PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2010 ID-50493
.
IIUphold democracy and unite for a vibrant studentmovementl.
~I .
friends,.
Fq .
.
08-02-2010.
Another shameful chapter of Cointnunist lumpcnisn1 and anarchy was added to the .
T~.
ed. 1 history of.JNU ~tudcnt movctn.ent on.5'11 Feb.
the lcft-\vJng bngade along With thc1r new found compatnot NSUI 111 the UUBM is not a new .
liT\ 1.
freinds, ~uary. The kin~ of hoolig.anism and chaos created by.
Sit ~ .
i1nmen1oriaJ. The only difference is that caa·licr the comntunists used this brand of politics .
rationalit!.
fo~ thing in the campus. The politics of this brand was the "co1nmunist-culture'' of JNU from time.
against.
Cq communi ABVP and tinte.
and rcli$.. and again fa·amcd our innocent.
.
vi~.
red rights...' .
the can1pus. The ABVP boycotted the last two UGBMs called by the ILLEGAL-JNUSU .
availabl< activists in false cases of.
thd 'luntpenisrn'. Time has shown the widca· .JNU community who exactly are the "goondas" ofrepresen.
Mh (read ·dictator') Sandeep Singh. The last two UGBMs ended in ruckus and anarchy. Last time felt that prin1arily due to the autocratic behavior of the ILLEGAL-JNUSU and its so-called 'President' .
wl'.
Be were g\.
knO"\Vll.
m sotne NSUI activists were beaten up by the cotnmunist goondas and this time so1ne of their 'own'tv1 .
SFJ activists. Last time it '~as an NSUJ activist who was branded as 'gender-insensitive' and this.
Sl Humall .
tin1e it's one of their own 'con1radc'. Isn't there a common, hidden strategy of the AISA and its .
bt constiu .
con1mon students and playing dirty politics?.
cconor.
~ .
now 1 lLLEGAL-JNUSU in place that is n1ani rested in both these UGBMs? Aren't they misguiding ther 11 I prote a Hum~.
I I .
1nanner; didn't allow their councilor to put his views, didn't put their resolution to vote and called .
smalU This time the SFI is clai1ning that Sandeep Singh behaved in a very undemocratic.
off the UGBM in a very dictatorial way. But is this a new thing? Yes it is a nevv thing for SFI and of pripo\iti other cotnmunist organizations. But it is not a new thing for den1ocratic organizations, particularly ABVP. Where was SFI with this 'detnocratic' cry when the satne chair didn't put the resolution of .
beca~.
can ( ABVP before the student con1n1unity in the last to last UGBM held at KV grounds over .
unit~.
sam< speak? This is now an established fact in this campus that the president of the present .
prospectus fee hike? Where \vas SFI when in the last UGBM the same chair didn't allow NSUI to.
lS Ill;.
keet .
.
ILLEGAL-JNUSU has always behaved in a very autocratic 1nanncr. The students of JNU.
fo~.
di have not forgotten and will never forget that it was the sante autocratic attitude of Sandecp.
main gate last semester. I [e succeeded in saving the skins of those outsider goondas who created .
it j the ruckus that day. .
Singh and his naxal-brigade that led to the lathi charge on the con1n1on students at the JNU.
bee What happened on 5th Feb. is just a repetition of history. So1ne 3 years ago the then .
of.
tra, .
.
president of JNUSU fro1n SFI, Dhananjay Tripathi behaved in the san1e 1nanner and ran avvay .
'Wl .
from the UGBM. AISA then declared him "bhagoda" president. What title \viii AISA use now for.
II .
the most autocratic and undctnocratic president in the recent years? This type of chaos is nothing .
lS new in the UGBMs. The only difference is that earlier all the leftists used to portray ABYP as an .
organization which creates chaos. But the last two UGBMs vvere boycotted by ABVP. So .
co1nrades whom you are going to blame now? Earlier..also the comtnu11ists·used to create chaos in .
the UGBM and in other den1ocratic spaces. As we are detcn11ined to expose the communist.
.
exposed and they stand naked..
I The confusion created by communists about the stand of ABVP... .
.
hypocrisy in this campus, they used to target us and malign our in1age. But now their hypocrisy is.
'' .
t .
c .
The communists arc spreading white lies that ABVP is supporting the lyngdoh.
aga1n..
fi l~ recotnn1cndations. We would like to put our stand about lyngdoh cotnn1ittce and elections in JNU .
·--1mmed1ate JrlltJation of the elections as per the JNUSU Constitution. .
.
PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2010 ID-50493
.
IIUphold democracy and unite for a vibrant studentmovementl.
~I .
friends,.
Fq .
.
08-02-2010.
Another shameful chapter of Cointnunist lumpcnisn1 and anarchy was added to the .
T~.
ed. 1 history of.JNU ~tudcnt movctn.ent on.5'11 Feb.
the lcft-\vJng bngade along With thc1r new found compatnot NSUI 111 the UUBM is not a new .
liT\ 1.
freinds, ~uary. The kin~ of hoolig.anism and chaos created by.
Sit ~ .
i1nmen1oriaJ. The only difference is that caa·licr the comntunists used this brand of politics .
rationalit!.
fo~ thing in the campus. The politics of this brand was the "co1nmunist-culture'' of JNU from time.
against.
Cq communi ABVP and tinte.
and rcli$.. and again fa·amcd our innocent.
.
vi~.
red rights...' .
the can1pus. The ABVP boycotted the last two UGBMs called by the ILLEGAL-JNUSU .
availabl< activists in false cases of.
thd 'luntpenisrn'. Time has shown the widca· .JNU community who exactly are the "goondas" ofrepresen.
Mh (read ·dictator') Sandeep Singh. The last two UGBMs ended in ruckus and anarchy. Last time felt that prin1arily due to the autocratic behavior of the ILLEGAL-JNUSU and its so-called 'President' .
wl'.
Be were g\.
knO"\Vll.
m sotne NSUI activists were beaten up by the cotnmunist goondas and this time so1ne of their 'own'tv1 .
SFJ activists. Last time it '~as an NSUJ activist who was branded as 'gender-insensitive' and this.
Sl Humall .
tin1e it's one of their own 'con1radc'. Isn't there a common, hidden strategy of the AISA and its .
bt constiu .
con1mon students and playing dirty politics?.
cconor.
~ .
now 1 lLLEGAL-JNUSU in place that is n1ani rested in both these UGBMs? Aren't they misguiding ther 11 I prote a Hum~.
I I .
1nanner; didn't allow their councilor to put his views, didn't put their resolution to vote and called .
smalU This time the SFI is clai1ning that Sandeep Singh behaved in a very undemocratic.
off the UGBM in a very dictatorial way. But is this a new thing? Yes it is a nevv thing for SFI and of pripo\iti other cotnmunist organizations. But it is not a new thing for den1ocratic organizations, particularly ABVP. Where was SFI with this 'detnocratic' cry when the satne chair didn't put the resolution of .
beca~.
can ( ABVP before the student con1n1unity in the last to last UGBM held at KV grounds over .
unit~.
sam< speak? This is now an established fact in this campus that the president of the present .
prospectus fee hike? Where \vas SFI when in the last UGBM the same chair didn't allow NSUI to.
lS Ill;.
keet .
.
ILLEGAL-JNUSU has always behaved in a very autocratic 1nanncr. The students of JNU.
fo~.
di have not forgotten and will never forget that it was the sante autocratic attitude of Sandecp.
main gate last semester. I [e succeeded in saving the skins of those outsider goondas who created .
it j the ruckus that day. .
Singh and his naxal-brigade that led to the lathi charge on the con1n1on students at the JNU.
bee What happened on 5th Feb. is just a repetition of history. So1ne 3 years ago the then .
of.
tra, .
.
president of JNUSU fro1n SFI, Dhananjay Tripathi behaved in the san1e 1nanner and ran avvay .
'Wl .
from the UGBM. AISA then declared him "bhagoda" president. What title \viii AISA use now for.
II .
the most autocratic and undctnocratic president in the recent years? This type of chaos is nothing .
lS new in the UGBMs. The only difference is that earlier all the leftists used to portray ABYP as an .
organization which creates chaos. But the last two UGBMs vvere boycotted by ABVP. So .
co1nrades whom you are going to blame now? Earlier..also the comtnu11ists·used to create chaos in .
the UGBM and in other den1ocratic spaces. As we are detcn11ined to expose the communist.
.
exposed and they stand naked..
I The confusion created by communists about the stand of ABVP... .
.
hypocrisy in this campus, they used to target us and malign our in1age. But now their hypocrisy is.
'' .
t .
c .
The communists arc spreading white lies that ABVP is supporting the lyngdoh.
aga1n..
fi l~ recotnn1cndations. We would like to put our stand about lyngdoh cotnn1ittce and elections in JNU .
·--1mmed1ate JrlltJation of the elections as per the JNUSU Constitution. .
.