PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2012 ID-54416
.
~Join .
Public Meetin.
... With JNU Faculty End the reign of discrimination!Fight for Justice and Inclusion!.
Democratisation and Strike atStructures that Exclude! .
tr.ll.t.ltLti!li.
Inclusion in Academics Strikeat Rules thatDiscriminate!.
Strike atAdministrative Apathy!.
.
-· Tasks anet Challenges Strikeatthe Rule ofMerit!.
... ' speakers Stand for theJNU oftoday andtomorrow!.
Fight for a Campus Open toAll!Prot. Kamal M. Chenov, SIS, JNU Indefinite Day 3Dr. O.K. loblval, President, JNUTA Ravi Prakash, Gen Secy JNUSU, Firoz, Joint Secy JNUSU, Om Prasad,.
-Prof. S.N.Malakar, SIS, JNU Convener SSS, Aardra, Councilor SSS, Tabrez, Councilor SL, Sarfaraz,Councilor SL, Lenin, Councilor SIS, Anagha, Anand, Arindan, Baljeet,.
Dr. Arvind Mlshra, SSS, JNU .
Balu, Chintu, Oibya Shikha, lmran, lshan, Jitendra Kumar, Kanhaia,-Prof. Sona Jharla Minz, sc&ss, JNU Mahendra, Martand, Nilmani, Nishant, Nitisha, Pavan, Piyush,Praveen, Priyadarshini, Rohan, Ruchira, Shabbir, VaibhavDr. Y.S. Alone, SAA, JNU Relay Day 3.
Dr. Maninder Thakur, sss, JNU .
Arvindan, Babita, Charu, Hasan, lrfan, Jagyaseni, Javed Wani, Kishore.
Gaurav, Meenakshi, Meghna, Nagmani, Niloykrittika, Prashant, Raghib,.
17 March Tonight Ad Block 9.30pm Ratnam, Rukmini, Rukmuddin, Sharath Chandra Bose, Srirupa,.
Subodh Kunwer, Surya, Ujitra, Uma, Urba, Vidhya, Vinay, Vivek, Waaris.
.
JNU prides itself on a progressive admissions policy and social justice. but on the ground it is being subverted in manyways. OBC reservations were scuttled for 3 years costing 400 students their futures! Now it has become increasingly .
evident how across centres and categories, viva-voce marks are being used to exclude and discriminate..
OPEN VIOLATION OF AN ORDER OF A CONSTIUTIONAL BENCH.
Admission to JNU based in two components: a written exam and then a viva. JNU allots a weightage of 30% for viva-voce. But way back in November 1980, a 5-Judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court comprising legal luminaries like .
P.N. Bhagwati, Y.V. Chandrachud (CJI), V.R. Krishnaiyer, Syed Murtaza. Fazal Ali, A.D. Koshal) had clearly said,.
We are of the view that, under the existing circumstances, allocation of more than 15% of the total marksfor the oral interview would be arbitrary and unreasonable and would be liable to be struck down as.
constitutional!y invalid".
Why then is the JNU Administration continuing with its blatant illegality?.
WHEN WRmEN IS REDUCED TO A QUALIFIER, VIVA BECOMES THE REAL 'JUDGE'!.
selection. The problem comes when some people decide that the written .
The idea of having two components to the admission process is BOTH SHOULD HAVE a complementary role in final.
-.
i~ ONLY a qualifying mark and that admission.
wilt be determined SOLELY based on performance in the viva. Consequently, we see two kinds of situations in the.
.
admissions data, where students (cutting across categories):.
(A) Have an average and high performance in the written, but very low marks in the viva. (This pattern is particularlyvisible for reserved category students.).
(B) Show average or less performance in the written, but very high marks in the viva. ·.
Clearly, the interview is being used to distribute subjective biases and select or reject candidates based on viva-voce.
.
alone. See for yourself how this works! .
Centre tv!arks in \Vritten.
Student A CHS/SSS Nlarks in v\ya Category.
54.
Stude-ntB 8.
SAS'SIS 43 ST.
Student C 4.
SAS 'SIS ST.
48 ').
Student D SAS,SIS 46 .!.. ST.
__Stu-dent E CSSS 'SSS 13 1 OBC i .
.
Student F CPS SSS ._,..., 4 6 General .. ~· \ Student G cps·sss 3-l 2') 5 ') G~neral L-Student H C~SSAA -l-l 6--GeneralRegardless of how well you perform in the written exam, the viva alone will decided your entry into the .
General.
university and your academic fate!.
THE STRANGE CLUSTERING OF MARKS IN THE VIVA.
Acareful study of viva marks shows a strange distribution with marks clustered either between 0-5 or in the 25-30 range. .
In the normal course, it is expected that the majority of the students would get average marks between 10-20 with a few .
very good aswell asfew very bad performers. Clearly something is very wrong in the way students are being judged in their .
.
viva, where they are either "very good" or "very bad". The obvious explanation is that the interview board is using this l.
bimodal marks distribution to select or reject candidates based on viva-voce alone. .
..
.
P.T.O. .
.
PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2012 ID-54416
.
~Join .
Public Meetin.
... With JNU Faculty End the reign of discrimination!Fight for Justice and Inclusion!.
Democratisation and Strike atStructures that Exclude! .
tr.ll.t.ltLti!li.
Inclusion in Academics Strikeat Rules thatDiscriminate!.
Strike atAdministrative Apathy!.
.
-· Tasks anet Challenges Strikeatthe Rule ofMerit!.
... ' speakers Stand for theJNU oftoday andtomorrow!.
Fight for a Campus Open toAll!Prot. Kamal M. Chenov, SIS, JNU Indefinite Day 3Dr. O.K. loblval, President, JNUTA Ravi Prakash, Gen Secy JNUSU, Firoz, Joint Secy JNUSU, Om Prasad,.
-Prof. S.N.Malakar, SIS, JNU Convener SSS, Aardra, Councilor SSS, Tabrez, Councilor SL, Sarfaraz,Councilor SL, Lenin, Councilor SIS, Anagha, Anand, Arindan, Baljeet,.
Dr. Arvind Mlshra, SSS, JNU .
Balu, Chintu, Oibya Shikha, lmran, lshan, Jitendra Kumar, Kanhaia,-Prof. Sona Jharla Minz, sc&ss, JNU Mahendra, Martand, Nilmani, Nishant, Nitisha, Pavan, Piyush,Praveen, Priyadarshini, Rohan, Ruchira, Shabbir, VaibhavDr. Y.S. Alone, SAA, JNU Relay Day 3.
Dr. Maninder Thakur, sss, JNU .
Arvindan, Babita, Charu, Hasan, lrfan, Jagyaseni, Javed Wani, Kishore.
Gaurav, Meenakshi, Meghna, Nagmani, Niloykrittika, Prashant, Raghib,.
17 March Tonight Ad Block 9.30pm Ratnam, Rukmini, Rukmuddin, Sharath Chandra Bose, Srirupa,.
Subodh Kunwer, Surya, Ujitra, Uma, Urba, Vidhya, Vinay, Vivek, Waaris.
.
JNU prides itself on a progressive admissions policy and social justice. but on the ground it is being subverted in manyways. OBC reservations were scuttled for 3 years costing 400 students their futures! Now it has become increasingly .
evident how across centres and categories, viva-voce marks are being used to exclude and discriminate..
OPEN VIOLATION OF AN ORDER OF A CONSTIUTIONAL BENCH.
Admission to JNU based in two components: a written exam and then a viva. JNU allots a weightage of 30% for viva-voce. But way back in November 1980, a 5-Judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court comprising legal luminaries like .
P.N. Bhagwati, Y.V. Chandrachud (CJI), V.R. Krishnaiyer, Syed Murtaza. Fazal Ali, A.D. Koshal) had clearly said,.
We are of the view that, under the existing circumstances, allocation of more than 15% of the total marksfor the oral interview would be arbitrary and unreasonable and would be liable to be struck down as.
constitutional!y invalid".
Why then is the JNU Administration continuing with its blatant illegality?.
WHEN WRmEN IS REDUCED TO A QUALIFIER, VIVA BECOMES THE REAL 'JUDGE'!.
selection. The problem comes when some people decide that the written .
The idea of having two components to the admission process is BOTH SHOULD HAVE a complementary role in final.
-.
i~ ONLY a qualifying mark and that admission.
wilt be determined SOLELY based on performance in the viva. Consequently, we see two kinds of situations in the.
.
admissions data, where students (cutting across categories):.
(A) Have an average and high performance in the written, but very low marks in the viva. (This pattern is particularlyvisible for reserved category students.).
(B) Show average or less performance in the written, but very high marks in the viva. ·.
Clearly, the interview is being used to distribute subjective biases and select or reject candidates based on viva-voce.
.
alone. See for yourself how this works! .
Centre tv!arks in \Vritten.
Student A CHS/SSS Nlarks in v\ya Category.
54.
Stude-ntB 8.
SAS'SIS 43 ST.
Student C 4.
SAS 'SIS ST.
48 ').
Student D SAS,SIS 46 .!.. ST.
__Stu-dent E CSSS 'SSS 13 1 OBC i .
.
Student F CPS SSS ._,..., 4 6 General .. ~· \ Student G cps·sss 3-l 2') 5 ') G~neral L-Student H C~SSAA -l-l 6--GeneralRegardless of how well you perform in the written exam, the viva alone will decided your entry into the .
General.
university and your academic fate!.
THE STRANGE CLUSTERING OF MARKS IN THE VIVA.
Acareful study of viva marks shows a strange distribution with marks clustered either between 0-5 or in the 25-30 range. .
In the normal course, it is expected that the majority of the students would get average marks between 10-20 with a few .
very good aswell asfew very bad performers. Clearly something is very wrong in the way students are being judged in their .
.
viva, where they are either "very good" or "very bad". The obvious explanation is that the interview board is using this l.
bimodal marks distribution to select or reject candidates based on viva-voce alone. .
..
.
P.T.O. .
.