mickeyono2005
"LONDON: KIBOSH ON THE OPTIC" by Anthony Cox in "Art and Artists" November, 1966 - 1
"LONDON: KIBOSH ON THE OPTIC" by Anthony Cox
in "Art and Artists" November, 1966
-- Page 62 - 63
LONDON
KIBOSH ON THE OPTIC?
AS A NEW YORKER, and over-stepped in the
ripe vegetarian of which the art world
there is composed, there seemed an
attraction in the recent host-house events
taking place on the London art scene.
No doubt there is a current in the air;
what has been described to me by one
young artist as an effort to 'put the
Ki bosh on the optic.' But it hasn't been
measured yet, and, as one knows,
measurement is the elusive but necessary
first step in making discoveries.
I trust that the London scene, as
looked at through the world of gal-
leries is only off to a show start and that
lurking about somewhere there must be at
least a couple of dark horses who are
now exercising their mental muscles in
secret. If there is so, will the gallery world
discover them? If not, will it simply be
left with the unusual bill of fare? And, if it
is, what is wrong with that?
Nothing really. At least one will have
a greater dissemination of ideas that come
from another source, whether it's your
own past or someone else's. Why the need
for a damper? On the other hand, there
could be a situation developing, like a
good compost heap, which might become
fertile ground for new plants.
Could this be the year that McLuhan
will be put to use? If the artist's position,
according to McLuhan, is to prepare us
for the future then one must be ready to
be confronted with the unknown. This
doesn't mean the only good art is un-
known, but it doesn't mean that the future
couldn't take place in London as well as
anywhere else either. McLuhan does,
after all, have certain roots in this country.
Just as there is a danger in only looking
for that which is unheard of, so there is a
danger in only looking for minute refine-
ments that indicate the slight differences
from one style to another, or even from
one painter to another in the same style.
In this refinement-sense, one paradox
that I have seen in London is the attitude
expressed towards two artists who appear
in the Group H show at the Drian
Galleries: John Latham, whose work has
been referred to as 'codswallop', and who
hasn't had a major showing here since
1962 and Jeff Nuthall who hasn't been
shown before. apparently their works are
considered offensive, but why the stir?
Latham hangs quite serenely in New York's
Museum of Modern Art with several
of the gods is considered a very refined
example of British art there. Nuthall
(England's answer to Bruce Conner), had
a big box stuffed with bloody bedding
that was a polished steal at £1,500. The
show was exciting for at least there was
some energy expressed in it, as in David
Warren's grotesque emulation of Bacon.
With the recent foray into the world of
the mind, most of Scottie Wilson's early
works and some of his recent, express
that quiet but bizzare state that takes
place in an illusion. He is at the Brook
Street Gallery.
Antony Donaldson's imprisoned fig-
ures at the Rowan Gallery reflect a gently
mysterious kind of Op-Pop; they leave
the viewer to decide where they are on
the canvas, as if the rest of the scene is
enveloped in a fog. in Sundry Alliance
this is brought out in the 'op' effect, lost
in the 'pop' (symbolic triple version); is it
the night before, or the morning after?
the least successful works here are those
where the structure takes over.
If there is a mystique to be found in Op
aer where would it be? In Jeffery Steele's
Sub Rosa one can see something in the
painting that looks like an underlying
structure - what might be described as a
kind of muse; it can be examined, it
remains the same, it acts like a bridge,
rather than a baseball bat. Segments of
a greater whole here are building up to
something, as if you blew up the shadow
of the birthmark on a certain venus. He
may be seen at McRoberts and Tunnard,
opening on the 8th of the month.
Gallery dealers take a lot of abuse.
Here is a job with all the strain of Wall
Street and none of the kicks. To find out
what made a great, as well as articulate
- described as a litterateur - dealer tick,
one might read Diary of an Art Dealer by
René Gimpel. Some of the works anec-
doted in this volume will be exhibited in
'Homage to René Gimpel' at the Gimpel
Fils Gallery. Not Rembrandt's Aristotle
however ('a painter must never indulge
in the theatrical' advised Gimpel père),
that's in the Metropolitan Museum, New
York, but there will be Degas, Fragonard,
Cassatt, Renoir, as well as Soutine and a
controversial self-portrait by Poussin,
along with lots of original and rarely
published manuscripts.
Critic and stage designer, as well as a
remarkable colourist with an incisive
sense of vision, Robin Ironside was self-
taught and a continual threat to his time
with his radical ideas, such as: 'formal
relations have absolutely no value in a
picture, and colour is about as important
as your carpet or wallpaper.' A memorial
to a man who was convinced that formal
training was a drawback to the imagina-
tion, the show is opening to November
30 at the New Art Centre.
Sculptures by Max Bill, shown for the
first time in this country, are on view at
the Hanover Gallery. Most of them are
smooth exercises in stone and metal, in
odd contrast to his painting which is more
stimulating in use of colour.
The Leicester Galleries, a grand old
standby, is showing prints of 19th and
20th century masters, including: three
generations of Pissaro (Caille, Lucien
and Orovida - who is still living); early
etchings by Augustus John, one of which
is a self-portrait; two rare prints by
C. R. W. Nevinson, one of the official
First World War artists, and a self-portrait
by Paul Nash. Many others are included
among some 300-odd prints in the show.
The work of Calliyannis, the Greek Ex-
pressionist painter now living in Paris, is
also being exhibited at the same time.
In the group show at the Grabowski
Gallery are Abrahams, Chilton and
Sandle. The graphic assemblages by
Sandle are an interesting metamorphosis
from machines to machine-clouds that
seem to cry.
The Hamilton Galleries has, among
other things, a very interesting people-hole
in the wall, a good eye cleaner when one
is taking in several transitions a day,
which should not be missed. Further
explanation would ruin the point, but I
strongly advise a visit there to get the
experience first-hand.
ANTHONY COX
Calliyannis The Massacre of Chios (after
Delacroix) Oil on canvas 63 1/4" x 51 1/4"
The Leicester Galleries
Augustus John Self-portrait in an oval
Etching
The Leicester Galleries
-- Page 63
Jeffrey Steele Sub Rosa 1966 Oil on canvas 48" x 36" McRoberts and Tunnard Gallery
Art and Artists
Volume One, Number Eight
November 1966
Edited by Mario Amaya
London: Hansom Books, 1966
Private collection of Mikihiko Hori
"LONDON: KIBOSH ON THE OPTIC" by Anthony Cox in "Art and Artists" November, 1966 - 1
"LONDON: KIBOSH ON THE OPTIC" by Anthony Cox
in "Art and Artists" November, 1966
-- Page 62 - 63
LONDON
KIBOSH ON THE OPTIC?
AS A NEW YORKER, and over-stepped in the
ripe vegetarian of which the art world
there is composed, there seemed an
attraction in the recent host-house events
taking place on the London art scene.
No doubt there is a current in the air;
what has been described to me by one
young artist as an effort to 'put the
Ki bosh on the optic.' But it hasn't been
measured yet, and, as one knows,
measurement is the elusive but necessary
first step in making discoveries.
I trust that the London scene, as
looked at through the world of gal-
leries is only off to a show start and that
lurking about somewhere there must be at
least a couple of dark horses who are
now exercising their mental muscles in
secret. If there is so, will the gallery world
discover them? If not, will it simply be
left with the unusual bill of fare? And, if it
is, what is wrong with that?
Nothing really. At least one will have
a greater dissemination of ideas that come
from another source, whether it's your
own past or someone else's. Why the need
for a damper? On the other hand, there
could be a situation developing, like a
good compost heap, which might become
fertile ground for new plants.
Could this be the year that McLuhan
will be put to use? If the artist's position,
according to McLuhan, is to prepare us
for the future then one must be ready to
be confronted with the unknown. This
doesn't mean the only good art is un-
known, but it doesn't mean that the future
couldn't take place in London as well as
anywhere else either. McLuhan does,
after all, have certain roots in this country.
Just as there is a danger in only looking
for that which is unheard of, so there is a
danger in only looking for minute refine-
ments that indicate the slight differences
from one style to another, or even from
one painter to another in the same style.
In this refinement-sense, one paradox
that I have seen in London is the attitude
expressed towards two artists who appear
in the Group H show at the Drian
Galleries: John Latham, whose work has
been referred to as 'codswallop', and who
hasn't had a major showing here since
1962 and Jeff Nuthall who hasn't been
shown before. apparently their works are
considered offensive, but why the stir?
Latham hangs quite serenely in New York's
Museum of Modern Art with several
of the gods is considered a very refined
example of British art there. Nuthall
(England's answer to Bruce Conner), had
a big box stuffed with bloody bedding
that was a polished steal at £1,500. The
show was exciting for at least there was
some energy expressed in it, as in David
Warren's grotesque emulation of Bacon.
With the recent foray into the world of
the mind, most of Scottie Wilson's early
works and some of his recent, express
that quiet but bizzare state that takes
place in an illusion. He is at the Brook
Street Gallery.
Antony Donaldson's imprisoned fig-
ures at the Rowan Gallery reflect a gently
mysterious kind of Op-Pop; they leave
the viewer to decide where they are on
the canvas, as if the rest of the scene is
enveloped in a fog. in Sundry Alliance
this is brought out in the 'op' effect, lost
in the 'pop' (symbolic triple version); is it
the night before, or the morning after?
the least successful works here are those
where the structure takes over.
If there is a mystique to be found in Op
aer where would it be? In Jeffery Steele's
Sub Rosa one can see something in the
painting that looks like an underlying
structure - what might be described as a
kind of muse; it can be examined, it
remains the same, it acts like a bridge,
rather than a baseball bat. Segments of
a greater whole here are building up to
something, as if you blew up the shadow
of the birthmark on a certain venus. He
may be seen at McRoberts and Tunnard,
opening on the 8th of the month.
Gallery dealers take a lot of abuse.
Here is a job with all the strain of Wall
Street and none of the kicks. To find out
what made a great, as well as articulate
- described as a litterateur - dealer tick,
one might read Diary of an Art Dealer by
René Gimpel. Some of the works anec-
doted in this volume will be exhibited in
'Homage to René Gimpel' at the Gimpel
Fils Gallery. Not Rembrandt's Aristotle
however ('a painter must never indulge
in the theatrical' advised Gimpel père),
that's in the Metropolitan Museum, New
York, but there will be Degas, Fragonard,
Cassatt, Renoir, as well as Soutine and a
controversial self-portrait by Poussin,
along with lots of original and rarely
published manuscripts.
Critic and stage designer, as well as a
remarkable colourist with an incisive
sense of vision, Robin Ironside was self-
taught and a continual threat to his time
with his radical ideas, such as: 'formal
relations have absolutely no value in a
picture, and colour is about as important
as your carpet or wallpaper.' A memorial
to a man who was convinced that formal
training was a drawback to the imagina-
tion, the show is opening to November
30 at the New Art Centre.
Sculptures by Max Bill, shown for the
first time in this country, are on view at
the Hanover Gallery. Most of them are
smooth exercises in stone and metal, in
odd contrast to his painting which is more
stimulating in use of colour.
The Leicester Galleries, a grand old
standby, is showing prints of 19th and
20th century masters, including: three
generations of Pissaro (Caille, Lucien
and Orovida - who is still living); early
etchings by Augustus John, one of which
is a self-portrait; two rare prints by
C. R. W. Nevinson, one of the official
First World War artists, and a self-portrait
by Paul Nash. Many others are included
among some 300-odd prints in the show.
The work of Calliyannis, the Greek Ex-
pressionist painter now living in Paris, is
also being exhibited at the same time.
In the group show at the Grabowski
Gallery are Abrahams, Chilton and
Sandle. The graphic assemblages by
Sandle are an interesting metamorphosis
from machines to machine-clouds that
seem to cry.
The Hamilton Galleries has, among
other things, a very interesting people-hole
in the wall, a good eye cleaner when one
is taking in several transitions a day,
which should not be missed. Further
explanation would ruin the point, but I
strongly advise a visit there to get the
experience first-hand.
ANTHONY COX
Calliyannis The Massacre of Chios (after
Delacroix) Oil on canvas 63 1/4" x 51 1/4"
The Leicester Galleries
Augustus John Self-portrait in an oval
Etching
The Leicester Galleries
-- Page 63
Jeffrey Steele Sub Rosa 1966 Oil on canvas 48" x 36" McRoberts and Tunnard Gallery
Art and Artists
Volume One, Number Eight
November 1966
Edited by Mario Amaya
London: Hansom Books, 1966
Private collection of Mikihiko Hori