PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2012 ID-54646
.
' .
~Jq (zo1z .
lseellvour for president ? lhllld againstlvogdob ?., we reJect"left" and opaonunism,? .
JNUSU Election 2012 is just a few days to go. But current election-like the previous one is again going to be under the Lyngdoh recommendations that meant for deflating the radicarism of students' politics. We all know the \.
.
·~ianprovisio~s of the Lyngdoh. Even if Kashmir is burning and peoples in north-east are killed and raped by Indian .
·~the Lyngdoh recommendation do not give any space to students to debate and discuss these crimes. For the .
lyngdoh, the student activist/leader has to be an "integrationist". Other constraints include administrative control of the .
student union. age .bar, lack of opportunities to link the students' issues with the struggling masses outside. In other .
WordS, .the Lyngdoh commission is nothing but an imperialist, capitalist, statist, brahminical design to clip the wings of .
.
students' politics. .
I, .therefor~, strongly befieve there is a need to intervene in the JNUSU election, given the politics of betrayal .
.
, AISF, ABVP, YFE, NSUI..
.
practiced by qpportunist, castiest and communal forces such as AI SA, SFI, SFl~JNU .
Therefore; my independent presidential candidature is to use the platform of JNUSU election to reach out to the .
.
studeqt commu~ity and take up those issues cannot be addressed by opportunist "lefr organisation because they fear .
that their light-wing base might get eroded. I think unless the Lyngdoh is rolled back, we will have a tamed student body. .
Such body is required for the elites because it will give a (false) impression that there is a "democratic" participation of .
~n~in the decision making at the university. But in reality, it works as a constraint on furthering the politics of .
struggle and resistance. This was the very reason that AISA-led JNUSU this time has-improved its earlier records of being .
.
abootlicker of JNU administration. Thus, AISA coufd not do anything for students. First, OBC reserva~i.on has not been fully implemented year after year. Second, marks for the viva from 30 to 10 j \t .
has not been reduced, despite its promise. As a result, SC/ST/OBC/women/ candidates continue to be discriminated. Third, oo·its promise of building up new hostels, AISA fail to pressurise the administration. As a resuiC hundreds of ~~ students are depfived of their basic rights to shelter and food month~ after the opening of new semester. AISA even did 'n d.
I.
not intervene when the funds for the expansion of infrastructure in the wake of 27% OBC reservation was diverted or .
rather misused by JNU administration as pointed out by CAG report. Fourth, on its promise to lead a struggle against the .
Lyngdolj ~uring t~e last JNUSU election and hold it only as an "interim" measure, what it has done is nothing more or less .
lhan tokepism and tourism. AJSAJs half-hearted fight against Lyngdoh starts when the new academic session begins for a .
.
'issue of social I I ~.
very short period to give an impression that it is the real crusader. Fifth, on its claim to champion the \.
I I I ~II.
{ustice. ·minority rights, AtSA has not taken any concrete step in fear of losing communal Hindutva forces within its d. \ organisation:In the eyes of AISA, SC/ST/OBC/minority/women constitute just avote-bank while its leadership comes from l 1 'St .
· -. I \e id.
uppE!rclass/castes. This continues to be reflected in the panel of AI SA. Most of the AISA presidents so far has been upper I .
~ I 1.
caStes..What accounted for the rejection of AI SA among student? _ The ~egeneration and revisionism of AISA along with its parental party CPI-ML · (Uberation) is because of the fact j I .
that they were floated with an aim to correct revisionism and opportunism of SFI and CPM. But AISA and CPI-ML J .
l .
, ~)very·soon fall prey to the same mistakes and dirty tactics which were once criticised by them. Under the crisis le .
ir.
~l~acyand shrinking base, CPM-ML (Liberation) entered into alliance with its enemy number 1 CPM during last .
n.
;~Gp,l;:·~j-:_~.--election, while it betrayed landles"s labourers, mostly Dalits by working as a partner of castiest, communal and .
.at.
~r.o:.ww-militarY force, Ranvir Sema, in Bihar, which engineered the Bathani Tola massacre in 1996. I I.
let me briefly tum to SFI. Division, internal fighting, .opportunism and lack of revolutionary theory has also .
.
SFI inte at least three camps in JNU. While "officialn SFI candidates have made the mockery of JNUSU election I .
.appearir:'Q like a ghost, the SFI-JNU·is the most confused organisation today. It has opposed its leadership candid~ureof neo-liberal" P.ranab Ml)khe~ee and got expelled, But, it is stm begging at the door of CPI-M leaders the expulsion. For them, the JNUSU election is Jess the fight for the cause for students and more to settle ·with its top leadership. It is a bizarre situation that while it upheld CPI-M's crime against farmers, workers and .
in Nandigram and Singure, it suddenly became "critical" "autonomous" and "independenf on Pranab episode. The I.
. " ,....
SFI is also due to the fact that it is agang of opportunist, careerists, professional comrades who" are in the patty f.
petty interests in the garb of progressivism. far as another..left organisation AISF is concerned, it is yet to break out of its slavery from SFI and now it has a new bondage with SFI-JNU. The very reason for AISF shirkfng base is its revisionism and lack of will to .
stud~nts. Most.importantly, it has way back lost faith in revolutionary politics. W,Att: attac~ing official left,.we must not forget that while Hindu communal-fascist ABVP a~d equally dangerous garb have no issue and concern for the students. These organisations are divided houses as they .
I. .
·· -r.~ >"'.
. ,. ~... 1 .
1 ,, ,. "!-! 1:..
.~d."''. ,.. ' .,,.
·-· -·'1.
~: ,;·J·.· I, . ------. ~ r:· .1·ti'.·· · ' '.
. '. ':. , ' . . ''Jf. ..::----...___ .
·, ,..
" ""' , ' . I . ·, ,lti'l..1 '''"''·' O~~ 0't_l . 1! ,· ' t ) 0,· ; 1"'111".-If. LlI . I '.
.,,11; <:·!1. ' I ' . ~---.
' It oil ' , , 0.
1 .
.
PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2012 ID-54646
.
' .
~Jq (zo1z .
lseellvour for president ? lhllld againstlvogdob ?., we reJect"left" and opaonunism,? .
JNUSU Election 2012 is just a few days to go. But current election-like the previous one is again going to be under the Lyngdoh recommendations that meant for deflating the radicarism of students' politics. We all know the \.
.
·~ianprovisio~s of the Lyngdoh. Even if Kashmir is burning and peoples in north-east are killed and raped by Indian .
·~the Lyngdoh recommendation do not give any space to students to debate and discuss these crimes. For the .
lyngdoh, the student activist/leader has to be an "integrationist". Other constraints include administrative control of the .
student union. age .bar, lack of opportunities to link the students' issues with the struggling masses outside. In other .
WordS, .the Lyngdoh commission is nothing but an imperialist, capitalist, statist, brahminical design to clip the wings of .
.
students' politics. .
I, .therefor~, strongly befieve there is a need to intervene in the JNUSU election, given the politics of betrayal .
.
, AISF, ABVP, YFE, NSUI..
.
practiced by qpportunist, castiest and communal forces such as AI SA, SFI, SFl~JNU .
Therefore; my independent presidential candidature is to use the platform of JNUSU election to reach out to the .
.
studeqt commu~ity and take up those issues cannot be addressed by opportunist "lefr organisation because they fear .
that their light-wing base might get eroded. I think unless the Lyngdoh is rolled back, we will have a tamed student body. .
Such body is required for the elites because it will give a (false) impression that there is a "democratic" participation of .
~n~in the decision making at the university. But in reality, it works as a constraint on furthering the politics of .
struggle and resistance. This was the very reason that AISA-led JNUSU this time has-improved its earlier records of being .
.
abootlicker of JNU administration. Thus, AISA coufd not do anything for students. First, OBC reserva~i.on has not been fully implemented year after year. Second, marks for the viva from 30 to 10 j \t .
has not been reduced, despite its promise. As a result, SC/ST/OBC/women/ candidates continue to be discriminated. Third, oo·its promise of building up new hostels, AISA fail to pressurise the administration. As a resuiC hundreds of ~~ students are depfived of their basic rights to shelter and food month~ after the opening of new semester. AISA even did 'n d.
I.
not intervene when the funds for the expansion of infrastructure in the wake of 27% OBC reservation was diverted or .
rather misused by JNU administration as pointed out by CAG report. Fourth, on its promise to lead a struggle against the .
Lyngdolj ~uring t~e last JNUSU election and hold it only as an "interim" measure, what it has done is nothing more or less .
lhan tokepism and tourism. AJSAJs half-hearted fight against Lyngdoh starts when the new academic session begins for a .
.
'issue of social I I ~.
very short period to give an impression that it is the real crusader. Fifth, on its claim to champion the \.
I I I ~II.
{ustice. ·minority rights, AtSA has not taken any concrete step in fear of losing communal Hindutva forces within its d. \ organisation:In the eyes of AISA, SC/ST/OBC/minority/women constitute just avote-bank while its leadership comes from l 1 'St .
· -. I \e id.
uppE!rclass/castes. This continues to be reflected in the panel of AI SA. Most of the AISA presidents so far has been upper I .
~ I 1.
caStes..What accounted for the rejection of AI SA among student? _ The ~egeneration and revisionism of AISA along with its parental party CPI-ML · (Uberation) is because of the fact j I .
that they were floated with an aim to correct revisionism and opportunism of SFI and CPM. But AISA and CPI-ML J .
l .
, ~)very·soon fall prey to the same mistakes and dirty tactics which were once criticised by them. Under the crisis le .
ir.
~l~acyand shrinking base, CPM-ML (Liberation) entered into alliance with its enemy number 1 CPM during last .
n.
;~Gp,l;:·~j-:_~.--election, while it betrayed landles"s labourers, mostly Dalits by working as a partner of castiest, communal and .
.at.
~r.o:.ww-militarY force, Ranvir Sema, in Bihar, which engineered the Bathani Tola massacre in 1996. I I.
let me briefly tum to SFI. Division, internal fighting, .opportunism and lack of revolutionary theory has also .
.
SFI inte at least three camps in JNU. While "officialn SFI candidates have made the mockery of JNUSU election I .
.appearir:'Q like a ghost, the SFI-JNU·is the most confused organisation today. It has opposed its leadership candid~ureof neo-liberal" P.ranab Ml)khe~ee and got expelled, But, it is stm begging at the door of CPI-M leaders the expulsion. For them, the JNUSU election is Jess the fight for the cause for students and more to settle ·with its top leadership. It is a bizarre situation that while it upheld CPI-M's crime against farmers, workers and .
in Nandigram and Singure, it suddenly became "critical" "autonomous" and "independenf on Pranab episode. The I.
. " ,....
SFI is also due to the fact that it is agang of opportunist, careerists, professional comrades who" are in the patty f.
petty interests in the garb of progressivism. far as another..left organisation AISF is concerned, it is yet to break out of its slavery from SFI and now it has a new bondage with SFI-JNU. The very reason for AISF shirkfng base is its revisionism and lack of will to .
stud~nts. Most.importantly, it has way back lost faith in revolutionary politics. W,Att: attac~ing official left,.we must not forget that while Hindu communal-fascist ABVP a~d equally dangerous garb have no issue and concern for the students. These organisations are divided houses as they .
I. .
·· -r.~ >"'.
. ,. ~... 1 .
1 ,, ,. "!-! 1:..
.~d."''. ,.. ' .,,.
·-· -·'1.
~: ,;·J·.· I, . ------. ~ r:· .1·ti'.·· · ' '.
. '. ':. , ' . . ''Jf. ..::----...___ .
·, ,..
" ""' , ' . I . ·, ,lti'l..1 '''"''·' O~~ 0't_l . 1! ,· ' t ) 0,· ; 1"'111".-If. LlI . I '.
.,,11; <:·!1. ' I ' . ~---.
' It oil ' , , 0.
1 .
.