THE CONCLUSION…
Art has long been controversial, that is to say disliked by some viewers, for a wide variety of reasons.
Disputes as to whether or not to classify something as a work of art are referred to as classificatory disputes about art.
Making judgments of value requires a basis for criticism. At the simplest level, a way to determine whether the impact of the object on the senses meets the criteria to be considered art is whether it is perceived to be attractive or repulsive.
Though perception is always coloured by experience, and is necessarily subjective, it is commonly understood that what is not somehow aesthetically satisfying cannot be art.
However, "good" art is not always or even regularly aesthetically appealing to a majority of viewers. In other words, an artist's prime motivation need not be the pursuit of the aesthetic.
Also, art often depicts terrible images made for social, moral, or thought-provoking reasons.
My conclusion? I, at last, know what I like and what I do NOT like… I think I enjoyed the architecture more than most of the paintings, LOL, great for some more creative photography, yes a complete break from the ‘usual’.
Willem Vermandere at the Roger Raveel museum. Roger Raveel was a Belgian painter whose work is often associated with pop art because of its depiction of everyday objects.
Thanks, M, (*_*)
For more of my other work or if you want to PURCHASE, visit here: www.indigo2photography.co.uk
IT IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN (BY LAW!!!) TO USE ANY OF MY image or TEXT on websites, blogs or any other media without my explicit permission. © All rights reserved
THE CONCLUSION…
Art has long been controversial, that is to say disliked by some viewers, for a wide variety of reasons.
Disputes as to whether or not to classify something as a work of art are referred to as classificatory disputes about art.
Making judgments of value requires a basis for criticism. At the simplest level, a way to determine whether the impact of the object on the senses meets the criteria to be considered art is whether it is perceived to be attractive or repulsive.
Though perception is always coloured by experience, and is necessarily subjective, it is commonly understood that what is not somehow aesthetically satisfying cannot be art.
However, "good" art is not always or even regularly aesthetically appealing to a majority of viewers. In other words, an artist's prime motivation need not be the pursuit of the aesthetic.
Also, art often depicts terrible images made for social, moral, or thought-provoking reasons.
My conclusion? I, at last, know what I like and what I do NOT like… I think I enjoyed the architecture more than most of the paintings, LOL, great for some more creative photography, yes a complete break from the ‘usual’.
Willem Vermandere at the Roger Raveel museum. Roger Raveel was a Belgian painter whose work is often associated with pop art because of its depiction of everyday objects.
Thanks, M, (*_*)
For more of my other work or if you want to PURCHASE, visit here: www.indigo2photography.co.uk
IT IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN (BY LAW!!!) TO USE ANY OF MY image or TEXT on websites, blogs or any other media without my explicit permission. © All rights reserved