PaRCha - JNU - AISA - 2007 ID-4084
.
-.
already know how the AFSPA far from curbing "terrorists" is actually a living terror for the common people .
North-East and Kashmir..
On the Sethusamudram project too, the BJ P's position was weak and unconvincing -since the NDA Govt itself had .
initiated and passed the project, and since there was no evidence whatsoever that the reef was a man-made .
construction. However, the UPA Gover·nment surrendered abjectly to tbe Sangh Parivar and BJP's communal .
designs and attempts to pass off mythology as history, by withdrawing the ASI's affidavit on the issue and taking .
action against the ASr officials who had quite rightly pointed out that mythological texts could not be used to prove .
the historical existence of a ·Ram bridge'. .
.
UPA-United Partners OfAmerica?! .
Continuing with the BJP-Ied NDA regime's foreign policy, the UPA Government has tied India in 'strategic' slavery .
.
to the imperialist USA. The red carpet welcome to George Bush, the vote against the Iran at the IAEA and the Nuke .
Deal are proofofthe UPA Govt's pro-imperialist positions. The UPA Govt.'s claims that the Nuke Deal will solve the .
energy needs of India's gro\\ ing economy are proved to be a lie by the fact that a1 best, by 2020, nuclear energy will .
provide merely 7% -and that too not 7% of India's total energy needs but just India's electricity needs. Apart from .
formidable costs of imported nuclear plants, there are enormous environmental. health and safety hazards. Real .
purpose of the Nuke Deal is not energy but larger strategic relationship between USA and India whereby USA wilJ .
closely control every aspect or rndia·s economy, military and foreign policy. The Hyde Act reveals the real text ofthis .
.
' to that of the USA. BJP's.
slavish deal: whereby the Deal is contingent on India·s foreign policy being 'congruent'opposition' to the deal is purely t~trcical as they were the original proponents ofthe deal. Unfortunately, CPI-CPI(M)? is perfonning yet another political theatre of pretending to "oppose'· the deal. CPI-CPI(M)must explain : why afterall they are not asking for a vote on the deal in the Parliament? Why are CPI-CPI(M) interested only in ''pause" and "debate''(without vote) and not eject and reject? .
Not just this, the UPA Go\·t. is strengthening everyday its military, commercial and strategic ties with racist colonialist Israeli and the military dictatorship of Burma even in the face of their increasing brutality. Shockingly CPI-CPI(M) and their rcpn~sentatiYes in our campus, once again, never condemn UPA's military and commercial support with these killer and racist regimes. Infact, CPI(M) govt in Bengal itself has commercial ties with colonial and racist lsr·ael! .
JNUSU in the face of the Burning Questions of Our Time .
The ongoing people's mo\'ements and their brutal repression by the state, as well as the assault of anti-people policies .
demand a powerful support and -;nl idarit) by JNUSU. However it was only that section of JNUSU. led by the JNUSU Vice President and General Secretary. who ensured continuous support of JNU students against displacement, draconian laws and caste rcpre5:-.ion in the country. The other section of JNUSU leadership were conspicuous by their silence, as they were more keen to serve their political bosses in UPA and CPI(M) government in West .
Bengal. .
On Reservations and Rights of SC/STs and OBCs .
In the face of renewed offensive by YFE, and their machinations to scall 27% reservation, social humiliation and .
virulent casteist attacks through administrative and social means against the forces of social justice, JNUSU led by .
the VP and Gen. Secy articulated a strong position in the April I0 AC meeting, in favour of implementation of 27% .
reseFVation and 54% seat increase without any staggering in JNU. \Vhen the Supreme Court stay on OBC quota, it was .
JNUSU VP and Gen. Secy alone who called for a Protest March on campus and at Pari iament Street. Implementation .
of27% reservation remains a key question and all attempts to derail it must be robustly countered. .
We stood in solidarity with AirMS doctors against the victimization of dalits and violation of Constitutional SC/ST quotas in AIIMS and protested against the brutal lynching of a dalit college student, Chandrasen by upper caste goons in Pratapgarh, U.P. .
On Struggles Against Corpor·ate Land Gr·a b and Police Firing The JNUSU VP and Gen. Secy. organised a protest-demo aga inst the Nandigram firing and rnasscre; this.
was boycotted by the JNUSU Vice President and Joint Secretary. The JNUSU General Secretary visited Singur in December 2006, following Tapasi Malik's n1pe and murder by CPI(M) leaders. .
In the case of the Khammam firing also, it was the JNUSU VP and Gen. Secy who ealled for a Protest Demo. while the JNUSU President boycotted it! Such silences nnd boycotts can only be explained by the fact that CPI(M) itself is engaged in the vvorsl form of state repression and forced eviction of peasantry in West Bengal for SEZs! They ar·c silent on Khammam because in the mirror of Khammarn, they see the .
face of Nandigr·am. 2 .
.
PaRCha - JNU - AISA - 2007 ID-4084
.
-.
already know how the AFSPA far from curbing "terrorists" is actually a living terror for the common people .
North-East and Kashmir..
On the Sethusamudram project too, the BJ P's position was weak and unconvincing -since the NDA Govt itself had .
initiated and passed the project, and since there was no evidence whatsoever that the reef was a man-made .
construction. However, the UPA Gover·nment surrendered abjectly to tbe Sangh Parivar and BJP's communal .
designs and attempts to pass off mythology as history, by withdrawing the ASI's affidavit on the issue and taking .
action against the ASr officials who had quite rightly pointed out that mythological texts could not be used to prove .
the historical existence of a ·Ram bridge'. .
.
UPA-United Partners OfAmerica?! .
Continuing with the BJP-Ied NDA regime's foreign policy, the UPA Government has tied India in 'strategic' slavery .
.
to the imperialist USA. The red carpet welcome to George Bush, the vote against the Iran at the IAEA and the Nuke .
Deal are proofofthe UPA Govt's pro-imperialist positions. The UPA Govt.'s claims that the Nuke Deal will solve the .
energy needs of India's gro\\ ing economy are proved to be a lie by the fact that a1 best, by 2020, nuclear energy will .
provide merely 7% -and that too not 7% of India's total energy needs but just India's electricity needs. Apart from .
formidable costs of imported nuclear plants, there are enormous environmental. health and safety hazards. Real .
purpose of the Nuke Deal is not energy but larger strategic relationship between USA and India whereby USA wilJ .
closely control every aspect or rndia·s economy, military and foreign policy. The Hyde Act reveals the real text ofthis .
.
' to that of the USA. BJP's.
slavish deal: whereby the Deal is contingent on India·s foreign policy being 'congruent'opposition' to the deal is purely t~trcical as they were the original proponents ofthe deal. Unfortunately, CPI-CPI(M)? is perfonning yet another political theatre of pretending to "oppose'· the deal. CPI-CPI(M)must explain : why afterall they are not asking for a vote on the deal in the Parliament? Why are CPI-CPI(M) interested only in ''pause" and "debate''(without vote) and not eject and reject? .
Not just this, the UPA Go\·t. is strengthening everyday its military, commercial and strategic ties with racist colonialist Israeli and the military dictatorship of Burma even in the face of their increasing brutality. Shockingly CPI-CPI(M) and their rcpn~sentatiYes in our campus, once again, never condemn UPA's military and commercial support with these killer and racist regimes. Infact, CPI(M) govt in Bengal itself has commercial ties with colonial and racist lsr·ael! .
JNUSU in the face of the Burning Questions of Our Time .
The ongoing people's mo\'ements and their brutal repression by the state, as well as the assault of anti-people policies .
demand a powerful support and -;nl idarit) by JNUSU. However it was only that section of JNUSU. led by the JNUSU Vice President and General Secretary. who ensured continuous support of JNU students against displacement, draconian laws and caste rcpre5:-.ion in the country. The other section of JNUSU leadership were conspicuous by their silence, as they were more keen to serve their political bosses in UPA and CPI(M) government in West .
Bengal. .
On Reservations and Rights of SC/STs and OBCs .
In the face of renewed offensive by YFE, and their machinations to scall 27% reservation, social humiliation and .
virulent casteist attacks through administrative and social means against the forces of social justice, JNUSU led by .
the VP and Gen. Secy articulated a strong position in the April I0 AC meeting, in favour of implementation of 27% .
reseFVation and 54% seat increase without any staggering in JNU. \Vhen the Supreme Court stay on OBC quota, it was .
JNUSU VP and Gen. Secy alone who called for a Protest March on campus and at Pari iament Street. Implementation .
of27% reservation remains a key question and all attempts to derail it must be robustly countered. .
We stood in solidarity with AirMS doctors against the victimization of dalits and violation of Constitutional SC/ST quotas in AIIMS and protested against the brutal lynching of a dalit college student, Chandrasen by upper caste goons in Pratapgarh, U.P. .
On Struggles Against Corpor·ate Land Gr·a b and Police Firing The JNUSU VP and Gen. Secy. organised a protest-demo aga inst the Nandigram firing and rnasscre; this.
was boycotted by the JNUSU Vice President and Joint Secretary. The JNUSU General Secretary visited Singur in December 2006, following Tapasi Malik's n1pe and murder by CPI(M) leaders. .
In the case of the Khammam firing also, it was the JNUSU VP and Gen. Secy who ealled for a Protest Demo. while the JNUSU President boycotted it! Such silences nnd boycotts can only be explained by the fact that CPI(M) itself is engaged in the vvorsl form of state repression and forced eviction of peasantry in West Bengal for SEZs! They ar·c silent on Khammam because in the mirror of Khammarn, they see the .
face of Nandigr·am. 2 .
.