PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2013 ID-55165
.
n . ,..
'"' (j .
'.111· _· :· .
:l'P j ']1:.
IJ, ·:t. v ·,,, IIIII.
.. .
.t! ;: .
I n' .
' .
·~"r .
-.
'' I .
, Q.
~ . "1: ,)iS' ;. ~ ~ ..I..
bt; l 'f".
~~ Jl ~' . .Ka;,andal-is~"; in .
': ~·.
in the very sam~ colleges Res.erved .C;:it~gory 199ds. · The .· improper ...
I ;. ·tili·)'~l· ..· .
·seats were ·fillec:J 3.0% below the sa1;1ction~d implementatipn of .constitutionally mandated.
· stre'lgth. . : . . . reservation~· in vr:zrious.
1-·.r... r-.
centres in thisacademic·session.not only vindicated AISA-ian.
.. ' .
I , ..
.
Thus, the an~i~.reservation .
lopby in the commitment '.
.. University has been robbing the seats from the . to. ' No Mandalism-No .
~~--..
. ~amandal-ism'; b"ut also the ineffectiveness-of.
~; : SC, ST, and OBC sti..idents and depriving them .. .
the A/SA-ian rh.etoric in JNU..
the 15", ~.5, -and 27 percentages ~f seats ,. provided ·by the Central l.
Educatic)nal.
..·~· . " Institutions (Reservations iri Admission). Act of ·similarly the issue of 'drop outs' is a srgnrficant ·.· .
;. ·,· 2006. ·thing whi~h. the AISA has .forgotten. The recent .
.
.,· '· ~....
years has seen.a rise in the ttlrop ot!t' rates ,nthe student community. in Delhi University JNU. The CAG report pointed to 40°~ drop out.
had to go for indefinite relay hunger. strike rates in School of Languages to which AISA led.
,.
. with the open support of DVSU lead by NSUI, .. ' .
-~· ·' JNUSU did not positively respond..
to which the DU administration had to bring.
·~ ! ,;, 11: .
an official order so as to ensure fair and -·-. "' ; !"; * AISA's role regarding scholarships s dtlbJOll<~,.
.
proper implementation of constitutionally .
·..~.. ~:r;: ·; .
.: .t:..· On the one hand, the duration of non·NET UGC .. .
' . ma'?dated reservations if! the admissions for.
. .
"SC/ST/and OBC students. fellowships from 5 years to entire duration of aPhd Course is not done, and on the other hnnci .
1.
On the other hand in JNU, a look into the nothing concrete has been done to increast..' ~.... --..·' '-: . . current year's admission ·process would reveal the MCM s.cholarships. It was NSUI~s struggle~~;L,<~i: ~},.. a dismal picture with an .
improper and interventions which led to the increase in ·:.
::~~.. :·~_: . ~: implementation of .
.
reservations the Mphii/Phd Scholarships from.
(SC/ST/OBC/PH) in Mphii/Phd admissions. This 3000 to.
.· 5000-5000 to 8000 respectively. ft is very.
not only has brought to light, the extent to.
;o ironic that A/SA is still making bogus claim on.
. which the anti-reservation lobby ca~ scuttle .
this landmark achievement which the NSUI.
the goal of social justice, but also exposed the.
dubious role of AISA led JNUSU. When the has brought about in this campus. .
'·. constitutionally mandated reservations for .
.
·~.
OBC-SC-ST-PH catepories are 27,15,7.5 and 3 + The infrastructure is another burning concernpercentages respectr\(ery; the actual in JNU right now. JNU has been declared ,1s thepercentage of students :in ·the admission list best University of our country. It b very ..belonging to .
the respective categories are pathetic to know that the infrastructural ~t<Jtus '19.63, 11.42.. 5.82, · 2.39 percentages in JNU is in a dismal phase. The more than 40respectively. Of this criminal injustice in the .
years of LEFT led student union functioninq .
. -.
..
.........__......_. .
.
....._ .
;.~--~~---·-_....___:_ ----------.
.. ----. . --.------------------~-----·---..-~.-..:-----------. .
.
PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2013 ID-55165
.
n . ,..
'"' (j .
'.111· _· :· .
:l'P j ']1:.
IJ, ·:t. v ·,,, IIIII.
.. .
.t! ;: .
I n' .
' .
·~"r .
-.
'' I .
, Q.
~ . "1: ,)iS' ;. ~ ~ ..I..
bt; l 'f".
~~ Jl ~' . .Ka;,andal-is~"; in .
': ~·.
in the very sam~ colleges Res.erved .C;:it~gory 199ds. · The .· improper ...
I ;. ·tili·)'~l· ..· .
·seats were ·fillec:J 3.0% below the sa1;1ction~d implementatipn of .constitutionally mandated.
· stre'lgth. . : . . . reservation~· in vr:zrious.
1-·.r... r-.
centres in thisacademic·session.not only vindicated AISA-ian.
.. ' .
I , ..
.
Thus, the an~i~.reservation .
lopby in the commitment '.
.. University has been robbing the seats from the . to. ' No Mandalism-No .
~~--..
. ~amandal-ism'; b"ut also the ineffectiveness-of.
~; : SC, ST, and OBC sti..idents and depriving them .. .
the A/SA-ian rh.etoric in JNU..
the 15", ~.5, -and 27 percentages ~f seats ,. provided ·by the Central l.
Educatic)nal.
..·~· . " Institutions (Reservations iri Admission). Act of ·similarly the issue of 'drop outs' is a srgnrficant ·.· .
;. ·,· 2006. ·thing whi~h. the AISA has .forgotten. The recent .
.
.,· '· ~....
years has seen.a rise in the ttlrop ot!t' rates ,nthe student community. in Delhi University JNU. The CAG report pointed to 40°~ drop out.
had to go for indefinite relay hunger. strike rates in School of Languages to which AISA led.
,.
. with the open support of DVSU lead by NSUI, .. ' .
-~· ·' JNUSU did not positively respond..
to which the DU administration had to bring.
·~ ! ,;, 11: .
an official order so as to ensure fair and -·-. "' ; !"; * AISA's role regarding scholarships s dtlbJOll<~,.
.
proper implementation of constitutionally .
·..~.. ~:r;: ·; .
.: .t:..· On the one hand, the duration of non·NET UGC .. .
' . ma'?dated reservations if! the admissions for.
. .
"SC/ST/and OBC students. fellowships from 5 years to entire duration of aPhd Course is not done, and on the other hnnci .
1.
On the other hand in JNU, a look into the nothing concrete has been done to increast..' ~.... --..·' '-: . . current year's admission ·process would reveal the MCM s.cholarships. It was NSUI~s struggle~~;L,<~i: ~},.. a dismal picture with an .
improper and interventions which led to the increase in ·:.
::~~.. :·~_: . ~: implementation of .
.
reservations the Mphii/Phd Scholarships from.
(SC/ST/OBC/PH) in Mphii/Phd admissions. This 3000 to.
.· 5000-5000 to 8000 respectively. ft is very.
not only has brought to light, the extent to.
;o ironic that A/SA is still making bogus claim on.
. which the anti-reservation lobby ca~ scuttle .
this landmark achievement which the NSUI.
the goal of social justice, but also exposed the.
dubious role of AISA led JNUSU. When the has brought about in this campus. .
'·. constitutionally mandated reservations for .
.
·~.
OBC-SC-ST-PH catepories are 27,15,7.5 and 3 + The infrastructure is another burning concernpercentages respectr\(ery; the actual in JNU right now. JNU has been declared ,1s thepercentage of students :in ·the admission list best University of our country. It b very ..belonging to .
the respective categories are pathetic to know that the infrastructural ~t<Jtus '19.63, 11.42.. 5.82, · 2.39 percentages in JNU is in a dismal phase. The more than 40respectively. Of this criminal injustice in the .
years of LEFT led student union functioninq .
. -.
..
.........__......_. .
.
....._ .
;.~--~~---·-_....___:_ ----------.
.. ----. . --.------------------~-----·---..-~.-..:-----------. .
.