Silly Deity
Creationist Trolling for Dummies
For context please see the following discussion threads:
Some background on Truth in science , his behaviour and tactics:
www.flickr.com/groups/atheism/discuss/72157655207697198/
His bizarre claims: Dinosaurs and humans co-existed:
www.flickr.com/groups/atheism/discuss/72157671262698836/
More of his bizarre claims: Science proves the existence of god, there has been an atheist conspiracy to hijack science and the BBC and other assorted drivel:
www.flickr.com/groups/atheism/discuss/72157671042685495/
A rather weird claim that somehow his brand of christianity is more rational and "scientific" than atheism: www.flickr.com/groups/atheism/discuss/72157674491298295/
His take on causality..............needless to say it's a tad wide of the mark: www.flickr.com/groups/atheism/discuss/72157676663714545/
What the critics have said about Truth in Science:"Common sense should tell anyone that's visited his photostream that a reasoned and well balanced mind doesn't invest the sheer dogmatism and obsession into one single point of view. You have to go to the fire and brimestone kind of evangelicals to find such blind certainty of your position.No doubt about it he sees himself as some sort of one man teacher, preacher and convertion machine"
And,"One thing is for sure, this fellow isn't above doctoring and trimming his argument to suit his agenda"
On his censorship of comments from others, "......it seems "Truth in science" is someone who, by posting images on Flickr, invites people to comment on them and when a well informed person politely responds, in a manner devastating to his claim or argument, that person is treated with abuse, non-sequitors and other fallacies. And when it becomes clear that the informed person has gained the upper hand in the discussions, he or she is censored. I can't think of anything that more obviously demonstrates "Truth in science's" claims and/or arguments are untenable or indefensible."
Also,"I found it the most telling that when he started attacking me for calling him out, he did not respond to my comment that he did not follow his own bible.....completely ignored that!"
As one reviewer succintly put it, "...if you have grown up in a developed country in a post enlightenment time, the only possible excuse I can see for retaining a belief in creationism is if you are a fully certified raving fruit loop."
The latest review of his output has one reader breathless!, " I don't think I've ever seen such a massive truckload of religious drivel on any forum before. It seems the guy has absolutely zero understanding of religion, philosophy, logic, science, history, the art of debate etc.
Creationist Trolling for Dummies
For context please see the following discussion threads:
Some background on Truth in science , his behaviour and tactics:
www.flickr.com/groups/atheism/discuss/72157655207697198/
His bizarre claims: Dinosaurs and humans co-existed:
www.flickr.com/groups/atheism/discuss/72157671262698836/
More of his bizarre claims: Science proves the existence of god, there has been an atheist conspiracy to hijack science and the BBC and other assorted drivel:
www.flickr.com/groups/atheism/discuss/72157671042685495/
A rather weird claim that somehow his brand of christianity is more rational and "scientific" than atheism: www.flickr.com/groups/atheism/discuss/72157674491298295/
His take on causality..............needless to say it's a tad wide of the mark: www.flickr.com/groups/atheism/discuss/72157676663714545/
What the critics have said about Truth in Science:"Common sense should tell anyone that's visited his photostream that a reasoned and well balanced mind doesn't invest the sheer dogmatism and obsession into one single point of view. You have to go to the fire and brimestone kind of evangelicals to find such blind certainty of your position.No doubt about it he sees himself as some sort of one man teacher, preacher and convertion machine"
And,"One thing is for sure, this fellow isn't above doctoring and trimming his argument to suit his agenda"
On his censorship of comments from others, "......it seems "Truth in science" is someone who, by posting images on Flickr, invites people to comment on them and when a well informed person politely responds, in a manner devastating to his claim or argument, that person is treated with abuse, non-sequitors and other fallacies. And when it becomes clear that the informed person has gained the upper hand in the discussions, he or she is censored. I can't think of anything that more obviously demonstrates "Truth in science's" claims and/or arguments are untenable or indefensible."
Also,"I found it the most telling that when he started attacking me for calling him out, he did not respond to my comment that he did not follow his own bible.....completely ignored that!"
As one reviewer succintly put it, "...if you have grown up in a developed country in a post enlightenment time, the only possible excuse I can see for retaining a belief in creationism is if you are a fully certified raving fruit loop."
The latest review of his output has one reader breathless!, " I don't think I've ever seen such a massive truckload of religious drivel on any forum before. It seems the guy has absolutely zero understanding of religion, philosophy, logic, science, history, the art of debate etc.