PaRCha - JNU - JNUSU - 2008 ID-63205
.
~ -:a,~?' 4i.<=-~.
~~ ~.
~~ G)~~ -~ ... ~b.
~~~~ ~~. %. ~-.
·~(6<:.~ v '5-. .
0 ~-·~ 0 t!t.. - -::;d\11\~,......,.;ii'l ... ~oa ~.
II\ ~ ·~ (I) <;. ;;..' .
-7 ~ \) ·-o II' :s:; .;. ~~ ~ 0 ' "\;-"' ~ G) .... ·~ ~.. L).
-~ ~ 'o ~'"0 ' t:. ~~ .....
·~ ~,.,Jtl ...... "~., .... .
. . . .JNUSU .calls upon :Ill those student~ ., .
ho were present on the night of the .
·" . .
ABVP and YFE elements should co11;c forward and depose their eyewitness.
-. Pr·csidcntial debate and witnessetl 1!11· massive violence engaged in by the accounts to the proctorial office. We ~. !Jpcal to the student community to give .
~ i.
·JnU·Stt. . .. , . ·4···' , ?r. . their written depositions about the vi,J.cnce on the night of the Presidential.
., ·, ,.-' ' .,.1 ..
.._._. .
'""\.
. . ~ . .·.·: J ; ;:. :..r ,'... Debate to the Chief Proctor·'s Office IA:.L Block, Room 1091 by 8th February .
.
so as to ensure th~lt the communally motJvated habitual offenders in the cam-.
pus do not go unpunished. .
5. 2.08 .
Submit Depositions to the Proctors Office! Ensure that the Communal Lumpens are Punished! l .
.
On the night ~)f till.' JNLISU Presidential debate. 31Ot:tober 2007, the JNU community witnessed widespread and .
Thi~ was I)J'gani;cd v.olcncc. clearly aimed at ending the pro-.
..
unprccec.Jentcd violence as lump~·n elements of the 1\ BY P and YFE went on a rampage. pelting stones and assaulting .
.
ceedings ofthe debate. which C\'<..:11 threw in dnubt the continuation ofthe election process. This unprecedented violence .
.
member~ of the aucli~TH.:c. candidntes and EC rm:mbcr~.
stands in every "<1) opposed to the clcmneratic etho:-. ,)f the university. More dangerously. it sewrcly injured many I .
.
~1r 111ore fatal consequcn<.:l'Sfor the university <..:t)f11munity. .
students and could ha' e had l.
Though this' iolcncc took plat:c in Cull vi~·" ofthe chicrsecurity o flicer and the media. so much so that the police had .
to be called in. the JNU administration has exhibited a most tardy rc;spoiJ',e in taking action against the culprits. It was .
.
onI) after repeated written reminders from JNUSU to the rector and other official~ that a proctorial enquiry was initiated .
after many month". llowevcr. ~,,en the depositions <..:OIH.iu<.:tl!cl by this enquiry were in C1 completely non-public manner, .
~N to the primary c~)mrlainant i.e. JN USU. A her JNUSU strongly .
.
I .
whereb) the cop) of' the notice ''as not provided EV .
protested against thi~ approach of the administrCition. the date for written d·::position has been extended to 8th Fcb.08. .
Such a del<.&yed response b) administration to ABVP's systematic violt:llt:e is not bt: \.vondered at. After aJL it was .
onI) aCter severe j,ublic outcry, that thl! JN U /\dm in istration was forced to take action against the same set ofcommunal .
lumpens when they beat up a seninr Ph. 0 scholar, b~:longing to the minority community. Iolli .
Such an npproach to AB'v P's lumpenism <;tand~ in ~.tar~ contrast to the speed orenquiry and harshness shown by the .
the basis ofthe verdict :~ftllc proctorial board. the JNL' Administration denied admission to a student who was himselfthcvery same administration '"henever [he <.H.:cused happened to belong to other political hues in the campus. Rccentl), on victim ofharassment and attack on casteist line~ by A BVP and JPF goon::.. The Delhi High Court has upbraided the JNU .
Administration for its castcist bias and has imposed n fine of Rs. 25. 000 on it lor denying admission to a dalit student on .
~U time and ngain about thee\ idenllack ofdiscriminatory grounds. iun taken by th~ .INl i The lligh Court verdict onI) corroborates thl.! pn~it .
will on the par1 of the proctorial board in dealing with incidents ofcasteist nnd communnl violence, which are inevitably .
being perpetrated by a particular group on this campu~. rhe verdict also calls into question the ncutrnlity and lack ofbias of these bodies in the matters of decisions 1akcn when individuals from the-;e groups are involved. When the blatant lumpenism ofcertain groups are met with a blind l.!ye then questions may logically be raised about Lht! biased and partial character of these bodies, which go against the ethos or any in~titution and ra ises questions about the political prefer-ences oftheAdministration. Such a sort treatment ofcornmunallumpcns has not only systematically emboldened them .
over time, allowing them to vitiate the atmosphere ofthe University time and again, but has also eroded the neutrality of .
reconstituted and appropriate actions be taken on the cases mentioned above so that the campus atmosphere is not the administration in a significant manm:r in the public Jomain. JNUSU therefore demands that the proctorial body be .
vitiated. .
whole holds that these miscreants should be forccfu lly dea It with. JNUSU ca lis on aII students to join the Protest Demo JNUSU elections have been upheld year after year as a model or student politics. and the JNU community as a .
Proctorial Board on 8th February at Ad. Block at 2.30 P.M. JNlJSU calls 11pon all students to raise their voice against for Speedy Punishmnet for the Perpetrators of Violence during Presidential Debate and Reconstiution of the Biased .
this lumpen brigade. and submit their written depositions to the proctors' o!'ficc so that the perpetrators ofthis violence do .
not go unpunisht d! .
Language Lab still devoid ofWater and Sanitation! Join Protest Demo! .
The newlyconstructed SL Lal1guage lab building is still lying unused due to Jack ofwaterand sanitation facilitjes. .
calls on students to join the protest demonstration at the Engineering Branch, tomorrow. 6th February at theSuch unwarranted delays combined with a totaladministrative insensitivity will not be tolerated by JNUSU. JNUSU .
Engineering Branch,Ad. Blockat 11.30 A.M. Md Mobeen Alam.
Pallavi Deka Jt. Secy., JNUSU.
Shephalika Shekhar.
Sandeep Gen. Secy.,JNUSU.
V1ce-President ,JNUSU.
President, JNUSU .
.
·y · 3vanathan.
__ Sucheta De.
Councillor_ 555_ JNU5U Council/or_ 5.SS.~!.Nt.JS..
-.
.
PaRCha - JNU - JNUSU - 2008 ID-63205
.
~ -:a,~?' 4i.<=-~.
~~ ~.
~~ G)~~ -~ ... ~b.
~~~~ ~~. %. ~-.
·~(6<:.~ v '5-. .
0 ~-·~ 0 t!t.. - -::;d\11\~,......,.;ii'l ... ~oa ~.
II\ ~ ·~ (I) <;. ;;..' .
-7 ~ \) ·-o II' :s:; .;. ~~ ~ 0 ' "\;-"' ~ G) .... ·~ ~.. L).
-~ ~ 'o ~'"0 ' t:. ~~ .....
·~ ~,.,Jtl ...... "~., .... .
. . . .JNUSU .calls upon :Ill those student~ ., .
ho were present on the night of the .
·" . .
ABVP and YFE elements should co11;c forward and depose their eyewitness.
-. Pr·csidcntial debate and witnessetl 1!11· massive violence engaged in by the accounts to the proctorial office. We ~. !Jpcal to the student community to give .
~ i.
·JnU·Stt. . .. , . ·4···' , ?r. . their written depositions about the vi,J.cnce on the night of the Presidential.
., ·, ,.-' ' .,.1 ..
.._._. .
'""\.
. . ~ . .·.·: J ; ;:. :..r ,'... Debate to the Chief Proctor·'s Office IA:.L Block, Room 1091 by 8th February .
.
so as to ensure th~lt the communally motJvated habitual offenders in the cam-.
pus do not go unpunished. .
5. 2.08 .
Submit Depositions to the Proctors Office! Ensure that the Communal Lumpens are Punished! l .
.
On the night ~)f till.' JNLISU Presidential debate. 31Ot:tober 2007, the JNU community witnessed widespread and .
Thi~ was I)J'gani;cd v.olcncc. clearly aimed at ending the pro-.
..
unprccec.Jentcd violence as lump~·n elements of the 1\ BY P and YFE went on a rampage. pelting stones and assaulting .
.
ceedings ofthe debate. which C\'<..:11 threw in dnubt the continuation ofthe election process. This unprecedented violence .
.
member~ of the aucli~TH.:c. candidntes and EC rm:mbcr~.
stands in every "<1) opposed to the clcmneratic etho:-. ,)f the university. More dangerously. it sewrcly injured many I .
.
~1r 111ore fatal consequcn<.:l'Sfor the university <..:t)f11munity. .
students and could ha' e had l.
Though this' iolcncc took plat:c in Cull vi~·" ofthe chicrsecurity o flicer and the media. so much so that the police had .
to be called in. the JNU administration has exhibited a most tardy rc;spoiJ',e in taking action against the culprits. It was .
.
onI) after repeated written reminders from JNUSU to the rector and other official~ that a proctorial enquiry was initiated .
after many month". llowevcr. ~,,en the depositions <..:OIH.iu<.:tl!cl by this enquiry were in C1 completely non-public manner, .
~N to the primary c~)mrlainant i.e. JN USU. A her JNUSU strongly .
.
I .
whereb) the cop) of' the notice ''as not provided EV .
protested against thi~ approach of the administrCition. the date for written d·::position has been extended to 8th Fcb.08. .
Such a del<.&yed response b) administration to ABVP's systematic violt:llt:e is not bt: \.vondered at. After aJL it was .
onI) aCter severe j,ublic outcry, that thl! JN U /\dm in istration was forced to take action against the same set ofcommunal .
lumpens when they beat up a seninr Ph. 0 scholar, b~:longing to the minority community. Iolli .
Such an npproach to AB'v P's lumpenism <;tand~ in ~.tar~ contrast to the speed orenquiry and harshness shown by the .
the basis ofthe verdict :~ftllc proctorial board. the JNL' Administration denied admission to a student who was himselfthcvery same administration '"henever [he <.H.:cused happened to belong to other political hues in the campus. Rccentl), on victim ofharassment and attack on casteist line~ by A BVP and JPF goon::.. The Delhi High Court has upbraided the JNU .
Administration for its castcist bias and has imposed n fine of Rs. 25. 000 on it lor denying admission to a dalit student on .
~U time and ngain about thee\ idenllack ofdiscriminatory grounds. iun taken by th~ .INl i The lligh Court verdict onI) corroborates thl.! pn~it .
will on the par1 of the proctorial board in dealing with incidents ofcasteist nnd communnl violence, which are inevitably .
being perpetrated by a particular group on this campu~. rhe verdict also calls into question the ncutrnlity and lack ofbias of these bodies in the matters of decisions 1akcn when individuals from the-;e groups are involved. When the blatant lumpenism ofcertain groups are met with a blind l.!ye then questions may logically be raised about Lht! biased and partial character of these bodies, which go against the ethos or any in~titution and ra ises questions about the political prefer-ences oftheAdministration. Such a sort treatment ofcornmunallumpcns has not only systematically emboldened them .
over time, allowing them to vitiate the atmosphere ofthe University time and again, but has also eroded the neutrality of .
reconstituted and appropriate actions be taken on the cases mentioned above so that the campus atmosphere is not the administration in a significant manm:r in the public Jomain. JNUSU therefore demands that the proctorial body be .
vitiated. .
whole holds that these miscreants should be forccfu lly dea It with. JNUSU ca lis on aII students to join the Protest Demo JNUSU elections have been upheld year after year as a model or student politics. and the JNU community as a .
Proctorial Board on 8th February at Ad. Block at 2.30 P.M. JNlJSU calls 11pon all students to raise their voice against for Speedy Punishmnet for the Perpetrators of Violence during Presidential Debate and Reconstiution of the Biased .
this lumpen brigade. and submit their written depositions to the proctors' o!'ficc so that the perpetrators ofthis violence do .
not go unpunisht d! .
Language Lab still devoid ofWater and Sanitation! Join Protest Demo! .
The newlyconstructed SL Lal1guage lab building is still lying unused due to Jack ofwaterand sanitation facilitjes. .
calls on students to join the protest demonstration at the Engineering Branch, tomorrow. 6th February at theSuch unwarranted delays combined with a totaladministrative insensitivity will not be tolerated by JNUSU. JNUSU .
Engineering Branch,Ad. Blockat 11.30 A.M. Md Mobeen Alam.
Pallavi Deka Jt. Secy., JNUSU.
Shephalika Shekhar.
Sandeep Gen. Secy.,JNUSU.
V1ce-President ,JNUSU.
President, JNUSU .
.
·y · 3vanathan.
__ Sucheta De.
Councillor_ 555_ JNU5U Council/or_ 5.SS.~!.Nt.JS..
-.
.