PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2007 ID-46511

.

------~----. --_.1!111.

....~..

Aftlftf 11;,__.

Sllinnal,ettld1.

? 1 · O Give Rs 8000/= to all, to start with .

.

)..> Expedite the disbursal of Fellowship, and MCM for BA/MA @Rs2000 and Rs2500 respective!.

!rlI~I~;t}i~i Il3~~ t) .

ATAD BLOCK .

nenas. .

There have been instances when the Govt. or those in authority take the all those people for granted, when they devise .

policies meant for those who are governed. It is very important at these points of time that the people at the receivino end do not sit .

they get heard and those policies are rectified for the better. Over the recent past we have been witness to similar nefarious tactics back hopelessly, cursing others. Rather than doing this, it is for all the people concerned to make their voice loud and clear, so that student community 1n particular, be that the OBC reservation policy(based purely on caste) in higher educational institution, or being displayed by the UPA govt. just to serve it's political ends . even if they are to the detnments of our country in general and the the one sided increase of fellowship amount by the UGC (and no commensurate increase by the CSIR) for the researchers, or .

the arbitrary decision( by the Vice -Chancellor) regarding date for the disbursal of the UGC fellowship etc etc. In all these cases, the stark discrimination meted out in the amount of fellowship between the UGC scholarship and the Rajeev Gandhi fellowship, or .

one basic principle of equality (enshrined in our coostitutionLis OPenly violated. .

Friends, it gives us the enormous satisfaction to tell you that, mu,cq.}iil·lkt31ii~JiimNaff4i1:W;ftJii!gtf:}.{jm!ktif¥W@f@l .

he fight a ainst such blatant violations of the right of equality And we are all witness to the result. So far as the case of OBC .

reservation is concerned, we convinced the Supreme Court that, there 1s sufficient arbitranness in the policy that uses the 1931 data for 1dentifymg the present backwards, caste can not be the sole basis, and it is a politically motivated decision. Arguments well taken .

and a stay order was the result. to prevent the country from further disintegration in all spheres. When last year, UGC increased the fellowship for the researchers JRF /S RF amount and .

.,,,..,,.1.,.,.,,~We also brought out the fact.

·' -A --, .

t.hat over the years, the seais of JRF was declining. Initially the OG-CSIR showed very lukewarm t"esponse. We filed Applications .

l.

:pn;umlu··a·, [·t·,....t[... "'tJI£l'''''.'tl' "'',,u.. ,aJ,·1.,,..,:,,d,,,,.·~·a·,,,.,,.,.,.,,.

Jnder -RT Act 2005, took the matter to all concerned, the ministers as wtll as other authorities, gherao::d the DST office (but didn't take any body hostage like our dear comrades experlise in) and with your determir.ed cooperation, our efforts tructified. The CSIR .

. se3~s witnessed an increase and so did the CSIR and UGC fellowship amount to Rs12, 000 for the JRF and Rs14, 000 for the SRF. .

Friends, we are standing at yet another similar juncture. The irrational discrimination in the fellowship amount between the RaJeev Gandhi fellowship (RS 8000) and that of UGC scholarship (Rs 3000), is simply unacceptable. Our dear comrades see .

extreme casteism being perpetrated, if we rightfully claim for equalizing the fellowship amount, on the ground that since the needs are rr.searcr organization. at the same pomt of t1me. SFI, one of the pseudo leftist organizations, d1splaying 1ts high score of LIE-Quotient. .

JSt the same ,why discrimination in the fellowship amount among researchers who undertake the same kind of research in the same .

accuses that YFE councilors never participated in the council meeting, another naked l1e, as our councilors have attendeg many, and .

-(who keeps on .

since: ely asked for worthy issues being discussed there. We must oint out that the above issues concernin the students i .

were never the topic of discussion in the council meeting. On all occasion, the .

sh1fting his position to keep with the directions from his high command, once in opposition on the inclusion of creamy layers in the OBC reservation, suddeniy says he doesn't mind, or even supports their inclusion once the bill was passed in the parliament), would .

es.. at the co~tof) discussing student related issue .· After all \:Jhat can be expected from these people ,who still consider wi-fi an elitist service a11d not an uroe11t requirement for thP. students, .

try to pass resolutions on Iraq war, or US-imperialism etc. at the cost of who does not have any shame to amass the funds collected for the community kitchen to be served to the distressed workers .

We also consider the decision on the date for the UGC scholarship from april 2007 as arbitrary. It is really unfortunate that .

,even though some other central universities viz. BHU and CU. Hyderabad etc are disbursing the same scholarship from 2006,our .

VC. for reasons known to him (and our JNUSU office bearers. party to the compromise deal for revocation of their suspension orders) .

,k,.ides a date from 2007. This too violates the principles of equality, as the students of all central universities must be treated all the rights to receive the scholarship from the same date. .

c &&C&U45.

sccccu; te .

I& t uc z ecce: a sa a .

Sd/ Dipika Si ngh (YFE Representative) .

Give your feed backs e-mail: yfejnuchapter@gmail.com.

1'-!idhi Singh (YFE Representative) .

-.

.

.

 

Done