PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2012 ID-53829

.

-.

-.

.YOUTH FOR EQUALITY 23rd Feb., 2012 .

VOTE SUPPORT ELECT .

YOUTH FOR EQUALITY.

(YFE) .

.

. . .

AAKANSHA BliAWSA .

.

(FOR PRESIDENT) .

FOR BETTERMENT OF OUR CAMPUS.

-.

(YOUTH FOR EQUALITY is an independent organization without any Parent Political Party. We do.

not have linkages in any form with any political party, neither outside nor inside the Campus. Hence if any.

political party or any student organization affiliated to such Political Party tries to give the impression.

.

among student community that they are associated with YFE, we will treat it as a serious offence of.

.

fraud played by them to dent the unparalleled Integrity of Y~E.. YFE is fi~:hting only for the post ofPresident in tlze ongoing ]NUSU election. For certain regrettable-:-l:iut avoidable technical problems ournominations for other posts in the central panel were disqualified. But this will not let O':fr resolve to b~weakened and we stand even firmer in our ideological struggle, after this setback Let it be known to everyone,for once and all, that we have not made any sort of 'understanding' with any of the student.

...

organizations, if anybody claims that uwe have a secret. pact or negotiation with any student.

organization" -The Supporters, Sympathizers of YFE should treat these rumor mongers with derision.

.

and contempt, because thisact is an assault on our entire ideology and will be an affront to the struggle.

.

raisedbyus against "The False Messiahs ofjustice".) .

Various student organizations in their election agendas are trying to woo the students by using devious.

.

slogans ~laiming to struggle against LCR but lest notbe forgotten that they are fighting this election under thevery rules ofLCR ~et us see why they are against LCR, in the words ofLCR itself, .

((It was .generally felt that organizations such as NSUI: ABVP. AISF: SFI etc.. had a tendency. m.ore often than.

.

not. to unnecessarily politicize the election process. The involvement of these organizations in student.

.

elections leads to the creation of rival factions within the students. which. in turn. leads to the subservjen.ce of.

.

the ultimate goal ofdemocratic student representation."(LCR. Page 46.).

... ----I .

Basically the Leftist student organizations have.. made their agendas which would favour a particular.

section of the student body to fetch votes, thereby adopting the British idea of uDivide and Rule,'. On.

the one hand they claim themselves to be Anti-US, Anti-British but on the other hand they are trying to adopt.

thei'r policy of 'divide and rule' bn the basis of caste, religion, language, etc. And some of so called 'Radical.

.

Leff organizations are even h?stile to Tndia', itself. No doubt, inside ~ampusthere should be intellectual.

.

debates but it does pot mean that, those debates should take priority over the studentissues..

..

.

They (the leftist organizations) claim that llwe are the organizations who are fighting for the whole student.

community in each and every moment"-but this is doubtful and dubious claim because they fight for only.

those student related issues which are targeted to attract certain sections of students whom they .

.

~..

think to be easy vote banks orfor those students who basjcally support their ideologies..

In one of their agenda every left student organizations have .r:~ised.

.

.. \ . . the i~sue of 'Placement Cell', butperhaps they are misguiding the students in the campus. This is because, the companies those who will .

I -.

.

 

Done