PaRCha - JNU - DSF SFI-JNU - 2013 ID-57753
.
r.rTt .
qtf .
Il .
. ilt·.
. ,} ''r'' .· ., ~· I!'1'1'·-''.
J '"~t (. '·' ·; .,,J ' I-·~·r~r~')~(;,?. ~ :;.,;..
' P',;.~ff'''. I.
'1,l!l Jif 'fJ.
'"' . d. ,l,····· :'(.'1·=..
i~· · . J!:~.t~t'r:!~ .
IS THE SPECTRE OF SFl-JNU HAUNTING.THE AISA? sfi-inu.
~-----------· -----.
-- .
JNUSU elections in March 2012. It is understandable that being a .
28.08.2012 union with a short tenure all the issues could not have possibly been .
Instead of clarifying and responding to the criticisms of the AISA-Ied however. were meaningful resolved. What was ~xpected, .
JNUSU for its non-performance, the AISA has chosen to launch a initiatives and serious struggles towards achieving at least some .
diatribe against the SFI-JNU through its pamphlet dated 27.08.2012. .
concrete gains for the students and advancing the student This is typical of the AISA, which has mastered the art of evading movement. What was witnessed instead was a sham agitation In March 2012 which only led to the formation of myriad accountability vis-a-vis the functiontng of the JNUSU by viciously .
attacking those who pose uncomfortable questions before them. committees and vague recommendations. There was NO .
CONCRETE ACHIEVEMENT on any of the issues, only tokenism DENYING ACCOUNTABILITY, EVADING STUDENT ISSUES and vacuous promises of delivering on them in the future. Moreover, .
initiative An important purpose of the annual school GBMs is to assess the launched sectarian attacks against any .
the AISA.
functioning of the JNUSU and hold the elected representatives .
.
accountable vJs-8-vis their pre-election commitments and what they undertaken by others, be it on the.Yamuna hostel agitation, the struggle of the PHNH students or the protest march called by SIS .
have been able to deli1er on student issues. Whal needs to be noted Councillor Comrade Lenin against non-fulfilment of reservations in is that the AISA has absolutely no answers to provide as far as the whole range of student 1ssues is concerned: admissions. On Social fnclusion: (a) Why was the JNUSU agitahon in March SFI~JNU's criticisms of the AISA-Ied JNUSU are therefore not "malicious" or uslanderous" campaigns but an effort totheir hold the .
own.
2012 withdrawn wrthout getting a concrete assurance from the JNU elected representauves accountable vis-a-vis administration regarding the reduction of the viva voce marks in commitments. AISA would do well.to categorically respond to the MPhil entrance for 2012? Why did the AISA conceal from the students that it had agreed in the AC meeting on 19th March that the concrete questions on student issues rather than evading them .
viva~voce weightage issue will be discussed onlyin the next meeting by attacking SFI-JNU. A/SA's pamphlet suggest that since the SIS or .
in November 2012? Why did the JNUSU fail to ensure fulfilment of SAA Convenors' reports were passed by amajority vote. the JNUSU does not need to respond to any of the questions posed by other SC/ST/OBC reservation in 2012 admissions? (b) In view of the high remedial classes are started and text books provided in vernacular student organisations. This is arrogance and hubris at its worst and .
drop-out rates, especially mSL., why couldn't the JNUSU ensure that reflects the deeply sectarian and anti-democratic mmdset of the languages? (c) Why couldn't the amount of the MCM scholarships be enhanced and the duration of t~e non-NET UGC scholarship for A/SA leadership. .
WHO IS INDULGING INCRASS ELECTORAL OPPOSRTUNISM? .
PhD students ~xtended? {d) Why were the eligibility criteria for OBC students not reduced and why discrimtnation continues vis-a-vis AISA's pamphlet shamelessly accuses the SFI-JNU of "electoral allotting hostels to OBC students? (e) Why mandated PH reservation opportunism" by selectively quobng from our pamphlets and has not been fulfilled this year and no initiative was undertaken to facebook posts. The SFI-JNU came rnto being only because the SFI .
all-India leadershr}l ~<fssolved"-~he entire JNU unit of the SFI and institute scholarships for PH students? (0 Why was the list of expelled 4 Delhi State Committee members from JNU for adopting a .
recognised Madarsas eligtbte for JNU admissions not expanded? dissenting political position vis-a-VIS the CPI (M)'s support ·for .
Why nothing has been done to get the relevant recommendations of Congressman Pranab Mukhe~ee in the Presidential elections. even Ranganath Mtshra and Sachar Committee implemented in JNU when the CPI and RSP.decided to abstajn. .
despite the proportion of Muslim minority students decreasing over .
In its pamphlet dated 81h July 2012, AISA stated that it qwefcomes time? .
thts decision of the SF/'s JNU Un;t to oppose CP/ (Mj's support to On Infrastructure Expansion and Students Facilities: (a) Why did Pranab Mukherjee.. The SFI's leaflet dated July 7has also indicated .
the JNUSU fa1l to raise the 1ssue of construction of new hostels .
despite a serrous hostel crisis afflicting the students? (b) Why no much the same analysis -thar ~in a left-leaning campus like JNu.· .
.
Singur and Nandtgram "eroded the SFI's support base among the .
ensuring mternet facility 1n hostels and improving transport fac11itres, progressive and democratic minded :::.tudents,b and led to SFI s initiatives were taken to improve the facilities in the health centre, .
defeat in the JNUSU elections of 2007 and 2012... We note that SF/ like Metrcrfeeder buses? (c) Why have cultural club election') not JNU unit, in its latest leaflet, has raised some of these issues .
taken place tlll date and most sports clubs are lying defunct? Why (especially relating to Singur. Nandigram, and TP Chandrasekharan) couldn't the annual festivals like Kallal and Summit be organized lhts as well. taking a position sharply.different from the official ~PI (M) year? (d) What has the JNUSU done to pressurize the JNU posts and stop line uadmintstration to fill up vacant teaching The CPI-ML General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya has written in contractualisation of non-teaching staff? many elected student the August issue of his party mouthpiece Liberation: "In JNU, the .
(a) HowOn Campus Democracy: traditional CPI (M)/SFI citadel, (often called the CPI {M}'s fourth .
bastion after West Bengal, K.~rala and Tripura), the entire SF! unitrepresentatives from other universit1es participated in the "national" convention organised by the JNUSU on the Lyngdoh Committee has been dissolved and dubbed a '8 team of the ultra-Left NSA' for .
recommendations? How many JNU students participated 10 the .
Convention? (b) Why did the JNUSU office-bearers fail to bring the questioning and opposing the CPI {M) decision to support Pranab Mukherjee! Can there be abigger .
agenda of restoring the JNUSU ConstitutJon to the fore? (c) Why did proof of the CPI (M)'s growing rightward deviation or derailment that .
the JNUSU fail to lake initiative in removing the discriminatory grade-any rad1cal political d1ssent wtthin the party or mass organisations is .
point criteria for AC/BoS elections or revivtng the SFCs across .
dubbed ultra-Left and banished forthwith?" .
Centres and Schools? While ..welcoming" SfJ.JNU's "radical political dissent" )n July-.
ZERO ACHIEVEMENT UNION August, why is the AISA doing an about-turn and terming it .
SFI-JNU's critiCISm of the AISA-Ied JNUSU as a zero achievement "electoral opportunism" on the eve of September? ~ union is based on these concrete issues which the AISA had Jtselt ~J .
committed to resolve through thetr "Perspective and Agenda·· for the Who is Indulging 10 welectoral opportunism· here? Did .
a Ill .
.
PaRCha - JNU - DSF SFI-JNU - 2013 ID-57753
.
r.rTt .
qtf .
Il .
. ilt·.
. ,} ''r'' .· ., ~· I!'1'1'·-''.
J '"~t (. '·' ·; .,,J ' I-·~·r~r~')~(;,?. ~ :;.,;..
' P',;.~ff'''. I.
'1,l!l Jif 'fJ.
'"' . d. ,l,····· :'(.'1·=..
i~· · . J!:~.t~t'r:!~ .
IS THE SPECTRE OF SFl-JNU HAUNTING.THE AISA? sfi-inu.
~-----------· -----.
-- .
JNUSU elections in March 2012. It is understandable that being a .
28.08.2012 union with a short tenure all the issues could not have possibly been .
Instead of clarifying and responding to the criticisms of the AISA-Ied however. were meaningful resolved. What was ~xpected, .
JNUSU for its non-performance, the AISA has chosen to launch a initiatives and serious struggles towards achieving at least some .
diatribe against the SFI-JNU through its pamphlet dated 27.08.2012. .
concrete gains for the students and advancing the student This is typical of the AISA, which has mastered the art of evading movement. What was witnessed instead was a sham agitation In March 2012 which only led to the formation of myriad accountability vis-a-vis the functiontng of the JNUSU by viciously .
attacking those who pose uncomfortable questions before them. committees and vague recommendations. There was NO .
CONCRETE ACHIEVEMENT on any of the issues, only tokenism DENYING ACCOUNTABILITY, EVADING STUDENT ISSUES and vacuous promises of delivering on them in the future. Moreover, .
initiative An important purpose of the annual school GBMs is to assess the launched sectarian attacks against any .
the AISA.
functioning of the JNUSU and hold the elected representatives .
.
accountable vJs-8-vis their pre-election commitments and what they undertaken by others, be it on the.Yamuna hostel agitation, the struggle of the PHNH students or the protest march called by SIS .
have been able to deli1er on student issues. Whal needs to be noted Councillor Comrade Lenin against non-fulfilment of reservations in is that the AISA has absolutely no answers to provide as far as the whole range of student 1ssues is concerned: admissions. On Social fnclusion: (a) Why was the JNUSU agitahon in March SFI~JNU's criticisms of the AISA-Ied JNUSU are therefore not "malicious" or uslanderous" campaigns but an effort totheir hold the .
own.
2012 withdrawn wrthout getting a concrete assurance from the JNU elected representauves accountable vis-a-vis administration regarding the reduction of the viva voce marks in commitments. AISA would do well.to categorically respond to the MPhil entrance for 2012? Why did the AISA conceal from the students that it had agreed in the AC meeting on 19th March that the concrete questions on student issues rather than evading them .
viva~voce weightage issue will be discussed onlyin the next meeting by attacking SFI-JNU. A/SA's pamphlet suggest that since the SIS or .
in November 2012? Why did the JNUSU fail to ensure fulfilment of SAA Convenors' reports were passed by amajority vote. the JNUSU does not need to respond to any of the questions posed by other SC/ST/OBC reservation in 2012 admissions? (b) In view of the high remedial classes are started and text books provided in vernacular student organisations. This is arrogance and hubris at its worst and .
drop-out rates, especially mSL., why couldn't the JNUSU ensure that reflects the deeply sectarian and anti-democratic mmdset of the languages? (c) Why couldn't the amount of the MCM scholarships be enhanced and the duration of t~e non-NET UGC scholarship for A/SA leadership. .
WHO IS INDULGING INCRASS ELECTORAL OPPOSRTUNISM? .
PhD students ~xtended? {d) Why were the eligibility criteria for OBC students not reduced and why discrimtnation continues vis-a-vis AISA's pamphlet shamelessly accuses the SFI-JNU of "electoral allotting hostels to OBC students? (e) Why mandated PH reservation opportunism" by selectively quobng from our pamphlets and has not been fulfilled this year and no initiative was undertaken to facebook posts. The SFI-JNU came rnto being only because the SFI .
all-India leadershr}l ~<fssolved"-~he entire JNU unit of the SFI and institute scholarships for PH students? (0 Why was the list of expelled 4 Delhi State Committee members from JNU for adopting a .
recognised Madarsas eligtbte for JNU admissions not expanded? dissenting political position vis-a-VIS the CPI (M)'s support ·for .
Why nothing has been done to get the relevant recommendations of Congressman Pranab Mukhe~ee in the Presidential elections. even Ranganath Mtshra and Sachar Committee implemented in JNU when the CPI and RSP.decided to abstajn. .
despite the proportion of Muslim minority students decreasing over .
In its pamphlet dated 81h July 2012, AISA stated that it qwefcomes time? .
thts decision of the SF/'s JNU Un;t to oppose CP/ (Mj's support to On Infrastructure Expansion and Students Facilities: (a) Why did Pranab Mukherjee.. The SFI's leaflet dated July 7has also indicated .
the JNUSU fa1l to raise the 1ssue of construction of new hostels .
despite a serrous hostel crisis afflicting the students? (b) Why no much the same analysis -thar ~in a left-leaning campus like JNu.· .
.
Singur and Nandtgram "eroded the SFI's support base among the .
ensuring mternet facility 1n hostels and improving transport fac11itres, progressive and democratic minded :::.tudents,b and led to SFI s initiatives were taken to improve the facilities in the health centre, .
defeat in the JNUSU elections of 2007 and 2012... We note that SF/ like Metrcrfeeder buses? (c) Why have cultural club election') not JNU unit, in its latest leaflet, has raised some of these issues .
taken place tlll date and most sports clubs are lying defunct? Why (especially relating to Singur. Nandigram, and TP Chandrasekharan) couldn't the annual festivals like Kallal and Summit be organized lhts as well. taking a position sharply.different from the official ~PI (M) year? (d) What has the JNUSU done to pressurize the JNU posts and stop line uadmintstration to fill up vacant teaching The CPI-ML General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya has written in contractualisation of non-teaching staff? many elected student the August issue of his party mouthpiece Liberation: "In JNU, the .
(a) HowOn Campus Democracy: traditional CPI (M)/SFI citadel, (often called the CPI {M}'s fourth .
bastion after West Bengal, K.~rala and Tripura), the entire SF! unitrepresentatives from other universit1es participated in the "national" convention organised by the JNUSU on the Lyngdoh Committee has been dissolved and dubbed a '8 team of the ultra-Left NSA' for .
recommendations? How many JNU students participated 10 the .
Convention? (b) Why did the JNUSU office-bearers fail to bring the questioning and opposing the CPI {M) decision to support Pranab Mukherjee! Can there be abigger .
agenda of restoring the JNUSU ConstitutJon to the fore? (c) Why did proof of the CPI (M)'s growing rightward deviation or derailment that .
the JNUSU fail to lake initiative in removing the discriminatory grade-any rad1cal political d1ssent wtthin the party or mass organisations is .
point criteria for AC/BoS elections or revivtng the SFCs across .
dubbed ultra-Left and banished forthwith?" .
Centres and Schools? While ..welcoming" SfJ.JNU's "radical political dissent" )n July-.
ZERO ACHIEVEMENT UNION August, why is the AISA doing an about-turn and terming it .
SFI-JNU's critiCISm of the AISA-Ied JNUSU as a zero achievement "electoral opportunism" on the eve of September? ~ union is based on these concrete issues which the AISA had Jtselt ~J .
committed to resolve through thetr "Perspective and Agenda·· for the Who is Indulging 10 welectoral opportunism· here? Did .
a Ill .
.