PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2012 ID-54498

.

. " ' -. .

3rd August 2012 .

Oppose the Double Speak of AISA led ..JNUSU on the.

constitutionally mandated Reservations!!.

Reject the Politics of 'NO MANDAI-ism' in JNU !!.

The admission process in both JNU and Delhi University has become controversial this year with the.

.

anti-reservation lobby exerting tremendous ploys to scuttle the constitutionally guaranteed reservations.

in the intake ofstudents..

' .

.

In Delhi University, even after the MHRD directive (directive in response to a delegation from the.

student community) to the University, the DU administration sought to play 'Hide and Seek' with the.

reservation Policy. .

.

An RTI filed by NSUI activists in around 30 colleg~s in 2010 revealed that on an average General.

Category seats were filled in excess by 30% of the sanctioned strength. It was also revealed that in the.

.

very same coll.eges Reserved Category seats were filled 30% below the sanctioned strength. Thus, the.

anti-reservation lobby in the University has been robbing the seats from the SC, ST, and OBC students.

.

....

and depriving them the 15, 7.5 and 27 percentages. of seats provided by. the Central Educational.

Institutions (Reser\lations in Admission} Act of 2006..

·.

The student community in Delhi University had to go for indefinite relay hunger strike with the open.

support of DUSU lead by NSUI earlier this week, after which the DU administration had to bring an.

official order so as to ensure fair and proper implementation of constitutionally mandated.

.

reservations in the admissions for SC/ST/and OBC students..

On the other hand in JNU, a look into the current year's admission process would reveal a dismal picture.

v..:ith an improper implementation of reser.·ations (SC/ST/OBC/PH) in Mphii/Phd/MA and BA admissions..

This not only has brought to iight, the extent to which the anti-reservation lobby can scuttle the goal of.

social justice, but also exposed the dubious role of AISA led JNUSU. When the constitutionally mandated.

.

reservations for OBC-SC-ST-PH categories are 27,15,7.5 and 3 percentages respectively, the actual.

percentage of students in the admission list belonging to the respective categories are 19.63, 11.42,.

5.82, 2.39 percentages respectively. Of this criminal injustice in the admission process, it is shocking that.

.

there have been no SC/ST and OBC students in the admission list of CITD, Spanish, German centers etc..

It was AISA which sought to settle the issue of the reduction of viva voce marks in admissions with.

.

academic council decidinwto setting up a committee with representation from AISA-Ied JNUSU on 19th.

March 2012, the follow up of which was completely negative..

Therefore, the present anomaly in the reservation policy ofJNU has to do more with the role ofJNUSU.

led by A/SA. I~ was A/SA who pioneered the slogan of 'No Manda/ -No Kamandal'. The improper.

implementation ofconstitutionally mandated reservations in various centers in this academic session.

not only vindicated A/SA-ian commitment to 'Kamandal-ism', but also the ineffectiveness ofthe AISA"s.

rhetoric in JNU. .

NSUI -appeals the student community in JNU to oppose the AISA·ploy to scuttle the goal of social justice.

in JNU. We appeal you to stand united to fight the opportunism of AISA led JNUSU and for proper.

implementation of reservations in JNU!! .

NSUI congratulates the stut.ent community on th~.

·fulfillment ofits demand to bring out a secondlist ofAdmissions in accordance with the constitutionally mandated rescn·ation policy. Thesecond list will be released tomorrow morning.Sd/-Manoranjan Mohapatra sd/-President Manish AryaJNU NSUI .

Vice PresidentJNU NSUI .

.

 

Done