PaRCha - JNU - AISA material - 2013 ID-36111
.
· The path-breaking step of setting up the JNU Press has been initiated, and the JNUSU representatives.
in the Library Committee have ensured transparency, accountability and democratic functioning during.
the entire process..
.
· Remote access to the Central Library's database has been introduced, whereby any JNU student.
can access the JNU library resources from any part of the world. Library infrastructure including.
computer, software, and reading room facilities has also been upgraded considerably. Library.
Convenor also alertly protested against undue surveillance..
.
· The UGC's attempts to curtail JRF fellowships in the name of "fund cuts" and to curtail reservation.
in JRF through was resisted..
.
· A protracted struggle to double the MCM amount and to extend the time period of the UGC.
fellowships forced a highly reluctant JNU administration to enhance the MCM to Rs 2000 and to create.
.
a corpus fund for research scholars during 4th and 5th year. This struggle to double the MCM amount.
however continues, and has to be taken to its logical conclusion..
.
· After protracted struggles, SPS dorm facilities for 150 students with mess facilities for Rs 1965 was.
ensured. We must struggle for immediate construction of hostels proposed under 12th Plan to resolve.
the huge crisis of hostel accommodation for all outstation students. Delay in fund allocation and.
administrative red-tapism will not be tolerated, and alternative accommodation must be ensured in the.
interim period..
.
· Administrative attempts to curtail photocopying in JNU were successfully resisted, thus defending.
students' inalienable right to research material..
.
· New courses were introduced in SIS and SSS, a separate centre for Korean language was started.
along with its long awaited M.Phil.programme.
.
· The admission procedures for PH students were made convenient..
.
· The struggle for workers' rights ensured that several anomalies and violations were stalled,.
administration was forced to set up 6 committees to monitor any violation of workers' rights, thus.
ensuring that the responsibility of JNU as an institution is squarely fixed..
.
· JNUSU office bearers from AISA joined the struggle against FYUP in DU, and JNUSU must continue.
to do so since JNU students too are affected by FYUP which erodes job prospects for research.
scholars. The JNUSU must also struggle to reverse UGC decision to exclude foreign languages.
as subject papers in the UPSC Exam..
.
However, the JNUSU's functioning remained handicapped by certain factors. The outgoing JNUSU.
President and his organisation the DSF owe answers to the student community on certain crucial.
silences and betrayals on crucial issues of democracy and social inclusion, including the one on.
Hem Mishra posed at the beginning of this leaflet..
On JNUSU Functioning.
.
· Why did the JNUSU President and councillors from DSF support ABVP's blatant act of communal.
targeting and false framing of the JNUSU General Secretary? Why did they refuse to endorse a JNUSU.
resolution challenging ABVP's vicious communal campaign, thus breaking unity with ALL other left and.
democratic groups on campus?.
.
· Why did the outgoing JNUSU President, following the directions of DSF's ideological mentors in the.
JNU faculty who openly opposed reduction in viva weightage, deliberately make it impossible for the.
Union as an institution to take up the crucial legal battle on this issue by his inconsistent and.
contradictory communication with the lawyer? This question was posed in the School Convenors'.
reports and endorsed by School GBMs - yet DSF has remained completely silent on this issue till date..
Their silence itself is proof that they do not have any convincing answer on this question. The viva.
struggle requires a firm ideological commitment of the entire JNUSU as an institution and the capacity.
to engage in the legal case with consistency and coherence: only AISA in JNU has shown consistency.
and will on such issues including OBC reservation, deprivation points, and recognition for madarsa.
certificates..
.
· DSF's candidates for Central Panel include its former School Councillors who were nominated by the.
JNUSU President as representatives to the EOO and Placement Cell: why did these representatives.
never show up for the job? Isn't it a fact that during the admission process, the EOO had no option but.
to contact the JNUSU Joint Secretary, who then worked as the JNUSU representative in the EOO?.
And that the Chairperson of the Placement Cell had to contact other Office bearers for new names of.
student representatives, after which SIS, SSS and SLL&CS Convenors (from AISA) were.
incorporated into the body? Isn't it the case that it was only thanks to these AISA Convenors that the.
Placement Cell began to have proper meetings and JNUSU organized an Open House to put together.
..
PaRCha - JNU - AISA material - 2013 ID-36111
.
· The path-breaking step of setting up the JNU Press has been initiated, and the JNUSU representatives.
in the Library Committee have ensured transparency, accountability and democratic functioning during.
the entire process..
.
· Remote access to the Central Library's database has been introduced, whereby any JNU student.
can access the JNU library resources from any part of the world. Library infrastructure including.
computer, software, and reading room facilities has also been upgraded considerably. Library.
Convenor also alertly protested against undue surveillance..
.
· The UGC's attempts to curtail JRF fellowships in the name of "fund cuts" and to curtail reservation.
in JRF through was resisted..
.
· A protracted struggle to double the MCM amount and to extend the time period of the UGC.
fellowships forced a highly reluctant JNU administration to enhance the MCM to Rs 2000 and to create.
.
a corpus fund for research scholars during 4th and 5th year. This struggle to double the MCM amount.
however continues, and has to be taken to its logical conclusion..
.
· After protracted struggles, SPS dorm facilities for 150 students with mess facilities for Rs 1965 was.
ensured. We must struggle for immediate construction of hostels proposed under 12th Plan to resolve.
the huge crisis of hostel accommodation for all outstation students. Delay in fund allocation and.
administrative red-tapism will not be tolerated, and alternative accommodation must be ensured in the.
interim period..
.
· Administrative attempts to curtail photocopying in JNU were successfully resisted, thus defending.
students' inalienable right to research material..
.
· New courses were introduced in SIS and SSS, a separate centre for Korean language was started.
along with its long awaited M.Phil.programme.
.
· The admission procedures for PH students were made convenient..
.
· The struggle for workers' rights ensured that several anomalies and violations were stalled,.
administration was forced to set up 6 committees to monitor any violation of workers' rights, thus.
ensuring that the responsibility of JNU as an institution is squarely fixed..
.
· JNUSU office bearers from AISA joined the struggle against FYUP in DU, and JNUSU must continue.
to do so since JNU students too are affected by FYUP which erodes job prospects for research.
scholars. The JNUSU must also struggle to reverse UGC decision to exclude foreign languages.
as subject papers in the UPSC Exam..
.
However, the JNUSU's functioning remained handicapped by certain factors. The outgoing JNUSU.
President and his organisation the DSF owe answers to the student community on certain crucial.
silences and betrayals on crucial issues of democracy and social inclusion, including the one on.
Hem Mishra posed at the beginning of this leaflet..
On JNUSU Functioning.
.
· Why did the JNUSU President and councillors from DSF support ABVP's blatant act of communal.
targeting and false framing of the JNUSU General Secretary? Why did they refuse to endorse a JNUSU.
resolution challenging ABVP's vicious communal campaign, thus breaking unity with ALL other left and.
democratic groups on campus?.
.
· Why did the outgoing JNUSU President, following the directions of DSF's ideological mentors in the.
JNU faculty who openly opposed reduction in viva weightage, deliberately make it impossible for the.
Union as an institution to take up the crucial legal battle on this issue by his inconsistent and.
contradictory communication with the lawyer? This question was posed in the School Convenors'.
reports and endorsed by School GBMs - yet DSF has remained completely silent on this issue till date..
Their silence itself is proof that they do not have any convincing answer on this question. The viva.
struggle requires a firm ideological commitment of the entire JNUSU as an institution and the capacity.
to engage in the legal case with consistency and coherence: only AISA in JNU has shown consistency.
and will on such issues including OBC reservation, deprivation points, and recognition for madarsa.
certificates..
.
· DSF's candidates for Central Panel include its former School Councillors who were nominated by the.
JNUSU President as representatives to the EOO and Placement Cell: why did these representatives.
never show up for the job? Isn't it a fact that during the admission process, the EOO had no option but.
to contact the JNUSU Joint Secretary, who then worked as the JNUSU representative in the EOO?.
And that the Chairperson of the Placement Cell had to contact other Office bearers for new names of.
student representatives, after which SIS, SSS and SLL&CS Convenors (from AISA) were.
incorporated into the body? Isn't it the case that it was only thanks to these AISA Convenors that the.
Placement Cell began to have proper meetings and JNUSU organized an Open House to put together.
..