PaRCha - JNU - PSU SFR SCB - 2012 ID-67237
.
Kumaun. In both these universities the students union elected under Lyngdoh was dissolved by the Administration. And more so, when the 'interventionists' are participating in the very election process (of 10 days) they are not even violating any recommendation of Lyngdoh. If they are also abiding by the LCR then how are they going to intervene and create an anti-lyngdoh struggle by participation? Or are they arguing that their intervention is conditional or contingent upon winning and that is why they are not violating Lyngdoh in the process of election and hence they are also 'corrupted' by the vote-.
bank politics! .
Even going by their own (mis)understanding of intervention, they should have fought for the elections to .
GSCASH. Why have they left the space of GSCASH? These 'radicals' along with the reactionary organisations are .
ready to compromise on the election of GSCASH. AISA-DSU-SFI has given in writing to the EC to hold elections .
to GSCASH after 3rd March. As per the JNUSU constitution GSCASH election has to take place along with JNUSU .
election. Despite knowing well that the LCR is not for GSCASH, AISA·DSU-SFI has agreed to compromise and .
they are shielding themselves under the 'pressure and fear' of EC. It is very well known to all of us that under LCR .
the university Administration is responsible to the judiciary for any kind of 'alteration' of any 'law. Hence it will ensure that .
EC function under its guidance, but it is not contingent upon the organisations and their politics who are giving 'temple like .
sanctity' to all 'fears' of EC. The JNUSU Constitution has already been sold out in case of JNUSU elections, but we need .
to uphold our own constitution for GSCASH elections. It is not only a matter of conducting elections (legalities), but a .
matter how we uphold our own constitution which in the case of GSCASH is compromised. .
Revolutionary politics cannot be election centric. Students' union elections are seen as a site of struggle that is why many struggles were led by students unions across the country to stand against the World Bank oriented goals of the State. But when students union itself is going to be governed and dictated by these very agendas that we stood against, and violating rt means dissolution, then on vvhat grounds will the students union be a site of struggle. The very fact that the right to dissolve the union lie in the hands of Administration and not students demonstrates the point. It will be a puppet union, a union monitored by Grievance Redressal Cell that has Dean of Students as the Chairperson. It will tum from a site of struggle to an instrument of oppression in the hands of Administration. We have already seen this in the case of humiliation of the EC members by Administration. Now the responsibility of conducting 'free and fair elections without any kind of violence, dispute' is in the hands of Administration and the Administration will definitely take all measures to avoid any 'dispute' arising out of 'caste and religious sentiments'. .
Revolutionary organisation/individual who believes in intervening 'successfully' in the puppet union is a cheater. The election under casteist'communalifascist!integrationist LCR must be rejected. As we know Parliament is a puppet of imperialist/fascist forces/comprador bourgeoise hence we do not believe in intervening into that by participating in parliamentary elections. Many erstwhile under-ground formations came over ground on the very argument of 'cleaning' the system from wtthin. But at the end of the day the system cleaned their 'revolutionary spirif and many of them who were the ardent supporters of making change within the system b} participating in the election ritual every five years chose finally the way of people's movement that boycott parliamentary elections. Thus Students for Resistance (SFR) appeal to the progressive students to .
.
PaRCha - JNU - PSU SFR SCB - 2012 ID-67237
.
Kumaun. In both these universities the students union elected under Lyngdoh was dissolved by the Administration. And more so, when the 'interventionists' are participating in the very election process (of 10 days) they are not even violating any recommendation of Lyngdoh. If they are also abiding by the LCR then how are they going to intervene and create an anti-lyngdoh struggle by participation? Or are they arguing that their intervention is conditional or contingent upon winning and that is why they are not violating Lyngdoh in the process of election and hence they are also 'corrupted' by the vote-.
bank politics! .
Even going by their own (mis)understanding of intervention, they should have fought for the elections to .
GSCASH. Why have they left the space of GSCASH? These 'radicals' along with the reactionary organisations are .
ready to compromise on the election of GSCASH. AISA-DSU-SFI has given in writing to the EC to hold elections .
to GSCASH after 3rd March. As per the JNUSU constitution GSCASH election has to take place along with JNUSU .
election. Despite knowing well that the LCR is not for GSCASH, AISA·DSU-SFI has agreed to compromise and .
they are shielding themselves under the 'pressure and fear' of EC. It is very well known to all of us that under LCR .
the university Administration is responsible to the judiciary for any kind of 'alteration' of any 'law. Hence it will ensure that .
EC function under its guidance, but it is not contingent upon the organisations and their politics who are giving 'temple like .
sanctity' to all 'fears' of EC. The JNUSU Constitution has already been sold out in case of JNUSU elections, but we need .
to uphold our own constitution for GSCASH elections. It is not only a matter of conducting elections (legalities), but a .
matter how we uphold our own constitution which in the case of GSCASH is compromised. .
Revolutionary politics cannot be election centric. Students' union elections are seen as a site of struggle that is why many struggles were led by students unions across the country to stand against the World Bank oriented goals of the State. But when students union itself is going to be governed and dictated by these very agendas that we stood against, and violating rt means dissolution, then on vvhat grounds will the students union be a site of struggle. The very fact that the right to dissolve the union lie in the hands of Administration and not students demonstrates the point. It will be a puppet union, a union monitored by Grievance Redressal Cell that has Dean of Students as the Chairperson. It will tum from a site of struggle to an instrument of oppression in the hands of Administration. We have already seen this in the case of humiliation of the EC members by Administration. Now the responsibility of conducting 'free and fair elections without any kind of violence, dispute' is in the hands of Administration and the Administration will definitely take all measures to avoid any 'dispute' arising out of 'caste and religious sentiments'. .
Revolutionary organisation/individual who believes in intervening 'successfully' in the puppet union is a cheater. The election under casteist'communalifascist!integrationist LCR must be rejected. As we know Parliament is a puppet of imperialist/fascist forces/comprador bourgeoise hence we do not believe in intervening into that by participating in parliamentary elections. Many erstwhile under-ground formations came over ground on the very argument of 'cleaning' the system from wtthin. But at the end of the day the system cleaned their 'revolutionary spirif and many of them who were the ardent supporters of making change within the system b} participating in the election ritual every five years chose finally the way of people's movement that boycott parliamentary elections. Thus Students for Resistance (SFR) appeal to the progressive students to .
.