PaRCha - JNU - AISA - 2008 ID-4571
.
Saboteurs' Federation of India lSfl) at Its Game Again I Ellpose and ResistIt II .
rday the JNUSU nelda timely and spirited demonstration at the Ad Slocl< against attempts by AdmtnlsuatiOII to .
scuttleImplementation of oac and Pli quotas through various anomalies in the admiss:on process. While studeh\S at \M.
c~emo ra.\sed v\goro~s voices against such moves by the Administratio.n. SFI (helped along by some straYsatellites 111<e 1 .
.
pSU)Th~ra1sesfl'sd thelf\)nitvo1ces,Ser\cretaOt agairynst the Adm·ln but against the JNUSUI 1.
even went to the extent of declaring "It's time AISA handed ovilr the .
sari'/ comrades of SFI-we \<now you must be desperately nustrated to nave lost ttle JNUSU-which foqou was the.
umon back to us (Sfl)." .
supreme seat from which to sabotage students' movements to serve your masters -both in the JNU Adn\lnlstration an1lln -Manmohan Singh's regime\ aut surely it's ume you rea\iz.ed that the JNUSU is not a fiefdom that you can demand oe .
,.
nanded ov~r.to you? The JNU student community votes to elect the JNUSU-and that student community last yea .
voted declswely to declare that the JNUSU would not be In the hands of those SfI which defended the NandigHom .
massacre; which supported the draconian Armed Forces special powers Act (AfSPA\ In the N East; the same flf'\ .
which ganged up with NSUI and A6VP in vilifying sturl' ots who snowed blacl< nags to \l1e slavishly pro-imperialistManmohon .
Singh, in 'censuring' the JNUSU President !rom AISA for supporting the blacl<-flag protest and boycotted herfor the en\lre .
tenure; Sf\ wnose JNUSU President in 2001 shamelessly dissociated from the movement tor wort to believe Manmohan Singh's lalse prom1ses on the Nul<e oeal and foreign policy. and jomed congress in vif1tying oppon~nts of \l1e Manmohan Government as closet communalists.When Manmonan Singh visited JNU in 2005, he nad alro11dj 1 .
I.
ini\i~ted the to~ul<e .
oeal; voted against \ran at the \AEI'; and nailed the British Rai as a model of " good gave· I nance." '(et Sf\ refused to express anY protest ;,tis visit-defending hitn by branding students who snowed him .
.b\acl< nags as undemocratic.' Today. CPI(M) and Sf\ are crying noarse against Manmonan's 'betrayal' of U1eir '\llll;\' WhY did \hey give a proven pro-imperialist stooge their 'trust' and \oyatty? Why did theY help to secure consentfor Manmohlln's.
1 .
regime -including tor the anti-people sEZ Act and the patents Amend:nent ACt tor which theY even voted with UI'A? WhYdid they provide the UPA regime with a 'suitable' Speal<ef-foremost leader of \he CPI(\1\) Parnamentarv ptlrl~.
0 .
-who is new embarrassing them bY being 'speaKing' more loyally for the congress than lor anti-imperia\isl1' and the.
1 0 .
CPI\M)?\ WhYare CPI(M)'s party card-carrying JNU intellectuals in Manmonan's Kitchen Cabinet (tile National Knowledge commission) scripting privatisation moves· and refusing to resign even aIter the CPI\M) nas withdrawn its support?I11' .
~ .
defended a\\ \l1e pro-corporate shady deals, corruption and mafla-bacl<ed SP and RJD in \)1e name of defending·secular '' ' and 'anti-imperialism'.waming; by revolutionary and independent Lett forces were brll3hed aside bY accusing tnose f_O"·ce I.
I .
ol 'aiding communal forces'. TodaY those vel)' same trusted allies are thumbing their nose at the CPI(M), voltll\1 t~ .
1\ .
pass the Nuke oeal and making the CPI(NI\ a victim of its own game by accusing it of aiding communal torcosl I \ Above all,the Cl'I(M\'S tactics of justifying opportunistic alliances in the name of 'keeping aJP at baY' has proved .
a dismal flop: the UPA Government's anti-people and soft-Hindutva policies nave facilitated a sJP comebacl<lll state aIter state-and \l1e latest exampie is the dangerous Amarnath frenzy Ianned by congress and ha"'ested by \)1e \l.ll' 6 The CPI\M) and Sf\ nave absolutely no answer to the above questions which are on the lips of everv well-wishe19r of ll1" le~ .
11 .
t=ar from learning from the above experience and initiating anY serious revieW or course correction, U CPI(M) 1.
\ 11 .
movement ~.1l.
displaying i\s total unconcern for any genuine anti-Imperialist and anti-communal movement. and its complete colnm.
"'.
tothe pa\l1 of opportunis\marriages ot convenienee. 1n the see-saw ol opportunism,it has seated 1tself on th~ s~meSid<' ae .
those who carnpaigned lor Modi after the Gujarat genocide and tnose who initiated the first wave of farmers suicides"' '" 10 .
~ .
countf'! in Andnra Pradesh P.T.O·.
Sfl: Spoiler and Saboteur of Campus StruggleS d.
Sincet\'lelast year,frorn the vef'J flfs\ initiative of the!\ISA-led JNUSU in November,till date,the Sfl has all unillte!TIIP track-record of non-participation: 1ts sole role hOS been to spread misinformation and base\essly vilifYJNUSU..
~ .
-I"' .
L J .
I .
.
PaRCha - JNU - AISA - 2008 ID-4571
.
Saboteurs' Federation of India lSfl) at Its Game Again I Ellpose and ResistIt II .
rday the JNUSU nelda timely and spirited demonstration at the Ad Slocl< against attempts by AdmtnlsuatiOII to .
scuttleImplementation of oac and Pli quotas through various anomalies in the admiss:on process. While studeh\S at \M.
c~emo ra.\sed v\goro~s voices against such moves by the Administratio.n. SFI (helped along by some straYsatellites 111<e 1 .
.
pSU)Th~ra1sesfl'sd thelf\)nitvo1ces,Ser\cretaOt agairynst the Adm·ln but against the JNUSUI 1.
even went to the extent of declaring "It's time AISA handed ovilr the .
sari'/ comrades of SFI-we \<now you must be desperately nustrated to nave lost ttle JNUSU-which foqou was the.
umon back to us (Sfl)." .
supreme seat from which to sabotage students' movements to serve your masters -both in the JNU Adn\lnlstration an1lln -Manmohan Singh's regime\ aut surely it's ume you rea\iz.ed that the JNUSU is not a fiefdom that you can demand oe .
,.
nanded ov~r.to you? The JNU student community votes to elect the JNUSU-and that student community last yea .
voted declswely to declare that the JNUSU would not be In the hands of those SfI which defended the NandigHom .
massacre; which supported the draconian Armed Forces special powers Act (AfSPA\ In the N East; the same flf'\ .
which ganged up with NSUI and A6VP in vilifying sturl' ots who snowed blacl< nags to \l1e slavishly pro-imperialistManmohon .
Singh, in 'censuring' the JNUSU President !rom AISA for supporting the blacl<-flag protest and boycotted herfor the en\lre .
tenure; Sf\ wnose JNUSU President in 2001 shamelessly dissociated from the movement tor wort to believe Manmohan Singh's lalse prom1ses on the Nul<e oeal and foreign policy. and jomed congress in vif1tying oppon~nts of \l1e Manmohan Government as closet communalists.When Manmonan Singh visited JNU in 2005, he nad alro11dj 1 .
I.
ini\i~ted the to~ul<e .
oeal; voted against \ran at the \AEI'; and nailed the British Rai as a model of " good gave· I nance." '(et Sf\ refused to express anY protest ;,tis visit-defending hitn by branding students who snowed him .
.b\acl< nags as undemocratic.' Today. CPI(M) and Sf\ are crying noarse against Manmonan's 'betrayal' of U1eir '\llll;\' WhY did \hey give a proven pro-imperialist stooge their 'trust' and \oyatty? Why did theY help to secure consentfor Manmohlln's.
1 .
regime -including tor the anti-people sEZ Act and the patents Amend:nent ACt tor which theY even voted with UI'A? WhYdid they provide the UPA regime with a 'suitable' Speal<ef-foremost leader of \he CPI(\1\) Parnamentarv ptlrl~.
0 .
-who is new embarrassing them bY being 'speaKing' more loyally for the congress than lor anti-imperia\isl1' and the.
1 0 .
CPI\M)?\ WhYare CPI(M)'s party card-carrying JNU intellectuals in Manmonan's Kitchen Cabinet (tile National Knowledge commission) scripting privatisation moves· and refusing to resign even aIter the CPI\M) nas withdrawn its support?I11' .
~ .
defended a\\ \l1e pro-corporate shady deals, corruption and mafla-bacl<ed SP and RJD in \)1e name of defending·secular '' ' and 'anti-imperialism'.waming; by revolutionary and independent Lett forces were brll3hed aside bY accusing tnose f_O"·ce I.
I .
ol 'aiding communal forces'. TodaY those vel)' same trusted allies are thumbing their nose at the CPI(M), voltll\1 t~ .
1\ .
pass the Nuke oeal and making the CPI(NI\ a victim of its own game by accusing it of aiding communal torcosl I \ Above all,the Cl'I(M\'S tactics of justifying opportunistic alliances in the name of 'keeping aJP at baY' has proved .
a dismal flop: the UPA Government's anti-people and soft-Hindutva policies nave facilitated a sJP comebacl<lll state aIter state-and \l1e latest exampie is the dangerous Amarnath frenzy Ianned by congress and ha"'ested by \)1e \l.ll' 6 The CPI\M) and Sf\ nave absolutely no answer to the above questions which are on the lips of everv well-wishe19r of ll1" le~ .
11 .
t=ar from learning from the above experience and initiating anY serious revieW or course correction, U CPI(M) 1.
\ 11 .
movement ~.1l.
displaying i\s total unconcern for any genuine anti-Imperialist and anti-communal movement. and its complete colnm.
"'.
tothe pa\l1 of opportunis\marriages ot convenienee. 1n the see-saw ol opportunism,it has seated 1tself on th~ s~meSid<' ae .
those who carnpaigned lor Modi after the Gujarat genocide and tnose who initiated the first wave of farmers suicides"' '" 10 .
~ .
countf'! in Andnra Pradesh P.T.O·.
Sfl: Spoiler and Saboteur of Campus StruggleS d.
Sincet\'lelast year,frorn the vef'J flfs\ initiative of the!\ISA-led JNUSU in November,till date,the Sfl has all unillte!TIIP track-record of non-participation: 1ts sole role hOS been to spread misinformation and base\essly vilifYJNUSU..
~ .
-I"' .
L J .
I .
.