ORWO NC 500 shot at ISO 400
First off, it's really daft to take a film with a box ISO rating of 400 and call it "NC 500". No need to even discuss it. It's daft.
Secondly, it's just as daft to take a film that's really ISO 200 or less, perhaps somewhere between 100 and 160, and rate it at ISO 400. What do they think, the customers won't notice?
I feel that each and every shot on the first test roll would have come out quite all right if shot at 1 -2 EV more. They're all too flat and grainy, but in essence, the colours seem to look OK, there is no halation, the shadows aren't drowned out,nuances and hues are all there. So now I know, and I'll never make the mistake of shooting this at ISO 400 again.
Camera: Nikon F5
Lens: AF Nikkor 50 mm 1:1.8 D
ORWO NC 500 ISO 400 colour negative film shot at ISO 400
Developed and scanned by www.meinfilmlab.de
ORWO NC 500 shot at ISO 400
First off, it's really daft to take a film with a box ISO rating of 400 and call it "NC 500". No need to even discuss it. It's daft.
Secondly, it's just as daft to take a film that's really ISO 200 or less, perhaps somewhere between 100 and 160, and rate it at ISO 400. What do they think, the customers won't notice?
I feel that each and every shot on the first test roll would have come out quite all right if shot at 1 -2 EV more. They're all too flat and grainy, but in essence, the colours seem to look OK, there is no halation, the shadows aren't drowned out,nuances and hues are all there. So now I know, and I'll never make the mistake of shooting this at ISO 400 again.
Camera: Nikon F5
Lens: AF Nikkor 50 mm 1:1.8 D
ORWO NC 500 ISO 400 colour negative film shot at ISO 400
Developed and scanned by www.meinfilmlab.de