PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2014 ID-56557
.
3) This UGBM resolves thatJNU administration mustexpedite the implementation ofGSCASH verdict recommending punishment against a faculty member passed in the EC meeting of12 October 2009. Also, the administration's out-.
of-bounds order on the woman complainantmustbe removedforthwith. .
Proposer: Radhika Krishnan Seconder: Vismay Basu Passed with voice vote .
Will SFI tell us: .
Isn't it true that CPIM defended its leader Suhrid Dutta even after he was convicted in 2008 for the rape and murder of Tapasi Malik at Singur? http:l/archive.indianexpress.com/news/guilty-cpm-s-suhrid-dutta-ally-debu-.
malik-for-killing-tapasi/384632/ .
Isn't it true that the CPIM held a 'victory rally' for Dutta when he was released on bail in 2009? .
archive.indianexpress.com/news/tapasi-malik-murder-case-suhrid-dutta-released/423474/ .
Isn't it true that the GSCASH representative from SFI, in the GSCASH election UGBM, had said publicly that the rape and murder ofTapasi Malik must be 'contextualized'-i.e by blaming the Singur peasants' agitation on 'Maoists' and TMC?! Please hear her shameful words here www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp-geEi7Mt4. Note that she claims SFI has 'answered this damned question' many times-but she herself does NOT answer the straight question: .
Isn't Suhrid Dutta, convicted ofTapasi's rape and murder, still a leader ofCP/M? .
A/SA strongly disapproves ofthe culture of'public trial' on ongoing GSCASH enquiry and will await the GSCASH findings and respect them, in every case, whether the person accused is an SF/ activist or an A/SA activist or anyone else. A/SA has ensured that when A/SA activistfacedsexual harassment complaint, they stepped down from public posts pending GSCASH enquiry. This is a principle NO organization has followed. ABVP knows howa rape-accused Niha/chand is a central Minister in Modi's Cabinet. NSUI knows how a rape-accused man was even Deputy Speaker ofthe Rajya Sabha from the Congress. And SF/ and DSF have the infamous track record ofharassing the complainants, and attacking and accusing GSCASH openly, to defend their comrade who had been found guilty. .
On the Slander Against CPI(ML) .
In order to cover up the SFI's and CPIM's own shameful track record of defending their comrades convicted of sexual harassment and rape, the SFI in its leaflet of 6 Sept 2014, has resorted to pure unsubstantiated slander against AISA and CPI(ML). To briefly put the record straight: .
In 'the case in Jehanabad referred to in the 2012 Telegraph report, the accused Shailendra Yadav is not a CPI(ML) .
activist but is in fact an RJD activist and serial offender whom CPI(ML) activists have thras hed on previous occasions. .
The news story gets the name of village also wrong-the name is 'Dimri-Kajiana' and not Tajariana and 'De hri' as .
.
said in the story. On this occasion too, CPI(ML) activists agitated for justice for the victim. This was already conveyed by AISA in 2012 and yet SFI is repeating the slander! How dare SFI accuse CPI(ML)'s ex-MLA Rajaram Singh of taking Ranveer Sena support without any substantiation?!.
.
SFI is falsely hinting that he is a leader from a feudal-upper-caste background, while in fact he is a very popular leader .
from the oppressed castesI In 2012 he was severely and publicly beat n by the SP of Aurangabad when leading a massive public agitation for justice for Chhotu Kushwaha, a backward caste mukhiya murdered by feudal forces. .
The JVC has used information provided by the Association for Democr tic Reforms ADR -information that is often .
wrong. It has been verified that there are no chargesheets for sexual violence against any of Its candidates. .
Again In the 2014 LS polls, CPIML filed a defamation case against ADR for wrongly reporting that the party's .
Purnea candidate Pankaj Kumar Singh had cited in his affidavit that he faced a case of IPC Section-373 (Buying .
.
minor for purposes of prostitution). The party's leadership immediately investigated the matter, and found that in fact, the affidavit cited a case of Section 379 (theft), NOT Section 373 I PC. .
Uphold the Principles of Gender Justice! .
Expose SFI-DSF's Double Standards on GSCASH ! .
AISAPanel for JNUSU Election2014 .
Central Panel sss SIS SLL&CS .
Abha Arya Meilem Wangnaolim Chetan TyagiPresident: Ashutosh Kumar Hamid Raza.
Debottam Saha Minhaj Ahmed Khan ice-President: Anant Prakash Narayan Rama Naga N Sai Balaji Meenal Gupta Gen. Secy. Chintu Kumari Sandip Mondal Pankaj Singh Kushwaha Waqqas Mahmood Jt. Secy.: Shafqat Hussain Butt Shashi Bhushan Gupta Sukrita Lahiri Vijay Kumar .
SAA .
Samia Khan .
Shweta Raj, Sandeep Saurav, for Central Campaign Committee, AI SA, JNU .
.
PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2014 ID-56557
.
3) This UGBM resolves thatJNU administration mustexpedite the implementation ofGSCASH verdict recommending punishment against a faculty member passed in the EC meeting of12 October 2009. Also, the administration's out-.
of-bounds order on the woman complainantmustbe removedforthwith. .
Proposer: Radhika Krishnan Seconder: Vismay Basu Passed with voice vote .
Will SFI tell us: .
Isn't it true that CPIM defended its leader Suhrid Dutta even after he was convicted in 2008 for the rape and murder of Tapasi Malik at Singur? http:l/archive.indianexpress.com/news/guilty-cpm-s-suhrid-dutta-ally-debu-.
malik-for-killing-tapasi/384632/ .
Isn't it true that the CPIM held a 'victory rally' for Dutta when he was released on bail in 2009? .
archive.indianexpress.com/news/tapasi-malik-murder-case-suhrid-dutta-released/423474/ .
Isn't it true that the GSCASH representative from SFI, in the GSCASH election UGBM, had said publicly that the rape and murder ofTapasi Malik must be 'contextualized'-i.e by blaming the Singur peasants' agitation on 'Maoists' and TMC?! Please hear her shameful words here www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp-geEi7Mt4. Note that she claims SFI has 'answered this damned question' many times-but she herself does NOT answer the straight question: .
Isn't Suhrid Dutta, convicted ofTapasi's rape and murder, still a leader ofCP/M? .
A/SA strongly disapproves ofthe culture of'public trial' on ongoing GSCASH enquiry and will await the GSCASH findings and respect them, in every case, whether the person accused is an SF/ activist or an A/SA activist or anyone else. A/SA has ensured that when A/SA activistfacedsexual harassment complaint, they stepped down from public posts pending GSCASH enquiry. This is a principle NO organization has followed. ABVP knows howa rape-accused Niha/chand is a central Minister in Modi's Cabinet. NSUI knows how a rape-accused man was even Deputy Speaker ofthe Rajya Sabha from the Congress. And SF/ and DSF have the infamous track record ofharassing the complainants, and attacking and accusing GSCASH openly, to defend their comrade who had been found guilty. .
On the Slander Against CPI(ML) .
In order to cover up the SFI's and CPIM's own shameful track record of defending their comrades convicted of sexual harassment and rape, the SFI in its leaflet of 6 Sept 2014, has resorted to pure unsubstantiated slander against AISA and CPI(ML). To briefly put the record straight: .
In 'the case in Jehanabad referred to in the 2012 Telegraph report, the accused Shailendra Yadav is not a CPI(ML) .
activist but is in fact an RJD activist and serial offender whom CPI(ML) activists have thras hed on previous occasions. .
The news story gets the name of village also wrong-the name is 'Dimri-Kajiana' and not Tajariana and 'De hri' as .
.
said in the story. On this occasion too, CPI(ML) activists agitated for justice for the victim. This was already conveyed by AISA in 2012 and yet SFI is repeating the slander! How dare SFI accuse CPI(ML)'s ex-MLA Rajaram Singh of taking Ranveer Sena support without any substantiation?!.
.
SFI is falsely hinting that he is a leader from a feudal-upper-caste background, while in fact he is a very popular leader .
from the oppressed castesI In 2012 he was severely and publicly beat n by the SP of Aurangabad when leading a massive public agitation for justice for Chhotu Kushwaha, a backward caste mukhiya murdered by feudal forces. .
The JVC has used information provided by the Association for Democr tic Reforms ADR -information that is often .
wrong. It has been verified that there are no chargesheets for sexual violence against any of Its candidates. .
Again In the 2014 LS polls, CPIML filed a defamation case against ADR for wrongly reporting that the party's .
Purnea candidate Pankaj Kumar Singh had cited in his affidavit that he faced a case of IPC Section-373 (Buying .
.
minor for purposes of prostitution). The party's leadership immediately investigated the matter, and found that in fact, the affidavit cited a case of Section 379 (theft), NOT Section 373 I PC. .
Uphold the Principles of Gender Justice! .
Expose SFI-DSF's Double Standards on GSCASH ! .
AISAPanel for JNUSU Election2014 .
Central Panel sss SIS SLL&CS .
Abha Arya Meilem Wangnaolim Chetan TyagiPresident: Ashutosh Kumar Hamid Raza.
Debottam Saha Minhaj Ahmed Khan ice-President: Anant Prakash Narayan Rama Naga N Sai Balaji Meenal Gupta Gen. Secy. Chintu Kumari Sandip Mondal Pankaj Singh Kushwaha Waqqas Mahmood Jt. Secy.: Shafqat Hussain Butt Shashi Bhushan Gupta Sukrita Lahiri Vijay Kumar .
SAA .
Samia Khan .
Shweta Raj, Sandeep Saurav, for Central Campaign Committee, AI SA, JNU .
.