PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2005 ID-44384
.
.
' --t ,. 3\ost sen-out j!.t .
I .
UP"o\d '"d\3's S~"ere;;~'/'1111'90 \0 t\009 ~oo9\ .
N\\o\ster\3\ fAeetl09 o . "vt10 ' .
.
. .... A.1'o"A-'-,ott"£"1'o" o . 3oe.c. os z.30 pl1l.
Jo'n " . 0. scneduled to be neld in 1-\ong \(ong. coNSI\IUi\ON CLU6 .
2/\2.05 . e l'Jiinisterial l'Jiee\lflg ol tne \[1[1 IS dol negotiatiofiS If\ zoo6. In tnese .
Of\ oecetnbef '3-'8 \\\IS -;eaf' \I\ be'ofe tl\e conc\USiOfl ol\1\e Qol\a0roUfl. ,, '· -'"'ef onefl \j\e econotni6S .
. . ... nu\titnate one ·' .d ·ng «ensNe ,o v " .. . , .
11\iSI'JiinistenalIS\\,e pe t .es nave launched a\I'll e-rang I I under consideration nave ,ar-negotiations. tne develo~edco_un~~~re industries and sef'.lices.11'le proposa s tin agriculture. industries. ser-.
ol developing cou~tneslfl ~gn~ur food and livelihOOd ~ecur~\:'1{of etnPio-;tne~sue\\ as nealt\'1' ed~catiofl and.
·· .
.
reacning adverse ltn~l,catio~s ~ nt and people-centnc poliCies lfl "'tal area to be all setto sacnflce tne "'tal .
vices·, and toryursu\II~:~~~~eo~~\'\iS o«ensive' ~nel..li'A'Go"erntnen~,s~=~~fsotne costnetic gains ol a small .
financial sef\llces-n ...e'\ as erode India s sovereign, . . .countries nas proved to.
.
interesiS oHMs 1'\l f .
' .
~ ggling masses as .. ' .
seetion ol tne elll.e popula ,on. \[1[\0's e~istence'tne promise ol gains Iof de"tlo~:;tin developing countries. .
In the past'o-;~ars ol ~0nas resulted in spiralling pover\'1 and unem~~edeveloping countries -.Nith tne .
oe nollo\1'1. I~ actuali\:'1' tne es-.Nere raisedb'; ~nerevNal oHI'le solldan\:'1 . enina and south p..~rica). suttne .
At cancun In zoo?>.some \'lOP f developing countrieS led b'; sraZII,\~dla\ ment cannotbe pursued o,N\1.1\In .
.
\.
emergence ol tne G20 ta grouP ~tnas belied tnese napes. proving tnat ;"~o~g\(ong· and itseems tnat1-\ong .
zo04 jul'; frame-.No~p..gr~~m: a\lolf!'S tne oasis ol negotiations to-.Nar s ~-to ma~eeven more damaging~ne\[1[10 paradigm.1\'le u ~ e . d \'"at-.Nould torce developing coun nes .
serJices and industrial goods. . reements, -.Nnic\'1 favours.
\(ong n~olla~onscan \ \.
. · onl'; resultln a ea "' conceSsions 'n agnculture. . nd as mme\1'; tnat is ouil\ in tne vanous \[1[10 ~;r a radical re-tnin\<. on tne .
Given tne stl'\lctur~l ,nequa\1~~on -t~trfl interests are oest sef\led b'; calling t \..li'A Governmenfs stance \ tne developed countnes.India g -.Nit\'1 developing countries. auttne presen . us NDA Govemtnen\. institution and malting comm~nc::~tdeparturefrom tne positions adollt~b'l!~~:~~edamaging deals. on\[1[10 doeS not reflect ~n'; sign t eager to p\a'; a proactive role In pus ,ng .-.J AND \..NELI\-\000 .
.farlrom an'; retn'n\<.lng. ,\Is onl'; oo 1\-\REA1'AoA'10roODbiasedsr.cUR\1in favour ,ol capital-intensNde an~rAGREEt~oEN1 oN AGRICU\..1URE: coRPoRP-1E \'.
\[1[10' Agreement on Agncu ,,lre' .,. . -d. tress ol peasantf'/ an po . 1\'le paradigm ol the . s . re is total\'; incapable ol addressing tne IS 1\'le issues ol mar\<.et .
' .
( corpofate agfibUSiness~f\'llen agf\C~~~e l~dia o,NI\efe agriculture iS a \Ne\11\0~d ISS~~~SiS being \'lig\'1\ig\\ted in .
tl agricultural labourers ~~t:~~~:s~pporta~de~portsubsidieSin develodpe -~~~ralo,Nofl<.ers in countrieS li\<.e .
rr .
access and reduction o o t \. ues confronting the peasantf'/ an. agnconndlan agncu v ..
.
or _.. t .
order to pla'1 do-.Nn tne lundarnen a ISS . . \t''t'e' \f'Je'JJ\\\ not .
Jt\ \nu\a. t tnat -.Ne sa-;'No' to corporatisa IOfl . and tnat tne rig\'Itto .
WE. .
\f'Je must{lgntto tell our Govern::on lor products ol interest onl'1 to tne nc\'1\ \{'Je ~:oredto developing.
AI: .
tolerate tne sac~\{lce ol our lood pro~QRs) on import ol agricultural products must ~a~gntol tne vola\lle global.
coc .
impose auant\ta\llle Restnc\lons I rvel'; de-lin\<.tneif agricu\\Ufe ~rom tne of\S \ o,NO~out appropriate.
oft .
countrieS so as to enable tnem to se ec ' I agri-business and to secure a po\IC'; space o .
Wh\ .
issu tna~et.to protectitlrom tne depredations o.
solutionto tneir agrarian question. N AGRICU\..1U!V-\.. t/IARI<.Ei p..ccr.ss.
t\'1 ., b\e lor tne developing countries nas snrunl..iiON INi\-\E GA.R6 oF NO -· It ral I'J\a~etAccess,.
noth Resc over tne last couple ol decades . e P ve tneir-.Na'1 in tne currentNANIA (Non Agncu u since tne da';S ol mant dratnaUcal\-;. Andil tne develoP~:~::~~::adeor so to tne eJ(tenttnat nas n~tb~~;:r~~all out impossible. .
desp\ .
neg o\la tions' It-.NilI s n n n \<. oil.e\ 1on and economic delle\opment In ~ne delle op n especial\'; those o,NI\ose.
defen .
imperialism. ma\<.lng ,ndustna ,sa' I I mar\<.et access -.Nil\ \'Ill poor masses..
accep .
1.
comm \ivelii\Ood depends on flsning.-.Norse tnan a tsuna . cce ted tne contents ol tne earlier_dlscredlte~!:~' .
orastic cnanges in tariff rules and otner ru es o mi . . .
contin .
untortunatel'; tne Indian ~over~~:~~~~s~~~~=~a:is1! NANIA negotiations-ne 1<.e'1~~~=~~~~tecliol reiected b'; most \[1[10 mem ers a'' nrot~ttheir tna~eiStnrougn nigner tan«s. tne main .
Pa .
Secretar NANIAis tnat while developing counules,. .
.
.
.
PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2005 ID-44384
.
.
' --t ,. 3\ost sen-out j!.t .
I .
UP"o\d '"d\3's S~"ere;;~'/'1111'90 \0 t\009 ~oo9\ .
N\\o\ster\3\ fAeetl09 o . "vt10 ' .
.
. .... A.1'o"A-'-,ott"£"1'o" o . 3oe.c. os z.30 pl1l.
Jo'n " . 0. scneduled to be neld in 1-\ong \(ong. coNSI\IUi\ON CLU6 .
2/\2.05 . e l'Jiinisterial l'Jiee\lflg ol tne \[1[1 IS dol negotiatiofiS If\ zoo6. In tnese .
Of\ oecetnbef '3-'8 \\\IS -;eaf' \I\ be'ofe tl\e conc\USiOfl ol\1\e Qol\a0roUfl. ,, '· -'"'ef onefl \j\e econotni6S .
. . ... nu\titnate one ·' .d ·ng «ensNe ,o v " .. . , .
11\iSI'JiinistenalIS\\,e pe t .es nave launched a\I'll e-rang I I under consideration nave ,ar-negotiations. tne develo~edco_un~~~re industries and sef'.lices.11'le proposa s tin agriculture. industries. ser-.
ol developing cou~tneslfl ~gn~ur food and livelihOOd ~ecur~\:'1{of etnPio-;tne~sue\\ as nealt\'1' ed~catiofl and.
·· .
.
reacning adverse ltn~l,catio~s ~ nt and people-centnc poliCies lfl "'tal area to be all setto sacnflce tne "'tal .
vices·, and toryursu\II~:~~~~eo~~\'\iS o«ensive' ~nel..li'A'Go"erntnen~,s~=~~fsotne costnetic gains ol a small .
financial sef\llces-n ...e'\ as erode India s sovereign, . . .countries nas proved to.
.
interesiS oHMs 1'\l f .
' .
~ ggling masses as .. ' .
seetion ol tne elll.e popula ,on. \[1[\0's e~istence'tne promise ol gains Iof de"tlo~:;tin developing countries. .
In the past'o-;~ars ol ~0nas resulted in spiralling pover\'1 and unem~~edeveloping countries -.Nith tne .
oe nollo\1'1. I~ actuali\:'1' tne es-.Nere raisedb'; ~nerevNal oHI'le solldan\:'1 . enina and south p..~rica). suttne .
At cancun In zoo?>.some \'lOP f developing countrieS led b'; sraZII,\~dla\ ment cannotbe pursued o,N\1.1\In .
.
\.
emergence ol tne G20 ta grouP ~tnas belied tnese napes. proving tnat ;"~o~g\(ong· and itseems tnat1-\ong .
zo04 jul'; frame-.No~p..gr~~m: a\lolf!'S tne oasis ol negotiations to-.Nar s ~-to ma~eeven more damaging~ne\[1[10 paradigm.1\'le u ~ e . d \'"at-.Nould torce developing coun nes .
serJices and industrial goods. . reements, -.Nnic\'1 favours.
\(ong n~olla~onscan \ \.
. · onl'; resultln a ea "' conceSsions 'n agnculture. . nd as mme\1'; tnat is ouil\ in tne vanous \[1[10 ~;r a radical re-tnin\<. on tne .
Given tne stl'\lctur~l ,nequa\1~~on -t~trfl interests are oest sef\led b'; calling t \..li'A Governmenfs stance \ tne developed countnes.India g -.Nit\'1 developing countries. auttne presen . us NDA Govemtnen\. institution and malting comm~nc::~tdeparturefrom tne positions adollt~b'l!~~:~~edamaging deals. on\[1[10 doeS not reflect ~n'; sign t eager to p\a'; a proactive role In pus ,ng .-.J AND \..NELI\-\000 .
.farlrom an'; retn'n\<.lng. ,\Is onl'; oo 1\-\REA1'AoA'10roODbiasedsr.cUR\1in favour ,ol capital-intensNde an~rAGREEt~oEN1 oN AGRICU\..1URE: coRPoRP-1E \'.
\[1[10' Agreement on Agncu ,,lre' .,. . -d. tress ol peasantf'/ an po . 1\'le paradigm ol the . s . re is total\'; incapable ol addressing tne IS 1\'le issues ol mar\<.et .
' .
( corpofate agfibUSiness~f\'llen agf\C~~~e l~dia o,NI\efe agriculture iS a \Ne\11\0~d ISS~~~SiS being \'lig\'1\ig\\ted in .
tl agricultural labourers ~~t:~~~:s~pporta~de~portsubsidieSin develodpe -~~~ralo,Nofl<.ers in countrieS li\<.e .
rr .
access and reduction o o t \. ues confronting the peasantf'/ an. agnconndlan agncu v ..
.
or _.. t .
order to pla'1 do-.Nn tne lundarnen a ISS . . \t''t'e' \f'Je'JJ\\\ not .
Jt\ \nu\a. t tnat -.Ne sa-;'No' to corporatisa IOfl . and tnat tne rig\'Itto .
WE. .
\f'Je must{lgntto tell our Govern::on lor products ol interest onl'1 to tne nc\'1\ \{'Je ~:oredto developing.
AI: .
tolerate tne sac~\{lce ol our lood pro~QRs) on import ol agricultural products must ~a~gntol tne vola\lle global.
coc .
impose auant\ta\llle Restnc\lons I rvel'; de-lin\<.tneif agricu\\Ufe ~rom tne of\S \ o,NO~out appropriate.
oft .
countrieS so as to enable tnem to se ec ' I agri-business and to secure a po\IC'; space o .
Wh\ .
issu tna~et.to protectitlrom tne depredations o.
solutionto tneir agrarian question. N AGRICU\..1U!V-\.. t/IARI<.Ei p..ccr.ss.
t\'1 ., b\e lor tne developing countries nas snrunl..iiON INi\-\E GA.R6 oF NO -· It ral I'J\a~etAccess,.
noth Resc over tne last couple ol decades . e P ve tneir-.Na'1 in tne currentNANIA (Non Agncu u since tne da';S ol mant dratnaUcal\-;. Andil tne develoP~:~::~~::adeor so to tne eJ(tenttnat nas n~tb~~;:r~~all out impossible. .
desp\ .
neg o\la tions' It-.NilI s n n n \<. oil.e\ 1on and economic delle\opment In ~ne delle op n especial\'; those o,NI\ose.
defen .
imperialism. ma\<.lng ,ndustna ,sa' I I mar\<.et access -.Nil\ \'Ill poor masses..
accep .
1.
comm \ivelii\Ood depends on flsning.-.Norse tnan a tsuna . cce ted tne contents ol tne earlier_dlscredlte~!:~' .
orastic cnanges in tariff rules and otner ru es o mi . . .
contin .
untortunatel'; tne Indian ~over~~:~~~~s~~~~=~a:is1! NANIA negotiations-ne 1<.e'1~~~=~~~~tecliol reiected b'; most \[1[10 mem ers a'' nrot~ttheir tna~eiStnrougn nigner tan«s. tne main .
Pa .
Secretar NANIAis tnat while developing counules,. .
.
.
.