Back to gallery

pεrsıstεncε oƒ sıllınεss and cynıcısm . .

 

___________________________________________________________________________________________

Outlining a Theory of General Creativity .. on a 'Pataphysical projectory

Entropy ≥ Memory ● Creativity ²

 

stratified as:

 

Memory ● Creativity ² = ΩΞ { Mimesis ● Catharsis ² }῀

Mimesis ● Catharsis ² = ΩΞ { Metabolê ● Catabolê ² }῀

Metabolê ● Catabolê ² = ΩΞ { Mitosis ● Cytosis ² }῀

Mitosis ● Cytosis ² = ΩΞ { Molecula ●. Chymia ² }῀

Molecula ● Chymia ² = ΩΞ { M ● c ² }῀

. . and . . M ● c ² = ΩΞ { E }῀

. . whe(re)n . . ΩΞ { E }῀ ≤ Ξntropy

 

with:

 

"ΩΞ"

= emergence of possibles (Ω) by individuating resonances (Ξ) in a multiple.

 

""

= resonance of similitudes by 1n1 individuating compulsions in a multiple.

 

"" = { μ¹ { δ῀ { π¹ ( technè▲lógos ) } } }῀

Algorithm of the 1n1 individuating compulsions in a multiple.

 

where "μ" ; "δ" ; "π"

are the 3 moments of a multiple individuating processus.

( symbolized by the 3 moments "Mosthai / Deiknuen / Poiein" of the creative processus

according to Maffesoli )

 

and where "( technè▲lógos )"

are the hypomnemata, or tertiary sedimentations of a multiple transindividuation.

( symbolized in a sensitive▲intelligible dialemmatic )

___________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Etant donné un monde et une fonction d'apparaître ayant ses valeurs dans le transcendantal de ce monde, nous appellerons "existence" d'un étant "x" qui apparaît dans ce monde le degré transcendantal assigné à l'identité de "x" à lui-même. Ainsi définie, l'existence n'est pas une catégorie de l'être, c'est une catégorie de l'apparaître. En particulier, "exister" n'a aucun sens en soi. Conformément à une intuition de Sartre, empruntée à Heidegger, mais aussi à Kiekegaard, voire à Pascal, "exister" ne se dit que relativement à un monde.

 

Given a world and an appearing function having its values in the transcendental of this world, we call "existence" of a being "x" that appears in this world, the transcendental degree assigned to the identity of "x" to himself. Thus defined, the "existence" is not a category of the being, this is a category of the appearing. In particular, "to exist" has no meaning in itself. According to an intuition of Sartre, borrowed from Heidegger, but also from Kiekegaard, even Pascal, "to exist" can be said only relatively to a world.

 

( Alain Badiou - 1991 - Logiques des mondes, L'être et l'événement, 2, livre III section I )

 

___________________________________________________________________________________________

| . rectO-persO . | . E ≥ m.C² . | . co~errAnce . | . TiLt . |

9,966 views
25 faves
19 comments
Uploaded on September 24, 2010