PaRCha - JNU - AISA - 2014 ID-6664
.
. .
3) This UGBMresolves thatJNU administration must expedite the implementation ofGSCASH verdict recommending .
punishmentagainstafaculty member passed in the ECmeeting o/12October 2009. Also, the administration's out-.
of-bounds order on the woman complainant must be removedforthwith. .
Proposer: Radhika Krishnan Seconder: Vismay Basu Passed with voice vote .
Will SFI tell us: .
Isn't it true that CPIM defended its leader Suhrid Dutta even after he was convicted in 2008 for the rape and .
murder of Tapasi Malik at Singur? archive.indianexpress.com/news/guilty-cpm-s-suhrid-dutta-....
malik-for-kiIIing-tapasi/384632/ .
Isn't it true that the CPIM held a 'victory rally' for Dutta when he was released on bail in 2009? .
archive.indjanexpress.com/news/tapasi-malik-murder-case-suhrid-dutta-released/423474/ .
Isn't it true that the GSCASH representative from SFI, in the GSCASH election UGBM, had said publicly that the .
rape and murder ofTapasi Malik must be 'contextualized'-i.e by blaming theSingur peasants' agitation on 'Maoists' .
.
and TMC?! Please hear her shameful words here www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp-geEi7Mt4. Note that she claims .
.
SFI has 'answered this damned question' many times -but she herself does NOT answer the straight question: .
Isn'tSuhridDutta, convictedofTapasi's rape andmurder, still a leader ofCPIM? .
A/SA stronglydisapproves ofthe culture of'public trial' on ongoing ($SCASH enquiry and will await the GSCASHfindings and .
respect them, in everycase, whether the person accused is an SF/ activist oranA/SA activist oranyone else. A/SA has ensured .
.
that when A/SA activistfacedsexual harassmentcomplaint, theystepped downfrom publicpostspending GSCASH enquiry. .
lowed. ABVP knows howa rape-accused Niha/chandis a central Minister in Modrs .
This is a principle NO organization has fol'.
.
Cabinet. NSUJ knows howa rape-accusedman was even DeputySpeaker ofthe Rajya Sabhafrom the Congress. AndSF/ and .
~ou.
DSF have the infamous trackrecord ofharassing the complainants, and attacking and accusing GSCASH openly, to defend .
theircomrade who hadbeenfound guilty. 34.L .
On the Slander Against CPI(ML) /JfM .
s own shameful track record of defending their comrades convicted of sexual .
dwt .
harassment and rape, the SFI in its leaflet of 6 Sept 2014, has resorted to pure unsubstantiated slander against AISA.
In order to cover up the SFI's and CPIM'fDlJ .
ldXCJ .
and CPI(ML). To briefly put the record straight: .
In the case in Jehanabad referred to in the 2012 Telegraph report, the accused Shailendra Yadav is not a CPI(ML) UOJ activist but is in fact an RJO activist and serial offender whom CPI(ML) activists have thrashed on previous occasions..
/Itt.
'Dehri1 as .
.
The news story gets the name of village also wrong-the name is 'Dimri-Kajiana' and not Tajariana and ~leU said in the story. On this occasion too, CPI(ML) activists agitated forjustice for the victim. This was already conveyed ow .
by AISA in 2012 and yetSFI is repeating the slander! .os How dare SFI accuse CPI(ML)'s ex-MLA Raja ram Singh oftaking Ranveer Sena support without any substantiation?! .
W!l .
nls .
SFI is falsely hintingthat he is a leaderfrom a feudal-upper-caste background, while in fact he is a very popular leader .
from the oppressed castes! Jn 2012 he was severely and publicly beaten by the SP of Aurangabad when leading a 4JS .
'lie.
massive public agitation for justice for Ch hotu Kushwaha, a backward caste mukhiya murdered by feudal forces. .
The JVC has used information provided by the Association for Democratic Reforms ADR-information that is often 4=>5 .
)lU! .
wrong. U has been verified that there are no chargesheets for sexual violence against any of its candidates. U!H .
Again in the 2014 LS polls, CPIML filed a defamation case against ADR for wrongly reporting that the party's .
Purnea candidate Pankaj Kumar Singh had cited in his affidavit that he faced a case of IPC Section·373 (Buy,ing .
11!1 .
minor for purposes of prostitution). The party's leadership immediately investigated the matter, and found .
1q e 2 l\f that in fact, the affidavit cited a case of Section 379 (theft), NOT Section 373 IPC. Jq e ~ Uphold the Principles of Gender Justice! .
!JaJ .
Expose SFI-DSF's Double Standards on GSCASH ! JU\f l iSe.
AISAPanel for JNUSU Election2014 .
~~q.
SLL&CSCentral Panel sss SIS Chelan Tyagi JO.:J .
.. Meilem WangnaolimAbha Arya Hamid Raza.
MinhajAhmed Khan.
President: Ashutosh Kumar Debottam Saha Meenal Gupta.
.
N Sai Balaji.
1c.e-President: Anant Prakash Narayan Rama Naga Pankaj Singh Kushwaha Waqqas Mahmood .
Gen. Sccy. Chintu Kumari Sandip Mondal Sukrita Lahiri Vijay Kurnnr .
Shashi Shushan Gupta.
.
Jt. Secy.: Shafqat Hussain Butt SAA .
Samia Khan ---------.
Shweta Raj, Sandeep Saurav, for Centrol Cnrnpni9n Committee. AISA. JNU .
.
.~ .
. .
.
PaRCha - JNU - AISA - 2014 ID-6664
.
. .
3) This UGBMresolves thatJNU administration must expedite the implementation ofGSCASH verdict recommending .
punishmentagainstafaculty member passed in the ECmeeting o/12October 2009. Also, the administration's out-.
of-bounds order on the woman complainant must be removedforthwith. .
Proposer: Radhika Krishnan Seconder: Vismay Basu Passed with voice vote .
Will SFI tell us: .
Isn't it true that CPIM defended its leader Suhrid Dutta even after he was convicted in 2008 for the rape and .
murder of Tapasi Malik at Singur? archive.indianexpress.com/news/guilty-cpm-s-suhrid-dutta-....
malik-for-kiIIing-tapasi/384632/ .
Isn't it true that the CPIM held a 'victory rally' for Dutta when he was released on bail in 2009? .
archive.indjanexpress.com/news/tapasi-malik-murder-case-suhrid-dutta-released/423474/ .
Isn't it true that the GSCASH representative from SFI, in the GSCASH election UGBM, had said publicly that the .
rape and murder ofTapasi Malik must be 'contextualized'-i.e by blaming theSingur peasants' agitation on 'Maoists' .
.
and TMC?! Please hear her shameful words here www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp-geEi7Mt4. Note that she claims .
.
SFI has 'answered this damned question' many times -but she herself does NOT answer the straight question: .
Isn'tSuhridDutta, convictedofTapasi's rape andmurder, still a leader ofCPIM? .
A/SA stronglydisapproves ofthe culture of'public trial' on ongoing ($SCASH enquiry and will await the GSCASHfindings and .
respect them, in everycase, whether the person accused is an SF/ activist oranA/SA activist oranyone else. A/SA has ensured .
.
that when A/SA activistfacedsexual harassmentcomplaint, theystepped downfrom publicpostspending GSCASH enquiry. .
lowed. ABVP knows howa rape-accused Niha/chandis a central Minister in Modrs .
This is a principle NO organization has fol'.
.
Cabinet. NSUJ knows howa rape-accusedman was even DeputySpeaker ofthe Rajya Sabhafrom the Congress. AndSF/ and .
~ou.
DSF have the infamous trackrecord ofharassing the complainants, and attacking and accusing GSCASH openly, to defend .
theircomrade who hadbeenfound guilty. 34.L .
On the Slander Against CPI(ML) /JfM .
s own shameful track record of defending their comrades convicted of sexual .
dwt .
harassment and rape, the SFI in its leaflet of 6 Sept 2014, has resorted to pure unsubstantiated slander against AISA.
In order to cover up the SFI's and CPIM'fDlJ .
ldXCJ .
and CPI(ML). To briefly put the record straight: .
In the case in Jehanabad referred to in the 2012 Telegraph report, the accused Shailendra Yadav is not a CPI(ML) UOJ activist but is in fact an RJO activist and serial offender whom CPI(ML) activists have thrashed on previous occasions..
/Itt.
'Dehri1 as .
.
The news story gets the name of village also wrong-the name is 'Dimri-Kajiana' and not Tajariana and ~leU said in the story. On this occasion too, CPI(ML) activists agitated forjustice for the victim. This was already conveyed ow .
by AISA in 2012 and yetSFI is repeating the slander! .os How dare SFI accuse CPI(ML)'s ex-MLA Raja ram Singh oftaking Ranveer Sena support without any substantiation?! .
W!l .
nls .
SFI is falsely hintingthat he is a leaderfrom a feudal-upper-caste background, while in fact he is a very popular leader .
from the oppressed castes! Jn 2012 he was severely and publicly beaten by the SP of Aurangabad when leading a 4JS .
'lie.
massive public agitation for justice for Ch hotu Kushwaha, a backward caste mukhiya murdered by feudal forces. .
The JVC has used information provided by the Association for Democratic Reforms ADR-information that is often 4=>5 .
)lU! .
wrong. U has been verified that there are no chargesheets for sexual violence against any of its candidates. U!H .
Again in the 2014 LS polls, CPIML filed a defamation case against ADR for wrongly reporting that the party's .
Purnea candidate Pankaj Kumar Singh had cited in his affidavit that he faced a case of IPC Section·373 (Buy,ing .
11!1 .
minor for purposes of prostitution). The party's leadership immediately investigated the matter, and found .
1q e 2 l\f that in fact, the affidavit cited a case of Section 379 (theft), NOT Section 373 IPC. Jq e ~ Uphold the Principles of Gender Justice! .
!JaJ .
Expose SFI-DSF's Double Standards on GSCASH ! JU\f l iSe.
AISAPanel for JNUSU Election2014 .
~~q.
SLL&CSCentral Panel sss SIS Chelan Tyagi JO.:J .
.. Meilem WangnaolimAbha Arya Hamid Raza.
MinhajAhmed Khan.
President: Ashutosh Kumar Debottam Saha Meenal Gupta.
.
N Sai Balaji.
1c.e-President: Anant Prakash Narayan Rama Naga Pankaj Singh Kushwaha Waqqas Mahmood .
Gen. Sccy. Chintu Kumari Sandip Mondal Sukrita Lahiri Vijay Kurnnr .
Shashi Shushan Gupta.
.
Jt. Secy.: Shafqat Hussain Butt SAA .
Samia Khan ---------.
Shweta Raj, Sandeep Saurav, for Centrol Cnrnpni9n Committee. AISA. JNU .
.
.~ .
. .
.