macarthyNS201
graph
Christina Macarthy, Michelle Lonnquist, Constantinos Gioulekas, Chris Bryson, and Michael Amador. In our experiment we observed the different situations of enzyme reaction to three
different temperatures. The Catechol Oxidase (enzyme) had the job of changing the
Catechol, making it go from a clear liquid to a brown liquid (the product). We expected
to see the slowest rate of change in the cold sample, a medium rate of change in the room
temperature same, and a fast rate of change in the warm sample. In the cold temperature,
we never observed a decrease in the rate of reaction (absorbency). However, by the
30-minute mark, the speed of absorbency was beginning to tapper off. In the room
temperature, although the rate of absorbency itself was greater than that of the cold
water, we observed the same situation; by the 30-minute mark, the rate of absorbency was
beginning to tapper off. However, in the warm water sample, we observed a decrease in the
rate of absorbency at the 24-minute mark. From our observations, we see that our warm
sample had the highest rate of change (0.208), the room temperature sample had the median
rate of change (0.164), and the cold sample had the lowest rate of change (0.115).
graph
Christina Macarthy, Michelle Lonnquist, Constantinos Gioulekas, Chris Bryson, and Michael Amador. In our experiment we observed the different situations of enzyme reaction to three
different temperatures. The Catechol Oxidase (enzyme) had the job of changing the
Catechol, making it go from a clear liquid to a brown liquid (the product). We expected
to see the slowest rate of change in the cold sample, a medium rate of change in the room
temperature same, and a fast rate of change in the warm sample. In the cold temperature,
we never observed a decrease in the rate of reaction (absorbency). However, by the
30-minute mark, the speed of absorbency was beginning to tapper off. In the room
temperature, although the rate of absorbency itself was greater than that of the cold
water, we observed the same situation; by the 30-minute mark, the rate of absorbency was
beginning to tapper off. However, in the warm water sample, we observed a decrease in the
rate of absorbency at the 24-minute mark. From our observations, we see that our warm
sample had the highest rate of change (0.208), the room temperature sample had the median
rate of change (0.164), and the cold sample had the lowest rate of change (0.115).