PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2012 ID-54505

.

.. .

.

' .

\\.

f'Ud-J~ 2f)/'2-.

-.. --___._ nnlrUl_tEI gnd llheratiOO·AISAI.

has squarely blamed CPI(M)'s repression of Singur and Nandigram movements as the reason forits d«feats in JNUSU elections,claiming.

'forthright positions', SFI-JNU even tried to sum up the experi~nce of the international Communist movement by daiming that ·oneof the .

that uthese developments have eroded the SFI's support base among the progressive and democratic min{fed students". In the nameof .

All such assertions leave no one in doubt that SFI-JNU s cnt1que of CPI{M) IS ent1rely based on 1ts calculations for the JNUSU etections. ~.' r. .

major shortcomings of the socialist experimentsof the 20th century was toaddress the questions of democracy,civil liberties, freedom of .

expresston and tolerance towards political dissent" -a~ ~rg~_men~ repeated ~b na~sium by the r~visionists ~nd opportunists all over the W( r IJ.JNU believes that to reverse the defeats 1n JNUSU elections, it has to now distance itself from CPI(M) and its past crimes. Even with this latest 'distancing' and 'di.ssident', SFI·JNU is nothing but a new avatar of its old self. SFI-JNU is unable and .

unwilling to break the. umbilical_chord that ties it with the.reactionary. ~nd.social-fascist_po,lit_ics of.

stance a reflection of any genUine attempt at self-reflection and rectification, because 1ts d1ssent.~PI(~)ts d1ctated purely by the considerations of .

. Nor SF1-JNU's present anti-CPI(M)victory and defeat in JNUSU elections. It is nothing but crass opportunism to conveniently put the entire blame of SFI's electoral defeat in .

JNUSU elections from 2007 on the 'm1stakes' of its parent party, without accepting its own dark history of anti·student politics in the campus. · The students of th1s campus will not allow SFI-JNU to conve~ien!IY forget its past b~tra.

_yals. V'_Vhile in JNUSU, SFI-JNU facilitated the entry of .

the Nestle outlet 1nto JNU in 2004 and defended the corporal1zat1onof the campus, 1l stded w1th NSUI and ABVP ·in opposingthe students of the campus who showed black flags to Manmohan Singh when the Wortd Bank-appointed PM visited JNU ·in 2005. SFI-JNUbetrayed the united struggle of workers and students in 2007 by demanding Proctorial enquiry and punishment for protesting students. JNUSU office bearers from SFI submitted apology letters to the VC along with AI SA's office bearers in JNUSU after the registrar was confronted by students demanding worker's rights. SFI-JNU betrayed the struggle against theimposition of user charges and elect~ic meters in 2010. 11 backstabbedelections. These are only afew glaring samples of SFI's 'glorious legacy' within this campus! Can it put the blame for such opportunist and the united anti-lyngdoh struggle by surrendering to the Solicitor General in the name of 'negotiations' and helped impose Lyngdoh on JNUSU.

anti-student acts on CPI(M)? Students of JNU have rejected SFI as much for its misdeeds in the campus as for the crimes of social-fascist CPI(M) ·outstde..

Now that 'SFt-JNU' has been summarily dissolved and its four leading members expelled by SFI's all-India committee, 'SFI· .

JNU' is crying hoarse against CPI(M) brand of 'authoritarianism'. But this is the method in which CPi(M) and its affiliate organisations have dealt with political opposition within its ranks and outside all along in its history. Why have SF1-JNU realized only now that they have I been treated in an 'authoritanan· and ·un~emocr.atic' manner?_Does it believe that CPI(M)'s actions against the Naxalites in the 1960s-70s, .

a .

against the people·of Marisjhapi. Singur. Nandigram; Chengara, Lalgarh etc. were democratic? What is their posttion on CPI(M)'s support to ,0 the UPA government in 2004, 1n wh,ch Pranab Mukherjee was a key player and one of the prominent cabinet ministers? Will oot now SFI-JNUIS accept that CPI(M) was willfully complicft in all the anti-people and reactionary policies of the Indian state, be it the passing of the notorious.

WI .

SEZ bill or the rampant sell-out of the public sectors in the name of disinvestment, the passing and strengthening of the dracooian UAPA and .

AFSPA. witch·hunt of Muslims in the name of:fighting terrorism', implementing the fascist Operation Green Hunt in West Bengal.and so on?.

de. .

va, Is SFI-JNU also opposed to CPI(M)'s complete surrender to imperialist capital and its luring of MNCs to make investments in CPI(M)-govemed states at the cost of the laQd anS lives of peasants and workers? Shouting from rooftops about 'authoritarian' and 'undemocratic'.

agJ 2007 and thereafter, is sheer opportunism and political bankruptcy which both SFI-JNU and Prasenjit Bose are guilty of. Their latest political .

nature of CPI(M} y.Jhen forced into a co~r, but not raising even a whisper of opposition against CPI(Mys social-fascist policies from 1960s till.

res .

CPI(ML) Liberation-AISA's opportunist and bankrupt poJffics of fishing in the troubled waters needs to be unmasked. As if .

somersault is symptomatic of the bickering and power struggles that have afflicted all ruling-class parliamentary parties in India..

Mr .

thy were waiting with bated breath for the occasion, Liberation-AISA'welcomed' wholeheartedly SFI-JNU's ant1-CPI(M) position without .

uttering asingle word of cnticism for the 'dissenting' SFI-JNU. much like they welcomed 'Comrade PrasenJft Bose' (AI SA's poster, 8July)..

Frie .

AISA probably was hoping that the 'dissident' SFI will split from CPI(M) and join the rag-tag NGO-ised 'Left movement' ·fabricated by its parent.

km. party CP!(ML) liberation! It was only when SFI-JNU retorted back at AISA's holier-than-thou sermonizing on the need for "a resolute struggle for a Left movement-. CPI(M)'s ~nght deviation" and its "erosion of mass baseu, CPI(M)'s tntolerance of political opposition etc.(SFI-JNU .

pamphlet, 9July), that AISA-Liberat1on made au-tum from their earlierposition of blindly eulogizing SFI~JNU's 'opposition' to CPI{M), and .

Pa~.

han made some 'cri!ique' of SFI-JNU AISA thereafter took the responsibility of impart1ng lessons of 'correct Marxist politics' and 'rectification.

Kas to correct any right-wing policy dev1at1on that has crept into our line" (AISA. 10July)! .

classes' to the 'independenf SFI-JNU unit, wh1le declaring in a self-congratulatory mode that "thankfully, we{Liberat1on-AISA]we do not have.

.

entiJ .

political line of Marxism-Leninism and armed agrarian revolution ushered In by Naxalbari. This was done in order to enter the quagmire .

the .

of parliamentary politics. Is it not nght opportunism-in other words, revisionism-in the garb of Marxism, 'comrades'?! Has AJSA forgotten AISA shamelessly peddles such self-serving lies even after its parent party Liberation has opportunistically betrayed the.

consStrir .

about Liberation's electoral alltance w1th the same CPI(M) in Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand. etc., whom they are now .claimingto be "right-It WJ accuses of CPI(M)'s aHiance v111th Jayalalltha, Chandrabau Naldu, Naveen Patnaik-all former NOA partners-do we need to remind them .

deviationists''? Why have they allied w1th CPI(M), which is guilty of Singur, Nandigram, amurder of TP Chandrashekhar", etc.? WhenAISA.

also .

that liberation too had allied with Samala party in 1990s in Biharheaded by NiUsh Kumar-presently an important NDA ally? ln 'criticising' .

SFI-JNU for the compromises it has made in the campus, does AISA want the students to forget about theirown dark history of betrayals of gas r the students' movement, almost on every occasion in connivance with SFI-JNU? Who doesn't know about AISA-SFI's joint efforts to impos~.

AISA's ~nderstandin~ of 'Left unity'! Th~ sha.

the draconian Lyngdoh regulations on the JNUSU elections and the betrayal of the JNUSU Constitution? This is just the latest example of.

unrestra1~ed bonhomte and cama~?enew~,do~-~xi~g ~f these two revisionist o.

1 .rga~isations, AISA and SFI-JNU, first indulging inle cnt~qutng CPI(M), bu~soon break1ng mto an opportunist slanging match to outdo each otht .

cannot h1de AISA-SFI1s shared pohllcal basts of ruling-class opportumsm and hypocrisy..

shrewd~y sile.

.n~ on th_eoi.s_solution of the It is this degenerate and unscrupulous politics of revisionism and opportunism that allows Liberation-A~SAto remain.

stood w1th t~e1 'di~sident' s.FI-JNU ~nit and the expulsion of its four leading members. WhyhasAISA notmanner. ~h1ch A! SA had so wholeheartedly welco~ed? Is th1s thesample of L1beration-AISA s much-touted idea of 'Left unit(? Such .

r comrades tn SFI~JNU or even Comrade Pr~sen]tt Bose when they were ·penalised' for opposing CPI(M) in a'principled'.

op~~rtumsmof L!~ratton:AISA_sterns fr~m.betray1ng..the cause of the oppressed classes to serve ruling-class interests through parliamentary .

pohtlc~. .

The tru~h 1s that Ltberat1on-AISA 1s JUSt another vanant of CPI(M)-SFI in the garb of Marx1sm-Leninism mired neck-.

'rJ~~·'I"ilf"l~..

.

\.._ -· t:\idli, '.

.1: ·~·!J.!..

. ;,'":l;:l . t ,.:·.r-\·.

' r. ·~ .rt:1: '·~.

~·, J-,...

~·;' ~-~~-·-jf·l:-.;~_ ~-:.:~n ~eep mthe part1amentary quagm1re. This brand of reactionary 'left' politics has to be relentlessly and resolutely exposed and.

' '.,I,,/. .

11nally defeated for thesuccess of the struggle for a revolutionary social transformation..

'.. t ,.(.' ,..'· .''1'.

lhf:J:li . ......

....:''hr-~k 'r' ''.t J.

:>:,)ir); :·: \ 'J,: __ IIt1.

;lj,....iJ/''· .

' ·-1\·y · ;.

·:,:-;~::\'... , :.'·' '-~·:;:f~:t "; :I' , .

,' .

j ::· ':·: ' . .

··'~;~~--.·' ~~~):!.

Ill-...

;' .t... . '/ .>\!:1':~4!~·~:·; " ;. . .

l.

',,_, .

'. ,., ., :}.,:·;·.~;·'.'... ' :~:;,;-: t;: ;:~,:>:i·/~'.l :;, .~.ic' ;,·; ·I ' -.

II!! .

't\'\ 10.

·o, .

.

tO' \S .

na .

.

 

Done