Hundreds of students took part in the UGBM and as per· Ar-ticle 14 [ii] of the JNVSU Constitution, the UGBM resolved to extend the tenur·e of JNUSU by a period of three months so as to guard against any vacuum in the absence of the student union. In a letter dAted 12 N vember 2008. the JNU U had informed you of these developments and the extension of the tenure of the JNVSU council. .
However, the attitude of the JNU Administration has been marked by a total refusal to cooperate or heed the voice of the student community. This, despite the fact that the student union sought the cooperation of the JNU Administration in safeguarding the democratic JNU U election process, which has been recognized as a commendable· feature of the university. In perpetually seeking to delegitimize the J NUSU, through its actions the university administration is going against the will of those hund1·eds of students who pa1·ticipated in the UGBM of 25'h October and unanimously placed their faith in JNU U as the legitimate body representing the student community. It is .
umbent on the university to heed the needs and aspirations of the students. .
r by refusing to invite JNU:::>U to meetings of any of the bodies of the university, the administration is seeking to e rights of the students in a mo t undemocratic way. We dema nd that the university provide us a categorical in writing, stating how it will ensure that there is student rept·esentation in all the e fora of the university. administration is using the smokescreen of a legal opinion a an excuse for refusing to invite JNUSU to deliberative bodies of the university. JNUSU demands that the administration immediately convene a the e i sues wit.h JNUSU, a nd also provide JNUSU a copy of the legal opinion on which this .
.
f~· .
/"'T sidem, U U .
CC: Rectqr 1, Rector2, DSW, JNUTA .
.
.
Secretary-General of ASEAN Dr. Kao Kim Hourn, presided the 7th Judging Committee Meeting for the ASEAN Prize at the ASEAN Headquarters/ASEAN Secretariat, today. Engaging in deliberative discussions with four former Secretaries-General of ASEAN, the Judging Committee meticulously assessed and examined all national nominees for the ASEAN Prize, ensuring the selection of a recipient based on excellence and merit this year.
The meeting also provided a platform for SG Dr. Kao and his predecessors to discuss recent regional developments, global affairs, and other significant matters related to the ASEAN Community building agenda.
Image Credit: ASEAN Secretariat / Kusuma Pandu Wijaya
Secretary-General of ASEAN, Dr. Kao Kim Hourn, today chaired the 8th Judging Committee Meeting for the ASEAN Prize, at the ASEAN Headquarters/ ASEAN Secretariat. The Committee, also comprising of former Secretaries-General of ASEAN, engaged in comprehensive and deliberative discussions to meticulously assess all the national nominations from ASEAN Member States. This process reaffirms ASEAN’s steadfast commitment to upholding the principle of excellence and merit-based recognition of ASEAN-based individuals and organisations who have contributed to ASEAN's community building efforts. The occasion also provided Dr. Kao and his distinguished predecessors the opportunity to exchange perspectives on the current regional dynamics and global megatrends, particularly in light of the recently adopted ASEAN Community Vision 2045 and its four Strategic Plans, at the 46th ASEAN Summit, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Image Credit: ASEAN Secretariat/Kusuma Pandu Wijaya