PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2013 ID-55524
.
. . · rador and nor imperialist. There is no book of Marxi~~ t_hat .~lai~s bourgeoisie that IS neither national,_ nor c~~P eoisielln our understanding, the Indian bourgeoiSie IS a JUniOr ~~geriali~t countries or axes); it is politically independent an_d.
that there can be o~IXthese three kmds o hi between this political independence and economic.
partner' of lmpenahsm {not on_e or t~o _I p . .
economically depe~dent; there IS symblo~c:~~a~~~~na~treality, while at other occasion, the other; as a result, .
.
. bour eoisie is behaving like a comprador; but one candependence; sometimes, t~e o~e s~emsto e .
sometimes there is an o~tlcal llluslonh tha;hth~ ;d~a~ourge~isie has gone against the imperialist p~essure and provide equal number of mst~nc~s w ~n. e n ~~ove that whatsoever be the case, but this much IS sure that . . d es not have any character of its own. It rules on.
interests. And only one occasion IS sufficient to P Indian bourgeoisie is not com~rador! Co~pr~dor bo~~~~~~~~~at~ In our opinion, India is in the stage of Socialist .
I ment of change is dominant in the newbehalf of Imperialism and carnes out eac an every th .
Revolution, but a new kind of Socialist_ Revol_ution, becausemb:r~;fundamental accounts and issues from the versions ofSocialist Revolutions. They will b_e ~,fferent o~annuthat were expected in the 19th century Europe. Bolshevik Socialist Revolution_ and thse s_o~!a~l~t ~~~~!~~~o ~e cannot elaborate on this point right now, but we .
. . d d on these formulations too and ready toTherefore we propose to call It New ocla IS . e .
would ap~reciate any discussion on this questlon._we a~e open-mm e . ..
en a ein friendly and revolutionary debates and d1scuss1ons..
. d most Of it is hone:;t c;ouraseous and committed..
g 0 .
As far as the cadre force of the ML can:'p ~~ co~ce~ne_ ,I of Bolshevism is n~t implemented in most ofthe 1 .clp e_ · .---... nt-nn ~nrl th11c; the resultant vacillation.
groups and paftle'!t j..(:,"d't~~lffi;\.fi'rt!, JD3.8[~~~~~t.~~~-yr~nbetween openism and undergroundism. What has been termed as 'Red Star over India' by Jan Myrdal is afar cry from what Edgar Snow called 'Red Star over China'. Such irresponsible parodical comparisons create a lot of confusion and conceptual problems. .
The line ofCPI (Maoist) in our opinion is a "left" adventurist line; it does not believe in revolutionary massline. The tribal areas where the loot and plunder of natural and human resources by the corporates is underway, it is not a .
matter of choice or ideological motivation for the tribal population but a matter of existence; they have to fight, if .
they have to live; in this, the CPI (Maoist) iS providing a courageous leadershipi however, this so-called 'red corridor' cannot be transformed into a countrywide revolution. There is a huge industrial working class in India that has been left at the mercy of the revisionist and corporatist trade unions of the social democratic and fascist parties. This working class is 22 crore strong. The agricultural working class is 32 crore strong according to the government data. The 54 crore strong proletariat is left as a political grazing ground for the bourgeois and revisionist parties; in such a situation, a 'red corridor' in the tribal areas, that are experiencing the most naked, most barbariC and predatory form Of lOOt, plUnder and CapitaliSt accumulation, Cclnnot be sufficient for the cause .
of Indian Revolution. Indian state cannot be subverted from this programme, from this path. At most, such a trend .
can create a law and order situation for the state, and it will continue to exist in a post-colonial backward capitalist country where the most advanced form of capitalist accumulation in some areas is curiously accompanied by the most barbaric forms of 'primitive accumulation'; such atrend will continue to exist until there is the resurgence of a new revolutionary communist party with acorrect ideological, programmatic and organizational understanding. The trend of 'left' adventurism is the dialectical other of the trend of parliamentary reformist revisionist left {the rightwing deviation of Marxism) and it creates false hopes and ungrounded optimism among a section of population, and especially, the revolutionary youth driven with the romantic imaginings of revolution and revolutionary movement. But in the end, such hopes are shattered and worst kind of defeatism and pessimism .
grips the masses. It has happened in the past and given such understanding and line persists in the ML movement, it will happen again. In the long run, such an adventurist line, despite its honesty, sacrifice and courage causes .
more harm than benefit. We would like to end on a few notes on the way to be taken for the resurgence of the revolutionary communist movement and organize a new revolutionary communist party.. .
We believe that today there is the need, more than ever, to defend the revolutionary content and core of .
Marxism-Leninism-.Maoism, because earlier it had been targeted by open reactionary bourgeois theories like postmodernism, postcolonial heory, etc. Now, it is being targeted by ostensibly radical philosophers who either .
claim to be Marxist, or post-Marxist communists, rather, we should say, postmodernist bourgeois philosophers camouflaged as revolutionary thinkers. Secondly, we need to fight against the anarcho-syndicalist, anarchist, .
liquldationist, non-party revolutionist, economist trends within the communist movement. These trends tantamount to what the "new vagabond philosophers" have been saying; ultimately, it targets the need for the .
,_....._-----~--~-------.
.
PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2013 ID-55524
.
. . · rador and nor imperialist. There is no book of Marxi~~ t_hat .~lai~s bourgeoisie that IS neither national,_ nor c~~P eoisielln our understanding, the Indian bourgeoiSie IS a JUniOr ~~geriali~t countries or axes); it is politically independent an_d.
that there can be o~IXthese three kmds o hi between this political independence and economic.
partner' of lmpenahsm {not on_e or t~o _I p . .
economically depe~dent; there IS symblo~c:~~a~~~~na~treality, while at other occasion, the other; as a result, .
.
. bour eoisie is behaving like a comprador; but one candependence; sometimes, t~e o~e s~emsto e .
sometimes there is an o~tlcal llluslonh tha;hth~ ;d~a~ourge~isie has gone against the imperialist p~essure and provide equal number of mst~nc~s w ~n. e n ~~ove that whatsoever be the case, but this much IS sure that . . d es not have any character of its own. It rules on.
interests. And only one occasion IS sufficient to P Indian bourgeoisie is not com~rador! Co~pr~dor bo~~~~~~~~~at~ In our opinion, India is in the stage of Socialist .
I ment of change is dominant in the newbehalf of Imperialism and carnes out eac an every th .
Revolution, but a new kind of Socialist_ Revol_ution, becausemb:r~;fundamental accounts and issues from the versions ofSocialist Revolutions. They will b_e ~,fferent o~annuthat were expected in the 19th century Europe. Bolshevik Socialist Revolution_ and thse s_o~!a~l~t ~~~~!~~~o ~e cannot elaborate on this point right now, but we .
. . d d on these formulations too and ready toTherefore we propose to call It New ocla IS . e .
would ap~reciate any discussion on this questlon._we a~e open-mm e . ..
en a ein friendly and revolutionary debates and d1scuss1ons..
. d most Of it is hone:;t c;ouraseous and committed..
g 0 .
As far as the cadre force of the ML can:'p ~~ co~ce~ne_ ,I of Bolshevism is n~t implemented in most ofthe 1 .clp e_ · .---... nt-nn ~nrl th11c; the resultant vacillation.
groups and paftle'!t j..(:,"d't~~lffi;\.fi'rt!, JD3.8[~~~~~t.~~~-yr~nbetween openism and undergroundism. What has been termed as 'Red Star over India' by Jan Myrdal is afar cry from what Edgar Snow called 'Red Star over China'. Such irresponsible parodical comparisons create a lot of confusion and conceptual problems. .
The line ofCPI (Maoist) in our opinion is a "left" adventurist line; it does not believe in revolutionary massline. The tribal areas where the loot and plunder of natural and human resources by the corporates is underway, it is not a .
matter of choice or ideological motivation for the tribal population but a matter of existence; they have to fight, if .
they have to live; in this, the CPI (Maoist) iS providing a courageous leadershipi however, this so-called 'red corridor' cannot be transformed into a countrywide revolution. There is a huge industrial working class in India that has been left at the mercy of the revisionist and corporatist trade unions of the social democratic and fascist parties. This working class is 22 crore strong. The agricultural working class is 32 crore strong according to the government data. The 54 crore strong proletariat is left as a political grazing ground for the bourgeois and revisionist parties; in such a situation, a 'red corridor' in the tribal areas, that are experiencing the most naked, most barbariC and predatory form Of lOOt, plUnder and CapitaliSt accumulation, Cclnnot be sufficient for the cause .
of Indian Revolution. Indian state cannot be subverted from this programme, from this path. At most, such a trend .
can create a law and order situation for the state, and it will continue to exist in a post-colonial backward capitalist country where the most advanced form of capitalist accumulation in some areas is curiously accompanied by the most barbaric forms of 'primitive accumulation'; such atrend will continue to exist until there is the resurgence of a new revolutionary communist party with acorrect ideological, programmatic and organizational understanding. The trend of 'left' adventurism is the dialectical other of the trend of parliamentary reformist revisionist left {the rightwing deviation of Marxism) and it creates false hopes and ungrounded optimism among a section of population, and especially, the revolutionary youth driven with the romantic imaginings of revolution and revolutionary movement. But in the end, such hopes are shattered and worst kind of defeatism and pessimism .
grips the masses. It has happened in the past and given such understanding and line persists in the ML movement, it will happen again. In the long run, such an adventurist line, despite its honesty, sacrifice and courage causes .
more harm than benefit. We would like to end on a few notes on the way to be taken for the resurgence of the revolutionary communist movement and organize a new revolutionary communist party.. .
We believe that today there is the need, more than ever, to defend the revolutionary content and core of .
Marxism-Leninism-.Maoism, because earlier it had been targeted by open reactionary bourgeois theories like postmodernism, postcolonial heory, etc. Now, it is being targeted by ostensibly radical philosophers who either .
claim to be Marxist, or post-Marxist communists, rather, we should say, postmodernist bourgeois philosophers camouflaged as revolutionary thinkers. Secondly, we need to fight against the anarcho-syndicalist, anarchist, .
liquldationist, non-party revolutionist, economist trends within the communist movement. These trends tantamount to what the "new vagabond philosophers" have been saying; ultimately, it targets the need for the .
,_....._-----~--~-------.
.