PaRCha - JNU - AISA chits - 2011 ID-12973
.
aisa Unite for Honour HC Verdict! Uphold Correct Implementation of OBC Reservation! 17.3.11.
.
Social Justice, End All Casteist Manipulations in Admissions!.
Transparency.
and Democracy Ensure Justice To All OBC Students Victimised By JNU's Deliberate Wrong Policy!.
in JNU's Admission.
Hold JNU Administration Accountable For Unilateral Actions Against Last AC Decisions!.
.
Reduce Weightage in Viva- Publicise All Marks - Expand Madarsa Recognition!.
.
Implement Reservation in All Faculty Positions!.
.
Strengthen Social Justice, Social Inclusion and Democratic Ethos of JNU!.
.
Join Tonight's (17 March) PUBLIC MEETING Join Tomorrow (18 March) United Protest Demo.
.
Sutlej Mess 9.30pm in front of the AC Meeting SSS-I at 2.00pm.
.
"Procedure followed by JNU and the stand of the...Union been denied of their rightful place in JNU..
of India (UOI) regarding reservation for OBCs is thus de-.
clared to be bad...The policy adopted by the ...UOI & JNU · To top it all, the JNU administration is now (mis)using public.
amounts to the Executive taking away what the legislature funds to shamefully defend its illegal scuttling of constitutional.
has given to the OBCs. The same cannot be permitted to provisions in court..
happen. The Act cannot be permitted to be used as a mode.
of making more seats available to the General (Unreserved) This multiple misuse of public office as well as public funds.
category than before; that was not the intent of the Act..." by the JNU administration is completely unacceptable to the.
Delhi High Court judge Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, in his verdict JNU community..
on OBC reservations..
JNU's Academic Council is meeting on March 18th 2011.
On 7th September 2010, the Delhi High Court (HC) thus rapped the after one whole year. At the upcoming AC meeting, it is absolutely.
JNU administration on its knuckles. The Delhi High Court reaffirmed essential that the HC verdict translates into an immediate change.
what the progressive sections of the entire JNU community and of JNU's admission policy. Those hundreds of OBC students who.
beyond have been reiterating for years: the JNU administration have been denied admission simply because the JNU administra-.
has been has been criminally denying admission to several OBC tion chose not to see reason, and chose instead to circumvent its.
students though its patently illegal, illogical, casteist interpretation own decision-making bodies, must be compensated. The correct.
of the cut-off criterion for OBC students, thus scuttling the proper cut-off criterion for OBC students must be put in place, in keeping.
implementation of the OBC Reservation Act. The verdict could not with the 7th September 2010 HC verdict. Also, the quantum of cut-.
more explicit - it clearly accuses the JNU administration as well as off must be correctly set; relaxation should proceed up to 10 marks.
the MHRD for `defeating the very purpose' of the Act: from the qualifying marks of the general category students, till all.
the OBC seats are filled. In order to ensure more accountability and.
"Requiring the OBC candidates to secure marks within transparency, marks obtained by all students seeking admission.
10% bandwidth of the last candidate admitted in the Gen- have to be declared by the JNU administration both at the viva.
eral (Unreserved) category amounts to requiring the OBC voce stage, as well as when the final lists of selected students are.
candidates to compete with the General (Unreserved) released. And, weightage for interviews in the admission process.
category candidates and which is contrary to the concept should be reduced to 10%..
of reservation..... The aforesaid in my view would defeat.
the very purpose of the Constitutional amendment and the It is also essential that at the AC meeting, those in the admin-.
Act." - Delhi High Court istration who are responsible for JNU's shameful loss of credibility.
should be held accountable for their acts of commission with this.
Even after this conclusive verdict, the JNU administration has till scuttling of social justice. We cannot allow administrative posi-.
now stubbornly refused to implement this verdict in its entirety. tions and public funds to be used for scuttling constitutional.
Far from offering admission to all the students who were denied provisions which defend social justice..
admission for no fault of theirs but because of JNU's faulty cut-off.
criteria, the JNU administration decided unilaterally to challenge AISA appeals to the student community to attend a Public.
the HC verdict in court, that too using public funds to defend its Meeting called by all organisations in Sutlej mess tonight.
illegalities! Subsequently, the HC once more validated the 7th Sept (March 17th 2011) from 9.30 pm onwards. This meeting will be.
2010 verdict by dismissing JNU's review petition. addressed by several faculty members. Also, we appeal to the.
student community to participate in large numbers in the joint.
See the irony of the situation: Protest Demonstration called tomorrow (March 18th) from 2.
pm onwards in front of the AC Meeting. It is our responsibility to.
· In the first place, the JNU administration chose to be guided take forward the struggle to defend JNU's democratic and socially.
by its ideological predilections, rather than by the law of the inclusive ethos to its logical conclusion..
land. The officials in the administration deliberately used their.
pubic office to scuttle the OBC reservation act, rather than to.
defend constitutional provisions..
.
· Thanks to the JNU administration, several OBC students have.
.
It Is Now In Black and White- In The Words of Manmohan Singh's Beloved American Masters!.
.
Wikileaks Cable Show How UPA Subjugated India's Sovereignty To US Dikatats!.
.
US Agent UPA Government Must Quit Immediately!.
.
The leaked Radia tapes revealed how corporate houses control crucial decisions made by the Central government, and.
.
exposed several UPA Ministers as corporate appointees. Now, US embassy cables leaked by the whistleblower website.
.
Wikileaks have revealed clear evidence of the lengths to which the US monitors and influences the functioning of Gov-.
.
ernment and Parliament. Not only have Cabinet appointments been tailored by the Manmohan Singh Government.
.
to suit US interests, the Congress party even spent crores of cash to buy MPs' votes during the Nuke Deal trust.
.
vote, with the collusion and approval of US representatives. P.T.O..
..
PaRCha - JNU - AISA chits - 2011 ID-12973
.
aisa Unite for Honour HC Verdict! Uphold Correct Implementation of OBC Reservation! 17.3.11.
.
Social Justice, End All Casteist Manipulations in Admissions!.
Transparency.
and Democracy Ensure Justice To All OBC Students Victimised By JNU's Deliberate Wrong Policy!.
in JNU's Admission.
Hold JNU Administration Accountable For Unilateral Actions Against Last AC Decisions!.
.
Reduce Weightage in Viva- Publicise All Marks - Expand Madarsa Recognition!.
.
Implement Reservation in All Faculty Positions!.
.
Strengthen Social Justice, Social Inclusion and Democratic Ethos of JNU!.
.
Join Tonight's (17 March) PUBLIC MEETING Join Tomorrow (18 March) United Protest Demo.
.
Sutlej Mess 9.30pm in front of the AC Meeting SSS-I at 2.00pm.
.
"Procedure followed by JNU and the stand of the...Union been denied of their rightful place in JNU..
of India (UOI) regarding reservation for OBCs is thus de-.
clared to be bad...The policy adopted by the ...UOI & JNU · To top it all, the JNU administration is now (mis)using public.
amounts to the Executive taking away what the legislature funds to shamefully defend its illegal scuttling of constitutional.
has given to the OBCs. The same cannot be permitted to provisions in court..
happen. The Act cannot be permitted to be used as a mode.
of making more seats available to the General (Unreserved) This multiple misuse of public office as well as public funds.
category than before; that was not the intent of the Act..." by the JNU administration is completely unacceptable to the.
Delhi High Court judge Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, in his verdict JNU community..
on OBC reservations..
JNU's Academic Council is meeting on March 18th 2011.
On 7th September 2010, the Delhi High Court (HC) thus rapped the after one whole year. At the upcoming AC meeting, it is absolutely.
JNU administration on its knuckles. The Delhi High Court reaffirmed essential that the HC verdict translates into an immediate change.
what the progressive sections of the entire JNU community and of JNU's admission policy. Those hundreds of OBC students who.
beyond have been reiterating for years: the JNU administration have been denied admission simply because the JNU administra-.
has been has been criminally denying admission to several OBC tion chose not to see reason, and chose instead to circumvent its.
students though its patently illegal, illogical, casteist interpretation own decision-making bodies, must be compensated. The correct.
of the cut-off criterion for OBC students, thus scuttling the proper cut-off criterion for OBC students must be put in place, in keeping.
implementation of the OBC Reservation Act. The verdict could not with the 7th September 2010 HC verdict. Also, the quantum of cut-.
more explicit - it clearly accuses the JNU administration as well as off must be correctly set; relaxation should proceed up to 10 marks.
the MHRD for `defeating the very purpose' of the Act: from the qualifying marks of the general category students, till all.
the OBC seats are filled. In order to ensure more accountability and.
"Requiring the OBC candidates to secure marks within transparency, marks obtained by all students seeking admission.
10% bandwidth of the last candidate admitted in the Gen- have to be declared by the JNU administration both at the viva.
eral (Unreserved) category amounts to requiring the OBC voce stage, as well as when the final lists of selected students are.
candidates to compete with the General (Unreserved) released. And, weightage for interviews in the admission process.
category candidates and which is contrary to the concept should be reduced to 10%..
of reservation..... The aforesaid in my view would defeat.
the very purpose of the Constitutional amendment and the It is also essential that at the AC meeting, those in the admin-.
Act." - Delhi High Court istration who are responsible for JNU's shameful loss of credibility.
should be held accountable for their acts of commission with this.
Even after this conclusive verdict, the JNU administration has till scuttling of social justice. We cannot allow administrative posi-.
now stubbornly refused to implement this verdict in its entirety. tions and public funds to be used for scuttling constitutional.
Far from offering admission to all the students who were denied provisions which defend social justice..
admission for no fault of theirs but because of JNU's faulty cut-off.
criteria, the JNU administration decided unilaterally to challenge AISA appeals to the student community to attend a Public.
the HC verdict in court, that too using public funds to defend its Meeting called by all organisations in Sutlej mess tonight.
illegalities! Subsequently, the HC once more validated the 7th Sept (March 17th 2011) from 9.30 pm onwards. This meeting will be.
2010 verdict by dismissing JNU's review petition. addressed by several faculty members. Also, we appeal to the.
student community to participate in large numbers in the joint.
See the irony of the situation: Protest Demonstration called tomorrow (March 18th) from 2.
pm onwards in front of the AC Meeting. It is our responsibility to.
· In the first place, the JNU administration chose to be guided take forward the struggle to defend JNU's democratic and socially.
by its ideological predilections, rather than by the law of the inclusive ethos to its logical conclusion..
land. The officials in the administration deliberately used their.
pubic office to scuttle the OBC reservation act, rather than to.
defend constitutional provisions..
.
· Thanks to the JNU administration, several OBC students have.
.
It Is Now In Black and White- In The Words of Manmohan Singh's Beloved American Masters!.
.
Wikileaks Cable Show How UPA Subjugated India's Sovereignty To US Dikatats!.
.
US Agent UPA Government Must Quit Immediately!.
.
The leaked Radia tapes revealed how corporate houses control crucial decisions made by the Central government, and.
.
exposed several UPA Ministers as corporate appointees. Now, US embassy cables leaked by the whistleblower website.
.
Wikileaks have revealed clear evidence of the lengths to which the US monitors and influences the functioning of Gov-.
.
ernment and Parliament. Not only have Cabinet appointments been tailored by the Manmohan Singh Government.
.
to suit US interests, the Congress party even spent crores of cash to buy MPs' votes during the Nuke Deal trust.
.
vote, with the collusion and approval of US representatives. P.T.O..
..