ronghualu says:
Actually, this photo is taken from Leica's website. This is an excellent photo, but still suffers the digital flatness, and the low contrast washes out any drama. Leica says the $8000 MM is the future of b/w. Compared to cameras from +50 yrs past and of today (below), what do you think?
ronghualu says:
per the photographer: Rolleiflex 3.5F with Yellow filter
Tri-x 400 Rate 400
D76 1+1 20ํ / 11 minute
northern Thailand.
An excellent b/w film image from a 1960s vintage camera. The photographer has captured the pathos of the subjects. It has what digital b/w lacks: depth and texture. It has some grain, due to the ISO400 speed, but this adds to the effect of depth and texture. I'm sure the analogue print would be far superior to what you see on screen. How would you compare this to LMM above?
Nothing here yet.
You can save a photo or video to a gallery from its detail page, or choose from your faves here.
Comments