PaRCha - JNU - AISA material - 2010 ID-26187
.
undermining of a transparent, democratic decision-making process in JNU to scuttle social justice and reservations: .
.
For the last three years, the JNU administration has stubbornly used the faulty and illegal cut-off criteria to steal OBC seats and deny admission to OBC students. This, despite the strong opposition from ALL sections of the university community. .
.
.
When the student community and the JNUSU protested, they instituted a committee under the chairpersonship of a known anti-reservationist (Prof. Aditya Mukherjee) to look into the matter. This committee overlooked all logic and legal proof, and was used by the administration to ratify its faulty and illegal admission process time and again. .
.
.
JNUs Academic Council (at its March 18th 2010 meeting) rejected the Aditya Mukherjee Committees recommendations. Subsequently, the Deans Committee upheld the ACs position in its 17th June 2010 meeting and recommended corrections in the cut-off criteria being followed by JNU. .
.
.
In July 2010, acting on spurious legal opinion served by the casteist YFE, the JNU administration shamefully overruled the AC decision and unilaterally issued an order in its own name reverting back to the Aditya Mukherjee Committees recommendations WITHOUT taking the sanction of the AC. .
.
.
And now, even after the Delhi HC has clearly indicted JNUs admission policy, the administration is refusing to give admission to those eligible OBC students whose seats were stolen! .
.
.
.
Poster 4: .
Questions that the Academic Council MUST ask at the November 24th meeting: .
.
How was the March 18th decision of the AC to reject the Aditya Mukherjee Committee recommendations superseded unilaterally by the JNU administration? Why wasnt another AC meeting called immediately if there was any need to question the AC decision? .
.
.
Why is the JNU administration not acting on the September 7th verdict of the Delhi HC? Why is admission being offered to just 2 victims, and not to ALL the 277 victims who were denied admission this year alone? .
.
.
Does the JNU administration expect ALL the victims to file extensive RTIs, find out their marks, and then file individual cases demanding admission? .
How MANY MORE court cases will have to be filed, before the JNU administration agrees to give justice to ALL the victims? How many times will these students be victimized and denied justice for no fault of theirs? How much more subterfuge will the administration resort to, to scuttle social justice? .
How is JNU allotting a high weightage of 30% to interviews in the admission process, even though the Supreme Court has clearly directed that this weightage can be NO MORE than 15%? .
.
.
PaRCha - JNU - AISA material - 2010 ID-26187
.
undermining of a transparent, democratic decision-making process in JNU to scuttle social justice and reservations: .
.
For the last three years, the JNU administration has stubbornly used the faulty and illegal cut-off criteria to steal OBC seats and deny admission to OBC students. This, despite the strong opposition from ALL sections of the university community. .
.
.
When the student community and the JNUSU protested, they instituted a committee under the chairpersonship of a known anti-reservationist (Prof. Aditya Mukherjee) to look into the matter. This committee overlooked all logic and legal proof, and was used by the administration to ratify its faulty and illegal admission process time and again. .
.
.
JNUs Academic Council (at its March 18th 2010 meeting) rejected the Aditya Mukherjee Committees recommendations. Subsequently, the Deans Committee upheld the ACs position in its 17th June 2010 meeting and recommended corrections in the cut-off criteria being followed by JNU. .
.
.
In July 2010, acting on spurious legal opinion served by the casteist YFE, the JNU administration shamefully overruled the AC decision and unilaterally issued an order in its own name reverting back to the Aditya Mukherjee Committees recommendations WITHOUT taking the sanction of the AC. .
.
.
And now, even after the Delhi HC has clearly indicted JNUs admission policy, the administration is refusing to give admission to those eligible OBC students whose seats were stolen! .
.
.
.
Poster 4: .
Questions that the Academic Council MUST ask at the November 24th meeting: .
.
How was the March 18th decision of the AC to reject the Aditya Mukherjee Committee recommendations superseded unilaterally by the JNU administration? Why wasnt another AC meeting called immediately if there was any need to question the AC decision? .
.
.
Why is the JNU administration not acting on the September 7th verdict of the Delhi HC? Why is admission being offered to just 2 victims, and not to ALL the 277 victims who were denied admission this year alone? .
.
.
Does the JNU administration expect ALL the victims to file extensive RTIs, find out their marks, and then file individual cases demanding admission? .
How MANY MORE court cases will have to be filed, before the JNU administration agrees to give justice to ALL the victims? How many times will these students be victimized and denied justice for no fault of theirs? How much more subterfuge will the administration resort to, to scuttle social justice? .
How is JNU allotting a high weightage of 30% to interviews in the admission process, even though the Supreme Court has clearly directed that this weightage can be NO MORE than 15%? .
.
.