PaRCha - JNU - ABVP - 2000 ID-216
.
.
AKHIL BHARTIYA VIDYARTHI PARISHAD .
08.1, .2000 .
.
Friends, .
It seems that the SFI ideologues have reached the brink of lunacy. To begin with, they made an unsuccessful attempt to slander the name of an ABVP councillor candidate by falsely accusing him of leading a mob to intimidate an SFI activist. When their slander campaign back-fired, they were forced to retreat by stating that 'it may have been an error of judgement' on their part to name a particular candidate. The fact is that the 'Slanderous Federation of India' (SFI) made an error of judgement regarding the JNU student community. They forgot that the trust of the student community cannot be won by dubious means such as slander campaigns. The more they slander us, the more they expose themselves. .
Carrying forward their misinformation campaign, they claimed in their pamphlet dated 7/11/2000 that ABVP activists were the perpetrators of violence in the Mushaira incident. If this be the case. they should have no reason to be afraid of a judicial enquiry into the said incident. Their fear gives their game away. The murderous assault on the two army Majors was carried out by none other than a bunch of SFI lumpens. It is in order to shield their lumpen activists that they are opposing the judicial enquiry. In the same pamphlet, they have shown full faith in an internal enquiry rather than an external one, thus proving that they have always been hand-in-glove with the JNU Administration. It is well known that last year, the SFI had signed an agreement with the JNU Administration that they would no longer resort to such modes of protest as hunger-strikes. gheraos etc. This strengthened the hands of the Administration, which came out with the Code of Conduct. .
The SFI pamphlet also sought to ridicule Sandeep Mahapatra's hunger strike in violation of the Code of Conduct. Do we need to remind them that it was this hunger-strike which had set the agenda for the JNU student movement this semester? The outcome was also positive. The Administration was compelled to agree to re-open the Rahmatullah Khan Committee report and work towards the fulfillment of SC/ST quotas in various centres. So far as the Code of Conduct goes, it was fearlessly violated and, thus, rejected. As a face-saving measure, the SFl also gave a call for a strike, in which they forcefully prevented many students from attending .
classes. The SFI should seriously think whom they harmed by their boycott of classes. While the V.C. was .
comfortably seated in his office, the innocent students were forced to suffer academically. .
Friends, the dirty and opportunistic politics of the SFI is there for all to see. There is a world of .
.
difference between their word and deed. If their track-record over the last four years were seen, It would be found that JNUSU presidents of 1996, 1997 and 1999, all from the SFI, have already left the organization in search of greener pastures. Thus, people who asked for votes on idealistic rhetoric became opportunistic after emerging victorious in the elections. It is high time the students of JNU gave a befitting reply to the SFI's politics of opportunism and showed the dubious duo (SFI-AISF) that the politically conscious student community of JNU cannot for long be taken for a ride. .
VANDE MATARAM I .
Sd/-Vyalok Campaign Coordinator .
OUR CANDIDATES FOR THE JNUSU ELECTIONS 2000 .
CENTRAL PANEL .
President Sandeep Kr. Mahapatra .
Vice President Shiv Shakti Nath Bakshi .
Gen.Secy. Uma Shankar Singh .
Jt.Sccy. Makhan Salkla .
§!.§ Amit Singh Anshu Joshi sss AlokSingh Deepak Singh SLL&CS Neha Jha Prltlsh Asthana .
Prafulla Ketkar Dlpankar Bose Satlsh Klahore .
Mukesh Kr. Mishra Michelle Patricia Peters Shlvkant Singh .
Parthasarathi Behra Suresh Chandra Mahakunda Vijay Kumar .
.
.
.
PaRCha - JNU - ABVP - 2000 ID-216
.
.
AKHIL BHARTIYA VIDYARTHI PARISHAD .
08.1, .2000 .
.
Friends, .
It seems that the SFI ideologues have reached the brink of lunacy. To begin with, they made an unsuccessful attempt to slander the name of an ABVP councillor candidate by falsely accusing him of leading a mob to intimidate an SFI activist. When their slander campaign back-fired, they were forced to retreat by stating that 'it may have been an error of judgement' on their part to name a particular candidate. The fact is that the 'Slanderous Federation of India' (SFI) made an error of judgement regarding the JNU student community. They forgot that the trust of the student community cannot be won by dubious means such as slander campaigns. The more they slander us, the more they expose themselves. .
Carrying forward their misinformation campaign, they claimed in their pamphlet dated 7/11/2000 that ABVP activists were the perpetrators of violence in the Mushaira incident. If this be the case. they should have no reason to be afraid of a judicial enquiry into the said incident. Their fear gives their game away. The murderous assault on the two army Majors was carried out by none other than a bunch of SFI lumpens. It is in order to shield their lumpen activists that they are opposing the judicial enquiry. In the same pamphlet, they have shown full faith in an internal enquiry rather than an external one, thus proving that they have always been hand-in-glove with the JNU Administration. It is well known that last year, the SFI had signed an agreement with the JNU Administration that they would no longer resort to such modes of protest as hunger-strikes. gheraos etc. This strengthened the hands of the Administration, which came out with the Code of Conduct. .
The SFI pamphlet also sought to ridicule Sandeep Mahapatra's hunger strike in violation of the Code of Conduct. Do we need to remind them that it was this hunger-strike which had set the agenda for the JNU student movement this semester? The outcome was also positive. The Administration was compelled to agree to re-open the Rahmatullah Khan Committee report and work towards the fulfillment of SC/ST quotas in various centres. So far as the Code of Conduct goes, it was fearlessly violated and, thus, rejected. As a face-saving measure, the SFl also gave a call for a strike, in which they forcefully prevented many students from attending .
classes. The SFI should seriously think whom they harmed by their boycott of classes. While the V.C. was .
comfortably seated in his office, the innocent students were forced to suffer academically. .
Friends, the dirty and opportunistic politics of the SFI is there for all to see. There is a world of .
.
difference between their word and deed. If their track-record over the last four years were seen, It would be found that JNUSU presidents of 1996, 1997 and 1999, all from the SFI, have already left the organization in search of greener pastures. Thus, people who asked for votes on idealistic rhetoric became opportunistic after emerging victorious in the elections. It is high time the students of JNU gave a befitting reply to the SFI's politics of opportunism and showed the dubious duo (SFI-AISF) that the politically conscious student community of JNU cannot for long be taken for a ride. .
VANDE MATARAM I .
Sd/-Vyalok Campaign Coordinator .
OUR CANDIDATES FOR THE JNUSU ELECTIONS 2000 .
CENTRAL PANEL .
President Sandeep Kr. Mahapatra .
Vice President Shiv Shakti Nath Bakshi .
Gen.Secy. Uma Shankar Singh .
Jt.Sccy. Makhan Salkla .
§!.§ Amit Singh Anshu Joshi sss AlokSingh Deepak Singh SLL&CS Neha Jha Prltlsh Asthana .
Prafulla Ketkar Dlpankar Bose Satlsh Klahore .
Mukesh Kr. Mishra Michelle Patricia Peters Shlvkant Singh .
Parthasarathi Behra Suresh Chandra Mahakunda Vijay Kumar .
.
.
.