2007OCT221659
QUERY: Authorship and placement of NYT story
TITLE: "The Google Way: Give Engineers Room"
AUTHOR: Story attributed to "Bharat Mediratta" and covered by NYT Journalist, "Julie Bick"
DATE: Published: October 21, 2007
FM: Peter Renshaw
Dear Sirs,
I have a question regarding the source of this story as appeared in the New York Times, October 21, 2007. I posted a link to this story on a Entrepreneur website for discussion and questions about it the authorship arose. The article features google employee "Bharat Mediratta" talking about his job. To put it bluntly it reads like a public relations straight from google . I'm unsure of the source of authorship.
Q. Can anyone please explain how this article came about and why it is newsworthy?
I ask this question because I noticed this particular article features in the "Jobs" section of your site and not the technology section as I would expect. I also notice in the "Past Coverage" and "Related Searches" sections below the article feature links to both the "Fashion" and "Labour" sections of your news site.
Q. Has this article been "placed" by google or agents for google?
Thankfully yours .... etc, etc.
<<< start
2007OCT221659
QUERY: Authorship and placement of NYT story
TITLE: "The Google Way: Give Engineers Room"
AUTHOR: Story attributed to "Bharat Mediratta" and covered by NYT Journalist, "Julie Bick"
DATE: Published: October 21, 2007
FM: Peter Renshaw
Dear Sirs,
I have a question regarding the source of this story as appeared in the New York Times, October 21, 2007. I posted a link to this story on a Entrepreneur website for discussion and questions about it the authorship arose. The article features google employee "Bharat Mediratta" talking about his job. To put it bluntly it reads like a public relations straight from google . I'm unsure of the source of authorship.
Q. Can anyone please explain how this article came about and why it is newsworthy?
I ask this question because I noticed this particular article features in the "Jobs" section of your site and not the technology section as I would expect. I also notice in the "Past Coverage" and "Related Searches" sections below the article feature links to both the "Fashion" and "Labour" sections of your news site.
Q. Has this article been "placed" by google or agents for google?
Thankfully yours .... etc, etc.
<<< start