jbcjqnyx87
Congressman Massie Restoring America\'s Leadership in Innovation Act, H.R. 5874
Finally, U.S. Inventors see a real attempt to right the wrong caused by the 2011 Leahy–Smith America Invents Act.
According to the latest "findings' by the U.S. Supreme Court, private property (patents) is not personal property but "GOVERNMENT FRANCHISE."
It means that your "fruits of labor" belong to the Government and the Government allows you to use them. Legally, you, the laborer (Inventor), are not a person in its rights but the "chattel" owned by the Government.
Logically, In simple English translation, according to the Supreme Court, the laborer (Inventor) is a "SLAVE."
You will not find a better description of the system we used to see behind the "IRON CURTAIN."
COMMUNISM is the name of the system I know from my experience and forced to leave. Everything there was a "Government franchise" like the SUPREME interprets. Suppose we intend to limit beneficiaries of any economic system to just a few. Let's name it Communist Party or Big Tech. The outcome is always the same.
Astonishing is the fact that our right-leaning U.S. Supreme Court, in its relentless madness trying to serve the BIG TECH, comes to such a conclusion. The 2011 Leahy–Smith America Invents Act was a significant step in eliminating Inventor Rights. It follows a long list of similar actions, for example, where eBay can disregard other people's property rights and use it at will. From invention ownership, it is just a tiny step for Supreme Court to take away your other private property rights.
www.paperbee.net/congressman-massie-restoring-americas-le...
Congressman Massie Restoring America\'s Leadership in Innovation Act, H.R. 5874
Finally, U.S. Inventors see a real attempt to right the wrong caused by the 2011 Leahy–Smith America Invents Act.
According to the latest "findings' by the U.S. Supreme Court, private property (patents) is not personal property but "GOVERNMENT FRANCHISE."
It means that your "fruits of labor" belong to the Government and the Government allows you to use them. Legally, you, the laborer (Inventor), are not a person in its rights but the "chattel" owned by the Government.
Logically, In simple English translation, according to the Supreme Court, the laborer (Inventor) is a "SLAVE."
You will not find a better description of the system we used to see behind the "IRON CURTAIN."
COMMUNISM is the name of the system I know from my experience and forced to leave. Everything there was a "Government franchise" like the SUPREME interprets. Suppose we intend to limit beneficiaries of any economic system to just a few. Let's name it Communist Party or Big Tech. The outcome is always the same.
Astonishing is the fact that our right-leaning U.S. Supreme Court, in its relentless madness trying to serve the BIG TECH, comes to such a conclusion. The 2011 Leahy–Smith America Invents Act was a significant step in eliminating Inventor Rights. It follows a long list of similar actions, for example, where eBay can disregard other people's property rights and use it at will. From invention ownership, it is just a tiny step for Supreme Court to take away your other private property rights.
www.paperbee.net/congressman-massie-restoring-americas-le...