muttormatt
––Something new to play with––
*Update* I've found the lens to be very sharp between the f4-f11 range. Let me put it another way. The background behind your subject is very sharp but not your actual subject. I've sent the lens off to Sigma UK for calibration. Because the lens is out of warranty I have to pay £33.99 for the calibration, which isn't too bad as I was expecting to have to pay more.
Just got this lens (Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 HSM) for £390 off ebay. It's used but in great condition.
I've taken a few test shots with it and it seems pretty sharp. Probably not as awesome as the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 but then this is less than half the price when bought new.
PS: Forgive the cheapo tripod. I don't use them very often so don't see the point in investing in a good (expensive) one just yet.
––Something new to play with––
*Update* I've found the lens to be very sharp between the f4-f11 range. Let me put it another way. The background behind your subject is very sharp but not your actual subject. I've sent the lens off to Sigma UK for calibration. Because the lens is out of warranty I have to pay £33.99 for the calibration, which isn't too bad as I was expecting to have to pay more.
Just got this lens (Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 HSM) for £390 off ebay. It's used but in great condition.
I've taken a few test shots with it and it seems pretty sharp. Probably not as awesome as the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 but then this is less than half the price when bought new.
PS: Forgive the cheapo tripod. I don't use them very often so don't see the point in investing in a good (expensive) one just yet.