PaRCha - JNU - General Procedures - 2012 ID-60541
.
cion committed to providing inclusiYe education. To maintain the ''eracity ofits progress~ve hold diplomas, thi~ proportion is Jess than 4 per cent amongst 1\luslims. JNU has always .
ust take concrete steps to adaress the poor representation of l\1uslim students. The demand for .
ation points to l\Iuslim students is a legitimate demand to address this. .
an Constitution recognises that in addition to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes there may be other and 46. Though the Constitutional (Scheduled Caste) Order, 1950, did not allow SC status to the most backward lly, educationally and econ01nically backward classes who may require special attention under Article 15, 16(4) .
castes (J\fBCs) within l\Juslin1s, later commissions have continuously identified these groups amongst the most depriYed. ll1e First Bachvard Classes Corrunission in 1995 or the Kaka Kalelkar Commission (1955) identified 2399 ()BCs and 837 1\IBCs. It included f'v!uslims in the OBC and :J\.1BC list. However, the Union go,·ernment did not accept this Comtnissjon. The Second .:\11 India Backward Classes Commission or the B.P. l\landal Commission .
(1980) identified 3743 OBCs in India including l\1uslims, Sikhs and Christians. It identified 82 l\1uslim OBCs. .
eYen tabled in the Parliatncnt. The Sachar and Rangnath l\1ishra Reports have also flagged these issues in the recent .
past. The Rangnath I\1ishra Committee Report explicitly called for pro\-iding 1Oo/o reserYation to l\1uslims and 5°/o However, this Comtnission did not talk of the l\1BCs. The findings of Gopal Singh Comtnittee Report were not .
rcsetYation to other religious rninorities. The Central Government has not yet adopted the recommendations of the .
Ranganath J\lishra Comnuttce and thus remains non-comtnittal on addressing the back-wardness and low JNU still recognizes a handful of 1\ladrasas for admissions. Tlus number is quite large in two central uniYersitics.
representation of the 1\luslim cornmunity. .
.
Recognize More Madrasas in JNU-.
namely .. \ligarh J\luslixn Cni\'ersity and Jatnia l\1illia lslamia. There cannot be any logic for recognizing Jesser l\1ad.rasas than other central uniYcrsirie~. The 1 \dmini::;tration should increase the number of recognized},fadrasas in time for the next .Year'~ admis~ions. .
Menon Committee Report 1 he 1\lenon corruninee r{commcnds certain changes in ]NU's ordinance, related to admission and academic criteria for the ~1C.\/l\1PJ 1/l\LPhil./1\LTech/Ph.D programmes. more semesters to improYe their grades in case they have not got the required CGP..r\ of 4.0 at the end of the sixth .
FirJI/y, in the 1\IC:\ programme, the JNU ordinance currently includes a provision for students to be allowed two .
semester. The 1\fenon committee recommends that on£y those students be allowed to repeat who haYe been awarded F grades in some courses, and that too. ONLY if they have obtained an overall CGPA of above 4.0. This ,.
,..ill cornpletely close the possibility of students getting another chanc:~ to complete the 1\IC.. \ programme, if they ha,·e not got the required grades in the first place for any reason. .
Second!J, the 1\fenon committee recotnmendations as a rule have tried to tamper with existing clauses regarding .
"removal of names of a student from the rolls of the university" (qualifying CGP.~\ to avail a degree or continue to In all programmes, this committee has recommended that the discretionary powers currently vested with the .
the higher level). .
Cr\SR of various schools/Dean/VC (in the case of "l\1CA) to deal with specific cases be done away with. The .
due deliberation and inspection. Though this is not a common occurrence, the existence of this pro,;sion does Dean/CASR/VC currently can take cognizance of specific problems faced by any individual student after .
leave some flexibility to address special problems Q1owsoever rare) on a case-by-case basis. .
J, In ca~e of Ph.l), the committee ha~ suggested that srudents who ha,·c tkrcgistcn·J must necessarily n.·c..·nrol.
Y Secondly, the con11nittce has recommended that the existing relaxations for SC/ ST ~tudcn(s during the l\fPhil .
course work also be done awav with. .
thcmsdYes within rwo years of dcregistration. This tin1c frame nf rc-n·gistration is ab~olutdy uncalled for and .
i~ al!'o cotnpktdy illogical frorn rhc point of \·icw ofthe uniY('r~it~·. ()frcn student!' who arc gc..·nuindy ~c..·rious .
4 .
' .
/~.-,~ .
(Prof..
(Dr. DK Lobiyal) .
.
PaRCha - JNU - General Procedures - 2012 ID-60541
.
cion committed to providing inclusiYe education. To maintain the ''eracity ofits progress~ve hold diplomas, thi~ proportion is Jess than 4 per cent amongst 1\luslims. JNU has always .
ust take concrete steps to adaress the poor representation of l\1uslim students. The demand for .
ation points to l\Iuslim students is a legitimate demand to address this. .
an Constitution recognises that in addition to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes there may be other and 46. Though the Constitutional (Scheduled Caste) Order, 1950, did not allow SC status to the most backward lly, educationally and econ01nically backward classes who may require special attention under Article 15, 16(4) .
castes (J\fBCs) within l\Juslin1s, later commissions have continuously identified these groups amongst the most depriYed. ll1e First Bachvard Classes Corrunission in 1995 or the Kaka Kalelkar Commission (1955) identified 2399 ()BCs and 837 1\IBCs. It included f'v!uslims in the OBC and :J\.1BC list. However, the Union go,·ernment did not accept this Comtnissjon. The Second .:\11 India Backward Classes Commission or the B.P. l\landal Commission .
(1980) identified 3743 OBCs in India including l\1uslims, Sikhs and Christians. It identified 82 l\1uslim OBCs. .
eYen tabled in the Parliatncnt. The Sachar and Rangnath l\1ishra Reports have also flagged these issues in the recent .
past. The Rangnath I\1ishra Committee Report explicitly called for pro\-iding 1Oo/o reserYation to l\1uslims and 5°/o However, this Comtnission did not talk of the l\1BCs. The findings of Gopal Singh Comtnittee Report were not .
rcsetYation to other religious rninorities. The Central Government has not yet adopted the recommendations of the .
Ranganath J\lishra Comnuttce and thus remains non-comtnittal on addressing the back-wardness and low JNU still recognizes a handful of 1\ladrasas for admissions. Tlus number is quite large in two central uniYersitics.
representation of the 1\luslim cornmunity. .
.
Recognize More Madrasas in JNU-.
namely .. \ligarh J\luslixn Cni\'ersity and Jatnia l\1illia lslamia. There cannot be any logic for recognizing Jesser l\1ad.rasas than other central uniYcrsirie~. The 1 \dmini::;tration should increase the number of recognized},fadrasas in time for the next .Year'~ admis~ions. .
Menon Committee Report 1 he 1\lenon corruninee r{commcnds certain changes in ]NU's ordinance, related to admission and academic criteria for the ~1C.\/l\1PJ 1/l\LPhil./1\LTech/Ph.D programmes. more semesters to improYe their grades in case they have not got the required CGP..r\ of 4.0 at the end of the sixth .
FirJI/y, in the 1\IC:\ programme, the JNU ordinance currently includes a provision for students to be allowed two .
semester. The 1\fenon committee recommends that on£y those students be allowed to repeat who haYe been awarded F grades in some courses, and that too. ONLY if they have obtained an overall CGPA of above 4.0. This ,.
,..ill cornpletely close the possibility of students getting another chanc:~ to complete the 1\IC.. \ programme, if they ha,·e not got the required grades in the first place for any reason. .
Second!J, the 1\fenon committee recotnmendations as a rule have tried to tamper with existing clauses regarding .
"removal of names of a student from the rolls of the university" (qualifying CGP.~\ to avail a degree or continue to In all programmes, this committee has recommended that the discretionary powers currently vested with the .
the higher level). .
Cr\SR of various schools/Dean/VC (in the case of "l\1CA) to deal with specific cases be done away with. The .
due deliberation and inspection. Though this is not a common occurrence, the existence of this pro,;sion does Dean/CASR/VC currently can take cognizance of specific problems faced by any individual student after .
leave some flexibility to address special problems Q1owsoever rare) on a case-by-case basis. .
J, In ca~e of Ph.l), the committee ha~ suggested that srudents who ha,·c tkrcgistcn·J must necessarily n.·c..·nrol.
Y Secondly, the con11nittce has recommended that the existing relaxations for SC/ ST ~tudcn(s during the l\fPhil .
course work also be done awav with. .
thcmsdYes within rwo years of dcregistration. This tin1c frame nf rc-n·gistration is ab~olutdy uncalled for and .
i~ al!'o cotnpktdy illogical frorn rhc point of \·icw ofthe uniY('r~it~·. ()frcn student!' who arc gc..·nuindy ~c..·rious .
4 .
' .
/~.-,~ .
(Prof..
(Dr. DK Lobiyal) .
.