Motherhood - The Cruelty of Lab Animal Testing
The american psychologist Harry Harlow (best known for his maternal-separation, social isolation experiments on rhesus monkeys) and his partner describe how they had the “fascinating idea” of inducing depression by “allowing baby monkeys to attach to cloth surrogate mothers who could become monsters:
The first of these monsters was a cloth monkey mother, who, upon schedule or demand, would eject high-pressure compressed air. It would blow the animals skin practically off its body. What did the baby monkey do? It simply clung tighter and tighter to the mother, because a frightened infant clings to its mother at all costs. We did not achieve any psychopathology. However, we did not give up. We built another surrogate monster mother that would rock so violently that the babys head and teeth would rattle. All the baby did was cling tighter and tighter to the surrogate. The third monster we built had an embedded wire frame within its body which would spring forward and eject the infant from its ventral surface. The infant would subsequently pick itself off the floor, wait for the frame to return into the cloth body, and then cling again to the surrogate. Finally, we built our porcupine mother. On command, this mother would eject sharp brass spikes over all of the ventral surface of its body. Altough the infants were distressed by these pointed rebuffs, they simply waited until the spikes receded and then returned and clung to the mother …
Peter Singer, Animal Liberation
Motherhood - The Cruelty of Lab Animal Testing
The american psychologist Harry Harlow (best known for his maternal-separation, social isolation experiments on rhesus monkeys) and his partner describe how they had the “fascinating idea” of inducing depression by “allowing baby monkeys to attach to cloth surrogate mothers who could become monsters:
The first of these monsters was a cloth monkey mother, who, upon schedule or demand, would eject high-pressure compressed air. It would blow the animals skin practically off its body. What did the baby monkey do? It simply clung tighter and tighter to the mother, because a frightened infant clings to its mother at all costs. We did not achieve any psychopathology. However, we did not give up. We built another surrogate monster mother that would rock so violently that the babys head and teeth would rattle. All the baby did was cling tighter and tighter to the surrogate. The third monster we built had an embedded wire frame within its body which would spring forward and eject the infant from its ventral surface. The infant would subsequently pick itself off the floor, wait for the frame to return into the cloth body, and then cling again to the surrogate. Finally, we built our porcupine mother. On command, this mother would eject sharp brass spikes over all of the ventral surface of its body. Altough the infants were distressed by these pointed rebuffs, they simply waited until the spikes receded and then returned and clung to the mother …
Peter Singer, Animal Liberation