M31.
test
I'm not posting this photo because I think it's "good," but rather because I've read some crap online about the Hasselblad not being able to take "good" photos (i.e., sharp) at shutter speeds slower than 1/125.
I'm here to show that this is BS. This photo was taken handheld at 1/8!! Sure, I "cheated" by using the mirror lock, but whether using the mirror lock function bettered the results in previous online garbage was not specified. And using the mirror lock was the first thing I thought of when I read that nonsense. Now, I've seen 1/8 handheld and crisp photos while using a Rolleiflex, but they don't have that mirror slap (and while I don't have a Rollei, I hear they, too, have a mirror lock function).
So that's the only point of this post. And, for the curious, there is NO PP of this shot. As is from the Hassy. No sharpening. But, again, what else is expected from a Hassy? :-)
test
I'm not posting this photo because I think it's "good," but rather because I've read some crap online about the Hasselblad not being able to take "good" photos (i.e., sharp) at shutter speeds slower than 1/125.
I'm here to show that this is BS. This photo was taken handheld at 1/8!! Sure, I "cheated" by using the mirror lock, but whether using the mirror lock function bettered the results in previous online garbage was not specified. And using the mirror lock was the first thing I thought of when I read that nonsense. Now, I've seen 1/8 handheld and crisp photos while using a Rolleiflex, but they don't have that mirror slap (and while I don't have a Rollei, I hear they, too, have a mirror lock function).
So that's the only point of this post. And, for the curious, there is NO PP of this shot. As is from the Hassy. No sharpening. But, again, what else is expected from a Hassy? :-)