PaRCha - JNU - AISA - 2008 ID-4939
.
·;· .
" .
. ~ .
Daily .
Disappearance$.
~,.....£~-.
......
an.. d --"'-Y'il·.
L , .
_.. ..~L.·A .
· .
reservation subject to the availability of eligible candidates so tpat the anomalfes In theprocess can be remedied". It was only after a strong point of order raised from the floor to remove the 'eligibility' clause. But from what understanding and position this clause ·comes· speaking the same language as the meritocratlc administration and Y4E? Whom are theytryingObjections were also raised from the floor when the SSS councillors from AISA had put the resolut1on .
house holds that for fulfilling the increased intake in the wake of OBC reservatio.ns, a prop-rl"'~'" '·:;~~·~~,~-~~ .
defined one shot offer method should be worked out for JNU admissions in the forthtomlng .sre.ctr.· .~ 1 .
· .
asked whether JNUSU holds offer system as a better system, to which the 5SS Councillor replied that:·~we .
.
keeping in view the due share of different categories in the admission list." The Councillors were.
.
think it Is a better system." When the students replied that this Is a complete contradiction of the.
the line "This house holds that reservation and seat increase would be calculated on the basis .
.
intake." .
held by JNU5U so far that offer system is arbitrary and not 'legally tenable', the 555 Councillors hastltySdcli.
Until the UGBM the JNUSU held that the offer system Is arbitrary and legally untenable. Why did they wait .
only until this point of placing resolutions to reveal their position that offer Is a better system? JNUSU claims.
However from then until now this Is the first time they have argued In favour of the offer system. Even then, that in the Academic Council meeting in May they had argued for the offer system which got defeated..
this resolution does not unconditionally support offer but a "properly defined one shot offer system" which .
they themselves have not properly defined In the UGBM or after it. We demand that the JNUSU stop .
( .
fooled their own cadre and students who stood In favour of Intake. .
.
deceiving the student community and clarify this method of admission. By placing this resolution they alsoYESTERDAY'S CALL FOR All ORGANIZATION CAOl Mt;ETING; TOO LITILE TOO LATE? For tht.. past two weeks, we have repeatedly demanded all organization meetings, GBMs, etc from the JNUSU to debate the .
0 issues at hand. They consistently denied this-the JNUSU Joint Secretary even stated after the Standing .
Committee meeting that "we will call It when we think It Is required." Finally they were forced to call a UGBM .
which they conducted In a highly undemocratic manner. Yesterday, they gave a call for an AO meeting to decide on the future course of action. However, the future course of action had already been decided .
unilaterally by the JNUSU which was a call for mass hunger strike at Ad Block even before the AO was held. .
Clearly the democratic functioning of the JNUSU works quite well according to their discretionary powers! We.
even the dissenting voices have a space to be heard. Moreover, we have noticed that the JNU5U Is not demand that the JNUSU stops making a mockery of democratic norms, and functions In a manner in which.
faithfully reporting to the student community about the deliberations within the administration of which the.
student community about the Academic Council decision that the intake and walt list system is being ,, Union Is a part of. A glaring example of it Is the failure (deliberate, or otherwise) of the JNU5U to Inform the.
who concealed the Information that the Prime Minister was coming to JNU three years back. We demand that .
introduced in place of the offer system. It reminds us also of the ex-JNUSU president from AISA Mona Oasthe JNU5U bring all the information about the present admission process to the notice of the student community immediately. The Union must also demand from the administration the center-wjse break-up of student registration this year, so that the violations In reservation are known in detail..
SEX's Sorry Tale of Opportunism continues: The sudden change of position and complete silence on thereservations, seat cut and to restore offer system cunningly In a single resolution ,and managed to get them issue of seat cut right after the UGBM should not surprise us. SFI placed its demands on the issue of.
defeated at one go. Subsequently they have very conveniently relinquished their "radical pretension and moved back to toeing the line of the administration. They should now clarify whether they still maintain .
the position of seat cut or not. Ifthey do, then should their councilors not resign upholding theirtoo much to ask from the upholders of soclal...fasclsm on campus? .
position rather than falling back on the populist politics AISA Is trying to propagate? Or will It be .
. ..
'SFI-Led DSU'?_The most striking aspect of the post-UGBM AISA poster was Its resemblance with the.
.
are In alliance with SFI. Isn't this the blame SFI always puts on AISA when they vote again~t school language with which SFI had spoken all these while. When we opposed AISA's resolution they propagated we.
Convenor's reports along wlth ABVP7 AISA's sudden invention of such alliance only reflects their own political .I..
implementation of OBC reservation In JNU. .
social justice, rather than trying to mislead the student community on the gross violations In the .
.
bankruptcy. We appeal to the AISA-Ied JNUSU to confront the truth and lead an uncompromising struggJ.e for .
· .
.-... .
J# '.
~ .
.
PaRCha - JNU - AISA - 2008 ID-4939
.
·;· .
" .
. ~ .
Daily .
Disappearance$.
~,.....£~-.
......
an.. d --"'-Y'il·.
L , .
_.. ..~L.·A .
· .
reservation subject to the availability of eligible candidates so tpat the anomalfes In theprocess can be remedied". It was only after a strong point of order raised from the floor to remove the 'eligibility' clause. But from what understanding and position this clause ·comes· speaking the same language as the meritocratlc administration and Y4E? Whom are theytryingObjections were also raised from the floor when the SSS councillors from AISA had put the resolut1on .
house holds that for fulfilling the increased intake in the wake of OBC reservatio.ns, a prop-rl"'~'" '·:;~~·~~,~-~~ .
defined one shot offer method should be worked out for JNU admissions in the forthtomlng .sre.ctr.· .~ 1 .
· .
asked whether JNUSU holds offer system as a better system, to which the 5SS Councillor replied that:·~we .
.
keeping in view the due share of different categories in the admission list." The Councillors were.
.
think it Is a better system." When the students replied that this Is a complete contradiction of the.
the line "This house holds that reservation and seat increase would be calculated on the basis .
.
intake." .
held by JNU5U so far that offer system is arbitrary and not 'legally tenable', the 555 Councillors hastltySdcli.
Until the UGBM the JNUSU held that the offer system Is arbitrary and legally untenable. Why did they wait .
only until this point of placing resolutions to reveal their position that offer Is a better system? JNUSU claims.
However from then until now this Is the first time they have argued In favour of the offer system. Even then, that in the Academic Council meeting in May they had argued for the offer system which got defeated..
this resolution does not unconditionally support offer but a "properly defined one shot offer system" which .
they themselves have not properly defined In the UGBM or after it. We demand that the JNUSU stop .
( .
fooled their own cadre and students who stood In favour of Intake. .
.
deceiving the student community and clarify this method of admission. By placing this resolution they alsoYESTERDAY'S CALL FOR All ORGANIZATION CAOl Mt;ETING; TOO LITILE TOO LATE? For tht.. past two weeks, we have repeatedly demanded all organization meetings, GBMs, etc from the JNUSU to debate the .
0 issues at hand. They consistently denied this-the JNUSU Joint Secretary even stated after the Standing .
Committee meeting that "we will call It when we think It Is required." Finally they were forced to call a UGBM .
which they conducted In a highly undemocratic manner. Yesterday, they gave a call for an AO meeting to decide on the future course of action. However, the future course of action had already been decided .
unilaterally by the JNUSU which was a call for mass hunger strike at Ad Block even before the AO was held. .
Clearly the democratic functioning of the JNUSU works quite well according to their discretionary powers! We.
even the dissenting voices have a space to be heard. Moreover, we have noticed that the JNU5U Is not demand that the JNUSU stops making a mockery of democratic norms, and functions In a manner in which.
faithfully reporting to the student community about the deliberations within the administration of which the.
student community about the Academic Council decision that the intake and walt list system is being ,, Union Is a part of. A glaring example of it Is the failure (deliberate, or otherwise) of the JNU5U to Inform the.
who concealed the Information that the Prime Minister was coming to JNU three years back. We demand that .
introduced in place of the offer system. It reminds us also of the ex-JNUSU president from AISA Mona Oasthe JNU5U bring all the information about the present admission process to the notice of the student community immediately. The Union must also demand from the administration the center-wjse break-up of student registration this year, so that the violations In reservation are known in detail..
SEX's Sorry Tale of Opportunism continues: The sudden change of position and complete silence on thereservations, seat cut and to restore offer system cunningly In a single resolution ,and managed to get them issue of seat cut right after the UGBM should not surprise us. SFI placed its demands on the issue of.
defeated at one go. Subsequently they have very conveniently relinquished their "radical pretension and moved back to toeing the line of the administration. They should now clarify whether they still maintain .
the position of seat cut or not. Ifthey do, then should their councilors not resign upholding theirtoo much to ask from the upholders of soclal...fasclsm on campus? .
position rather than falling back on the populist politics AISA Is trying to propagate? Or will It be .
. ..
'SFI-Led DSU'?_The most striking aspect of the post-UGBM AISA poster was Its resemblance with the.
.
are In alliance with SFI. Isn't this the blame SFI always puts on AISA when they vote again~t school language with which SFI had spoken all these while. When we opposed AISA's resolution they propagated we.
Convenor's reports along wlth ABVP7 AISA's sudden invention of such alliance only reflects their own political .I..
implementation of OBC reservation In JNU. .
social justice, rather than trying to mislead the student community on the gross violations In the .
.
bankruptcy. We appeal to the AISA-Ied JNUSU to confront the truth and lead an uncompromising struggJ.e for .
· .
.-... .
J# '.
~ .
.