PaRCha - JNU - JNUSU - 2008 ID-63694

.

a. c u-' .~~:~ ·. ,. r~ '-() 4) c-..J.

I~} I~L n. .

~ . .,_ o: !. , f!"~ 10i .

~· ·: .,., '. ' .ill ·~ ' ..... ·!! 'fir;~ ·:~:..: ~~~ ··., ::' "CS 0.

: :~:f;'· .

': ;~ .., ;: .. ~:!.

J.' -.....1 .. ·~ !l.-·~ ;. 11 '·.;~-,,,: ' ;_~-.fl; ;'It ~~.; ;; ;(!' ··:; .:· ~r.~-. , .. -~· ,l· .~:; a. ~ (.).

!'·-''· ·~·~· : ;;: .. :~ :~r-.

t. I' L!~!:J~-~]' ' ~ H t~ (Jill~' ;~t. i!lJi . ~:; ,r:,·· .....-·~-:. ~, :'·~ ~--=· ,j: ti; . ! '-.

l.'~ o' ,· o; 'o· 1 ,, .;.1,; !i :1 ·,_,. ., .. ...~ :· () tn :::> ; r~,;;-. .

.

' .: ·!.1: I ~ " ll ~~ -~; 1 ·; _ _l ~:-,.. .. , , ~1'J · ., ~~o ·~ ~-u. (/) .

. ·., .

(J.

't : ··, :~ !: ~~-. !j,_IJ,~--,;. i . .-·-.'· 1:'l_ ·-' ,;~ . -. ' . '.. . ·......

.., _,..~ .;. !;'}. .' I\,.' . . '.. ..]. '· !;:~.-'· :: :~ ' !" .-~~ .-~ '· ,. Q).

i ;} : L,~:'·,hj:;~ ~:_ ~f .:· ,. u. ~ ' : ,. '·-,..1.0 ~ -. ' ' ~··I;- i!.o :-It. l.' > z.

~ t~ '~ I' '· 0 i'; '!J~ 't ii ;~, !;·,1· .::111. -; :'>l ··:... 1· ~.:. '· . ~ ... -,'\:· ~-o' :·-~tt''f} f:' I 'I1 .,,: ~~ ~i-! 'O o:.

I'. ; ' : ~.

:: '· . t·j~: . ~.:,. ~~·:.· .

" ' ' ·: r:~:~~:~..~~-;f_\ ,-.·:_,:. .

,.-:,~f;· ,,!· -~-,~:: :~:t;:i~;!.~~-~·;;~ .: ;1~~ -!:1 ·~ ·-c Q) (1).

_... .

en.

::» 0.rJ .-.c .

In particular, in 2006 and 2007, the intake/offer/joined for CESP (MA) had been:.

Intake .

Offered.

2006 Joined.

50 .

107.

2007 so -I I8 42 .

4 I.

In particular. for example, the intake/offer/joined for CESP (MA) in 2006 and 2007, had been:.

.

.

"Seats Offer" does NOT indicate and is NOT equivalent to the actual number of seats and the actual number.

of students in the University. .

The "offer" method so far adopted is merely a one-shot measure to fill the intake..

.

So, the SFI's devious method of only projecting "seats offered" as the actual number of seats, and.

thereby spreading that there is a massive seat-cut is a complete travesty of facts and truth. .

reservation and seat increase that is being initiated this year? .

Will SFI clarify: Can "seats offered" which they are peddling, be the basis of implementation of .

'..

Let us note that there are two possible methods of fulfilling the " intake". One method practiced so far is the "seats.

offered" method, whereby some extra seats over and above the "intakeu are announced, once and for all, to fulfil the.

"intake". The other method is to have a waiting list and announce a series of time-bound 2"d/3rd lists from amongst the.

waitlisted candidates. as is being practiced this year (2008). It is to be noted that JNUSU strongly stood for the.

continuation of the "offer system" in the Academic Council meeting for fulfilling "intake" compared to the wart list_.

fulfilling the intake in course of the new admission system for this year when OBC reservation and seal increase was .

system. However majority of the faculty and centres argued in favour of waitlist and subsequent 200/3rd list systems fo.-.

to be implemented. .

But whatever be the debate regarding the method of fulfilling the uintake", the crucial.

.

issue was the correct implementation of OBC reservations and seat increase in the new admission policy, for.

which "intake" of 2006 forms the legal basis for all calculations and NOT "seats offered"..

.

Another big confusion that SFI is indulging in is to equate incomparables : compare.

the "offer" list of last year (2007) with the very first "intake"listof this year (2008)..

Since the earlier method of one-shot "seat offer" method has not been adopted this year, any data on "seats offered".

in 2008 will have to include the seats in first list along with all the subsequent (2nd/ 3rd etc) lists announced. For.

example, in CESP (MA). so far in 2008, 97 students have been offered seats (62 in the 1st list and 35 m the 21'd list).

.

towards fulfilling the mandated "intake" . Overall in JNU so far, 2102 students have already been offered seats till.

Saturday afternoon {Aug 2. 2008), and not 1836 which SFI has quoted in its malicious poster campaign. Clearly, even.

if we talk in terms of "seats offered", correct calculation shows that the "seats offered" in 2008 till now is 2102.

which is 90 more than the 2007 useat offer" figure of 2012. More lists are awaited as the admission process is.

still in progress. Such motivated spread of confusion with numbers must be condemned..

The Real Dangers Of Such Motivated Mischief.

While politicking might have inspired SFI to indulge in such games, it has real dangers. Firstly, implementation of.

legally mandated reservation and concomitant seat increase demands that all calculations must be done on the basis.

of intake {base year 2006) and not on the ever fluctuating numbers of seats offered. So, to interpret this year's.

admission process which has undertaken OBC reservation on the basis of "seats offered", as SFI is.

mischievously doing, is legally untenable and has real danger of inviting legal impediments from the anti-.

.

reservation forces. .

Secondly, to wrongly proJect some bloated figures as the actual seats in JNU is to fuel those anti-reservation forces in.

the campus who from the very beginning wanted to block and delay the implementation of the OBC reservation and.

undertaking these unethical moves. by quoting untenable figures is trying to fan a frenzy that can actually act agatnst the seat increase on the spurious plea that it will make the system "too big and thus unmanageable". SFI by.

the proper and speedy implementation of the reservation in JNU..

They are also helping to deflect attention from the real problems at hand that administration is putting time.

and again to scuttle the actual implementation of OBC reservation pertaining to correct application of relaxed.

eligibility criterion for OBC students. Interestingly, SFI is conspicuous by its total and calculated silence on.

this casteist elitist ploy of the administrations. This calculated silence, however, speaks volumes of their real.

motives. .

. .

We would also like to inform the student community that the ploy of the JNU administration to scuttle PH reservationshas been successfully rebuffed. An additional list of 31 PH students has been released on August 2, 2008..

However. the discrepancy on OBC reservations regarding the relaxation in the eligibility criterion . is yet to be resolved.

We call upon the JNU student community to rally behind JNUSU in ensuring proper implementation of OBC.

reservations, and stand up against JNU administration's casteist attempts to dilute the potential of OBC.

challenges at hand. .

reservations and at the same time to foil all other devious methods to deflect attention from the real.

Saudcep Pallavi Dcka.

Pn·sident, .JNUSU Md. Mobecn Alam.

Gen. Sen'-.. JNUSU .

.ft. .\'~.>c:r.. JNUSU .

.

 

Done