Jammed
...how do you get this picture without great noise reduction and high ISO? Sure I could have had a faster lens (this is f/4), but I'd lose depth of field. I could have selected a slower shutter speed, but traffic was moving...slowly. Basically the most compelling reason for the Mark II is high ISO and superb noise reduction. Sure, this shot is noisy if seen LARGE, but it is good enough and better than none at all.
Jammed
...how do you get this picture without great noise reduction and high ISO? Sure I could have had a faster lens (this is f/4), but I'd lose depth of field. I could have selected a slower shutter speed, but traffic was moving...slowly. Basically the most compelling reason for the Mark II is high ISO and superb noise reduction. Sure, this shot is noisy if seen LARGE, but it is good enough and better than none at all.