Back to gallery

cat woman detail

In Invisible Art Sartre can’t define the language and what symbols are used to substitute things.

 

Jean-Paul Charles Aymard Sartre

 

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Paul_Sartre Existentialism

 

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existentialism

 

Facticity is a concept defined by Sartre in Being and Nothingness as the “in-itself”, of which humans are in the mode of not being.

 

(Sartre maintained that the concepts of authenticity and individuality have to be earned but not learned.)

 

Sartre analyzed the problem of language in correlation of symbolism to expression. In language we don’t operate with things. When we speak about a thing we don’t use the thing but substitute it with the word. Same happens in science, art and so on where language uses symbols or substitutes to convey an idea.

 

Sartre can’t define the language of invisible painting, therefore there’s no symbols that substitute things in the language of the invisible painting. All creativity and science known to this day uses its own language.

 

source gleitzeit blog 2013

 

paul-jaisini-gleitzeit

1,015 views
35 faves
0 comments
Uploaded on October 20, 2014