A disturbing card to those rogue authoritarians who wish to claim "illegal" rule; Photography is not illegal. Blogged:
"Moreover, to the extent that the troopers were restraining Robinson from making
any future videotapes and from publicizing or publishing what he
had filmed, the defendants' conduct clearly amounted to an
unlawful prior restraint upon his protected speech."..."Robinson was simply
recording the activities of Pennsylvania state troopers as they
went about their duties on a public highway and its adjoining
berm."..."The activities of the police, like those of other
public officials, are subject to public scrutiny. Indeed, 'the
First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism
and challenge directed at police officers.' " Robinson v. Fetterman
Blogged: technorati.com/photos/tag/Tyranny
A disturbing card to those rogue authoritarians who wish to claim "illegal" rule; Photography is not illegal. Blogged:
"Moreover, to the extent that the troopers were restraining Robinson from making
any future videotapes and from publicizing or publishing what he
had filmed, the defendants' conduct clearly amounted to an
unlawful prior restraint upon his protected speech."..."Robinson was simply
recording the activities of Pennsylvania state troopers as they
went about their duties on a public highway and its adjoining
berm."..."The activities of the police, like those of other
public officials, are subject to public scrutiny. Indeed, 'the
First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism
and challenge directed at police officers.' " Robinson v. Fetterman
Blogged: technorati.com/photos/tag/Tyranny