View allAll Photos Tagged AnIndividual
Energy is what sustains us, it is the element we need to continue our daily lives, and not following a healthy diet can cause lethargy and tiredness.
Here are 5 foods to incorporate into your diet to get that much needed energy boost during those long days.
1. Grains and pulses
A meal must never be skipped, as it will send the signal to your body to use up energy and fat slower, and can actually lead to weight gain. Eating at least one cooked meal a day is advised, followed by smaller and more frequent meals throughout the day. Adding whole grains, such as millets, quinoa, South Indian chama rice, whole grain brown rice,kidney beans, lentils and chickpeas, to meals slows down the release of insulin and gives anindividual sustained energy. They also provide the body with important carbs, proteins, vitamins and minerals.2. Water
Dehydration is a large cause of fatigue and energy loss. That is why drinking water is essential and it is vital that we keep our bodies hydrated throughout the day. Busy working hours often make us forgetful, but we must try to make it a habit to have 6 to 8 glasses of water throughout the day. Drinking tap or mineral water provides us with vital minerals too such as magnesium and calcium. Tea and coffee do not count as part of your water intake as caffeine is a diuretic and contributes to dehydration, however, having a glass of water with your coffee just like they do in Greece and Cyprus is better.
www.mmnutrition.co.uk/the-michelle-mina-guide-5-foods-to-...
.
RALLY BEHINP rtiE JNUSU TO UPHOLD ITS SANCTITY AND PRESTIGE! .
SFI .
EXPOSE THE HYPOCRISY AND SURRENDER BY THE ULT~~·LEFT!I AISF July 25,2007 The pamphlet issued by AISA yesterday was yet another instance of their hypocrisy on the one hand and their failure touphold the sanctity and .
Dear Friends, .
prestige of the JNUSU on the other. AISA has made three claims in its pamphlet: (i) The JNUSU office-bearers from the SFI-AISF are violating UGBM resolutions reganling the incident on 19111 February; (ii) The refusal of the JNUSU office-bearers from the SFI-AISF to submit letters of regret violates the agreement signed between the JNUSU and the administration and (iii} SFI-AISF is trying to break students' unity. Each one of these arguments is fallacious and sinister. .
The UGBM held on 81h March 2007 was held in the backdrop of the JNUSUCouncil meetingexpressing regret for the 19th February incident (the .
Who Is violating UGBM Resolutions? .
were suspended, had already expressed regret on the lines of the JNUSU Council resolution. It was the DSU which defied the Council Resolution and AISA representatives abstained on voting in the Council). Following the Council meeting, the JNUSUoffice-bearers along with some other students vmo .
refused to express regret. The UGBM endorsed the JNUSU Council Resolution expressing regret on the 19th February incident and rejected the DSU line .
~iplin~ry action on any student and therefore noProctorial .
i..
enquiry into the matter. The JNUSU President communicated the UGBM resolution to the admm1strat1on the very next day and the Proctorial Enquiry was .
boycotted by the JNUSU. Nobody from the SFI-AISF ever went to deposebefore the Proctorial enquiry. Ho\Yever, the submission of regret letters by the.
~ ofnot expressing regret. It further resolved that upon expression of regret there ~hould benodsuspended students of OSUfollowing the UGBM, was not i(l keeping with the JNUSU resolution: they regretted the "Inconvenience caused, ifan(.That . It was in keeping with the UGBM resolution that the JNUSU launched an agitation against the rustication of 8 students and fine imposed upon .
was aviolation of the UGBM resolution by the DSU. .
basis of an appeal expressing regret, the JNUSUoffice-bearers from SFI-AISFcategorically refused to subm~ any appeal once again. It was theAISA and the office-bearers, under the leadership of the JNUSU President from SFI-AISF. When the Administration agreed to reconsider the punishment on the .
the General Secretary of the JNUSU who were more than willing to submit regret letters. disregarding the letter and spirit of the UGBM resolution. Since SFI-AISF understands the concerns of the rusticated students. whose student life is at stake, it did not oppose an agreement 'Mth the administration on mandated the JNUSU office-bearers to express regret on anindividual basis. The minutes of the JNUSU Council and all-organization meetings held at the '-( this basis. However, submission of any regret letter by the JNUSU office-bearers was categorically opposed by the SFI-AISF because the UGBM never administrative block before signing the agreement with the administration would clearly show the various positions in that debate. JNUSU offi~arars .
of the JNUSU Council resolution even before the UGBMwas held! Therefore, it is the General Secretary of the .
I had already expressed regret on the lines.. .
seek the opinion of the student community before submitting another regret letter? Afrajd of confronting the administration any more, even on .
JNUSU from theAISA YAloowes an explanation to the student community for submitting another regret letter! Did the General Secretary of the JNUSU .
legitimate grounds, the General Secretary of the JNUSU has meeklysurrendered before the administration. Now, in order to justify his act of cowardice .
and opportunism, the AISA is levering baseless charges against the SFI-AISFof violating UGBMresolution. Let the AISA mention one resolution passed .
In the UGBM tM1ich mandates the JNUSU office-bearers tosubmit another regret letter. ;j Where Is the Breach of the Agreement? .
The AJSA has correctfy pointed out that the agreement with the administration states: --rhe Vice chancellor has agreed to reconsider the .
punishment based on the Proctorial decision with regard to the incident that took place on 19th February 2007 on receiving individuaJ letters of regret \Wh.
~ .
an appeal from concerned students to enable them to register by 14th August 200r. However, that JNUSU office-bearers have to make an appeal for 0 -· .
<.
f-c i been denied regisbation in the first place; they have only been fined. This agreement is only meant for those students who have been rusticated and seeking registration by 14" August 2007 is indeed a strange interpretation of the agreement on AISA's part because the JNUSU office-bearers have not .
~g .
hence denjed registration. The SFI-AISFsticks to the position that the fines levied on the JNUSU office-bearers, on the basis of the charge that they were ~~.
~s .
'unable to control the situation', should be revoked unconditionally. The SFI-AISF would have liked to see an the punishments revoked unconditionally in keeping with the UGBMresolution. However, since the rusticated students had agreed to make an appeal to the administration expressing regret once again, the SFI-AISFdid not want to stand in the way of the revocation of their rustication. However, if anybody has breached the agreemen~ in the .
sense of going overboard In placating the administration, It Is the General Secretary of the JNUSU, because the administration has never .
by the General Secretary who is trying to bend backwards to appease the admintstration. Would he have the backbone to face the administration ever.
~~ .
demanded any regret by the JNUSU office-bearers In the first place. In fact the SFI-AISF is shocked and dismayed by thissupine attitude displayed z< .
again and fight against anti-student moves? We doubt it strongly. It is indeed shameful for the AISA to have allo\ved the General Secretary to submit a.
to regret letter and then accusing the SFI-AISFof trying to begood boysbefore theadministration. This is aclassic case of hypocrisy..
f;j~ .
AISA has accused the SFI-AISFof disrupting the unity of the students. This is in keeping with their unethical and immoral politics. The J"'USU~~ Who is Disrupting Student Unity? .
~CJ .
President is yet to recover fromthe after-effects of the arduous indefinite hunger strike that he led fromthe front against the punishment of th~ students .
<' and the students' charter of demands. The entire university was witness to the steadfast commitment of the SFI-AISF activists to student unity Y'hen they .
~·.
:X:I .
woti(ed tirelessly during the difficutt agitation in order to make it a success. How easily the AISA glosses over these facts for sectarian ends. r·~ w:mt to f-cl ask some simple questions to the AISA. Do they genuinely regret tho Incident of 19th February? Ifso, who do they hold responsible for it? As far as ~JNUSU office-bearers from the SFI-AISF are concerned, they did not participate in the gherao of the Registrar, but could not pre''"31! it from .
-~~ .
happening. They haVe' already offered regret' for that. But some students did tie a rope around the car of the Registrar, some deflated trre tyres, ~me smeared black paint on the car and one student climbed on the top of the car and shouted slogans. Who were they? Was there a"collective· decisionof .
the JNUSU or the UGBM to indulge inall these acts?AISA should either categorically deny their role on 19th February (which we knowt1 ':.Y ca'l't bee"'' 'SO . the test. he .
they issued a pamphlet celebrating the 'gherao·) or accept responsibility for the same. If the AISA's parameters for expressing soli~· tri~' Wl~ wor ' rs' .
' .
Proctorial enquiry has nothing to do with this: the JNUSU has already rejected the punishments based on the Proctorial enquiry and tougl.t to rights or upholding student unity imply lying to the student community or justifying these adventurist acts. we are sorry we cannot ~ .
reverse them. However, AISA should not suffer from the Illusion that they can obfuscate their adventurist role on 19th Februal) r fy··· ~..,. et.. community, riding piggy back upon the successful agitation led by the JNUSU. The students of JNU would expect themnot to repeat~ ich 51up;.:1 tes future, which discredit the JNU student movement The sanctity and prestige of the JNUSU is supreme, since it embodies the collectiJJ spirit of the JNU .
r.
student community. The JNUSU office-bearers from theSFI-AISF would not submit any more appeal expressingregret. SFI-AISF demar ~:-that !:teir r-s .
be revoked unconditionally. If AISA does not support this position, let them at least not come in the way. Any effort on their part to collude with tne .
SdJ. Rajlv Ranjan, Secy. SFI·JNU administration against the SFI-AISF would not be forgiven by the student community. Sdl· Fauzan Abrar, Jt. Seey., AISF.JNU.
. .
--""""',._.. """''f'r.~.
-~ ---~-~·.
"..........-~...: .
.
.