Me being fake ?
I had a conversation with a cousin here concerning a flickr contact few months ago. He said, why I'm not commenting
on this person's stream. I said to my cousin, this particular person doesn't anymore visit or comment on my photos, despite my several nice comments on the this person's photos. She just ignore me. But it's of no big issue if one suddenly undo me as a contact. That's fine with me it's just sometimes the way here in flickr. No big deal. I know why cousin asked me. He was fond of her.
But the last thing I read on this person's post was she is deleting some fake people. So checked I it out if as me.
Wow, I was one of them she deleted. I don't know why.
As I used to post lovely comment. I never question her sensual photos at all. Let it be . I understand, that's way of individual preferences.
Even I couldn't agree on a particular photo , I put myself more objectively well in good manners when I comment. I don't like making negative criticisms on people. Who am I judging people and their lives. I am careful of what I click as FAVORITE photo. I do reciprocate FAV for FAV,COMMENT for COMMENT But if a photo doesn't agree of what my soul' dictates as right , I normally skip from favoriting. Huh, and one for sure in my criteria as for favs are l nature, people,daily lives , animals, objects, arts . But one in particular I'm not up to favorite is any photo with sensual / sexual messages.
If post my devotion of the Lord here and sharing my testimonies of how good God is , yet I favorited a sensual photo, how would that make me look like - partly a pervert ?Although , I actually did a few by accident.
Also one of the reasons I deleted most of my London Naked bike ride photos as it consist of many naked people cycling ---
I don't normally see nakedness as always sexual across the board. It all depends with the motive and behavior. I dont think those people cycling naked on streets of London were sexualized. Their nakedness was done as props for political agenda putting their message across.
However, it may look contrary to my new testimonies since 2011, that I find people lusting over some naked images of London strangers during the WNBR inmy photo stream. A few sent me messages, "who is this guy" , so and so - handsome naked bloke huh, asking for his address or phone number, I'm not a pimp - So I have to rid of many of those photos :)
Me as fake ? For not favoriting a very sensual photo?
Whatevaaaaa.
Only God sees and judges me in the purest sense :)
Me being fake ?
I had a conversation with a cousin here concerning a flickr contact few months ago. He said, why I'm not commenting
on this person's stream. I said to my cousin, this particular person doesn't anymore visit or comment on my photos, despite my several nice comments on the this person's photos. She just ignore me. But it's of no big issue if one suddenly undo me as a contact. That's fine with me it's just sometimes the way here in flickr. No big deal. I know why cousin asked me. He was fond of her.
But the last thing I read on this person's post was she is deleting some fake people. So checked I it out if as me.
Wow, I was one of them she deleted. I don't know why.
As I used to post lovely comment. I never question her sensual photos at all. Let it be . I understand, that's way of individual preferences.
Even I couldn't agree on a particular photo , I put myself more objectively well in good manners when I comment. I don't like making negative criticisms on people. Who am I judging people and their lives. I am careful of what I click as FAVORITE photo. I do reciprocate FAV for FAV,COMMENT for COMMENT But if a photo doesn't agree of what my soul' dictates as right , I normally skip from favoriting. Huh, and one for sure in my criteria as for favs are l nature, people,daily lives , animals, objects, arts . But one in particular I'm not up to favorite is any photo with sensual / sexual messages.
If post my devotion of the Lord here and sharing my testimonies of how good God is , yet I favorited a sensual photo, how would that make me look like - partly a pervert ?Although , I actually did a few by accident.
Also one of the reasons I deleted most of my London Naked bike ride photos as it consist of many naked people cycling ---
I don't normally see nakedness as always sexual across the board. It all depends with the motive and behavior. I dont think those people cycling naked on streets of London were sexualized. Their nakedness was done as props for political agenda putting their message across.
However, it may look contrary to my new testimonies since 2011, that I find people lusting over some naked images of London strangers during the WNBR inmy photo stream. A few sent me messages, "who is this guy" , so and so - handsome naked bloke huh, asking for his address or phone number, I'm not a pimp - So I have to rid of many of those photos :)
Me as fake ? For not favoriting a very sensual photo?
Whatevaaaaa.
Only God sees and judges me in the purest sense :)